Early Childhood Programs: Lasting Benefits and Large Returns
Milagros Nores, PhD Steve Barnett, PhD
- Camden. October 30, 2015.
Early Childhood Programs: Lasting Benefits and Large Returns Camden. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Early Childhood Programs: Lasting Benefits and Large Returns Camden. October 30, 2015. Milagros Nores, PhD Steve Barnett, PhD Potential Gains from ECEC Investments Educational Success and Economic Productivity Achievement test scores
Decreased Costs to Government
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Treatment End Ages 5-10 Age >10 Effects (sd) Age at Follow-Up Note: 1 sd = achievement gap, so High Quality preschool closes nearly half the achievement gap All Designs HQ Programs
– Intentional teaching – Individualization & small groups – Less emphasis on comprehensive services (Head Start is less effective for cognitive gains)
Abecedarian Chicago High/Scope (Perry) Year began
1972 1985 1962
Location
Chapel Hill, NC Chicago, IL Ypsilanti, MI
Sample size
111 1,539 123
Design
RCT Matched neighborhood RCT
Ages
6 wks-age 5 Ages 3-4 Ages 3-4
Program schedule
Full-day, year round Half-day, school year Half-day, school year
Barnett, W. S., & Masse, L. N. (2007). Early childhood program design and economic returns: Comparative benefit-cost analysis of the Abecedarian program and policy implications, Economics of Education Review, 26, 113-125; Temple, J. A., & Reynolds, A. J. (2007). Benefits and costs of investments in preschool education: Evidence from the Child-Parent Centers and related programs. Economics of Education Review, 26(1), 126-144; Schweinhart, L. J., Montie, J., Xiang, Z., Barnett, W. S., Belfield, C. R., & Nores, M. (2005). Lifetime effects: The High/Scope Perry Preschool study through age 40 (Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, 14). Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.
45% 15% 34% 66% 49% 15% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Graduated from high school on time Age 14 achievement at 10th %ile + Special Education (Cog.) Program group No-program group
Berrueta-Clement, J.R., Schweinhart, L.J., Barnett, W.S., Epstein, A.S., & Weikart, D.P. (1984). Changed lives: The effects of the Perry Preschool Program on youths through age 19. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
50% 62% 40% 76% 76% 60% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Had Savings Account Employed Earned > $20K Program group No-program group
Schweinhart, L. J., Montie, J., Xiang, Z., Barnett, W. S., Belfield, C. R., & Nores, M. (2005). Lifetime effects: The High/Scope Perry Preschool study through age 40 (Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, 14). Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.
34% 48% 55% 14% 33% 36% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Drug Crime Violent Crime Arrested > 5X Program group No-program group
Schweinhart, L. J., Montie, J., Xiang, Z., Barnett, W. S., Belfield, C. R., & Nores, M. (2005). Lifetime effects: The High/Scope Perry Preschool study through age 40 (Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, 14). Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.
13% 51% 65% 49% 36% 67% 34% 31% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
4 Yr College HS Graduation Grade Repeater Special Education Program group No-program group
Barnett, W. S., & Masse, L. N. (2007). Early childhood program design and economic returns: Comparative benefit-cost analysis of the Abecedarian program and policy implications, Economics of Education Review, 26, 113-125; Campbell, F.A., Ramey, C.T., Pungello, E., Sparling, J., & Miller-Johnson, S. ( 2002). Early childhood education: Young adult outcomes from the Abecedarian Project. Applied Developmental Science, 6(1), 42-57.
25% 38% 25% 39% 17% 23% 14% 50% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Juvenile Arrest Grade Repeater Special Education HS Graduation Program group No-program group
Temple, J. A., & Reynolds, A. J. (2007). Benefits and costs of investments in preschool education: Evidence from the Child-Parent Centers and related programs. Economics of Education Review, 26(1), 126-144
3.9 19.9 34.6 27.7 12.1 1.7 0.0 0.2 4.2 32.2 47.4 16.0 10 20 30 40 50 60 1.00-1.99 2.00-2.99 3.00-3.99 4.00-4.99 5.00-5.99 6.00-7.00
Percentage of Classrooms
ECERS-R Score (1=minimal, 3=poor 5= good 7=excellent) 00 Total (N = 232) 08 Total (N = 407)
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 KAPPLES1 2APPLES1 4/5APPLES1 PPVT Read Math
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 KAPPLES2 2APPLES2 4/5APPLES2 PPVT Read Math
.12 .18 .17 .14 .17 .26 .22 .37 .29 .37
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 LAL 4th LAL 5th Math 4th Math 5th Science 4 th 1 year Abbott pre-k 2 year Abbott pre-k
12% 12% 19% 17% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% Retention Special Education Abbott pre-K No Abbott pre-K
19
Weiland & Yoshikawa, 2013, Child Development
Weiland & Yoshikawa, 2013, Child Development
Weiland & Yoshikawa, 2013, Child Development
21
0.44*** 0.62*** 0.59*** 0.50***
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
PPVT-III (vocabulary) W-J LW (early reading) W-J AP (numeracy) REMA Short (numeracy, geometry)
effect size
Weiland & Yoshikawa, 2013, Child Development 0.24*** 0.24*** 0.21*** 0.28*** 0.11
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Backward DS (working memory) Forward Digit Span (working memory) Pencil Tap (inhibitory control) DCCS (inhibitory control) TOQ Attention (att. shifting)
effect size
22
23
Weiland & Yoshikawa, 2013, Child Development
1. High Quality programs have shown persistent effects across various cognitive and behavioral domains. 2. Pre-K varies in initial and long-term effects—can only expect persistent gains from large initial gains, and that requires quality. 3. Proper design, high standards, adequate funding, and evaluation can ensure high cost/benefits 4. Essence of quality is strong individualized teacher-child interaction, especially 1:1 and in small groups. 5. High-quality preschool benefits both low- and middle income children, with substantial effects on both groups, but greater impact on children living in or near poverty and/or DLLs (Tulsa, Boston).
6. ECEC can be a strong public investment: Increased educational
achievement and attainment, Decreased economic and educational inequality and fewer social problems and Job and GDP growth (local and national).