EFFECTIVENESS OF ARCH STRENGTHENING EXERCISES Joy Teo Nicole Ho - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

effectiveness of arch
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

EFFECTIVENESS OF ARCH STRENGTHENING EXERCISES Joy Teo Nicole Ho - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARCH HEIGHT AND STRENGTH AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ARCH STRENGTHENING EXERCISES Joy Teo Nicole Ho Rachel Chan Overview Background Aim Hypotheses Method Data Discussion Conclusion Background


slide-1
SLIDE 1

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARCH HEIGHT AND STRENGTH AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ARCH STRENGTHENING EXERCISES

Joy Teo Nicole Ho Rachel Chan

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview

  • Background
  • Aim
  • Hypotheses
  • Method
  • Data
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

  • Arches of feet are important for:

– Stability – Flexibility – Shock absorption – Weight distribution – Assisting feet in adapting to surface changes

  • Hence weak arches will increase chances
  • f injury
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Aim of Project

  • Determine relationship between arch

height and arch strength

  • Come up with an exercise plan as an

intervention

  • Measure effectiveness of proposed exercise

plan

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Research Question 1

Which type of arch is the strongest?

Hypothesis 1

Low arches are the strongest.

  • More surface area
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Research Question 2

Is the intervention exercise plan effective?

Hypothesis 2

It is effective.

  • Adapted from exercises commonly used by

professional ballet dancers to improve arch strength

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Methodology

Foot Arch Ratio

  • Measuring arch height and categorizing into

high, medium and low

Grip Test

  • Measuring arch strength using spring balance

Intervention

  • Month-long intervention with arch

strengthening exercises

Grip Test

  • Repeat to measure arch strength improvement

after intervention

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Foot Arch Ratio

  • Calculated from subjects’ footprints on

graph paper

  • 𝐺𝐵𝑆 =

𝐶 𝐵+𝐶+𝐷

slide-9
SLIDE 9

High Arch

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Medium Arch

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Low Arch

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Determining Arch Categories

  • Average of FAR taken
  • Standard Deviation (SD) calculated
  • Upper limit = Ave FAR+ 1 SD
  • Lower limit= Ave FAR – 1 SD
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Results

Type of Arch Low Medium High FAR range >0.343 Between 0.257 and 0.343 <0.257 Percentage of subjects (%) 10.3 76.5 13.2

Low, 10.3% Medium, 76.5% High, 13.2%

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Categorization

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Grip Test

  • Adapted from the Paper Grip Test

commonly used in leprosy patients

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Grip Test

  • Participants to:

– Sit upright – Feet flat on ground – Legs kept at right angles – Refrain from using toes to hold

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Arch Height and Strength

  • High arches are stronger

– Varying pressure points of different types of feet

Arch Type Arch Strength (N) Low 23.6 Medium 21.3 High 29.8

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Arch Height and Strength

  • High arch

– Arch elevation reduces contact area with ground – Plantar pressure increases

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Arch Height and Strength

  • Low arch

– Even distribution of pressure on foot contact area – Plantar pressure decreases

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Arch Height and Strength

  • Focus of the Grip Test- Plantar Pressure
  • Favors subjects with high arch
  • Variety of means to measure Arch

Strength

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Intervention

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Results

75% 25%

Improvement in Arch Strength Post- intervention Improved Did not Improve

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Results

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Low Arch Medium Arch High Arch Percentage Improvment (%)

Percentage Improvement in Arch Strength (Post-Intervention)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Intervention

  • Arch strengthening exercises proven

effective

  • However some subjects did not improve

– Less than 50% of exercises completed – Foot-related injuries

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Limitations

  • Paper grip test only measures one aspect
  • f “strength”
  • Fat feet vs. flat feet
  • Limited resources
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Conclusion

  • Relationship between arch height and

strength not definite

  • Research proved

– High arches are stronger – Intervention was effective

  • Intervention exercises can be

recommended for use

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Recommended extension

  • Explore other methods of analysing

strength

– Intrinsic Positive Test – Ultrasonography

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Thank you