Drivers behaviour, motivation and acceptance for in-vehicle - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

drivers behaviour motivation and acceptance for in
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Drivers behaviour, motivation and acceptance for in-vehicle - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Drivers behaviour, motivation and acceptance for in-vehicle eco-assistant system design y g INDEX 1) I t 1) Introduction d ti 2) Driver Behaviour and Motivation Study Motivation and Background Method Results R lt 3)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Drivers’ behaviour, motivation and acceptance for in-vehicle eco-assistant system design y g

slide-2
SLIDE 2

1) I t d ti

INDEX

1) Introduction 2) Driver Behaviour and Motivation Study

– Motivation and Background – Method R lt – Results

3) ecoHMI Preliminary Study

– Motivation and Background – Method R lt – Results

4) Discussion

2

Guillem Bernatallada Ferrer RACC Foundation

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Wh t i C M ?

1 Introduction

  • What is eCoMove?

– eCoMove it’s a Project within the Seventh Framework Programme that is creating an integrated solution for Programme that is creating an integrated solution for road transport energy efficiency by developing systems and tools to help drivers sustainably eliminate unnecessary fuel consumption (and thus CO2 emissions), and to help road operators manage traffic in the most energy-efficient way traffic in the most energy efficient way.

  • RACC contribution:

– RACC provides the end users’ view on the system RACC provides the end users view on the system requirements by performing surveys and thoroughly analysing its results.

3

Guillem Bernatallada Ferrer RACC Foundation

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2 Driver Behaviour and Motivation Study

  • Motivation and Background:

– Goal of the study: to evaluate the acceptance of eCoMove driver assistant systems on a European level. Th bl f t – Three comparable features:

  • Positive environmental impact by saving fuel
  • System usefulness
  • System usefulness
  • Willingness to pay

4

Guillem Bernatallada Ferrer RACC Foundation

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2 Driver Behaviour and Motivation Study

  • Method:

– Online survey (conducted by RACC and DLR) in cooperation with 15 European motoring associations (members of EuroTest) with 15 European motoring associations (members of EuroTest). – The survey presented potential eCoMove applications using illustrations. – Each application (scenario) was rated according to several perceptual items between (1) – strongly agree – and (5) – strongly disagree: strongly disagree:

  • Acceptance of use
  • Usefulness
  • Environmental impact
  • Willingness to pay

5

Guillem Bernatallada Ferrer RACC Foundation

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2 Driver Behaviour and Motivation Study

  • Scenarios:

6

Guillem Bernatallada Ferrer RACC Foundation

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2 Driver Behaviour and Motivation Study

  • Average respondent:

Average respondent Above average (+) Below Average (-) (Median/Share) 35 – 49 years old France, Austria (50-65 years) Croatia (25-34 years) Male (79,6%) Norway (91,3%), France (88,3%) Spain (52,2%) 12.001-20.000 km yearly driving performance Slovenia (>30.000km) Spain (9.001-12.000km) driving performance 21-40 years driving experience

  • Croatia, Portugal,

Slovenia, Spain (11-20 years) years)

7

Guillem Bernatallada Ferrer RACC Foundation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2 Driver Behaviour and Motivation Study

  • eCoMove applications:

3 3,5 4 2 2,5 Scenario 1 S i 2 0 5 1 1,5 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 0,5

It helps to reduce fuel consumption It uses too much personal information It would be useful It would be worth to pay for it

8

Guillem Bernatallada Ferrer RACC Foundation

consumption information it

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2 Driver Behaviour and Motivation Study

  • Regional differences:

N th W t S th E t Factor Northern Europe Western Europe Germany Alp Region Southern Europe Eastern Europe

Usefulness

(+) (+)(+) (-) (-) (-) (+) (+)

(11 items)

(+) (+)(+) (-) (-) (-) (+) (+)

System

  • peration

(9)

(+) (+) (+) (+) (+) (+)(+)

(9) Environm. Impact (8)

(+)(+) (+)(+) (+) (+) (+) (+) (+)

Worthiness to pay (3)

(+)(+) (-) (+) (+) (+) (+)

* Extracted from Arne Höltl (DLR) presentation in NECTAR 2011 Conference 9

Guillem Bernatallada Ferrer RACC Foundation

Extracted from Arne Höltl (DLR) presentation in NECTAR 2011 Conference

slide-10
SLIDE 10

3 ecoHMI Preliminary Study

  • Motivation and Background:

– Goals of the study:

  • To identify the needs and expectations of end users as

regards the ecoHMI

  • To assess the acceptability of early designs
  • To assess the acceptability of early designs

– Focus:

  • Preferred notification channels

Preferred notification channels

  • Acceptability of use of eCoMove applications

10

Guillem Bernatallada Ferrer RACC Foundation

slide-11
SLIDE 11

3 ecoHMI Preliminary Study

  • Method:

– Face to face interviews (Spain and Germany) – Scheme:

  • Demographic characteristics
  • Preferences as regards sensory channels and notification

locations

  • Acceptance of use

Acceptance of use

11

Guillem Bernatallada Ferrer RACC Foundation

slide-12
SLIDE 12

3 ecoHMI Preliminary Study

  • Results: Preferred Sensory Channel

12

Guillem Bernatallada Ferrer RACC Foundation

slide-13
SLIDE 13

3 ecoHMI Preliminary Study

  • Results: Notification

– Two out of three users consider acceptable to use more than

  • ne modality simultaneously
  • ne modality simultaneously.

– Unique modality:

  • Preferred by users with a relative interest in the system

y y

  • Recommendations with certain continuity (e.g. speed

recommendation on a highway)

– Multiple modalities: – Multiple modalities:

  • Preferred by users with high level of awareness
  • Recommendations that requires immediacy (e.g. green wave)

– Vibration modality could require more information / another accompanying modality.

13

Guillem Bernatallada Ferrer RACC Foundation

slide-14
SLIDE 14

3 ecoHMI Preliminary Study

R lt

  • Results: Acceptance of use (parameter entry

requirement)

leisure N = 60 shopping vacationing

  • 2
  • 1

1 2

commuting

Mean on a scale from -2 (never) to 2 (always)

14

Guillem Bernatallada Ferrer RACC Foundation

slide-15
SLIDE 15

3 ecoHMI Preliminary Study

R lt

  • Results: route choice

Starting time Arrival time Consumption Route 1 9:15 10:00 100% Route 1 9:15 10:00 100% Route 2 9:35 10:10 90% Route 3 9:15 10:15 80%

50

When sitting in the car

50

When sitting at home

wers

20 30 40 20 30 40

r of answ

10 20 Rank 1 Rank 2 Rank 3 10 20 Rank 1 Rank 2 Rank 3

numbe

15

Guillem Bernatallada Ferrer RACC Foundation Rank 1 Rank 2 Rank 3 Rank 1 Rank 2 Rank 3

slide-16
SLIDE 16

4 Discussion

Hi h t f C M li ti ith

  • High

acceptance

  • f

eCoMove applications with reservations due to the time factor, mainly for daily commutes commutes.

  • Regional differences on willingness to pay.
  • The visual modality is the best rated for eco-information
  • The visual modality is the best rated for eco-information,

preferably located in the instrument cluster.

  • Major interest in post-trip detailed reports of driving

Major interest in post trip detailed reports of driving performance (quantitative data) and preferably available

  • utside the car (e.g. via PC or Smartphone).

16

Guillem Bernatallada Ferrer RACC Foundation

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Thank you for your attention

Guillem Bernatallada Ferrer guillem.bernatallada@racc.es Phone: +34 93 495 50 00