SLIDE 1
1
This paper is an extract from a keynote presentation prepared for the Career Development Association of New Zealand. Cite as: McIlveen, P. (2016). Effectiveness of Career Development? Ask a Precise Question if You Want a Precise Answer. Keynote paper presented at the Symposium of the Career Development Association of New Zealand, Christchurch, 3 October.
Effectiveness of Career Development? Ask a Precise Question if You Want a Precise Answer Peter McIlveen University of Southern Queensland
Career development practitioners are challenged to provide evidence of the relevance of their research, expertise in delivering career guidance and developing informational resources, and effectiveness of their interventions. The paper addresses the chronic problems of unemployment, under-employment, and obstacles to job search effectiveness. These problems are contextualized in the paradigmatic Psychology of Working Framework and the empirically robust Social Cognitive Career Theory. Contemporary empirical research demonstrates that career development research and interventions offer practical directions for action by policy leaders, practitioners, and researchers. Keywords: career development, unemployment, Psychology of Working, SCCT, decent work The research field
- f
vocational psychology and its professional arm, career development (guidance), have for a century, or more in some nations, provided theories and practices that guide the way people make informed decisions and transitions into and through education systems and the labour market. Whether it be discerning individual’s alignment with an occupation on the basis of their skills, knowledge, and interests, or designing and delivering high quality career information resources in schools, universities, and vocational education and training, professional career development practitioners are the experts in evidence-based career decision-making and
- transitions. No other professional group can claim
this distinctive contribution to successful negotiation of developmental tasks across the lifespan, from schooling to retirement. Un/Underemployment is Trauma Unemployment and underemployment are scourges—nothing short of a problem of public
- health. Unemployed people are at greater risk of
poorer physical health (Griep et al., 2015) and mental health (Wanberg, 2012), including suicidal behavior (Breuer, 2014; Drydakis, 2014; Madianos, Alexiou, Patelakis, & Economou, 2014; Milner, Morrell, & LaMontagne, 2014; Milner, Page, & LaMontagne, 2013, 2014), and change in personality, such as agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness (Boyce, Wood, Daly, & Sedikides, 2015). Unemployment not only diminishes mental health. In turn, poorer mental health is a risk factor for unemployment (Butterworth, Leach, Pirkis, & Kelaher, 2012; Olesen, Butterworth, Leach, Kelaher, & Pirkis, 2013), which sets up a vicious cycle that entraps those with mental health issues in poverty. Furthermore, poor quality employment confers similar negative effects on mental health. Tragically, suicide is concomitant to unemployment (Milner, Morrell, et al., 2014; Milner, Page, et al., 2014; Norstrom & Gronqvist, 2015; Reeves, McKee, & Stuckler, 2014) and evident higher rates of suicide within the first five years of unemployment (Milner et al., 2013). Thus, with the provision of interventions for unemployment and re-employment within their scope of professional expertise, career practitioners must also be alert to associated mental health concerns and suicidality (Popadiuk, 2013). Poverty is inherent to unemployment and underemployment and it too has devastating effects. It is alarming that poverty is associated with diminished cognitive development in children (Dickerson & Popli, 2016; Heberle & Carter, 2015; Kalil, Duncan, & Ziol-Guest, 2016). Decent Work In the presence of such compelling evidence about the pernicious effects
- f