ELENA transfer lines Glenn Vanbavinckhove, Wolfgang Bartmann, Dani - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

elena transfer lines
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ELENA transfer lines Glenn Vanbavinckhove, Wolfgang Bartmann, Dani - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ELENA transfer lines Glenn Vanbavinckhove, Wolfgang Bartmann, Dani Barna and Ranko Ostojic Many thanks to: Francois Butin, Olivier Choisnet, Damien Brethoux, Stephane Maridor, TE-ABT-BTP Discussions with people from the experiments


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ELENA transfer lines

Glenn Vanbavinckhove, Wolfgang Bartmann, Dani Barna and Ranko Ostojic

Many thanks to: Francois Butin, Olivier Choisnet, Damien Brethoux, Stephane Maridor, TE-ABT-BTP

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Discussions with people from the experiments
  • General integration overview
  • Full beam-line simulation
  • Error studies
  • Conclusions
  • Outlook
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Discussions with people from the experiments:

AEGIS

ATRAP

Special thanks to: Michael Doser, Stephan Ettenauer

slide-4
SLIDE 4

AEGIS

First proposal

Quadrupole Bend Monitor Corrector Handover point

slide-5
SLIDE 5

3 4 1 m m 1 1 m m

AEGIS

Second proposal

Doublet moved before deflector

slide-6
SLIDE 6

AEGIS

Final proposal

Doublet moved before + BPM corrector

slide-7
SLIDE 7

ATRAP 1 & 2

  • First discussion with ATRAP:

First proposal of handover point, currently under discussion in the ATRAP collaboration

Request from ATRAP to have a “peephole”, currently being investigated

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ATRAP 1 & 2

0.9 m 2.3 m 3.2 m Red current Blue proposed FLOOR 1.55 m 0.3 m ATRAP 1 0.6 m

slide-9
SLIDE 9

General integration overview

– LNE50 – LNE00->LNE07 – Critical point around LNE07-LNE01-LNE50 – Future possible assembly
slide-10
SLIDE 10

General integration overview

slide-11
SLIDE 11

LNE50- GBAR

Longitudinal pickup BPM Doublet+ corrector 1.9m

slide-12
SLIDE 12

LNE00-LNE07

Source LNE07 LNE01 LNE02 LNE05 LNE06 LNE03 LNE04 LNE00

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Critical point LNE07-LNE01-LNE05

slide-14
SLIDE 14

A possible future assembly

  • Currently 4 assemblies:

Singlet

Singlet + corrector

Doublet

Doublet+corrector

  • Proposed to go for one assembly:
  • All elements will be installed, but only active

elements will be connected (and have feed-troughs )

Quad Corrector Quad

slide-15
SLIDE 15

A possible future assembly

Active Non-active T.b.d (see error studies)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Full beam simulation

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Full beam simulation

  • Goal: independent check to see if simulation in

MADX is correct

  • Full beam simulation of a line was conducted in

Comsol and C++ (Runge–Kutta)

  • Comparison of the optics and voltages between

MADX and Comsol

  • First simulation has been conducted on a dummy

line, preliminary results are shown:

Next step → simulation for a complete line

→ including dispersion

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Full beam simulation

Quad Voltage [Kv] 1

  • 9.319

2 9.228 3

  • 8.219

4 4.674

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Error studies

  • Goal of the error studies
  • Assumptions
  • Lines used during the studies
  • Results: trajectory mismatch
  • Results: monitor reading error
  • Results: quadrupole misalignment
  • Results: all errors together
  • What if a monitor is installed at every monitor
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Error studies

  • Goal of the error studies
  • Assumptions
  • Lines used during the studies
  • Results: trajectory mismatch
  • Results: monitor reading error
  • Results: quadrupole misalignment
  • Results: all errors together
  • What if a monitor is installed at every monitor

P r e l i m i n a r y

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Goal of the error studies

  • To identify maximum misalignments of the monitors,

correctors, quadrupoles, bends,...

Current alignment of the BPM is 1-2 mm (M. Hori)

Quad displacement < 0.74 mm (D. Barna)

Quad rotation < 20 mrad (D. Barna)

Error on the voltage ~0.01 (J. Baillie)

Trajectory stability at extraction +/- 3 mm from AD (T. Eriksson, L. Bojtar)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Assumptions

  • No errors applied on fast deflectors and bends
  • Maximum trajectory deviation due to the error

applied should not exceed 10 mm in the lines.

  • Combined effect of the misalignments should be

less then 20

  • Assumption that trajectory correction for LNE00 +

LNE07 would be combined

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Lines during the studies

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Results (Trajectory mismatch)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Results (Monitor reading error)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Results

Quadrupole misalignments (horizontal plane)

Up to 30% error on the optics → beam size could be between 0.7 & 1.3 mm (ignoring dispersion, similar effect)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Results

Quadrupole misalignments (vertical plane)

For the beam size calculation we assumed at 20% optics error

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Results (All misalignments + trajectory fluctuation + reading error)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

What if a monitor is installed at every assembly?

  • For LNE00+LNE07 this means an

increase from 6 to 11 monitors (46% increase)

  • In most cases the extra monitors are

being installed at the defocussing quad

slide-30
SLIDE 30

What if a monitor is installed at every assembly?

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Conclusions

  • Integration
  • Error studies
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Conclusions

Integration

  • Integration has been started:

First implementation of the different elements in the ELENA transfer lines

First feedback has been provided and have let to several minor changes

  • Discussing with AEGIS & ATRAP provided us with

valuable feedback:

AEGIS line has been adjusted to provide more space for a possible pulse drift tube

ATRAP handover point is currently under discussion

  • Full beam simulation comparison between

Comsol/c++ and MAD is showing promising results.

slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • First preliminary error studies for the

combined LNE00+LNE07 were conducted:

1-2 mm monitor alignment is not sufficient, target alignment for monitor should be < 1 mm

Results will be be used to re-evaluate the location of monitors/correctors and add an extra monitor/corrector where needed

  • Installing a monitor/correction assembly at

every monitor is in current setting only beneficial for vertical plane, maybe alternating?

Conclusions

Error studies

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Outlook

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Outlook

  • Continue with integration of the transfer lines:

Currently at version 4 for the lines

  • Discussions with people from the other

experiments will start soon

  • Systematic error studies:

All lines

Define limits for alignments tolerances of the different elements

Define limit for alignment (internal & external) for the monitors

slide-36
SLIDE 36

The end

(thanks for the last two years … !)