EDSSU developing a successful MOC The Westmead Experience Amith - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

edssu developing a successful moc the westmead experience
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

EDSSU developing a successful MOC The Westmead Experience Amith - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EDSSU developing a successful MOC The Westmead Experience Amith Shetty Staff Specialist Westmead hospital ED Leadership Forum Friday 27 June 2014 Background 1. Annual census 64000 2. 30% - 35% inpatient admission rates 3. Need for


slide-1
SLIDE 1

EDSSU – developing a successful MOC The Westmead Experience

Amith Shetty Staff Specialist Westmead hospital

ED Leadership Forum

Friday 27 June 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

  • 1. Annual census 64000
  • 2. 30% - 35% inpatient admission rates
  • 3. Need for observation medicine
  • 4. Access block and ED overcrowding a daily occurrence
  • 5. Need for flow in department
  • 6. WHY DISCHARGE STREAM FOCUS?
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Project initiations

Westmead ESSU built 2010 – initial focus NEAT rather than flow

Result – extension of ED beds; adverse effects of SSU

Re-education – change management DATA, DATA, DATA – collection, reporting and tool for change

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Definitions

Appropriate admission – admitted under EDSS, high likelihood of discharge <24hrs Inappropriate admission – inpatient team admission placed in ESSU Failed admission – initial appropriate admission then needing inpatient hospital bed Successful admission – appropriate admission discharged home <24 hrs

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Sample EDSSU performance reports

Date range 01/2012 to 06/2012 07/2012 to 12/2012 Staff Specialist (surnames in alphabetical order) ESSU admissions (failed admissions and percentage) ESSU admissions AXXXXXXXXX 83 (6 – 7.2%) 115 (11 – 9.6%) BXXXXX 97 (10 – 10.3%) 96 (4 – 4.2%) CXXXXX 48 (1 – 2%) 66 (5 – 7.6%) DXXXXX 29 (1 – 3.4%) 83 (5 – 6%) Missing rows xxxx xxxx Shetty 161 (10 – 6.2%) 252 (10 – 4%) SXXXXX 28 (2 – 7.1%) 61 (9 – 14.8%) SXXXXX 70 (4 – 5.7%) 61 (3 – 4.9%) VXXXXXXX 215 (14 – 6.5%) 121 (12 – 9.9%) Total 1842 (127 – 6.9%) 2249 (154 – 6.8%)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Sample ESSU audit reports

Criteria 07/2011 to 12/2011 01/2012 to 06/2012 total admissions 1846 2213 (+19.9%) Inappropriate admissions 418 (22.6%) 371 (16.8%) appropriate admissions 1428 (77.4%) 1842 (83.2%) Failure rate amongst appropriate admissions 103 (7.2%) 127 (6.9%) Total failure rate of ESSU 521 (28.2%) 498 (22.5%)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Achievements

failures Inappropriate Total 12.2011 6.2012 12.2012 6.2013 12.2013 103 127 154 165 187 418 371 395 359 417 1846 2213 2644 3255 3689

6 monthly audit results

failures Inappropriate Total

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Results

Actual failure rate Total failure rate 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% Axis Title 12.2011 6.2012 12.2012 6.2013 12.2013 Actual failure rate 7.2% 6.9% 6.8% 5.7% 5.7% Inappropriate admissions 22.6% 16.8% 14.9% 11.0% 11.3% Total failure rate 28.2% 22.5% 20.8% 16.1% 16.4%

Chart Title

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Appropriate versus inappropriate

Median LOS for all patients 320 minutes ( IQR 130 - 632.5) Median LOS for appropriate ESSU admissions 300 minutes (IQR 160 - 590) Median LOS of inappropriate patients 602.5 minutes (IQR 200 - 825) Mann-Whitney U test - median difference in LOS - 145 minutes (95% CI 50-255) p=0.0001 Median LOS of successful admission 271.5 (IQR 150 - 497.5) Median LOS of failed ESSU admissions 707.5 (IQR 360 - 1405) Median LOS of patients who stay for >24hrs in ESSU - 1873.5 (IQR 1632 - 2040)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

What about elderly patients?

21-40 41-60 61-70 >70 total patients 1872 1619 729 901 failure rate 85 65 35 63 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Axis Title

slide-11
SLIDE 11

What about time of admission

4.40% 4.50% 4.60% 4.70% 4.80% 4.90% 5.00% 5.10% 5.20% 5.30% 22:00-06:00 06:01-22:00

failure rate

failure rate

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Conclusions

Failure rates increase with age but still below the 85% KPI benchmark Admissions after-hours slightly higher failure rates but still acceptable Inappropriate admissions probably cause most negative impact on patient flow in the EDSSU Future NSW health EDSSU policy may serve as empowering tool to prevent inappropriate admissions

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Key requirements

Need for change – engagement Hospital administrators, ED director and Staff specialists, senior nursing staff Space and financial commitments Definition, education and dissemination of MOC concepts Clinical champion DATA, DATA, DATA

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Key lessons

Whole department engagement Understanding of streaming principles Clinical / MOC champion Data is your friend – use it as a tool to guide change

slide-15
SLIDE 15

www.ecinsw.com.au

Level 4, Sage Building , PO Box 699 T 02 9464 4674 www.ecinsw.com.au 67 Albert Avenue, Chatswood NSW 2067 Chatswood NSW 2057 F 02 9464 4728 ABN 89 809 648 636