drawn fr from neuroscie ience, , psychology, and economics: Im - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

drawn fr from neuroscie ience
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

drawn fr from neuroscie ience, , psychology, and economics: Im - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Towards a m model of f trust drawn fr from neuroscie ience, , psychology, and economics: Im Impli licatio ions for th the New and Next xt Gen eneratio ion Computin ing Envir ironments Frank Krueger, Ph.D. Associate Professor of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Frank Krueger, Ph.D.

Associate Professor of Systems Social Neuroscience

School of Systems Biology George Mason University, VA, USA

Chief, Social Cognition and Interaction: Functional Imaging (SCI:FI) Lab Director, Transdisciplinary Research Union for the Study of Trust (T-R-U-S-T)

CROSSING Conference 2019 Darmstadt 9|10|19

Towards a m model of f trust drawn fr from neuroscie ience, , psychology, and economics:

Im Impli licatio ions for th the New and Next xt Gen eneratio ion Computin ing Envir ironments

slide-2
SLIDE 2

How much money would you lend this person?

$0 $2 $6 $8 $10

To Trust or Not to Trust: That is the Question

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Why Should We Care About Trust ?

http://www.cristanchohr.com/page/2/ http://www.handicappeddoctor.com/?p=744 http://bahaiteachings.org/free-society-depends-trust-trustworthiness https://medium.com/nhct-nanohealth-care-token/decentralized- vs-centralized-systems-cb31b95928c5

Blockchain Trust Architecture

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Parable: The Blind Men and the Elephant

https://equilibregaia.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/conte-sufc3ad0001-copiaeng.jpg?w=1075

Seppanen et al. (2007) ~70 definitions

slide-5
SLIDE 5

NeuroPsychoEconomic Approach

Definition Framework Model

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Definition & Paradigm

https://www.theodysseyonline.com/trust-underestimated-fear

Interpersonal trust encompasses

  • ne‘s

willingness to accept vulnerability based on the expectation regarding the behavior of another party that will produce some positive outcome in the future.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Working Definition of Trust

Social Dilemma

(uncertainty)

Trustor Trustee Reciprocity Trust

Motivation Behavior Cognition Affect

Trust in reciprocity entails a psychological state in which a trustor is willing to be vulnerable to the risk of treachery (affect) based on the expectation (cognition) regarding the action of a trustee that will produce some anticipated reward (motivation) due to reciprocation in the future.

T-R-U-S-T

Treachery Trustworthiness

slide-8
SLIDE 8

=

NeuroPsychoEconomic Framework

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Behavior: Trust Game

$

Bounded Rationality

Computer vs. Risk Stages:

(ii) Reciprocity (iii) Feedback (i) Trust

A A B(A)

Types:

  • ne-shot

multi-shot

Trust Propensity Trust Dynamics

A B(A) A B(A)

?

Social Dilemma

(uncertainty)

Trust Reciprocity

Trustor Trustee

Berg et al., 1995

B(A) A 3*A

Game Theory:

slide-10
SLIDE 10

=

NeuroPsychoEconomic Framework

slide-11
SLIDE 11

extrinsic economic

<– S

Economic Strategy Resolution

Resolution

Bounded Rationality

Psyche: T-R-U-S-T Components

Evolution

IBT IBT, identification-based trust KBT KBT, knowledge-based trust

T-R-U-S-T Model

Krueger & Meyer-Lindenberg (TINS, 2019)

Social social intrinsic Resolution

– T

Trust-

worthiness

– R

Reward

Uncertainty

–> U

Social Dilemma

Formation

T

Treachery CBT CBT, calculus-based trust

Lewicki & Bunker (1995)

Trustor Trustee Reciprocity Trust

Motivation Behavior Cognition Affect

Social Dilemma

(uncertainty)

Bounded Rationality

slide-12
SLIDE 12

=

NeuroPsychoEconomic Framework

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Functional Neuroimaging

Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) Signal

 neural activity ➔  blood flow ➔  de-/ oxygenated Hgb ➔  T2* ➔  MR signal

glucose

  • xygen

T1,T2

$

2) Lesion Evidence 1) Control Condition

slide-14
SLIDE 14

(10,15) (5,5) (0,25)

Game 6s

Wait Trust

Jitter 2-6s

Wait Wait Reciprocity Wait

6s

(10,15) (5,5) (0,25)

Outcome 4s

Feedback Feedback

(10,15) (5,5) (0,25) (10,15) (5,5) (0,25)

Introduction 2s

Time (s)

DM1

M1 M2 M1 M2 Computer II Computer I

Krueger et al., 2007

+ + + +

Task-Based Functional MRI

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Inside the Scanners Scanner II Scanner I

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Brain: Large-Scale Networks

Amygdala dACC dmPFC AI TPJ dlPFC vmPFC VTA vSTR SN vlPFC dSTR

Reward Network Salience Network Default-Mode Network Central-Executive Network

nigrostriatal pathway mesocortical pathway mesolimbic pathway

Large-Sale Networks

CBT, calculus-based trust; KBT, knowledge-based trust; IBT, identification-based trust; VTA, vental tegmentum area; SN; substantia nigra; dSTR, dorsal striatum; vSTR, ventral striatum; vmPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex; AI, anterior insula; dACC, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; TPJ, temporoparietal junction; dmPFC; dorsomedial PFC; dlPFC, dorsolateral PFC; vlPFC, ventrolateral PFC

Domain-General

T – R – U – S – T

Trustor Trustee Reciprocity Trust

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Social Dilemma: Formation

T – R – U – S – T

Resolution Formation

CBT, calculus-based trust; KBT, knowledge-based trust; IBT, identification-based trust; VTA, vental tegmentum area; SN; substantia nigra; dSTR, dorsal striatum; vSTR, ventral striatum; vmPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex; AI, anterior insula; dACC, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; TPJ, temporoarietal junction; dmPFC; dorsomedial PFC; dlPFC, dorsolateral PFC; vlPFC, ventrolateral PFC

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Reward Network = Reward

Anticipation of Reward

➢ Subjective Reward Value (Utility) ▪ Ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) ➢ Reinforcement Learning ▪ Striatum (STR)

CBT, calculus-based trust; KBT, knowledge-based trust; IBT, identification-based trust; VTA, vental tegmentum area; SN; substantia nigra; dSTR, dorsal striatum; vSTR, ventral striatum; vmPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex; AI, anterior insula; dACC, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; TPJ, temporoarietal junction; dmPFC; dorsomedial PFC; dlPFC, dorsolateral PFC; vlPFC, ventrolateral PFC

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Salience Network = Treachery

Risk of Treachery

➢ Threat of Treachery (Emotional Response) ▪ Amygdala ➢ Treachery Aversion (Subjective Feeling) ▪ Anterior Insula (AI) ➢ Treachery vs. Reward (Monitoring) ▪ Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex (dACC)

CBT, calculus-based trust; KBT, knowledge-based trust; IBT, identification-based trust; VTA, vental tegmentum area; SN; substantia nigra; dSTR, dorsal striatum; vSTR, ventral striatum; vmPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex; AI, anterior insula; dACC, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; TPJ, temporoarietal junction; dmPFC; dorsomedial PFC; dlPFC, dorsolateral PFC; vlPFC, ventrolateral PFC

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Social Dilemma: Resolution

Uddin (2014)

T – R – U – S – T

Resolution Formation

Dynamic Switching

Internally directed action Externally directed action

VTA, vental tegmentum area; SN; substantia nigra; dSTR, dorsal striatum; vSTR, ventral striatum; vmPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex; AI, anterior insula; dACC, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; TPJ, temporoarietal junction; dmPFC; dorsomedial PFC; dlPFC, dorsolateral PFC; vlPFC, ventrolateral PFC

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Default-Mode Network = Trustworthiness

Evaluation of Trustworthiness

➢ Inferring and Attributing of Traits ▪ Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) ➢ Inferring and Attributing of Intentions ▪ Temporoparietal junction (TPJ)

!

CBT, calculus-based trust; KBT, knowledge-based trust; IBT, identification-based trust; VTA, vental tegmentum area; SN; substantia nigra; dSTR, dorsal striatum; vSTR, ventral striatum; vmPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex; AI, anterior insula; dACC, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; TPJ, temporoarietal junction; dmPFC; dorsomedial PFC; dlPFC, dorsolateral PFC; vlPFC, ventrolateral PFC

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Central-Executive Network = Strategy

Context-Based Adaption of Strategy

➢ Accounting Conflicting Evidence ▪ Dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC) ➢ Disaccounting Conflicting Evidence ▪ Ventrolateral PFC (vlPFC)

!

CBT, calculus-based trust; KBT, knowledge-based trust; IBT, identification-based trust; VTA, vental tegmentum area; SN; substantia nigra; dSTR, dorsal striatum; vSTR, ventral striatum; vmPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex; AI, anterior insula; dACC, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; TPJ, temporoarietal junction; dmPFC; dorsomedial PFC; dlPFC, dorsolateral PFC; vlPFC, ventrolateral PFC

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Types of Trust

KBT, knowledge-based trust [The known unknowns] IBT, identification-based trust [The known knowns]

vSTR

z = -6

Trust (mulit-shot) > Trust (one-shot)

Bellucci et al., 2016

ALE: 30 papers, 10,000 permutations, cluster forming threshold of P < 0.001, k>90

Trust (one-shot) > Trust (multi-shot)

AI

4

y = 18

R

CBT, calculus-based trust [The unknown unknowns]

Rumsfeld (2012)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

=

NeuroPsychoEconomic Framework

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Neuropeptide: Oxytocin

The Birth Hormone The Love Hormone The Bonding Hormone The Cuddle Hormone

Hormone & Neurotransmitter

Lee et al., 2009

Oxytocin (quick birth)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), nucleus accumbens (NA), bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST)

Meyer-Lindenberg et al., 2011

extracellular space peripheral circulation

Neuropeptide: Oxytocin

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Interactionist Model

▪ Task difficulty ▪ Stimuli valence ▪ Group status ▪ Attachment style ▪ Mental Disorder ▪ OXTR Gene

Bartz et al., 2011

Neuropeptide: Oxytocin

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Neuropeptide: Oxytocin

Baumgartner et al., 2008 Kosfeld et al., 2005

$

Placebo Oxytocin

slide-30
SLIDE 30

=

NeuroPsychoEconomic Framework

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Birbaumer & Schmitt 2010 p-Arm q-Arm

DNA = Deoxyribonucleic acid

Codon: 3 nucleotides (word) = 64 possibilities Gen: Part of DNA molecule (many codons) DNA: ~1.100 genes, chain of nucleotides Chromosomes: Protein + DNA (1.100 genes) Nucleus: 23 chromosome pairs (30.000 genes) 4 types: A, G, C, and TI

Gene

Sugar phosphate backbone

Adenin Thymin

DNA Double Helix

Cytocin Guanine

base pairs

twin studies (10-20 %) mutation polymorphism

Cesarinie et al., 2008

slide-32
SLIDE 32

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 GG AG/AA Trust Game Average Transfer (MU) Relative Frequency (%)

P < 0.0001

Krueger et al., 2012

Oxytocin-Receptor Gene

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 GG AG/AA Relative Frequency (%) Average Transfer (MU) Risk Game

Translation initiation site

Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) Coding Region Untranslated region Exon 1 2 3 4 Intron 1 2 3

Chr3 (p.25.3)

Trust Reciprocity

Trustor Trustee

G to A substitution A allele carrier (AA and AG) vs. G allele carrier (GG = homozygous)

Robustness of OT Research (Nave et al., 2015)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Summary: T-R-U-S-T Model

=

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Summary: T-R-U-S-T

Trustor Trustee Reciprocity Trust

Motivation Behavior Cognition Affect

KBT CBT IBT

Evolution

Amygdala dACC dmPFC AI TPJ dlPFC vmPFC VTA vSTR SN vlPFC dSTR

Salience Network Default-Mode Network Central-Executive Network

nigrostriatal pathway mesocortical pathway mesolimbic pathway CBT, calculus-based trust; KBT, knowledge-based trust; IBT, identification-based trust; VTA, vental tegmentum area; SN; substantia nigra; dSTR, dorsal striatum; vSTR, ventral striatum; vmPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex; AI, anterior insula; dACC, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; TPJ, temporoparietal junction; dmPFC; dorsomedial PFC; dlPFC, dorsolateral PFC; vlPFC, ventrolateral PFC

Reward Network

<– S – T

Social social intrinsic Economic

Trust- worthiness

extrinsic economic Resolution Resolution

Strategy

Resolution

T-R-U-S-T Model

Bounded Rationality

Uncertainty

Reward

Social Dilemma

Treachery

U T – R –>

Formation

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Outlook: What‘s next?

Paradigm 1 Mechanism 2 Application 3

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Toward a Refined Understanding of the Study of Trust (T-R-U-S-T)

Framework T-R-U-S-T Model

T-R-U-S-T3 Initiative

Transdisciplinary Research Union for the Study of Trust (T-R-U-S-T)

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Trust Architectures

Crypto-Economics

Promoting trust in a network without trusting any individual actor. People must heed the norms

  • f the community.

People cede control over personal data.

Black elments = trusted components

Power of Sanctions to Promote Trusts. Different architectures give rise to a trust trade-off, in which users give up some freedom to gain the benefits of trust.

“Trustless Trust” Centralized trust creates vulnerabilities and is not transitive.

  • K. Werbach, 2018

Intermediary Peer-to-Peer Blockchain

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Blockchain — Too Trusted to Fail?

Auinger & Riedl, 2018

USING/ SELLING MOTIVATION INFORMATION BUYING

Do I trust dhe traditional monetary systems? Digitial currency exchange and all Companies, typically online buiseness today, that accept Bitcoin as currency General government, central banks, financial institutions Digitial currency exchange which may be either brick-and-mortar business, and/or pure online businesses, etc. Bitcoin communitiy and miners, genéral government, central banks, financial institutions, Bitcoin startups, expersts, etc. Do I trust the trading platforms and others distribution channels? Do I trust the people and institutions that provide information on Bitcoin?

Do I trust the algorithms and consensus mechanisms? Potential Bitcoin User Do I trust the legislative system and justice? Political system and judicature

Do I trust the companies accepting Bitcoins for purchases and the trading platforms?

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Trust Architectures

Crypto-Economics

Promoting trust in a network without trusting any individual actor. People must heed the norms

  • f the community.

People cede control over personal data.

Black elments = trusted components

Power of Sanctions to Promote Trusts. Different architectures give rise to a trust trade-off, in which users give up some freedom to gain the benefits of trust.

“Trustless Trust” Centralized trust creates vulnerabilities and is not transitive.

Werbach, 2018

Intermediary Peer-to-Peer Blockchain

=> Crypto-Psycho-Economics

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Frank Krueger, Ph.D.

Social Cognition and Interaction: Functional Imaging (SCI:FI) Lab

www.scifi-lab.com

FKrueger@gmu.de

CROSSING Conference 2019 Darmstadt 9|10|19

Towards a m model of f trust drawn fr from neuroscie ience, , psychology, and economics:

Im Impli licatio ions for th the New and Next xt Gen eneratio ion Computin ing Envir ironments