EEE25: Building your own satellite 101 - CanSat Part I: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
EEE25: Building your own satellite 101 - CanSat Part I: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
EEE25: Building your own satellite 101 - CanSat Part I: Introduction Introduction to CanSat What is a CanSat? Simulation of a real satellite integrated within the volume of a soft drink can. How does a CanSat function?
Part I: Introduction
Introduction to CanSat
- What is a CanSat?
- Simulation of a real satellite integrated within the volume of a soft drink can.
- How does a CanSat function?
- Contains sensors, microcontrollers, and a radio module that allows it to gather
and transmit scientific data to a ground station.
- What are CanSatβs usually used for?
- Various uses, most are used to conduct a scientific investigation.
Introduction to our project
- What do we hope to achieve with our CanSat?
- To determine the optimal time for prolonged outdoor activity over the day
according to UV radiation levels, TVOC levels and Humidex values. (From 8:00 am to 6:00 pm)
- How can we achieve our objectives?
- Drop tests conducted every hour from 8:00 am to 6:00 pm to gather data,
which is sent to a ground station and plotted graphs. Data is analyzed and conclusions are drawn.
Chosen factors, metrics and guidelines
- Ultraviolet (UV) radiation levels
- Prolonged exposure to high levels of UVR can increase risk of melanoma and
damage to skin.
- Total volatile organic compound (TVOC) levels
- Many VOCs are carcinogenic in nature and irritate the respiratory tract.
- Humidex
- Prolonged outdoor activity during periods of high humidex values can result in
heatstroke and other heat related illnesses.
- Calculated using: πΌπ£πππππ¦ = π΅ππ π’πππππ ππ’π£π π +
5 9 π Γ (6.112 Γ 107.5Γ
π 237.7+π Γ
πΌ 100 β 10οΌ
- Takes into account both temperature and humidity to give a more accurate
assessment of the perceived temperature.
Chosen factors, metrics and guidelines
UV Index Risk and recommendations 0-2 (Optimal) 1.Low risk of harm from unprotected exposure to Sun 2.Optimal amount of UVR for
- utdoor activities
3-5 (Safe) 1.Moderate risk of harm from unprotected exposure to Sun 6-7 (Unsafe) 1.High risk of harm from unprotected exposure to Sun 2.Reduce time spent in the Sun 8-10 (Dangerou s) 1.Very high risk of harm from unprotected exposure to Sun 2.Minimize time spent in the Sun 11+ (Dangerou s) 1.Extreme risk of harm from unprotected exposure to Sun 2.Avoid spending time in the Sun Chemical Recommended levels (safe/optimal) Benzene No recommended healthy levels Formaldehyde < 81.4 ppb Polyaromatic rocarbons < 11.0 ppb Chloroethylenes (Tri- and Per-) <100 ppb Estimated total based on above data and considering
- ther VOCs
<300 ppb
Part II: Design
Material and structural design - Basic components
- Considerations when using components:
- Size: Small enough to fit in a can
- Mass: Light enough to ensure CanSat falls at a reasonable rate
- Capabilities: Able to perform functions as required to
- List
β
Arduino UNO microcontroller
β
XBee Shield radio module
Material and structural design - Sensors
- Considerations when selecting sensors
- Mass: Light to ensure that CanSat falls at a reasonable rate without the need
for an excessively large parachute
- Size: Small enough to ensure all components of the CanSat fit within a can.
- Capabilities: Must be suited to the limitations of the other components, such
as the battery and processing power of the microcontroller. (Hence no reliance
- n sensors that produce images/videos.)
- Sensor list
- SI1145 UV Radiation Sensor
- CCS811 TVOC level Sensor
- BME280
Material and structural design - Sensors
Material and structural design β Internal structure
- Structural features:
- SI1145 UVR sensor exposed at the top of the CanSat and stabilized with a
metal plate, allowing for better data collection whilst being stable.
- 2 sided design to maximize the space available.
Material and structural design - Parachute
- Calculations and considerations
- Upon weighing, CanSat is found to weigh 0.180 kg. Size of parachute required
calculated using the equation: ππ =
1 2 ππ€2ππ·π
- Where:
π = π’ππ’ππ πππ‘π‘ (ππ) π = πππππππ ππ’πππ, 9.81 ππ‘β2 π = π‘π£π ππππ ππ ππ ππ π’βπ πππ ππβπ£π’π (π2) π = πππ ππππ‘ππ’π§, 1.275 πππβ3 π·π = ππ ππ πππππππππππ’, 0.75
- Design: Circular hole of radius 0.090 m cut at the center of parachute to increase
stability during descent and to allow for sunlight to pass through to improve UVR data collection. Octagon chosen to allow for convenient calculation of the area and attachment of washers while providing a reasonable amount of drag.
Material and structural design - Parachute
- Parachute:
- Final area found to be 1.13 m2
- πΊππ ππ£ππ: π΅π ππ = 2(1 +
2)π2 β ππ2
- Proof of parachute working:
- During test drops, terminal velocity with the parachute fully deployed was
shown to be around 1.1 meters per second, lower than the 2 meter per second limit.
Electrical design - Circuit
- Circuit interface
- All sensors use analogue signals and are connected to A4 and A5 pins of the
analog side of the microcontroller. I2C connection used for all sensors.
- All sensors soldered onto a PCB board, with 2 loops connecting the sensors and
forming the circuit.
Electrical design - Software
- Flowchart of data during mission:
- Data flows from sensors to the microcontroller, which determines the format of
the data transmitted via the radio module to the ground station, which uses PLX-DAQ to plot the data into graphs in real time.
- Arduino software
- Code used first ensures each sensor functions properly, then it groups data
from each individual sensors into 1 group and makes it compatible with PLX- DAQ.
Part III: Results and discussion
Initial testing
- Results obtained
- Xbee module has a maximum effective range of around 50 meters.
- CCS811, BME280 giving reliable information.
- Anomalies observed
- SI1145 giving unreliable information, with unstable UVR readings due to
- scillation of CanSat during drop.
20 40 60 80 14:32:58 14:32:59 14:33:01 14:33:02 14:33:03 14:33:05 14:33:06 14:33:07 14:33:09 14:33:11 14:33:12 14:33:13 14:33:18 14:33:30 14:33:35 14:33:44 14:33:47 14:33:48 14:33:50 14:33:51 14:33:52 14:33:54 14:33:55 14:33:56 14:33:57 14:33:58
- Approx. Altitude (m)
- Approx. Altitude (m)
Initial testing - troubleshooting
- Comparing results of ground testing vs drop testing
- Difference found to be an average of about 15%.
- Addition of code to eliminate erroneous data points
2 4 6 8 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
UV Index of drop test vs ground test
Drop Test Ground test
Drop tests: 22/12/18
- Drop test procedure:
- 5 tests every hour, from 8:00 am to 6:00 pm. Then repeated across 5 days.
Results are obtained from the averages of data gathered.
Drop tests: Results over 5 days
Trends observed and discussion
- UV radiation levels: Increases from 8:00 am to 1:00 pm, then decreases. UV index
readings all in the βunsafeβ and βdangerousβ category from 10:00 am to 4:00 pm. UVR levels only relatively safe outside this 6 hour period.
- TVOC levels: Insignificant in general and no obvious trend across the day. Probably
due to the lack of a distinct source of TVOCs.
- Humidex levels: Generally high and peaks at around 12:00 pm to 2:00 pm. Even
the lowest readings were near βunsafeβ levels and could cause βsome discomfortβ during prolonged outdoor activity. During most daylight hours, prolonged outdoor activity with the humidex levels obtained would cause βgreat discomfortβ.
Conclusion
Time UV Index TVOC concentration (ppb) Humidex Overall 8:00 AM Optimal (2.64) Optimal (13) Safe (37) Optimal 9:00 AM Safe (4.12) Optimal (14) Safe (38) Safe 10:00 AM Unsafe (5.87) Optimal (18) Unsafe (41) Unsafe 11:00 AM Dangerous (8.62) Optimal (17) Unsafe (42) Unsafe 12:00 PM Dangerous (9.80) Optimal (27) Unsafe (42) Unsafe 1:00 PM Dangerous (10.9) Optimal (22) Unsafe (43) Dangerous 2:00 PM Dangerous (8.68) Optimal (25) Unsafe (41) Unsafe 3:00 PM Unsafe (6.39) Optimal (12) Unsafe (40) Unsafe 4:00 PM Unsafe (6.24) Optimal (11) Unsafe (40) Unsafe 5:00 PM Safe (4.21) Optimal (16) Safe (39) Safe 6:00 PM Optimal (1.52) Optimal (13) Safe (39) Optimal
Limitations of results
- For individual data sets:
- UVR data: Represents a worst case scenario with no cloud cover in the sun.
- TVOC: Not indicative of overall air quality. (Other measurements such as CO
concentration, PM2.5 levels and PSI should be taken into account as well)
- Humidex: Does not take into account wind speed, which also affects perceived
temperature.
- Specific timing and location
- Timing: Data obtained during month of December, may vary throughout the
year.
- Location: Most drops conducted in a small area, hence might not be
representative of Singapore.
Future work and extensions
- Concept of using CanSat to collect and transmit environmental
data to ground station proven to be possible and relatively easy to achieve.
- More powerful versions of the hardware used can be employed to