Update on the Standard EudraVigilance Paediatric Query Paediatric - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

update on the standard eudravigilance paediatric query
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Update on the Standard EudraVigilance Paediatric Query Paediatric - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Update on the Standard EudraVigilance Paediatric Query Paediatric workshop 28 April 2014 Presented by: Cosimo Zaccaria Signal Management Pharmacovigilance Department An agency of the European Union Safety in the Special population


slide-1
SLIDE 1

An agency of the European Union

Presented by: Cosimo Zaccaria Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

Update on the Standard EudraVigilance Paediatric Query

Paediatric workshop – 28 April 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

– Safety in the Special population – PhV obligations – EudraVigilance overview – Paediatric queries – Future implications and usefulness of EV paediatric queries – Conclusions

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

I ntroduction

W ould the presence of this special condition alter the effects of the drug producing m ore or different adverse events?

  • Paediatric population: age < 18 y/ o
  • Pregnant women
  • Elderly population
  • Population with genetic conditions
  • Groups with specific disease
  • Etc…

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Off-label use of m edicinal products in children

Use in children despite a relative lack of information on how to prescribe safely:

  • Dosing error – medication error
  • More severe ADRs or different

from what is known in adults.

  • Higher underreporting in

children vs adults

  • Risk/ benefit balance in children

could change

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5 Development of medicines for children: the EU experience 5

  • Increase high quality, ethical research into medicines for

children

  • Increase availability of authorised medicines for children
  • Pharmacovigilance : Improve Paediatric Signal Detection
  • Increase inform ation on medicines

How to im prove the health in children

Achieve the above: W ithout unnecessary studies in children

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

The EU Paediatric Regulation 1 9 0 1 / 2 0 0 6

New obligations for Pharm acovigilance: it is essential to ensure that PhV mechanisms are adapted to meet the specific challenges of collecting safety data in the paediatric population, including data on possible long- term effects. 1 . Obligations for new applications ( PI P/ w aivers/ Deferrals) 2 . Obligations for approved products: Article 4 5 & 4 6 aiming at not repeating studies that have previously been performed. Impact in reducing ADRs

Main aim : im prove paediatric health w ithout delaying authorization for adults

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Monitoring of drugs in the paediatric population

1 ) Standard Paediatric query 2 ) Paediatric Signal Detection

Pharmacovigilance

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000

  • Paed. EVCT overtim e
  • Paed. EVPM overtim e

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

Post-Authorisation reports ( I CSRs) : EVPM

– Children: 249 .776 9 8 %

  • Adult: 3.094.729 9 3 .5 %

Clinical Trial reports ( SUSARs) : EVCT

– Paediatrics: 6.684 2 %

  • Adults 216.164 6 .5 %
slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Children vs Adults

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

TOTAL EV = ~ 4 .5 m illion I CSRs Tot I CSRs by EEA Country

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

  • Written requests (including emails)

for access to any document

  • riginated, received or held by the

Agency

  • Proactive disclosure of EMA

documents through website or other sources

  • Protection of commercial and

confidential information, personal data and conflicting interest+

Access Policy – external requests

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

“General” standard EV paediatric query ( routine)

– any evidence of the rum our in the paediatric profile reported in EV in the paediatric population? – any differences as com pared to the adult population ? – any specific paediatric age group at risk taking in account the progressive m aturation of the organ involved?

“ Detailed “standard EV paediatric query ( ad hoc query)

– issue specific to the product/ substance or exists for the all class? – role of the specific form ulation(s) used in the paediatric population? – any specific paediatric age group at risk taking in account the progressive maturation of the different functions of the organ involved – Any other paediatric specificities ? Dose? Duration? I ndication? … (ad hoc)

Standard EV paediatric query – internal requests

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

A query on EV database is requested by PDCO/PaedTeam General Standard EV Paediatric issue Query’ is generated

Within 15 days as standard

START

is theSafety concern statistically reflected in EV ?

END Conclusion presented to PDCO/PRAC Additional Ad hoc analysis needed: analysis of the role

  • f formulation , class, sex,

dose, indication etc.

Timelines to be defined case by case according to complexity and seriousness of the issue

no

yes

General Standard EV Paediatric Query ( SEVPQ) triggered by PDCO

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

paediatrics paediatrics

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Request of a Standard EV paediatric query

13

Tem plate for internal request

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

General Standard EV paediatric query

1 . I ntroduction

1. Description of the safety concern

2 . Query results

2.1 General paediatric ADR profile for the product/ active substance 2.2 Analysis of the specific issue in the paediatric population 2.3 analysis of the specific paediatric issue per age group

3 . Sum m ary and conclusions

Confirmation whether the risk is reflected or not in EV

4 . Annexes

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Standard Paediatric Query since 2 0 1 0 7 out of 9 reports reflected the risk in EV 1.

Captopril & nephrotoxicity – reflected in EV 2. Cisplatin & Ototoxicity - reflected in EV 3. Gadobutrol & Nephrogenic System ic Fibrosis - not reflected 4. Metoclopramide & Neurotoxicity - reflected in EV 5. Fenofibrate & Rhabdom yolysis - not reflected 6. Terbinafine & haem atopoietic cytopenias – reflected in EV 7. Previgen & haemolytic disorders - reflected in EV 8. Enalapril & Renal and Cardiotoxicity - reflected in EV 9. Captopril & Renal Cardiotoxicity – reflected in EV

15 Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department Pilot phase 200 9 -2010 201 1 201 2 201 3

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Captopril and Renal Toxicity as an example

I ntroduction

  • 1. Basic information

Captopril is an ACE inhibitor used for the treatment of hypertension and some types of congestive heart failure. Nephrotoxicity is an adverse reaction already recognized in adults for Captopril.

  • 2. Information on the known safety profile

Adverse effects of Captopril include cough, angioedema, agranulocystosis, proteinuria, hyperkalemia, taste alteration, teratogenicity, postural hypotension, acute renal failure and leukopenia

  • 3. Uses in children

Experience with Captopril in children is limited. The BNFC refers to the use of captopril in hypertension, heart failure, proteinuria in nephritis, or diabetic nephropathy.

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

1 . Graph com paring the num ber of paediatric and non- paediatric cases: 2 . Num ber of Paediatric ADRs by I CH E1 1 age group categories

Captopril and Renal Toxicity as an example

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

3 . General paediatric profile per SOC versus Adult ADRs:

Captopril and Renal Toxicity as an example

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

PRR-ratio statistic 1 : children vs. adult based on all cases reported for Captopril

Captopril cases for SOC 'Renal and urinary disorders' in children 3 1 / Captopril cases in children 1 0 1

  • Captopril cases for SOC 'Renal and urinary disorders' in adult 1 2 2

/ Captopril cases in adult 9 3 6

Ratio= 2 .3 5 CI 1 .6 8 - 3 .3 0 PRR-Ratio statistic 2 : Captopril vs. all other products based on paediatric cases only

Captopril paediatric cases for the SOC 'Renal and urinary disorders' 3 1 All Captopril paediatric cases 1 0 1

  • All other drugs paediatric cases for the SOC 'Renal and urinary disorders' 7 1 4 1

/ All other drugs paediatric cases 2 1 7 9 9 8

Ratio = 9 .3 7 CI 6 .9 8 – 1 2 .5 7

4 . Statistical analysis : Paediatric PRR ratios at SOC level ‘ Renal and Urinary Disorders’

Captopril and Renal Toxicity as an example

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Stratification by Age according to the organ m aturation

Number of cases by ICH E11 Age group in Children for the SOC 'Renal and urinary disorders' 11 2 10 8 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 - 28 days >28 days - 24 Months >24 Months - 12 Years >12 - 18 Years Number of cases Number of cases by Specific Age Group in Children for the SOC 'Renal and urinary disorders' 13 18 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 - 36 Months days >36 Months - 18 Years Number of cases

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

General Standard EV paediatric query

4 . Sum m ary and conclusions

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Lim itations

The limitations of spontaneous reporting should always be taken in account in the interpretation of the results. The query does not evaluate the causality or the incidence of the reaction in the paediatric population. The absence of evidence for the paediatric population considered in EudraVigilance does not prove the absence of the safety

  • issue. The low number of reports may be due to a limitation in

exposure or to underreporting. It should be noted that there is currently no ‘gold standard’ method or threshold for significance established and that further studies are necessary.

22 Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

1 . PDCO adoption of the pre-defined age groups for other target organs: liver, brain, skin etc. 2 . Review usefulness of the Paediatric queries …

  • utcome of the workshop

3 . I m plication of the PRAC

Future Steps

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Sum m ary & Conclusion

  • Special population may require ad-hoc analyses focusing on post-

marketing data

  • Monitor efficacy of the PhV system , improve quality of reporting

(age, co-morbidities, co-medications)

  • Use SEVP Query to trigger:

1 . Signal leading to Risk minimisation (e.g. labelling) 2 . Risk com m unication – emphasise aspects relevant to paed. 3 . Post-authorization safety studies (PASS) – target paed. ADRs 4 . Long term follow up studies – detect drug-induced and development disorders

Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department

Brighter future: based on safety data identify the patient w ho m ost benefit from treatm ent

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Thank you

25 Cosimo Zaccaria - Signal Management – Pharmacovigilance Department