Emergency Department Paediatric Models of Care Setthy Ung FACEM - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

emergency department paediatric models of care
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Emergency Department Paediatric Models of Care Setthy Ung FACEM - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Emergency Department Paediatric Models of Care Setthy Ung FACEM Staff Specialist Emergency Medicine & Paediatric Ambulatory Care Services Campbelltown Hospital Level 4 Metropolitan & Outer Metropolitan Paediatric Units (MP4) ED


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Emergency Department Paediatric Models of Care

Setthy Ung FACEM Staff Specialist – Emergency Medicine & Paediatric Ambulatory Care Services Campbelltown Hospital Level 4 Metropolitan & Outer Metropolitan Paediatric Units (MP4)

ED Leadership Forum

Friday 27 June 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

NSW Paediatric NEAT 2013 (Target 71%)

MP4 Total 75.8% MP4 Inpatient 36.5% 210,559 ED paediatric presentations

2014 expected NEAT 81%

NSW K&F – MP4 – ECI project group initiation To investigate paediatric Models Of Care (MOC) compatible with NEAT and generate recommendations for governance and implementation

The Emergency Short Stay Unit / Emergency Medical Unit

To what extent is the PSSU already implemented in MP4 units? Can the adult model be simply translated into paediatrics? If not, how should it be different?

Background & Project Objectives

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Surveying all Stakeholders

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Was the right population surveyed?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Was the right population surveyed?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

What attitudes exist towards NEAT?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Resourcing Required (60%)

Inadequate inpatient beds, medical and nurse staffing

Current Models of Care (25.7%) NEAT incompatible Decision making issues (14.3%)

CPGs not in line with NEAT Longer periods of observation required prior to admit decision Poor access to surgical reviews

Patient Flow issues (17%)

Between The Flags prohibitive Perception of ‘Walls’ from inpatient units

Population Growth issues (11.4%)

Demand rapidly outgrowing supply

Comments towards NEAT

slide-8
SLIDE 8

What Paediatric MOCs already exist?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

What the MOC stakeholders think are worth developing?

Unpopular amongst ED Physicians & ED Nurses

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Where do current PSSUs exist?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Who Governs current PSSUs?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

When are existing PSSUs operating?

Hours of Operation Days of Operation

slide-13
SLIDE 13

So when is the PSSU actually required?

00- 1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9- 10 10- 11 11- 12 12- 13 13- 14 14- 15 15- 16 16- 17 17- 18 18- 19 19- 20 20- 21 21- 22 22- 23 23- 24 ARRIVALS TO ED Arrivals 379 284 269 233 208 175 218 279 451 628 701 769 729 747 725 736 707 690 728 683 704 603 609 445 ARRIVALS TO ED Average / hour 6.214.664.413.823.412.873.574.577.3910.311.512.6 12 12.211.912.111.611.311.911.211.59.899.98 7.3 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850

Paediatric presentations by hour

Paediatric presentation by hour (<16yrs) April/May 2014

BY TIME/HOUR

slide-14
SLIDE 14

How should PSSUs be governed?

Emergency Department located

  • > ED Governance

Paediatric Precinct located

  • > Paediatric Governance

ED Nurses Paediatricians & Paediatric Nurses

slide-15
SLIDE 15

‘Decision to Admit’ to PSSUs

GP consulting ED Registrar Paediatrician review ED Physician Review Paed RN Liaison Review

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Differences of Opinion

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Already existing PSSUs are mostly located in or adjacent to inpatient paediatric areas and governed by paediatric services Either ED or Paediatric governance are both considered appropriate for PSSU implementation and preference can be based on physical location within the facility Other NEAT strategies thought to be favorable were:

Acute Review Clinic PACU (HITH) PAU

Early PSSU admission after ED presentation through review by either an ED Physician or a consultant Paediatrician are agreed as acceptable events for ‘Decision to Admit’ to occur Review by a Paediatric nurse or direct communication between the GP and admitting Paediatrician are considered to be suitable events also

Survey Conclusions

slide-18
SLIDE 18

www.ecinsw.com.au

Level 4, Sage Building , PO Box 699 T 02 9464 4674 www.ecinsw.com.au 67 Albert Avenue, Chatswood NSW 2067 Chatswood NSW 2057 F 02 9464 4728 ABN 89 809 648 636