DRAFT International People Placement (IPP) Process
(For Discussion Only)
January 19, 2017 Presented by: Linda Dionne & Magdalene Lee
Page 1
DRAFT International People Placement (IPP) Process (For Discussion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
DRAFT International People Placement (IPP) Process (For Discussion Only) January 19, 2017 Presented by: Linda Dionne & Magdalene Lee Page 1 IPP Process CONTEXT: Many international projects or programs may need to hire local people or
January 19, 2017 Presented by: Linda Dionne & Magdalene Lee
Page 1
– Mitigate risk (employment, tax, safety, etc.) and promote legal compliance
Page 2
Page 3
Tasks Resources/Experts
Linda Dionne, Magdalene Lee
Long Tran, Drew Wheadon
Steve Filipiak, Marianna Melnyk
Shawna Vogel
Page 4
Tasks Resources / Experts
Other planning and implementation tasks, including:
Maria Barrios, Kristen Panagopoulos
governance (local vs. MIT) Core team
Allison Romantz
Janet Johnston
Pam Greenley
Todd Holmes
Sandy Mitchell
Oliver Thomas
TBD – outsource
TBD – outsource
Page 5
(OMA, HR, VPF, OSP)
http://icc.mit.edu/manage/people/hiring-internationally-and-working-abroad
Page 6
*MIT has recently established a new company, MIT International, Inc. that may be used to facilitate and support human resources needs for MIT's work abroad
Page 7
Page 8
(a) Country risk assessment is based on individual country tax and employment laws, MIT activity level in the country, number of MIT employees working there, frequency of travel, etc. (b) Options for PEO or local collaborators
(a) # of employees (b) Cost of PEO vs. cost of setting up local entity (c) Possibly IP, supervisory issues
(c) If a country does not respect the secondment arrangement (e.g. Russia, China), the employees would be hired directly by MIT Intl or a MIT local entity while working abroad (d) Existing MIT employees will be terminated by MIT and hired by the PEO or local collaborators. (e) Existing MIT employees may need to be terminated by MIT and rehired by a MIT local entity. It is also possible for this group of people to stay with MIT and be seconded to a MIT local entity. Generally speaking, the cost of secondment is higher than placing an employee directly in a local entity. A MIT local entity needs to establish its own payroll structure and benefit plans. (f) Existing MIT employees will be terminated by MIT and rehired by MIT Intl. MIT Intl will participate MIT pension and benefits program as a related, adopting employer so that MIT Intl employees could continue their vesting and eligibility service
Length ¡of ¡Stay ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ < ¡30 ¡days? ¡
Resources to Employees
Resources to DLCs
§ How? Interview? Survey? § What are we trying to learn?
Page 9