Eligibility Assessments November 21, 2013 Introduction Chris - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

eligibility assessments
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Eligibility Assessments November 21, 2013 Introduction Chris - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Promoting Independence through Public Transit & Eligibility Assessments November 21, 2013 Introduction Chris Hunter Assessments Project Director, MTM, Inc. Jameson Auten Director of ADA Compliance & Customer Relations ,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Promoting Independence through Public Transit & Eligibility Assessments

November 21, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

  • Chris Hunter
  • Assessments Project Director, MTM, Inc.
  • Jameson Auten
  • Director of ADA Compliance & Customer Relations ,

Kansas City Area Transportation Authority (KCATA)

  • Kathy Miller
  • Manager of LIFT Eligibility & Community Relations, TriMet
slide-3
SLIDE 3

ADA Paratransit Eligibility

  • ADA regulations define paratransit eligibility as

individuals with disabilities who have specific impairment-related condition(s) that prevent them from boarding or disembarking public transit

  • Public transit systems must provide complementary

paratransit service for such individuals

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ADA Paratransit Eligibility

  • ADA mandates that the

paratransit eligibility process:

  • Does not impose administrative

burden or application fees

  • Is not aimed at making a medical
  • r diagnostic determination
  • Practically determines ability to use fixed route
  • Ensures only those who meet criteria are eligible
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Goals of ADA Eligibility Process

  • Create a person-centered process that considers

functional ability

  • Ensure consistent, objective & reliable results
  • Include individuals in the process
  • Determine independent travel abilities
  • Determine which mode(s) of service are appropriate

based on the individual’s most limiting condition(s)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

In-Person Assessments

  • In-person assessments have higher initial cost, but cost is

quickly exceeded by savings

  • In-person assessments recommended because they:
  • Thoroughly indicate ability
  • Are more accurate than paper-based assessments
  • Reduce error, bias, fraud & abuse
  • Are based on abilities, not diagnoses
  • Are performed by qualified & trained Mobility

Assessment Evaluators

slide-7
SLIDE 7

MTM’s Assessment Workflow

*All applicants are interviewed; as appropriate based on the interview’s findings, the applicant may undergo the functional assessment

Functional assessment* Summary report submitted Determination letter sent Application packet submitted Assessment scheduled In-person interview*

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Abilities Tested During Assessments

Physical Abilities

 Walk or wheel independently  Move from sitting to standing position  Safely cross street  Traverse uneven terrains, sloping walks, inclines & ramps  Maneuver mobility device  Walk up to ¼ or ½ mile  Ride fixed route bus

Cognitive Abilities

 Pay fare or make change  Recognize landmarks & routes  Recognize & respond to safety hazards  Tell time & the passage of time  Display sound decision making skills  Stay focused  Follow directions

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The Assessment Experience

  • Assessments should

always be comfortable for the applicant, from initial scheduling to final determination

  • Process should be

streamlined to ensure efficiency

slide-10
SLIDE 10

MTM Assessment Highlights

Client Individuals Served Annually Assessments Performed Annually Dates of Operation TriMet 15,000 3,200 1/2010–Present Raleigh Capital Area Transit 14,000 900 10/2010–Present District of Columbia Department of Healthcare Finance 40,000 500 10/2007–Present Texas Health & Human Services Commission 878,100 1,200 3/2012–Present Minnesota Metro Counties Consortium 445,245 400 6/2004–Present Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority 100 120 2/2012–Present Kansas City Area Transportation Authority 85 100 1/2012–Present

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Typical Assessment Results

Unconditionally Eligible Ineligible Conditionally Eligible Temporarily Eligible

38% 15% 40% 7%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Typical Assessment Results

  • 20% opt-out rate
  • Applicant decides not to

participate in assessment process

  • 5% of applicants moved

from paratransit to public transportation

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Web-Based Eligibility Model

  • Applicants submit applications via mail, fax, or
  • nline
  • Online application offers flexibility & efficiency
  • Approved by riders & Board of Directors
  • Application assessed by subject matter experts
  • Option for conditional eligibility
  • Typical processing time of one to two days
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Web-Based Eligibility Model Pros & Cons

Pros of Web- Based Model

  • Cost effective
  • Customer friendly
  • Online access to

expertise

Cons of Web- Based Model

  • No local presence
  • r “boots on the

ground”

  • Restrictive

customization

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Web-Based Eligibility Model Results

Unconditionally Eligible Ineligible Conditionally Eligible

70% 24% 6%

slide-16
SLIDE 16

KCATA Current Eligibility Model

  • Paper-based process
  • Applicants submit original paper application with

professional verification

  • Inaccurate or incomplete applications returned to

applicants

  • KCATA makes eligibility determination
  • Eligibility is all or nothing—no conditional eligibility
slide-17
SLIDE 17

KCATA Eligibility Model Pros & Cons

Pros of KCATA’s Model

  • Quick processing

times

  • Easily understood

& accepted

  • Comfortable

Cons of KCATA’s Model

  • Determinations

less than optimal

  • Lack of expertise
  • Results in capacity

restraints

slide-18
SLIDE 18

KCATA Results

Unconditionally Eligible

100%

slide-19
SLIDE 19

KCATA Future Eligibility Model

  • Shifting to new model with:
  • Some level of functional

assessments

  • Revised applications
  • Experts to oversee the process
  • Shift is intended to:
  • Increase operational efficiency
  • Identify travel training
  • pportunities
slide-20
SLIDE 20

KCATA Future Eligibility Model

  • Changing the assessment model through community

input & organizational buy-in

  • All involved need to be on board
  • Includes keeping elected officials in the loop
  • Communication with paratransit customers—what is

changing, why its changing & benefits of the change

  • Develop a Request for Proposals based on local

preferences for determining eligibility

slide-21
SLIDE 21

TriMet Transit Mobility Center

  • Located on the transit mall in

downtown Portland

  • Central location
  • Convenient bus & light rail access
  • LIFT-designated stops
  • Administrative offices for TriMet
  • Assessment center for MTM
slide-22
SLIDE 22

TriMet LIFT Eligibility Model

  • In-person interview &

evaluation

  • Functional assessment of

physical abilities (if needed)

  • Functional assessment of

cognitive abilities (if needed)

  • Recertification every three

years

slide-23
SLIDE 23

LIFT Eligibility: Interview & Evaluation

  • New applicants must complete in-person interview
  • Conducted by TriMet LIFT Eligibility Coordinator
  • Eligibility Coordinator:
  • Evaluates mobility device (measurements & weight)
  • Determines need for further assessment
  • If needed, functional assessment occurs immediately
  • Makes the final eligibility determination
slide-24
SLIDE 24

LIFT Eligibility: Functional Assessment

  • Need for functional assessment determined based on

interview & evaluation

  • Physical functional assessment
  • Conducted by MTM
  • Simulated and/or actual fixed route trip
  • Cognitive functional assessment
  • Conducted by MTM
  • Functional Assessment of Cognitive Transit Skill (FACTS) test
slide-25
SLIDE 25

LIFT Eligibility: Past Process

  • Before moving to functional assessment process,

TriMet self-certified

  • Challenges of this process:
  • Accurately evaluating applicants’ functional abilities
  • Encouraging applicants to use fixed route & participate in

travel training when appropriate

  • Addressing increased ridership & paratransit service costs
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Implementing a New Eligibility Model

  • Educate applicants & the community on the

appropriate use of paratransit services

  • Ensure accurate, consistent determinations
  • Demonstrate appropriate processes to manage

paratransit demand & resources

  • Ensure continuing availability of resources to provide

quality service to appropriate customers

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Implementing a New Eligibility Model

Spring 2008

Internal discussions to develop new process

Fall 2008

New process approved

Winter 2008

Refined process & developed outreach plan with Citizen Advisory Committee

Spring 2009

Conducted public workshop to introduce new process

Fall 2009

Leased & remodeled facility, hired staff, finalized process & contracted with MTM

April 2010

Implemented new process for new applicants

May 2010

Began recertifying approximately 9,000 existing customers

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Benefits of TriMet’s New Model

  • Improved information exchange during interview
  • Assessments make a more accurate determination
  • Allows TriMet to promote fixed route accessibility &

its benefits as appropriate

  • Provides greater opportunity to educate agencies,

service organizations & medical professionals on appropriate paratransit use

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Financial Impacts of TriMet’s New Model

  • Fewer new applicants
  • Self-certification process: 350 to 400 per month
  • In-person process: 260 per month
  • 20% to 25% of new applicants submit application but do not

complete the assessment process

  • Ridership has declined by an average of 1% per year
  • By establishing process in advance of anticipated future

growth, TriMet is prepared for aging population

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Closing

  • For questions about

MTM’s On the Move assessments program contact Chris Hunter

  • chunter@mtm-inc.net
  • Questions?