education meet
play

Education Meet Fiona Stevens, Janine Rhodes, Dr Phyllis Chee and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Contributions to Social Justice: When Social Housing and Field Education Meet Fiona Stevens, Janine Rhodes, Dr Phyllis Chee and Tammy Milton Introduction Field Education cornerstone in social work placements Unprecedented demand


  1. Contributions to Social Justice: When Social Housing and Field Education Meet Fiona Stevens, Janine Rhodes, Dr Phyllis Chee and Tammy Milton

  2. Introduction • Field Education – cornerstone in social work placements • Unprecedented demand for placements = increasing student numbers • Changes in Program structures • Pressure in the field = demand vs funding • Response = collaborative partnerships

  3. How did this happen? • Serendipity! • Agency with multiple projects & University requiring multiple placements • Mangrove = open to “give it a go” and “why not?” rather that “why would we?” • Staff to support and absorb students • Confident agency could manage the challenge • Students could support each other – negotiate projects based on own capabilities

  4. Initial Observations • Students contribution to agency = • Increase in service delivery • Project implementation • Meeting key performance indicators • Engagement with other staff – questioning, reflecting, processing

  5. Integrating students in the agency: • Creating a positive/shared supervision model • Staff providing support/direction with students • Orientation process = positive outcomes • Students confidence established in this process • Students’ project presentation = shift in staff’s attitude

  6. In practice... • Trust in the relationship • Continual engagement – checking in • Goodwill with parties • Matching student goals to learning opportunities • It’s not perfect!

  7. Critique of our process: • Organic process vs evidence-based approach • How is this different from any other placement arrangement? • Developed agency confidence • Integration of students • Increasing momentum for students • Identified process for “matching” students

  8. Limitations – research team reflection: • Personal experiences of the team - may not work elsewhere • Based in relationship - time/resources can limit the approach

  9. Discussion & Implications: • Identified extension to supervisors training • Compatibility & availability with staff and students • Resource intensive (model)

  10. Conclusion ● Be aware of mutual benefits (field education placements can support agency’s practice and vice versa) ● Focus on relationships and building trust ● Select suitable students (university and agency) ● Allocate resources appropriately ● Ongoing review of placement process (university and agency)

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend