10/11/2017 1
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas Katarina Magulova Secretariat of the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions
EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION UNDER ARTICLE 16 OF THE STOCKHOLM - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION UNDER ARTICLE 16 OF THE STOCKHOLM CONVENTION- UNINTENTIONAL POPS Katarina Magulova Secretariat of the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas 1 10/11/2017 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION:
10/11/2017 1
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas Katarina Magulova Secretariat of the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions
10/11/2017 2 10/11/2017 2
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
Purpose of the effectiveness evaluation
has succeeded in achieving its
and the environment from persistent
specific measures taken to implement the Convention;
effectiveness of the Convention. Framework for effectiveness evaluation Process for effectiveness evaluation adopted by:
Framework set out in document:
evaluate effectiveness of implementation of the various article.
cycle. Effectiveness evaluation committee Established in May 2015 (SC-7/24) Consists of 14 experts, as follows:
(when and if established);
First stage: Information collection and compilation Independent compilation of information gathered through existing arrangements under the Convention, including the reports from the global monitoring plan, the compilation of national reports, technical assistance reports by the Secretariat and reports from the entity entrusted with administering the financial mechanism, as well as reports generated in accordance with the compliance procedure under Article 17, once established. Second stage: Information synthesis and evaluation Secretariat prepares a preliminary report, including compilation of the various information and data available in the information obtained from the first stage. The effectiveness evaluation committee reviews and evaluates the information compiled by the Secretariat, draws conclusions as to the effectiveness of the Convention, and makes recommendations to the Conference of the Parties on any improvements that might be warranted.
10/11/2017 3 10/11/2017 3
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
Three main streams of information according to Article 16:
the global monitoring plan;
pursuant to Article 15;
established under Article 17. Other relevant scientific, environmental, technical and economic information available:
scientific articles
Mechanism
Outputs of expert processes under the Convention:
Global Monitoring Plan;
Network. These groups through their operation and data analysis have contributed to QA/QC of the reported data in their respective areas.
10/11/2017 4
Effectiveness Evaluation report (COP.8/22/Add.1 and COP.8/INF/40) Report of the effectiveness evaluation framework (COP7/INF/41) Substance specific factsheets (available online at http://chm.pops.int)
10/11/2017 5 10/11/2017 5
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
10/11/2017 6 10/11/2017 6
www.brsmeas.org @brsmeas
20 40 60 80 100 120 Before 2004 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Aldrin Chlordane Dieldrin Endrin Heptachlor Hexachlorobenzene Mirex PCB Toxaphene DDT AlphaHCH BetaHCH Chlordecone Hexabromobiphenyl
Number of parties responded that they have implemented measures to control POPs Entry into force of endosulfan listed in 2011 Entry into force of POPs listed in 2009 Initial POPs POPs listed in 2009 and 2011
10/11/2017 7
10 20 30 40
Uganda Kenya Mauritius Tonga Nigeria Syria Ghana Haiti Kiribati Mali Korea Rep. Fiji Antigua and Barbuda Taijikistan Cyprus Georgia Australia Hungary Norway Lithuania Finland Sweden Switzerland Sudan Slovak Republic Uruguay Senegal Hong Kong SAR Czech Republic Moldova Chile Belgium Luxembourg Ivory Coast Congo DR India
WHO PCDD/PCDF-TEQ/g fat 1987-2002 2005-2010
10/11/2017 8
10/11/2017 9