E nro n Pre se nta tio n Outline E a rly L ife o f Arthur Ande - - PDF document

e nro n
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

E nro n Pre se nta tio n Outline E a rly L ife o f Arthur Ande - - PDF document

1/10/2019 E nro n Pre se nta tio n Outline E a rly L ife o f Arthur Ande rse n E nro nT he Gre a te st Co mpa ny in the Wo rld T he F a ll o f Arthur Ande rse n Addre ss Ca se Que stio ns Additio na l Ac a de mic


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1/10/2019 1

E nro n

Pre se nta tio n Outline

 E

a rly L ife o f Arthur Ande rse n

 E

nro n—T he Gre a te st Co mpa ny in the Wo rld

 T

he F a ll o f Arthur Ande rse n

 Addre ss Ca se Que stio ns  Additio na l Ac a de mic So urc e s—L

uc c i, Co pe la nd

slide-2
SLIDE 2

1/10/2019 2

E a rly life o f Arthur Ande rso n

 F

  • unde r is so n o f No rwe g ia n immig ra nts

 Jo hn a nd Ma ry Ande rso n

 Pla no , I

llino is

 Also kno wn a s No rwa y, I

llino is

 Arthur wa s b o rn in 1885

 F

a sc ina te d b y numb e rs a t a yo ung a g e

E a rly life o f Arthur Ande rso n

 Disc ipline , ho ne sty, a nd a stro ng wo rk e thic

 K

e ys tra its tha t Jo hn a nd Ma ry Ande rso n instille d in Arthur

 Arthur wa s o rpha ne d a t a yo ung a g e  Hig h Sc ho o l Ca re e r

 Wo rke d a full time jo b a nd a tte nde d e ve ning c la sse s

slide-3
SLIDE 3

1/10/2019 3

E a rly Pro fe ssio na l L ife o f Arthur Ande rso n

 Co lle g e Ca re e r a t Unive rsity o f I

llino is

Wo rke d a s a c c o unta nt fo r Allis-Cha lme rs while a tte nding c la ss

 Ac c e pte d e ntry le ve l jo b a t Pric e Wa te rho use

 F

irm wa s first o rg a nize d in Gre a t Brita in

 Yo ung e st CPA in the sta te o f I

llino is

 At the a g e o f 23

E a rly Pro fe ssio na l L ife o f Arthur Ande rso n

 E

sta b lishe d pa rtne rship to pro vide a c c o unting , a uditing , e tc .

Ande rso n, De la ny & Co mpa ny

 De la ny le ft to g o his o wn wa y

 Ar

thur Ander sen & Company was established  1915- Arthur fa c e d his first pro fe ssio na l dile mma

 “Sub se q ue nt e ve nt” – disc lo se d in fo o tno te s o f the F

S

slide-4
SLIDE 4

1/10/2019 4

Arthur Ande rso n & Co mpa ny

 Dile mma with DuPo nt two de c a de s la te r fro m first dile mma

 Dismisse d a s the ir a udito r fo r no t a g re e ing with DuPo nt

 Ande rso n wa s o pinio na te d, stub b o rn, a nd “diffic ult”

 “T

hink stra ig ht, ta lk stra ig ht”

 Critic s a dmitte d tha t Ande rso n wa s po int-b la nk ho ne st

 100% inte g rity o r b e fire d b y Ande rso n

Arthur Ande rso n & Co mpa ny

 Arthur c re a te d a nic he fo r firm

 Va rio us e ne rg y industrie s

 E

a rly 1930’ s, firm wa s a thriving pra c tic e

 L

e a ding re g io na l firm in the Midwe st

 Gre a t De pre ssio n hit ha rd o n Arthur’ s c lie nts

 Arthur Ande rso n c o nvinc e d b a nks to ke e p funding his strug g ling e ne rg y

c lie nts

slide-5
SLIDE 5

1/10/2019 5

Arthur Ande rso n & Co mpa ny

 Arthur Ande rse n g a ine d re spe c t fro m le a ding fina nc ia l e xe c utive s

 I

nc re a se d re fe rra l o f c lie nts o utside o f Midwe st

 Arthur wa s a spo ke spe rso n fo r his disc ipline

 L

  • b b ie d fo r c o ntinuing pro fe ssio na l e duc a tio n (CPE

) re q uire me nt

 Arthur die d in 1947

 L

e ft b e hind a firm tha t e mplo ye d 1,000 plus a c c o unta nts

Arthur Ande rso n & Co mpa ny

 L

e o na rd Spa c e wa s the suc c e sso r o f Arthur

 E

a rne d a re puta tio n a s a no -no nse nse pro fe ssio na l

 Ope nly c ritic ize d the pro fe ssio n fo r slo ppy sta nda rds

 Ac c o unting Princ iple s Bo a rd (APB) e sta b lishe d in 1950

 Re pla c e d with F

ina nc ia l Ac c o unting Sta nda rds Bo a rd (F ASB)  Arthur Ande rso n & Co . e sta b lishe d wo rld’ s la rg e st priva te unive rsity  Arthur Ande rso n & Co . Ce nte r fo r Pro fe ssio na l E

duc a tio n

slide-6
SLIDE 6

1/10/2019 6

Arthur Ande rso n & Co mpa ny

 L

e o na rd Spa c e 's stro ng le a de rship a nd b usine ss skills

 Re tire d in 1973- a rg ua b ly the mo st re spe c ta b le firm in wo rld

 T

hre e de c a de s la te r Arthur Ande rso n & Co mpa ny:

 E

mplo ye d 80,000 pro fe ssio na ls

 Offic e s in 80 plus c o untrie s  Annua l re ve nue wa s $10 b illio n

 I

n la te 2001

 F

a c e d the b ig g e st c risis in firm’ s histo ry

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

 No rthe rn Na tura l Ga s Co mpa ny

 F

  • unde d in Oma ha , Ne b ra ska , in 1930

 Princ iple inve sto r

 I

nc lude d a T e xa s-b a se d c o mpa ny, L

  • ne Sta r Ga s Co rpo ra tio n

 No rthe rn strug g le d with g a ining c usto me rs

 Ho me “e xplo sio ns” c a use d b y na tura l g a s dro ve a wa y c usto me rs

slide-7
SLIDE 7

1/10/2019 7

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

 During De pre ssio n No rthe rn g a ine d c usto me rs

 “Co ld stric ke n a nd sha llo w-po c ke te d”

E xpe rie nc e d unlimite d so urc e o f c he a p la b o r during De pre ssio n

 Allo we d No rthe rn to de ve lo p pipe line g rid in Midwe st

 Co mpa ny b e c a me liste d o n Ne w Yo rk Sto c k E

xc ha ng e in 1947

 He lpe d with me e ting c a pita l re q uire me nts

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

 During 1970, No rthe rn b e c a me princ iple inve sto r in Ala ska n pipe line

 T

a p into Ca na da ’ s na tura l g a s re se rve s

 I

n 1980, No rthe rn c ha ng e d its na me to I nte rNo rth, I nc .

 E

xpa nde d sc o pe to o il e xplo ra tio n, c he mic a ls, a nd c o a l mining

 I

n 1985, I nte rNo rth purc ha se d Ho usto n Na tura l Ga s Co mpa ny

 $2.3 b illio n a nd a c q uire d 40,000 mile s o f pipe line s

slide-8
SLIDE 8

1/10/2019 8

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

 I

n 1986, I nte rNo rth c ha ng e d its na me to E

nr

  • n

 K

e nne th L a y wa s c ho se n a s CE O

 F

  • rme r c ha irma n o f Ho usto n Na tura l Ga s

 L

a y a do pte d a g g re ssive g ro wth stra te g y

 Hire d Je ffe ry Skilling a s to p sub o rdina te s

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

 During the 1990s, Skilling c re a te d a pla n to tra nsfo rm E

nro n

 E

ne rg y-tra ding c o mpa ny

 I

n e a rly 2001, Skilling b e c a me CE O

 L

a y re ta ine d the title o f c ha irma n o f the b o a rd

slide-9
SLIDE 9

1/10/2019 9

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

 E

nro n’ s 2000 a nnua l re po rt

 60 pe rc e nt inc re a se in tra nsa c tio n vo lume

 I

nc re a se fue le d b y E nro nOnline

 B2B (b usine ss to b usine ss) e le c tro nic ma rke t pla c e fo r e ne rg y industrie s

 E

nro nOnline pro c e sse d mo re tha n $335 b illio n o f tra nsa c tio ns

 L

a rg e st e -c o mme rc e c o mpa ny in the wo rld

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

slide-10
SLIDE 10

1/10/2019 10

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

 Ja nua ry 2001

 L

a y’ s ultima te g o a l fo r E nro n wa s to b e “ T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny”

 June 2001

 Skilling wa s sing le d o ut a s “the No .1 CE

O in the e ntire c o untry”

 E

nro n wa s ha ile d a s “Ame ric a ’ s mo st inno va tive c o mpa ny”

 Skilling wa s kno wn fo r b ra ssy, if no t ta c ky c o mme nts.

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

 T

hro ug ho ut 2001, E nro n’ s sto c k pric e drifte d lo we r

 Sto c k pric e we nt fro m $80 to mid-$30

 T

hird q ua rte r fo r E nro n

 Myste rio us $1.2 b illio n re duc tio n in o wne r’ s e q uity

 Re ve rsa l tra nsa c tio n

 No te s Re c e iva b le s sho uldn’ t ha ve b e e n re c o rde d a s a sse ts, b ut a s a

re duc tio n o f o wne r’ s e q uity.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

1/10/2019 11

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

 Oc to b e r 16, 2001 pre ss re le a se

 Wipe d o ut $600 millio n o f pro fits. Sto c k pric e plumme te d.

 De c e mb e r 2, 2001

 Pre ssure fro m c re dito rs, pe nding litig a tio n, a nd inve stig a tio ns fo rc e d E

nro n to file b a nkruptc y.

 L

a rg e st c o rpo ra te b a nkruptc y a t the time (Wo rldCo m- $100 Billio n)

 $60 b illio n lo ss to sha re ho lde rs

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

slide-12
SLIDE 12

1/10/2019 12

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

 Je ffre y Skilling sudde n a nd une xpe c te d re sig na tio n a s CE

O

 Suspic io us

 Suspic io n pro mpte d She rro n Wa tkins(VP) to write a le tte r

 Addre sse d to K

e nne th L a y

 Aske d q ue stio ns re g a rding the a c c o unting de c isio ns

 L

e tte r ma de pub lic

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

 Ho w did the y hide so muc h lo ss?

 Use o f c o mple x tra nsa c tio ns

 E

nro n c re a te d do ze ns o f limite d pa rtne rships

 Ca lle d SPE

’ s o r spe c ia l purpo se e ntitie s

 Cre a tive na me s o f the se e ntitie s

 Bra ve he a rt, Ra whide , Ra pto r, Co ndo r, a nd T

a lo n

 CF

O na me d a fe w o f the se e ntitie s a fte r his c hildre n

slide-13
SLIDE 13

1/10/2019 13

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

 Wha t wa s the mo tiva tio n b e hind c re a ting a n SPE

?

 “de b t a vo ida nc e ”

 T

hro ug ho ut the 1990’ s

 Co mpa nie s to o k a dva nta g e o f SPE

’ s minima l le g a l a nd a c c o unting g uide line s

 Dive rte d ma ssive a mo unts o f the ir lia b ilitie s to o ff-b a la nc e she e t

e ntitie s

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

 So ld a sse ts a t g ro ssly infla te d pric e s to the ir SPE

s

 Allo we d la rg e r “pa pe r” g a ins

 Pro fits infla te d b y unre a lize d g a ins o n inc re a se s in the ma rke t va lue

  • f it’ s o wn c o mmo n sto c k

 Prima ry mo tiva tio n fo r e xte nsive SPE

use

 Gro wing ne e d fo r c a pita l during the 1990s  F

ina nc ing c o mpa ny tra nsfo rma tio n

slide-14
SLIDE 14

1/10/2019 14

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

 Ne e d to susta in E

nro n’ s sto c k pric e a t hig h le ve l

 SPE

s inc lude d “lo a n trig g e rs”

 Re q uire d to pro vide a dditio na l sto c k, c a sh pa yme nts o r re struc ture prio r

tra nsa c tio ns

 Wo rst-c a se sc e na rio

 Disso lve SPE

, me rg e a sse ts a nd lia b ilitie s into c o nso lida te d fina nc ia l sta te me nts

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

 SPE

s ha d la rg e lo sse s o n a sse ts purc ha se d fro m E nro n

 F

  • rc e d to po ur a dditio na l re so urc e s to SPE

s

 Se lf-de a ling b y E

nro n o ffic ia ls in o pe ra tio n o f SPE s

 F

a sto w re a lize d $30 millio n in pro fits while CF O

 Se ve ra l frie nds e a rne d $1 millio n in pro fit fro m inve stme nt o f $5,800 in a s

little a s 60 da ys

slide-15
SLIDE 15

1/10/2019 15

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

 Oc to b e r 2001, Ma na g e me nt a ssume d c o ntro l o f tro ub le d SPE

s

 I

nc o rpo ra te d fina nc ia l sta te me nt da ta into E nro n’ s c o nso lida te d fina nc ia l sta te me nts

 Ne w fina nc ia l sta te me nts, ne w o utc o me

 L

a rg e lo ss re po rte d b y E nro n in F a ll 2001

 Re sta te d c o mpa ny’ s e a rning s fo r pre vio us 5 ye a rs

 De c e mb e r 2001, E

nro n file d b a nkruptc y

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

 Pub lic fire sto rm o f a ng e r a nd c ritic ism

 Co rpo ra te c ulture o f rule -b re a king , a rro g a nc e , a nd intimida tio n

 F

ifth a me ndme nt rig ht o f se lf-inc rimina tio n

 I

nvo ke d b y K e nne th L a y a nd Andre w F a sto w

 “I

a m no t a n a c c o unta nt”

 Je ffre y Skilling ’ s de fe nse a g a inst q ue stio na b le a c c o unting ta c tic s

slide-16
SLIDE 16

1/10/2019 16

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

 Nume ro us E

nro n Offic ia ls fa c e d c rimina l indic tme nts

 Andre w F

a sto w, Je ffre y Skilling , a nd K e nne th L a y

 Andre w F

a sto w ple a de d g uilty to c o nspira c y to c o mmit se c uritie s fra ud a nd o the r c ha rg e s

 10-ye a r priso n te rm—sho rte ne d to 6 ye a rs a fte r te stifying a g a inst Skilling

a nd L a y

 Re q uire d to fo rfe it $25 millio n o f pe rso na l a sse ts a c c umula te d while a t

E nro n

T he Wo rld’ s Gre a te st Co mpa ny

 Skilling a nd L

a y c o nvic te d o n multiple c o unts o f fra ud a nd c o nspira c y in Ma y 2006

 Je ffre y Skilling se nte nc e d to 24 ye a rs in priso n

 Sho rte ne d to 14 ye a rs in 2013

 K

e nne th L a y die d o f a ma ssive he a rt a tta c k in June 2006

 F

e de ra l judg e o ve rturne d c o nvic tio n

 L

a y no lo ng e r a b le to a ppe a l

slide-17
SLIDE 17

1/10/2019 17

T he F a ll o f Arthur Ande rse n

 L

a c k o f a nswe rs fro m E nro n le a ds to Arthur Ande rse n disma y

 Why ha d a udits fa ile d to re sult in mo re re lia b le fina nc ia l sta te me nts?

 Unq ua lifie d o pinio ns issue d

 Ho w c o uld this ha ppe n o n fa ulty fina nc ia l sta te me nts?

 Ande rse n kne w a b o ut Wa tkins c o mpla int

 Be g a n to re vie w pre vio us de c isio ns ma de b y E

nro n

T he F a ll o f Arthur Ande rse n

 Awa re o f E

nro n’ s ra pidly de te rio ra ting fina nc ia l c o nditio n

 Hig hly invo lve d in re struc turing c e rta in SPE

s to q ua lify a s unc o nso lida te d e ntitie s

 Ma de a n e rro r o n SPE

tra nsa c tio n

 Pro mptly no tifie d E

nro n to c o rre c t it

 20% o f $600 millio n re sta te me nt wa s due to this ite m

 One -ha lf o f SPE

minimum 3% e xte rna l e q uity c o ntrib ute d b y E nro n

 Do e s no t q ua lify fo r SPE

tre a tme nt

 80% o f $600 millio n re sta te me nt wa s due to this ite m

slide-18
SLIDE 18

1/10/2019 18

T he F a ll o f Arthur Ande rse n

 Jo se ph Be ra rdino , CE

O, rig ht b e fo re firm swa mpe d b y c ritic ism

 I

mplie d E nro n’ s la c k o f ho ne sty o n SPE e xe mpte d Ande rse n o f re spo nsib ility fo r a c c o unting a nd fina nc ia l re po rting e rro rs

 Only minima lly invo lve d in tra nsa c tio ns

 Re sulte d in $1.2 b illio n re duc tio n o f o wne r’ s e q uity

 2001 fina nc ia l sta te me nts ha d no t b e e n a udite d ye t

 Do no t a udit q ua rte rly fina nc ia l sta te me nts—no t re q uire d

T he F a ll o f Arthur Ande rse n

 F

irst so urc e o f Critic ism: Sc o pe o f Se rvic e s

 Offe ring a la rg e pro duc t line o f se rvic e s to a udit c lie nt

 E

a rne d $52 millio n in fe e s fro m E nro n

 Only $25 millio n re sulting in a udit fe e s

 Je o pa rdize s inde pe nde nc e

 Re c e iving $1 millio n/ we e k—o b je c tivity disa ppe a rs

slide-19
SLIDE 19

1/10/2019 19

T he F a ll o f Arthur Ande rse n

 Se c o nd so urc e o f c ritic ism: SPE

  • re la te d tra nsa c tio ns

 Hig hly invo lve d in a g g re ssive a c c o unting a nd fina nc ia l re po rting

 T

hird so urc e o f c ritic ism: Shre dding o f E nro n a udit do c ume nts

 Ho usto n o ffic e de stro ye d a sig nific a nt a mo unt  Ob struc tio n o f Justic e —inc rimina ting e vide nc e o f ro le

 Critic ism b y E

nro n to p ma na g e me nt

 Disc ha rg e d Ande rse n a s inde pe nde nt a udit firm  Justifie d de c isio n b y re fe rring to de struc tio n o f do c ume nts

T he F a ll o f Arthur Ande rse n

 Be ra rdino insiste d po o r b usine ss de c isio ns we re re sult o f E

nro n’ s do wnfa ll

 Re sig ne d in Ma rc h 2002 a fte r fa iling to ne g o tia te me rg e r with Big F

ive firm.

 Do ze ns o f c lie nts dro ppe d Ande rse n a s inde pe nde nt a udit firm

 Mid-April 2002—la id o ff mo re tha n 25% o f wo rk-fo rc e

 Da vid Dunc a n—E

nro n Audit Pa rtne r, ple a de d g uilty to o b struc tio n

  • f justic e

 T

e stifie d a g a inst Ande rso n

slide-20
SLIDE 20

1/10/2019 20

T he F a ll o f Arthur Ande rse n

 June 2002, F

e de ra l Jury fo und firm g uilty o f o b struc tio n o f justic e

 F

  • rc e d to te rmina te re la tio nship with c lie nts

 T

hre e ye a rs la te r, Supre me Co urt o ve rturne d de c isio n—little to o la te

 T

a inte d a nd e mb a rra sse d e ve ry a c c o unta nt

 Pub lic o utc ry to stre ng the n inde pe nde nt a udit func tio n  I

mpro ve a c c o unting a nd fina nc ia l re po rting pra c tic e s

Stric te r Ac c o unting Re g ula tio ns

 F

ASB impo se d stric te r a c c o unting a nd fina nc ia l re po rting g uide line s

  • n SPE

s

 Re q uire mo st c o mpa nie s to inc lude fina nc ia l da ta in the ir c o nso lida te d

fina nc ia l sta te me nts

 Sa rb a ne s-Oxle y Ac t o f 2002

 Stre ng the n fina nc ia l re po rting fo r pub lic c o mpa nie s  I

mpro ving rig o r a nd q ua lity o f inde pe nde nt a udits

 L

imits type s o f c o nsulting se rvic e s a udito rs c a n pro vide to c lie nts

 Pub lic Co mpa ny Ac c o unting Ove rsig ht Bo a rd (PCAOB)

 Ove rse e inde pe nde nt a udit func tio n fo r SE

C re g istra nts

slide-21
SLIDE 21

1/10/2019 21

Que stio n 1

 T

he par ties most r esponsible for E nr

  • n’s c r

isis

 T

he Bo a rd o f Dire c to rs in E nro n

 K

e nne th L a y, Andre w F a sto w a nd Je ffre y Skilling

 Use d a g g re ssive g ro wth stra te g y  F

  • c use d o n e nha nc ing E

nro n’ s o pe ra ting re sult

 I

g no re d the wa rning fro m She rro n Wa tkins

 T

he c o nflic ts b e twe e n e xe c utive s g o a ls a nd sto c kho lde rs inte re sts

Que stio n 1 Co nt.

 I

nte rna l Audit Co mmitte e in E nro n

 Use d SPE

s to ma inta in the ir pa pe r wo rk he a lthy  E

xte rna l Audito r, Arthur Ande rso n & Co .

 Que stio ne d a b o ut the inde pe nde nc e o f the e xte rna l a udito r  Sho uld’ ve no tic e d the suspic io us in the E

nro n’ s fina nc ia l re po rt

 I

g no re d E nro n’ s missta te me nt in o rde r to ke e p the c lie nts

slide-22
SLIDE 22

1/10/2019 22

Que stio n 2

 T

hr ee types of c onsulting ser vic es that audit fir ms ar e now pr

  • hibited

fr

  • m pr
  • viding to c lients that ar

e public c ompanies

 De sig n o f Ac c o unting Syste m  Re vie w the F

ina nc ia l Sta te me nt

 Pro vide T

a x Co nsulting Se rvic e s

Que stio n 3

 Do you believe that Ander

sen’s involvement in those dec isions violated any pr

  • fessional auditing standar

ds?

 I

nde pe nde nc e

 I

nte rna l Co ntro l E va lua tio n

 Supe rvisio n  Re po rting

slide-23
SLIDE 23

1/10/2019 23

Que stio n 4

Whic h par ty “owns” audit wor k paper s: the c lient or the audit fir m?

 Audit F

irm

 Audit Wo rk pa pe r

 Re c o rd o f the a udit pro c e dure s  E

vide nc e o f the a udit pro c e dure s

 Summa ry o f the a udit re se a rc h

 K

e y Re q uire me nts

 Must a c c o rda nc e with GAAP  Must disc lo sure if the info rma tio n a re no t e no ug h  Must issue a n o pinio n o r no te d in the re po rt whe n a udito rs c a n no t sta te a n

  • pinio n

Que stio n 5

F ive r ec ommendations made to str engthen the independent audit func tion following the E nr

  • n sc andal.

 E

sta b lishe d the inde pe nde nc e b y the a udit firm

 L

imite d the a udit firm fro m pro viding o the r no n-a udit se rvic e s

 Re q uire the c o mpa ny to c ha ng e the ir inde pe nde nt a udit firm

pe rio dic a lly

 Re q uire the inde pe nde nt a udito rs wo rking mo re c lo se ly with the c lie nt’ s

a udit c o mmitte e

 Pro hib it c lie nt’ s e xe c utive s fro m inte rfe ring with the inde pe nde nt

a udito r’ s wo rk

slide-24
SLIDE 24

1/10/2019 24

Que stio n 6

 Has ther

e been a shift of “pr

  • fessionalism” in public ac c ounting? If

so, explain how it has evolved over time.

 Culture Shift

 No n-disc lo sure o f ma te ria l missta te me nts—a fte r SOX no w re q uire d

 Cha ng e s in Re g ula tio n

 Big g e st re a so n fo r ma nda te d pro fe ssio na lism  I

nde pe nde nc e with no n-c o nsulting se rvic e s ke e ps firms c o rdia l with c lie nts

Que stio n 7

 What r

esponsibilities, if any, do audit fir ms have with r egar d to the quar ter ly financ ial statements of their c lients? In your

  • pinion, should

quar ter ly financ ial statements be audited?

 No true re spo nsib ility unle ss c lie nt re q ue sts it  I

n a n ide a l wo rld q ua rte rly fina nc ia l sta te me nts wo uld b e a udite d

 Re a listic a lly—this is no t fe a sib le

 Re vie ws o f q ua rte rly fina nc ia l sta te me nts mo re like ly

 E

nsure fo llo wing a ppro pria te a c c o unting pro c e dure s

slide-25
SLIDE 25

1/10/2019 25

T he Ba nkruptc y He a rd Aro und the Wo rld - L uc c i

 No lo ng e r se lf re g ula te d

 PCAOB a nd Audit Co mmitte e s

 CE

O c o nfirma tio n o f F ina nc ia l Sta te me nts

 6 c e rtific a tio n q ue stio ns

 I

nc re a se d po we r o f the SE C

Po st E nro n Cha lle ng e s fo r the Auditing Pro fe ssio n - Co pe la nd

 3 ma in c ha lle ng e s

 Do ing wha t a udito rs do b e tte r  Ma na g ing litig a tio n c o sts  Attra c ting a nd re ta ining the b e st ta le nt

 I

nve sto rs sho uld b e ske ptic a l

slide-26
SLIDE 26

1/10/2019 26

Co nc lusio n

 E

nro n a g g re ssive ma na g e me nt stra te g ie s le a d to the ir do wnfa ll

 Use o f SPE

s a nd q ue stio na b le a c c o unting me tho ds

 Arthur Ande rse n’ s la c k o f inte g rity a nd pro fe ssio na lism le a d to the ir

disb a ndme nt

 Sa rb a ne s-Oxle y wa s pa sse d in re spo nse to the issue s a t E

nro n a nd Arthur Ande rse n

 Impo rta nc e o f inte rna l c o ntro l is no w se e n a s sig nific a nt fo r o pe ra tio ns  Co nsulting se rvic e s limite d

 PCAOB wa s c re a te d to he lp e nfo rc e ne w re g ula tio ns

Que stio ns?

slide-27
SLIDE 27

1/10/2019 27

Re fe re nc e s

 E

nro n—T he Ba nkruptc y He a rd Aro und the Wo rld a nd the I nte rna tio na l Ric o c he t o f Sa rb a ne s-Oxle y

 Jo hn Pa ul L

uc c i

 Po st E

nro n Cha lle ng e s fo r the Auditing Pro fe ssio n

 Jim Co pe la nd