Egypts Administrative Corruption Perception Index 2016 February 2018 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Egypts Administrative Corruption Perception Index 2016 February 2018 Egypts Administrative Corruption Perception Index Definition of Administrative Corruption The term The term of of admin adminis istration tration corrup
“The “The term term of
“adminis istration tration corrup
ion” is is a tec echnical cal expre xpress ssion ion means eans the the spreading preading of
infringing on
public funds funds and nd profiteering profiteering from from public public posts posts in the he soci society ety.”
To construct an indicator for measuring administrative corruption in Egypt based
the level of perception of population at the national level. To support decision makers towards developing policies and procedures necessary for combating the phenomenon of administrative corruption across the various sectors of the State. Main Objective Importance of Measuring Administrative Corruption
Ranking among 176 Countries 2016 Score Country
1 90 Denmark 1 90 New Zealand 24 66 UAE 108 34 Egypt 174 12 North Korea 176 10 Somalia
118 114 94 88 108
30 60 90 120 150
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Global Average Score
Average Score of the Middle East and North Africa Region
Results of Egypt’s Administrative Corruption Perception Index
Egypt’s Administrative Corruption Perception Index is based on Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index in addition to other sub‐indices measuring the public perception of corruption across the Egyptian governorates as well as a number of governmental sectors.
The score ranges between zero (best score) and 100 (best score).
High score of Egypt’s Corruption Perception Index
100 Zero Lowest Score of Administrative Corruption Perception Highest Score of Administrative Corruption Perception Highest Score of Administrative Corruption Perception Lowest Score of Administrative Corruption Perception Zero 100
The index’s ndex’s data data relies lies on
three types ypes of
field sur urveys: veys: The The score core ind indicates cates the he perceived perceived level evel of
corruption on
cale of
(highest score
corrup
ion percep erception) ion) and and 100 100 (lowest (lowest score core
corruption corruption perception). perception).
Sub-Indices Forming Egypt’s Administrative Corruption Perception Index 2016
Representative random sample consisting of 11.6 thousand citizens from all over the country (18 years +)
580 companies nationwide representing various sectors Prominent experts in five fields (economic, political, law, corporate management and governance) who were selected based on expertise and professional competence
Scor
e of admin administr istrativ tive corr corruptio tion pe perception rception from citizen citizens’ perspec ’ perspective, M ive, Marc rch 2016 2016
Zero 100
Highest Score Lowest Score Sc Score of
administrative ve co corrupti tion perception f rception from c
mpanies’ mana nagers’ gers’ perspect perspective, M ive, March rch 2016 2016 Sc Score of
administrative ve co corrupti tion perc percep eption fro from experts experts’ perc percep eption, , March rch 2016 2016
50 Zero 100
Highest Score Lowest Score
Zero 100
Highest Score Lowest Score
50 50
Score:28.8 29.6 31.9
Results of Egypt’s Administrative Corruption Perception Index
differences in corruption perception by sex and place of residence
Males are more perceptiv Males are more perceptive of
administrativ administrative corruption. corruption.
Urban ban cit itiz izens are re more re percept rceptive ve of adminis inistrat ativ ive corru corruption ption. .
31.5 26.5 30.9 26.3
The score ranges between zero (worst score) and 100 (best score).
Lowes west Sc Score of Adminis
rative Corrup Corruption ion Pe Percepti tion
Highe Highest Sc Score
Administra rative Corrup Corruption ion Pe Percepti tion
100 zero
Results of Egypt’s Administrative Corruption Perception Index
University degree and above (23.6) Secondary school and less than universities (26.5) Less than Secondary school (28.3)
Literate (31.1) Illiterate (36.3)
Qualitative differences in perception of corruption by educational level and age group
100 zero 60 + 50-59 30-40 18-29 35.1 30.1 27.8 26.3
Results of Egypt’s Administrative Corruption Perception Index
The score ranges between zero (worst score) and 100 (best score).
Lowe west S Score
Administra strati tive ve Corru rrupti tion
Perce rception tion High Highest Scor t Score of
Administ strativ tive Corru Corrupti tion
Percepti tion
30.1 35.1 27.8 26.3
18‐29 30‐49 50‐59 60 +
36.3 31.1 28.3 26.5 23.6
secondary school and above Less than secondary school Literate
26.3 30.9
Women are less perceptive of corruption than men.
Lowest Score of Administrative Corruption Perception Highest Score of Administrative Corruption Perception Lowest Score of Administrative Corruption Perception
Summary of the results regarding public people who are most perceptive of corruption
University degree and above illiterate
Lowest Score of Administrative Corruption Perception
Age groups urban Rural
Most Common Forms of Corruption and Methods of Handling Them
Bribes, gifts, tips Bribes, gifts, tips Nepotism and seek Nepotism and seeking ing the help of the help of relativ relatives and friends to s and friends to facilita facilitate e government procedure government procedures Misu Misuse of
public Mone Money Stealing public Stealing public money money
100 zero Exposur posure th through paying rough paying bribes bribes, gifts or , gifts or tips tips Exposur posure th through rough nepotism potism
seeking the help of the help of acquaint aintances ances Witnessing Witnessing a civil servant a civil servant misusing misusing public money for public money for personal gains personal gains Witness Witnessing appropriation of ng appropriation of public m ic money (c y (civil il serv rvant ant disposi disposing publi g public money money under h er his r responsib sponsibility) ility) Yes No Yes No Yes No 24.7 75.3 20.4 79.6 15.7 84.3 6.0 94.0 Yes No
The score ranges between zero (worst score) and 100 (best score).
Lowe west S Score
Administra strati tive ve Corru rrupti tion
Per Perception Highes est S Score o e of Admi minis nistrat rative ve Corrupt ptio ion n Per Perception
Ye Yes
No No
Not iden Not identified tified
ID IDSC SC aske asked the he pop population tion 18+ 18+ about bout th the role
mass mass med media in incr ncreasi asing the heir ir awareness awareness
Most Common Forms of Corruption and Methods of Handling Them
41.2% of the citizens
Companies’ managers’ role Companies’ managers’ role in combating corruption in combating corruption
72 % of companies’ managers
Will Will repor report upon exp upon exposure to to corr corrupti tion
Role of community in combating corruption.
Citize Citizen’s role in combating corruption n’s role in combating corruption
I strongly agree I agree I don’t agree I strongly disagree
16.1 41.2 24.3 18.4
50 40 30 20 10
Corruption P Corruption Perception in Egypt rception in Egypt (Egypt on the Map (Egypt on the Map of
International Corruption Indicato ational Corruption Indicators) rs)
Identifying Causes of Corruption Geographical and Sectoral Concentration of Corruption
Adopting a clear and publicly announced system in respect of government procedures such as government licensing procedures.
Automating government procedures and e-payment and activating smart government services.
Setting a maximum time for accomplishment of services to avoid manipulation of the public interest. This includes fixing 48 hours as the maximum duration of issuing licenses and completion of customs clearance within a specific period.
Disconnecting regulatory bodies from the executive authority to ensure independent performance. Not disclosing the names of individuals reporting corruption issues and providing them and their families with guarantees and incentives to encourage them to report any corruptions.
Activating a mobile application (egaby) e- reporting any administrative corruption practices. Public announcement for punishing corruption practices, which will serve as a deterrence to employees who exploit their jobs to make personal gains.
Imposing sever penalties and rapid reaction to corruption cases
A competition to select the governorate which achieves advanced levels of corruption perception.
A competition to select the best governorate and governmental
which achieves good corruption perception scores, along with rewarding the employees working at such entities. Enacting laws and developing mechanisms so as to measure the level
service provision, citizen’s satisfaction which reflects in the evaluation of their performance. A comprehensive awareness plan to educate and enhance the citizen perception about anti-corruption mechanisms; intensifying awareness programs; dissemination of the culture of belonging; incorporating the work’s code of ethics.
Increase level of awareness among population about the importance of combating corruption and the positive role of citizens to reduce bribes and favoritism
Egypt’s Administrative Corruption Perception Index 2016