educational results partnership
play

EDUCATIONAL RESULTS PARTNERSHIP Ac#onable Data to Improve - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EDUCATIONAL RESULTS PARTNERSHIP Ac#onable Data to Improve Ac#onable Data to Improve Student Student Success Success Ken Sorey Victoria Pluim Who We Are


  1. EDUCATIONAL RESULTS PARTNERSHIP Ac#onable ¡Data ¡to ¡Improve ¡ Ac#onable ¡Data ¡to ¡Improve ¡Student ¡ Student ¡Success ¡ Success ¡ ¡ ¡ Ken ¡Sorey ¡ Victoria ¡Pluim ¡

  2. • Who We Are ¡ ¡ • Actionable Data • Predictive Analytics and Placement • Questions and Discussion 2 ¡

  3. The Pr The Problem: oblem:

  4. The Looming Shortage of The Looming Shortage of Educated W Educated Workers orkers Who will fill the demand? 4 4

  5. The Chal The Challenge lenge College Entry Rates for High School Graduates by Ethnicity Hispanic 50% African American 44% White 72% 5 5

  6. An Economic Imperat An Economic Imperative ive Raise college graduation rates among minorities and the disadvantaged. Reduce inequities in education. 6 6

  7. An Economic Imperat An Economic Imperative ive Economic Productivity Requires EDUCATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY 7 7

  8. Educat Educational Pr ional Product oductivity ivity Begin at the end What do employers need? What does student success look like? What do students need to succeed? 8 8

  9. Momentum Points Momentum Points Early Third 8 th Grade College Non- College Labor Childhood Grade Algebra Ready remedial Success Market Education Literacy Coursework Placement Alignment • Momentum points in the education-to- workforce pipeline are key to student success • Lack of alignment in the pipeline perpetuates these choke points • We can and must eliminate the choke points in the system 9 9

  10. So… So… What does ERP do? 10 10

  11. ERP: Structur ERP: Structure & Leadership e & Leadership • A 501(c)3 nonprofit • Board comprised of business and education leaders • Close and cooperative relationships: K-12 school systems; colleges and universities; thought leaders • President and Founder Jim Lanich, PhD, national leader in educational systems/outcomes • 2015-16 goal: Make ERP’s work available to more educators/districts 11 11

  12. What does ERP do? What does ERP do? Maintains the nation’s largest database on student achievement. 12 12

  13. What does ERP do? What does ERP do? Applies data analytics to uncover bright spots and find out why 13 13

  14. What does ERP do? What does ERP do? Documents and disseminates best practices to educators (for free!) 14 14

  15. What does ERP do? What does ERP do? Learn what works works And copy it. 15 15

  16. 16 ¡

  17. Public ¡K-­‑12 ¡Data ¡

  18. Public ¡K-­‑12 ¡Data ¡

  19. Public ¡K-­‑12 ¡Data ¡

  20. Public ¡K-­‑12 ¡Data ¡

  21. College-­‑Readiness ¡Charts ¡

  22. The ¡“How” ¡

  23. Transition Reports Sample ¡College ¡ Sample ¡District ¡ Sample ¡Local ¡College ¡

  24. Related ¡Ini#a#ves ¡ • Mul#ple ¡Measures ¡ • Common ¡Assessment ¡ • Foster ¡Youth ¡and ¡Financial ¡Aid ¡Dashboards ¡ • CTE ¡Career ¡Pathways ¡Trust ¡

  25. Momentum Points Momentum Points Early Third 8 th Grade College Non- College Labor Childhood Grade Algebra Ready Remedial Success Market Education Literacy Coursework Placement Alignment Placement ¡ 27 27

  26. Momentum ¡Point: ¡ ¡Placement ¡ • Tes#ng ¡and ¡placement ¡prac#ce ¡vary ¡widely ¡ • Inaccurate ¡and ¡inefficient ¡placement ¡ • High ¡rate ¡of ¡unnecessary ¡remedia#on ¡ • Students ¡inconsistently ¡understanding ¡and ¡preparing ¡ for ¡the ¡test ¡ • Tes#ng ¡and ¡remedia#on ¡is ¡expensive ¡ • Mul#ple ¡Measures ¡inconsistently ¡or ¡inappropriately ¡ used ¡

  27. Common ¡Assessment ¡Goal ¡ • To ¡develop ¡a ¡comprehensive, ¡common ¡assessment ¡ system ¡that ¡will: ¡ ¡ – align ¡to ¡state ¡legisla#on ¡ – reduce ¡unnecessary ¡remedia#on ¡ ¡ – provide ¡statewide ¡efficiencies ¡ – effec#vely ¡support ¡faculty ¡and ¡staff ¡to ¡ensure ¡accurate ¡ student ¡placement, ¡resul#ng ¡in ¡more ¡successful ¡student ¡ outcomes ¡

  28. Key ¡Objec#ves ¡ • A ¡test ¡that ¡covers ¡curricular ¡areas ¡of ¡ – Math, ¡English, ¡English ¡as ¡a ¡second ¡language ¡(ESL) ¡ • Mul#ple ¡Measures ¡(with ¡MMAP) ¡ • Assessment ¡Prepara#on ¡(with ¡EPI/OEI) ¡ • Professional ¡Development ¡ • Integrate ¡data ¡across ¡the ¡system ¡ • Align ¡where ¡possible ¡with ¡Common ¡Core/SBAC ¡

  29. Reimagining Student Capacity Predictive Analytics and Multiple Measures

  30. Overview • Over-reliance on standardized assessment has led us to systematically and substantially underestimate student capacity Particularly for students of color, low income students, first • generation college students, women • Evidence-based, multiple measures is a key cornerstone on which to rebuild the foundations of community college education Demonstrates fundamental capacity of far more of our • students to succeed if given the chance Powerful completion, equity, and real world implications • Based powerfully both on basic principles of assessment and • measurement as well as strong evidence

  31. But first, I digress A little classics

  32. Daedalus and Icarus Daedalus crafted the • labyrinth of inescapable complexity for King Minos To escape from Minos, • Daedalus built wings of feather and wax for his son Icarus and himself Don’t fly too high, lest sun melt • the wax and you plummet to your doom Dangers of innovation/ • invention, hubris, Importance of knowing your • limits, listening to your wiser elders But most of us forget the rest • of that story…

  33. Transition to College: Assessment and Placement • Community colleges are open enrollment institutions • Requires assessing and planning for educational needs of students. • Goal • Effectively place student at most appropriate level for their skill • Ensure that all students complete their courses, persist to the next academic term, and achieve their educational objective(s) in a timely manner.

  34. What we are actually doing: Community college student transition to college • Community colleges rely nearly entirely on standardized assessment (WestEd, 2011) • Most CC students placed below college-level • Significant barrier (Bailey, Jeong, and Cho, 2010) • What does this mean? • First interaction is to tell students they don’t belong • Imply that most students are not ready for college and are likely to fail

  35. What if? • What if the problem is not primarily with our students but with limitations in how we have assessed and understood their capacity to do college-level work?

  36. LBCC Multiple Measures Research • Five cohorts tracking more than 7,000 HS grads who matriculate to LBCC directly • Examined predictive utility of wide range of high school achievement data • For predicting: • How students are assessed and placed • How students perform in those classes • (and alignment between them)

  37. Alignment in English Predicting Placement Predicting Performance 1.34 x 1.4 1.0 Ordinal Regression Coefficients Logistic Regression Coefficients .88 x 1.2 0.8 1.0 0.6 0.8 .37*** 0.6 0.4 0.4 .30** .17* 0.2 0.2 .00 0.0 0.0 CST ELA (z) Eng Grade GPA (other) CST ELA (z) Eng Grade GPA (12) (12) (other) * p <.05 **, p <.01, *** p<.001, x = p< 1 x 10 -10

  38. Alignment in Math Predicting Placement Predicting Performance 1.0 1.0 Ordinal Regression Coefficients Logistic Regression Coefficients .75 x 0.8 0.8 .73 x 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 .25** .20* .20 0.2 0.2 .00 0.0 0.0 CST Math Last Math HSGPA CST Math Last Math HSGPA (z) Grade (z) Grade * p <.05 **, p <.01, *** p<.001, x = p< 1 x 10 -10

  39. Key Takeaways • Assessment should predict how students will perform at our colleges • Instead: • Current standardized tests predict standardized tests • Classroom performance predicts classroom performance • More info tells us more about student capacity than less info

  40. Re-imagined student capacity • Starting in Fall 2012, students from LBUSD (now 6 districts covering >30 high schools and growing) were provided an alternative assessment • Reverse engineered the analysis to place students using: Last high school course in discipline • Grade in last course in discipline • Overall HSGPA • Last standardized test in discipline (and level) • • Placed students in highest course where projected success rate higher than average success rate for that course.

  41. Implementing Multiple Measures Placement: Transfer-level Placement Rates F2012 70% 60% 60% 50% F2011 First time students F2011 LBUSD 40% 31% F2012 Promise Pathways - Accuplacer Only 30% F2012 Promise Pathways - Multiple Measures 20% 14% 13% 11% 9% 9% 7% 10% 0% Transfer Level English Transfer Level Math

  42. But …

  43. … didn’t that just flood transfer- level courses with unqualified students?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend