Early Childhood Programs May 4, 2018 1 Office of the Legislative - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

early childhood programs
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Early Childhood Programs May 4, 2018 1 Office of the Legislative - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

O L A Office of the Legislative Auditor State of Minnesota Early Childhood Programs May 4, 2018 1 Office of the Legislative Auditor Nonpartisan Financial Audit Division Program Evaluation Division O L A 2 OLA in State Government


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Early Childhood Programs

May 4, 2018

1

O L A Office of the Legislative Auditor

State of Minnesota

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Office of the Legislative Auditor

  • Nonpartisan
  • Financial Audit Division
  • Program Evaluation Division

O L A

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

OLA in State Government

Executive Branch Legislative Branch Judicial Branch

OLA

State Agencies Governor House of Representatives Senate Courts Constitu- tional Officers

3

O L A

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Key Findings

O L A

  • Programs are complex, fragmented
  • Not currently possible to determine extent
  • f potential duplication
  • Statewide data on program effectiveness

are inadequate

  • Legal requirements limit sharing data

across programs

  • Extent of early childhood screening is

unknown

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

O L A

Programs Offering Direct Services

  • Early Childhood Family Education
  • Early Childhood Health and

Development Screening

  • Family Home Visiting
  • Head Start and Early Head Start
  • School Readiness Program
  • Voluntary Prekindergarten
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

O L A

Programs that Provide Funding Rather than Services

  • Child Care Assistance Program

(CCAP)

  • Early Learning Scholarships
  • Pathway I, awarded to individual children
  • Pathway II, awarded to certain early

learning programs or child care programs

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

O L A

Quality Rating System

Parent Aware Quality Rating and Improvement System

  • Qualifies programs to accept scholarships

and higher reimbursements for child care assistance

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Complex, Fragmented Programs

  • Eligibility requirements differed
  • Income is not an eligibility requirement for

Early Childhood Family Education, Screening, and Voluntary Prekindergarten

  • Among other programs, income limits differ

by program

O L A

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Income Eligibility

O L A

9

2017 Income Limit for Family of Four

$24,600 $45,510 $49,200 $64,423 $31,980 $45,510

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Staffing Requirements Differ

O L A

10

Early Childhood Family Education School Readiness School Readiness Plus Voluntary Prekindergarten Maximum Class Size

√ √ √

Staff-Child Ratio

√ √ √

Salary Requirement

Teacher Licensure

√ √

Program Supervisor Licensure

√ √

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Funding and Program Differences

O L A

11

Early Childhood Family Education Early Learning Scholarships- Pathway II School Readiness Program Voluntary Prekindergarten Compete for Funding

√ √

User Fees Allowed

√ √

In limited circumstances Transporting Preschool Children

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Recommendation

  • The Legislature should consider aligning

eligibility and funding requirements for certain programs

  • Could lead to a single application form for

certain programs

  • Could allow providers more efficiency
  • The Legislature could convene a working

group as a first step

O L A

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Potential Duplication

  • Not possible to determine extent of

potential duplication

  • Agencies use different methods to identify

children

O L A

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Potential Duplication (cont.)

  • Longitudinal data system
  • Not designed to identify potential

duplication

  • Missing and incomplete data
  • Department lacks participation data
  • Lack of information on local program

delivery

O L A

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Children Using Multiple Funding Streams

  • Does not indicate duplicative funding

O L A

15

15%

  • f children who used

Scholarships awarded in FY 2016 also used Child Care Assistance to pay for a program

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Children in Multiple Programs

  • Could not determine extent of potential
  • verlap

O L A

16

27%

  • f children registered in

Voluntary Prekindergarten in FY 2017 were also registered in School Readiness program

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Recommendation

  • Minnesota Department of Education (MDE),

Minnesota Department of Health (MDH), and Department of Human Services (DHS) should jointly identify what is needed to use a universal identification number

  • MDE should consistently collect participation

data

O L A

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Statewide Data on Effectiveness are Inadequate

  • Statutes do not require all programs to

report on their effectiveness

  • Statutes place priority on school

readiness

  • Data do not exist to measure whether

children statewide are ready for school

O L A

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Assessment Requirements Differ

O L A

19

Head Start and Early Head Start Voluntary Prekindergarten School Readiness Program Assessments Required

√ √ √

Must Align with Standards

√ √

Tool Must be State Approved Federal

Skills Measured Literacy, cognition, motor development, social and emotional development Cognitive and language skills Cognitive and language skills

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Assessments at Kindergarten

  • No state requirement to assess school

readiness in kindergarten

O L A

20

81%

assessed all children for school readiness

49%

used assessment tools other than MDE approved

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Recommendation

  • Legislature should consider requiring

assessments of all children’s school readiness as they complete certain early childhood programs

  • Eventually, all publicly funded, Parent Aware-

rated programs

  • Use a state-approved assessment tool
  • Submit assessment results to the state
  • Legislature should consider requiring

assessments for children in kindergarten

O L A

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Recommendation

  • The Legislature should direct MDE, MDH,

and DHS to plan a comprehensive approach to evaluating impacts

  • Legislature would specify general outcomes
  • Agencies would identify indicators of

effectiveness

  • Legislature would decide whether to proceed

O L A

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Legal Requirements Limit Data Sharing Across State Agencies

  • Laws protect children’s identity
  • Laws prohibit sharing data unless the

subject of the data gives informed consent

  • Restrictions can interfere with program
  • perations

O L A

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Recommendation

  • The Legislature should consider

broadening authority for MDE, MDH, and DHS to share individual-level data from early childhood programs

O L A

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Early Childhood Screening

  • State law requires that all children

undergo health and development screening, with exception for conscientious objections

  • The number of children who are not

screened is unknown

O L A

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Recommendation

  • Minnesota Department of Education

should collect data on children who are not screened

O L A

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Summary

Changes are needed to address:

  • Program complexity and fragmentation
  • Lack of data on whether young children

statewide are prepared for school

  • Need to measure program impacts
  • Legal restrictions on data sharing
  • Unknown number of children not

screened

O L A

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Early Childhood Programs

www.auditor.leg.state.mn.us O L A

28