District NWEA Spring Update Adam Sax Administrator for Integration - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

district nwea spring update
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

District NWEA Spring Update Adam Sax Administrator for Integration - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

District NWEA Spring Update Adam Sax Administrator for Integration of Teaching, Learning and Technology Kristina Guntharp Director for Teaching and Learning D34 Strategic Plan Continuous Student Growth & Achievement T


slide-1
SLIDE 1

District NWEA Spring Update

Adam Sax – Administrator

for Integration of Teaching, Learning and Technology

Kristina Guntharp –

Director for Teaching and Learning
slide-2
SLIDE 2

D34 Strategic Plan

Continuous Student Growth & Achievement

slide-3
SLIDE 3

T erminology

— NWEA – Northwest Educational Measurement

Association company that publishes MAP

— MAP – Measures of Academic Progress test which

is given two to three times a year via a computer. The test is dynamic, As a student responds to questions, the test responds to the student, adjusting up or down in difficulty.

— RIT – Unit of measure for MAP assessment, the

score

— Conditional Growth Index - normative growth

  • metric. It is a standardized measure of observed

student or school growth compared to the 2015 NWEA student or school growth norms.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PART I

slide-5
SLIDE 5

READING

slide-6
SLIDE 6 7.8% 7.9% 8.9% 10.8% 9.7% 10.1% 9.6% 10.6% 10.5% 10.6% 13.1% 12.8% 12.3% 14.6% 12.5% 17.4% 17.2% 16.8% 16.3% 17.1% 14.9% 13.6% 12.4% 12.5% 13.3% 21.7% 24.0% 23.0% 21.5% 21.6% 9.1% 9.9% 11.2% 9.3% 10.3% 5.8% 5.0% 4.9% 4.5% 4.8% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Sp rin g 1 3 -1 4 Sp rin g 1 4 -1 5 Sp rin g 1 5 -1 6 Sp rin g 1 6 -1 7 Sp rin g 1 7 -1 8

NWEA MAP Spring Reading %ile Distribution

>9 5 %il e (Nat'l M erit Sc h
  • lar)
9 0
  • 9 5
%ile (Sta te Hon
  • rs)
7 6
  • 8 9
%ile (AP S u c cess ) 6 6
  • 7 5
%ile (Col leg e Rea d y ) 5 1
  • 6 5
%ile (HS Re ad y ) 3 6
  • 5 0
%ile (AYP /Me ets ) 2 1
  • 3 5
%ile (At-Ri s k) 0 -2 0 %i le (In ten si v e Risk) 52.5% 51.5% 47.8% 50.0% 17.9% 17.5% 19.5% 21.3% 20.3% 51.5%
slide-7
SLIDE 7 Sp rin g 1 3 - 1 4 Sp rin g 1 4 - 1 5 Sp rin g 1 5 - 1 6 Sp rin g 1 6 - 1 7 Sp rin g 1 7 - 1 8 Ki n d ergarten 6 5 % 6 4 % 6 5 % 8 0 % 1 st Grad e 7 1 % 7 1 % 7 0 % 5 0 % 5 5 % 2 n d G ra d e 6 2 % 6 9 % 6 5 % 6 3 % 5 9 % 3 rd Grad e 5 1 % 5 9 % 5 0 % 4 9 % 5 7 % 4 th Grad e 5 7 % 5 5 % 5 4 % 5 7 % 5 0 % 5 th Grad e 5 7 % 5 7 % 6 0 % 6 1 % 5 8 % 6 th Grad e 6 0 % 5 3 % 5 1 % 5 8 % 6 1 % 7 th Grad e 6 3 % 5 4 % 6 2 % 4 9 % 5 2 % 8 th Grad e 6 0 % 6 2 % 5 0 % 5 6 % 5 5 % Di strict 6 0 . 6 % 6 0 . % 5 7 . 3 % 5 6 . 3 % 5 8 . 5 % 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 %

NWEA MAP Spring Reading Percent of Students Meeting Growth T argets

slide-8
SLIDE 8 Spri ng 1 3- 1 4 Spri ng 1 4- 1 5 Spri ng 1 5- 1 6 Spri ng 1 6- 1 7 Spri ng 1 7- 1 8 K i ndergart en 71% 58% 62% 64% 71% 1st G rade 61% 56% 68% 67% 61% 2nd G rade 58% 59% 65% 63% 58% 3rd G r ad e 60% 58% 60% 61% 60% 4t h G rade 59% 61% 62% 62% 59% 5t h G rade 60% 62% 65% 61% 60% 6t h G rade 62% 59% 57% 59% 62% 7t h G rade 58% 58% 62% 61% 58% 8t h G rade 61% 64% 60% 66% 61% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 %

NWEA MAP Spring Reading Average RIT Percentile

slide-9
SLIDE 9 Spri ng 1 3- 1 4 Spri ng 1 4- 1 5 Spri ng 1 5- 1 6 Spri ng 1 6- 1 7 Spri ng 1 7- 1 8 K i ndergart en 59% 60% 59% 72% 1st G rade 63% 63% 63% 49% 52% 2nd G rade 57% 61% 59% 54% 57% 3rd G r ad e 48% 54% 48% 47% 53% 4t h G rade 54% 52% 52% 54% 49% 5t h G rade 53% 54% 56% 55% 54% 6t h G rade 54% 49% 48% 53% 57% 7t h G rade 58% 51% 57% 48% 51% 8t h G rade 56% 57% 51% 56% 54% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 %

NWEA MAP Spring Reading Conditional Growth Index Percentile by Grade Level

slide-10
SLIDE 10 Spri ng 1 3- 1 4 Spri ng 1 4- 1 5 Spri ng 1 5- 1 6 Spri ng 1 6- 1 7 Spri ng 1 7- 1 8 K i ndergart en
  • 54. 5%
  • 54. 6%
  • 54. 0%
  • 58. 2%
  • 62. 6%
1st G rade
  • 46. 7%
  • 59. 7%
  • 52. 5%
  • 34. 9%
  • 43. 7%
2nd G rade
  • 28. 3%
  • 27. 4%
  • 37. 8%
  • 26. 2%
  • 30. 8%
3rd G r ad e
  • 32. 3%
  • 29. 5%
  • 31. 5%
  • 32. 8%
  • 32. 8%
4t h G rade
  • 29. 2%
  • 31. 7%
  • 35. 6%
  • 26. 1%
  • 33. 5%
5t h G rade
  • 32. 9%
  • 28. 1%
  • 29. 0%
  • 34. 0%
  • 30. 8%
6t h G rade
  • 35. 3%
  • 30. 3%
  • 28. 3%
  • 27. 7%
  • 38. 7%
7t h G rade
  • 29. 3%
  • 30. 2%
  • 32. 7%
  • 27. 2%
  • 30. 6%
8t h G rade
  • 32. 7%
  • 37. 2%
  • 25. 2%
  • 31. 8%
  • 34. 1%
D i st ri ct
  • 34. 5%
  • 34. 2%
  • 35. 5%
  • 32. 2%
  • 37. 1%
0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 %

NWEA MAP Spring Reading IEP Average RIT Percentile

slide-11
SLIDE 11 Sp rin g 1 3 - 1 4 Sp rin g 1 4 - 1 5 Sp rin g 1 5 - 1 6 Sp rin g 1 6 - 1 7 Sp rin g 1 7 - 1 8 Ki n d ergarten 5 7 . 4 % 5 3 . 6 % 5 9 . 4 % 6 3 . 9 % 1 st Grad e 6 2 . 1 % 6 9 . 8 % 7 5 . 6 % 4 2 . 8 % 5 1 . 5 % 2 n d G ra d e 4 7 . 5 % 4 9 . 3 % 4 4 . 8 % 4 4 . 1 % 4 1 . 8 % 3 rd Grad e 4 2 . 7 % 5 0 . 3 % 4 7 . % 4 1 . 4 % 5 1 . 8 % 4 th Grad e 5 0 . 5 % 4 7 . 7 % 6 0 . 4 % 4 4 . 8 % 5 4 . % 5 th Grad e 5 1 . 4 % 4 1 . % 4 8 . 2 % 4 6 . 8 % 4 4 . 5 % 6 th Grad e 4 8 . 5 % 4 8 . 1 % 4 6 . 2 % 5 5 . 4 % 6 2 . 9 % 7 th Grad e 4 8 . 6 % 4 7 . 4 % 5 2 . 5 % 5 5 . % 6 2 . 1 % 8 th Grad e 4 7 . 1 % 5 5 . 3 % 4 4 . 9 % 5 3 . 9 % 5 2 . 9 % Di strict 5 0 . 3 % 5 0 . 1 % 5 1 . 8 % 4 8 . 7 % 5 3 . 8 % 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 %

NWEA MAP Spring Reading IEP Conditional Growth Index Percentile by Grade Level

slide-12
SLIDE 12 Sp rin g 1 3 -1 4 Sp rin g 1 4 -1 5 Sp rin g 1 5 -1 6 Sp rin g 1 6 -1 7 Sp rin g 1 7 -1 8 Kin d erg arte n 3 5 .0 % 4 7 .1 % 6 1 .1 % 7 7 .4 % 1 st Grad e 5 1 .9 % 7 5 .0 % 8 7 .5 % 3 6 .8 % 5 9 .1 % 2 n d G rad e 3 2 .4 % 4 5 .2 % 4 0 .0 % 5 0 .0 % 3 7 .5 % 3 rd Gr ad e 4 0 .7 % 5 0 .0 % 4 8 .4 % 3 8 .1 % 5 6 .7 % 4 th Gra d e 3 1 .4 % 3 6 .7 % 6 0 .5 % 4 7 .6 % 6 0 .9 % 5 th Gra d e 5 2 .0 % 1 7 .9 % 5 0 .0 % 4 5 .5 % 4 5 .8 % 6 th Gra d e 5 0 .0 % 3 4 .0 % 4 4 .4 % 6 4 .5 % 6 8 .3 % 7 th Gra d e 4 5 .2 % 4 0 .0 % 4 8 .8 % 5 6 .0 % 6 7 .6 % 8 th Gra d e 4 3 .8 % 4 2 .9 % 4 6 .4 % 5 0 .0 % 6 4 .0 % District 4 3 .0 % 4 1 .0 % 5 2 .0 % 4 9 .1 % 5 9 .1 % 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % NWEA MAP Spring Reading IEP Percent of Students Meeting Growth Targets
slide-13
SLIDE 13 92.3% 93.3% 90.5% 90.3% 90.3% 92.4% 91.3% 5 0 % 5 5 % 6 0 % 6 5 % 7 0 % 7 5 % 8 0 % 8 5 % 9 0 % 9 5 % 1 0 0 % 3 rd Gr ad e 4 th Gra d e 5 th Gra d e 6 th Gra d e 7 th Gra d e 8 th Gra d e District

NWEA MAP Spring Reading Gifted Average RIT Percentile by Grade Level (1st Y ear of Data)

slide-14
SLIDE 14 59.8% 62.9% 59.8% 64.6% 57.6% 61.6% 61.2% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % 3 rd Gr ad e 4 th Gra d e 5 th Gra d e 6 th Gra d e 7 th Gra d e 8 th Gra d e District

NWEA MAP Spring Reading Gifted Conditional Growth Index Percentile by Grade Level

slide-15
SLIDE 15 66.7% 72.7% 66.7% 72.2% 50.0% 47.4% 61.8% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % 3 rd Gr ad e 4 th Gra d e 5 th Gra d e 6 th Gra d e 7 th Gra d e 8 th Gra d e District NWEA MAP Spring Reading Gifted Percent of Students Meeting Growth Targets by Grade Level (1st Year of Data)
slide-16
SLIDE 16 37.7% 24.9% 37.9% 24.4% 31.5% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % 1 st Grad e 2 n d G rad e 3 rd Gr ad e 4 th Gra d e District

NWEA MAP Spring Reading - Reading Recovery Average RIT Percentile by Grade Level (1st Y ear of Data)

slide-17
SLIDE 17 62.2% 51.6% 60.9% 35.4% 53.5% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % 1 st Grad e 2 n d G rad e 3 rd Gr ad e 4 th Gra d e District

NWEA MAP Spring Reading - Reading Recovery Conditional Growth Index Percentile by Grade Level (1st Y ear of Data)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

MATH

slide-19
SLIDE 19 11.4% 12.3% 11.0% 11.7% 8.4% 14.7% 13.5% 11.9% 12.8% 11.3% 15.2% 16.0% 14.1% 14.3% 13.3% 16.3% 17.7% 16.8% 15.1% 16.3% 11.9% 12.2% 12.1% 12.7% 11.4% 17.1% 16.4% 19.3% 19.2% 21.6% 8.5% 8.0% 10.3% 8.9% 9.6% 5.0% 3.8% 4.4% 5.3% 8.1% 0 . 0 % 1 0 .0 % 2 0 .0 % 3 0 .0 % 4 0 .0 % 5 0 .0 % 6 0 .0 % 7 0 .0 % 8 0 .0 % 9 0 .0 % 1 0 0 . 0 % Sp rin g 1 3 -1 4 Sp rin g 1 4 -1 5 Sp rin g 1 5 -1 6 Sp rin g 1 6 -1 7 Sp rin g 1 7 -1 8

NWEA MAP Spring Mathematics %ile Distribution

>9 5 %il e (Nat'l M erit Sc h
  • lar)
9 0
  • 9 5
%ile (Sta te Hon
  • rs)
7 6
  • 8 9
%ile (AP S u c cess ) 6 6
  • 7 5
%ile (Col leg e Rea d y ) 5 1
  • 6 5
%ile (HS Re ad y ) 3 6
  • 5 0
%ile (AYP /Me ets ) 2 1
  • 3 5
%ile (At-Ri s k) 0 -2 0 %i le (In ten si v e Risk) 42.5% 40.4% 46.1% 46.1% 50.7% 26.1% 25.8% 22.9% 24.5% 19.7%
slide-20
SLIDE 20 Sp rin g 1 3 -1 4 Sp rin g 1 4 -1 5 Sp rin g 1 5 -1 6 Sp rin g 1 6 -1 7 Sp rin g 1 7 -1 8 Kin d erg arte n 6 9 % 9 0 % 1 st Grad e 7 6 % 8 0 % 8 1 % 6 7 % 6 6 % 2 n d G rad e 4 0 % 5 5 % 6 7 % 6 2 % 6 8 % 3 rd Gr ad e 2 7 % 4 1 % 4 4 % 4 7 % 5 2 % 4 th Gra d e 3 9 % 5 1 % 5 2 % 4 6 % 5 2 % 5 th Gra d e 4 4 % 5 3 % 6 7 % 6 9 % 7 3 % 6 th Gra d e 6 1 % 5 5 % 5 4 % 4 5 % 6 7 % 7 th Gra d e 5 1 % 4 9 % 6 1 % 5 3 % 5 6 % 8 th Gra d e 5 8 % 5 4 % 5 1 % 5 3 % 5 7 % District 4 9 .4 % 5 4 .3 % 5 8 .7 % 5 6 .3 % 6 4 .6 % 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % NWEA MAP Spring Mathematics Percent of Students Meeting Growth T argets
slide-21
SLIDE 21 Spri ng 1 3- 1 4 Spri ng 1 4- 1 5 Spri ng 1 5- 1 6 Spri ng 1 6- 1 7 Spri ng 1 7- 1 8 K i ndergart en 62% 61% 76% 1st G rade 68% 64% 69% 62% 67% 2nd G rade 50% 57% 64% 63% 63% 3rd G r ad e 52% 50% 55% 57% 64% 4t h G rade 51% 54% 53% 56% 60% 5t h G rade 54% 51% 61% 62% 62% 6t h G rade 59% 52% 49% 53% 57% 7t h G rade 58% 58% 59% 52% 56% 8t h G rade 61% 61% 61% 60% 58% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 %

NWEA MAP Spring Mathematics Average RIT Percentile

slide-22
SLIDE 22 Spri ng 1 3- 1 4 Spri ng 1 4- 1 5 Spri ng 1 5- 1 6 Spri ng 1 6- 1 7 Spri ng 1 7- 1 8 K i ndergart en 63% 79% 1st G rade 66% 71% 71% 61% 62% 2nd G rade 42% 52% 60% 59% 62% 3rd G r ad e 32% 41% 44% 44% 50% 4t h G rade 40% 49% 51% 48% 51% 5t h G rade 45% 49% 62% 61% 65% 6t h G rade 55% 51% 51% 45% 58% 7t h G rade 50% 46% 56% 50% 51% 8t h G rade 52% 50% 49% 49% 51% 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1

NWEA MAP Spring Mathematics Conditional Growth Index Percentile by Grade Level

slide-23
SLIDE 23 Sp rin g 1 3 -1 4 Sp rin g 1 4 -1 5 Sp rin g 1 5 -1 6 Sp rin g 1 6 -1 7 Sp rin g 1 7 -1 8 Kin d erg arte n 5 1 .6 % 5 7 .8 % 6 5 .1 % 1 st Grad e 5 9 .3 % 5 5 .3 % 5 6 .3 % 4 0 .9 % 4 7 .5 % 2 n d G rad e 2 9 .6 % 2 9 .2 % 3 9 .6 % 4 6 .9 % 3 8 .4 % 3 rd Gr ad e 3 0 .7 % 2 6 .2 % 3 5 .3 % 3 1 .8 % 4 0 .0 % 4 th Gra d e 2 6 .3 % 2 8 .3 % 2 8 .4 % 2 9 .3 % 3 3 .0 % 5 th Gra d e 3 0 .0 % 2 3 .1 % 3 3 .5 % 3 6 .1 % 3 5 .1 % 6 th Gra d e 3 2 .3 % 2 6 .8 % 2 4 .6 % 2 3 .4 % 3 2 .3 % 7 th Gra d e 2 9 .5 % 3 1 .7 % 3 0 .8 % 1 7 .7 % 2 8 .1 % 8 th Gra d e 2 5 .6 % 3 0 .9 % 2 7 .8 % 2 8 .4 % 2 8 .2 % District 3 1 .8 % 2 9 .7 % 3 5 .0 % 3 3 .9 % 3 8 .2 % 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 %

NWEA MAP Spring Mathematics IEP Average RIT Percentile

slide-24
SLIDE 24 Sp ri n g 1 3 - 1 4 Sp ri n g 1 4 - 1 5 Sp ri n g 1 5 - 1 6 Sp ri n g 1 6 - 1 7 Sp ri n g 1 7 - 1 8 Ki n d e rgarte n 6 1 . 6 % 7 3 . 1 % 1 st Gra d e 7 8 . 9 % 8 9 . 4 % 8 0 . 7 % 5 4 . 0 % 6 1 . 8 % 2 n d Grad e 3 2 . 2 % 3 9 . 9 % 5 7 . 1 % 5 3 . 4 % 4 5 . 0 % 3 r d Grad e 3 4 . 7 % 3 8 . 0 % 4 4 . 8 % 3 8 . 0 % 4 2 . 0 % 4 th Grad e 4 1 . 1 % 4 8 . 1 % 3 9 . 2 % 4 5 . 1 % 4 4 . 4 % 5 th Grad e 4 7 . 1 % 4 1 . 5 % 6 2 . 3 % 5 2 . 2 % 6 0 . 9 % 6 th Grad e 5 0 . 5 % 4 9 . 1 % 4 1 . 7 % 3 7 . 5 % 6 3 . 2 % 7 th Grad e 4 4 . 2 % 4 5 . 5 % 5 2 . 0 % 4 3 . 3 % 4 9 . 4 % 8 th Grad e 4 3 . 4 % 4 7 . 0 % 4 6 . 5 % 4 5 . 9 % 4 6 . 8 % Distri c t 4 5 . 5 % 4 7 . 0 % 5 0 . 6 % 4 7 . 8 % 5 5 . 0 % % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 %

NWEA MAP Spring Mathematics IEP Conditional Growth Index Percentile by Grade Level

slide-25
SLIDE 25 Sp rin g 1 3 -1 4 Sp rin g 1 4 -1 5 Sp rin g 1 5 -1 6 Sp rin g 1 6 -1 7 Sp rin g 1 7 -1 8 Kin d erg arte n 6 6 .7 % 8 0 .7 % 1 st Grad e 7 8 .3 % 9 3 .3 % 8 7 .5 % 5 7 .9 % 7 2 .7 % 2 n d G rad e 1 7 .6 % 2 5 .8 % 6 3 .2 % 4 5 .8 % 4 5 .2 % 3 rd Gr ad e 2 5 .9 % 2 3 .5 % 4 8 .4 % 3 8 .1 % 4 0 .0 % 4 th Gra d e 3 8 .2 % 5 1 .7 % 3 1 .6 % 4 0 .5 % 3 9 .1 % 5 th Gra d e 3 2 .0 % 5 0 .0 % 6 1 .5 % 5 3 .3 % 6 6 .7 % 6 th Gra d e 4 2 .9 % 5 5 .3 % 4 4 .4 % 3 8 .7 % 7 3 .2 % 7 th Gra d e 3 3 .3 % 3 6 .0 % 5 3 .5 % 4 4 .0 % 5 2 .9 % 8 th Gra d e 3 4 .4 % 3 5 .7 % 4 1 .4 % 4 7 .2 % 4 4 .0 % District 3 6 .3 % 4 3 .7 % 5 0 .7 % 4 7 .9 % 5 8 .6 % 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 %

NWEA MAP Spring Mathematics IEP Percent of Students Meeting Growth T argets

slide-26
SLIDE 26

PART II

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Cohort Data Explained

— When looking at Cohort Data, all

students in Kindergarten (or 1st or 2nd) in the given cohort are selected, and then followed throughout their years in District 34.

— Students who have moved in are not

counted in this specific data set

— Students who move out are still counted

when they were students in D34.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Cohort Data Examples

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Example - Cohort Breakdown (1-20%ile)

This and next two slides show a breakdown of each band of the cohort’s data over the 6 years

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Example - Cohort Breakdown (51-65%ile)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Example - Cohort Breakdown (96-99%ile)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

NWEA MAP Spring Reading Percentile Band Distribution Over Time

slide-33
SLIDE 33 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th >9 5 %il e (Nat'l M erit Sc h
  • lar)
8 . 4 % 4 . 8 % 7 . 4 % 5 . 1 % 2 . 9 % 4 . 8 % 4 . 8 % 9 0
  • 9 5
%ile (Sta te Hon
  • rs)
1 0 .5 % 1 1 .0 % 1 0 .6 % 1 1 .1 % 9 . 2 % 7 . 4 % 8 . 8 % 7 6
  • 8 9
%ile (AP S u c cess ) 2 8 .9 % 2 0 .6 % 1 8 .2 % 1 4 .9 % 1 9 .5 % 2 3 .6 % 2 1 .9 % 6 6
  • 7 5
%ile (Col leg e Rea d y ) 8 . 1 % 1 5 .8 % 1 6 .8 % 9 . 0 % 1 2 .4 % 7 . 7 % 1 3 .4 % 5 1
  • 6 5
%ile (HS Re ad y ) 1 3 .0 % 1 4 .3 % 1 3 .5 % 1 6 .5 % 1 5 .8 % 1 7 .6 % 1 6 .5 % 3 6
  • 5 0
%ile (AYP /Me ets ) 9 . 6 % 1 0 .4 % 1 5 .0 % 1 2 .9 % 1 5 .2 % 1 5 .3 % 1 5 .1 % 2 1
  • 3 5
%ile (At-Ri s k) 1 0 .2 % 1 0 .1 % 8 . 2 % 1 2 .3 % 1 4 .9 % 1 3 .9 % 1 0 .0 % 0 -2 0 %i le (In ten si v e Risk) 1 1 .1 % 1 2 .8 % 1 0 .3 % 8 . 1 % 1 0 .1 % 9 . 7 % 9 . 4 % 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 %

Class of 2018 NWEA MAP Spring Reading Percentile Band Distribution Over Time

slide-34
SLIDE 34 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th >9 5 %il e (Nat'l M erit Sc h
  • lar)
8 . 3 % 7 . 1 % 4 . 4 % 4 . 7 % 6 . 3 % 3 . 6 % 3 . 5 % 9 0
  • 9 5
%ile (Sta te Hon
  • rs)
9 . 7 % 7 . 1 % 7 . 8 % 8 . 8 % 1 4 .0 % 7 . 5 % 8 . 5 % 7 6
  • 8 9
%ile (AP S u c cess ) 2 3 .7 % 2 5 .3 % 1 9 .7 % 2 5 .3 % 2 6 .7 % 2 1 .0 % 2 0 .4 % 6 6
  • 7 5
%ile (Col leg e Rea d y ) 1 3 .3 % 1 0 .5 % 1 6 .3 % 1 5 .2 % 8 . 3 % 1 5 .1 % 1 4 .8 % 5 1
  • 6 5
%ile (HS Re ad y ) 1 3 .7 % 1 6 .9 % 1 6 .6 % 1 3 .1 % 1 7 .3 % 1 5 .1 % 1 4 .8 % 3 6
  • 5 0
%ile (AYP /Me ets ) 1 4 .3 % 1 3 .2 % 1 4 .6 % 1 4 .1 % 1 0 .7 % 1 5 .1 % 1 4 .2 % 2 1
  • 3 5
%ile (At-Ri s k) 1 0 .0 % 8 . 8 % 1 0 .2 % 9 . 8 % 9 . 7 % 1 1 .5 % 1 0 .7 % 0 -2 0 %i le (In ten si v e Risk) 7 . 0 % 1 1 .1 % 1 0 .5 % 9 . 1 % 7 . 0 % 1 1 .1 % 1 3 .2 % 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2019 NWEA MAP Spring Reading Percentile Band Distribution Over Time
slide-35
SLIDE 35 Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th >9 5 %il e (Nat'l M erit Sc h
  • lar)
8 . 2 % 6 . 3 % 4 . 5 % 2 . 0 % 3 . 6 % 4 . 6 % 3 . 5 % 9 0
  • 9 5
%ile (Sta te Hon
  • rs)
8 . 5 % 9 . 9 % 7 . 4 % 9 . 0 % 1 0 .9 % 1 0 .9 % 7 . 5 % 7 6
  • 8 9
%ile (AP S u c cess ) 1 9 .6 % 2 1 .1 % 2 0 .4 % 2 4 .3 % 2 2 .8 % 2 1 .1 % 2 4 .5 % 6 6
  • 7 5
%ile (Col leg e Rea d y ) 1 1 .0 % 1 5 .8 % 1 6 .5 % 1 7 .3 % 1 4 .5 % 1 4 .9 % 1 4 .2 % 5 1
  • 6 5
%ile (HS Re ad y ) 1 7 .8 % 1 4 .5 % 1 6 .8 % 1 8 .3 % 1 4 .9 % 1 6 .2 % 1 9 .8 % 3 6
  • 5 0
%ile (AYP /Me ets ) 1 4 .2 % 1 4 .8 % 9 . 1 % 1 0 .7 % 1 4 .9 % 1 6 .2 % 1 2 .9 % 2 1
  • 3 5
%ile (At-Ri s k) 1 3 .5 % 1 1 .8 % 1 3 .9 % 8 . 7 % 8 . 9 % 8 . 9 % 1 0 .7 % 0 -2 0 %i le (In ten si v e Risk) 7 . 1 % 5 . 9 % 1 1 .3 % 9 . 7 % 9 . 6 % 7 . 3 % 6 . 9 % 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2020 NWEA MAP Spring Reading Percentile BandDistribution Over Time
slide-36
SLIDE 36 Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th >9 5 %il e (Nat'l M erit Sc h
  • lar)
6 . 5 % 8 . 6 % 4 . 2 % 4 . 8 % 5 . 0 % 2 . 3 % 9 0
  • 9 5
%ile (Sta te Hon
  • rs)
9 . 1 % 1 3 .1 % 1 3 .5 % 1 0 .0 % 1 0 .0 % 1 1 .3 % 7 6
  • 8 9
%ile (AP S u c cess ) 1 8 .4 % 1 9 .0 % 2 1 .9 % 1 7 .9 % 2 1 .1 % 1 9 .4 % 6 6
  • 7 5
%ile (Col leg e Rea d y ) 1 0 .0 % 1 5 .6 % 1 4 .4 % 1 8 .2 % 1 2 .3 % 1 6 .5 % 5 1
  • 6 5
%ile (HS Re ad y ) 2 2 .3 % 1 5 .9 % 1 8 .0 % 1 6 .1 % 1 8 .2 % 1 9 .1 % 3 6
  • 5 0
%ile (AYP /Me ets ) 1 2 .6 % 1 4 .1 % 1 0 .2 % 1 1 .5 % 1 5 .2 % 1 0 .7 % 2 1
  • 3 5
%ile (At-Ri s k) 1 2 .6 % 9 . 5 % 7 . 8 % 1 0 .9 % 9 . 1 % 1 2 .8 % 0 -2 0 %i le (In ten si v e Risk) 8 . 4 % 4 . 3 % 1 0 .2 % 1 0 .6 % 9 . 1 % 7 . 8 % 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2021 NWEA MAP Spring Reading Percentile Band Distribution Over Time
slide-37
SLIDE 37 Ki n d e r 1 st 2 n d 3 r d 4 th >9 5 %ile (Nat' l Merit Sch o lar) 8 .8 % 1 2 . 6 % 4 .3 % 2 .5 % 3 .7 % 9 0 -9 5 % ile (State Hon
  • rs)
8 .5 % 1 4 . 4 % 1 5 . 8 % 7 .3 % 9 .0 % 7 6 -8 9 % ile (AP Su c cess) 1 9 . 2 % 2 0 . 6 % 2 6 . 7 % 2 2 . 5 % 2 1 . 3 % 6 6 -7 5 % ile (Co ll e ge Read y) 1 4 . 2 % 1 2 . 3 % 1 3 . 6 % 1 5 . 3 % 1 5 . 7 % 5 1 -6 5 % ile (HS R e ad y ) 1 7 . 3 % 1 0 . 8 % 1 6 . 1 % 1 7 . 5 % 1 6 . 5 % 3 6 -5 0 % ile (AY P / M eets) 1 5 . 4 % 1 1 . 2 % 8 .2 % 1 1 . 6 % 9 .0 % 2 1 -3 5 % ile (At
  • Risk)
1 2 . 7 % 1 3 . 0 % 8 .6 % 9 .5 % 1 2 . 4 %
  • 2 0
%il e (In te n sive Ri sk ) 3 .8 % 5 .1 % 9 .7 % 1 3 . 8 % 1 2 . 4 % % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2022 NWEA MAP Spring Reading Percentile Band Distribution Over Time
slide-38
SLIDE 38 Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd >9 5 %il e (Nat'l M erit Sc h
  • lar)
8 . 6 % 9 . 1 % 4 . 7 % 2 . 3 % 9 0
  • 9 5
%ile (Sta te Hon
  • rs)
9 . 1 % 1 5 .1 % 9 . 1 % 8 . 5 % 7 6
  • 8 9
%ile (AP S u c cess ) 2 1 .1 % 2 5 .0 % 2 2 .9 % 2 4 .3 % 6 6
  • 7 5
%ile (Col leg e Rea d y ) 1 3 .4 % 9 . 9 % 1 1 .5 % 1 3 .1 % 5 1
  • 6 5
%ile (HS Re ad y ) 1 8 .5 % 1 3 .5 % 1 3 .0 % 1 6 .6 % 3 6
  • 5 0
%ile (AYP /Me ets ) 1 5 .1 % 1 0 .7 % 1 4 .2 % 1 5 .4 % 2 1
  • 3 5
%ile (At-Ri s k) 9 . 9 % 1 1 .9 % 1 0 .3 % 1 1 .2 % 0 -2 0 %i le (In ten si v e Risk) 4 . 3 % 4 . 8 % 1 4 .2 % 8 . 5 % 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2023 NWEA MAP Spring Reading Percentile Band Distribution Over Time
slide-39
SLIDE 39

NWEA MAP Spring Math Percentile Band Distribution Over Time

slide-40
SLIDE 40 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th >9 5 %il e (Nat'l M erit Sc h
  • lar)
1 . 8 % 4 . 2 % 2 . 6 % 8 . 0 % 1 . 4 % 2 . 3 % 6 . 3 % 9 0
  • 9 5
%ile (Sta te Hon
  • rs)
1 3 .4 % 4 . 8 % 7 . 6 % 1 1 .3 % 6 . 9 % 6 . 3 % 7 . 7 % 7 6
  • 8 9
%ile (AP S u c cess ) 2 1 .7 % 1 4 .2 % 1 3 .6 % 2 0 .3 % 1 4 .9 % 1 5 .3 % 1 8 .5 % 6 6
  • 7 5
%ile (Col leg e Rea d y ) 1 8 .1 % 1 5 .1 % 1 2 .6 % 9 . 7 % 8 . 6 % 1 2 .8 % 1 0 .3 % 5 1
  • 6 5
%ile (HS Re ad y ) 1 6 .6 % 2 1 .8 % 1 8 .5 % 1 4 .7 % 1 5 .5 % 1 3 .1 % 1 6 .8 % 3 6
  • 5 0
%ile (AYP /Me ets ) 1 1 .6 % 1 7 .5 % 1 6 .6 % 1 3 .7 % 1 5 .8 % 1 7 .0 % 1 8 .2 % 2 1
  • 3 5
%ile (At-Ri s k) 1 1 .2 % 1 2 .7 % 1 6 .2 % 1 2 .7 % 1 7 .8 % 1 5 .9 % 1 4 .5 % 0 -2 0 %i le (In ten si v e Risk) 5 . 8 % 9 . 7 % 1 2 .3 % 9 . 7 % 1 9 .0 % 1 7 .3 % 7 . 7 % 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2018 NWEA MAP Spring Mathematics Percentile Band Distribution Over Time
slide-41
SLIDE 41 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th >9 5 %il e (Nat'l M erit Sc h
  • lar)
2 . 8 % 1 . 8 % 6 . 7 % 7 . 6 % 1 . 6 % 5 . 3 % 9 0
  • 9 5
%ile (Sta te Hon
  • rs)
1 1 .6 % 5 . 8 % 7 . 3 % 1 1 .2 % 6 . 9 % 7 . 2 % 7 6
  • 8 9
%ile (AP S u c cess ) 2 9 .6 % 2 0 .7 % 1 4 .4 % 2 0 .1 % 1 8 .0 % 1 6 .7 % 6 6
  • 7 5
%ile (Col leg e Rea d y ) 1 4 .0 % 1 6 .7 % 1 2 .3 % 1 1 .2 % 9 . 2 % 1 1 .6 % 5 1
  • 6 5
%ile (HS Re ad y ) 1 4 .0 % 1 7 .1 % 1 7 .3 % 1 3 .5 % 1 6 .7 % 1 5 .1 % 3 6
  • 5 0
%ile (AYP /Me ets ) 9 . 6 % 1 3 .8 % 1 5 .2 % 1 6 .4 % 1 7 .7 % 1 7 .6 % 2 1
  • 3 5
%ile (At-Ri s k) 1 0 .8 % 1 2 .7 % 1 3 .2 % 1 2 .2 % 1 6 .4 % 1 4 .8 % 0 -2 0 %i le (In ten si v e Risk) 7 . 6 % 1 1 .3 % 1 3 .5 % 7 . 9 % 1 3 .4 % 1 1 .6 % 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2019 NWEA MAP Spring Mathematics Percentile Band Distribution Over Time
slide-42
SLIDE 42 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th >9 5 %il e (Nat'l M erit Sc h
  • lar)
4 . 2 % 7 . 0 % 9 . 1 % 1 0 .4 % 4 . 1 % 9 0
  • 9 5
%ile (Sta te Hon
  • rs)
1 1 .5 % 6 . 6 % 1 0 .2 % 9 . 2 % 7 . 9 % 7 6
  • 8 9
%ile (AP S u c cess ) 2 7 .1 % 2 2 .5 % 1 8 .6 % 2 1 .6 % 1 8 .2 % 6 6
  • 7 5
%ile (Col leg e Rea d y ) 1 1 .5 % 1 5 .9 % 1 0 .6 % 1 0 .1 % 9 . 1 % 5 1
  • 6 5
%ile (HS Re ad y ) 1 5 .6 % 1 9 .8 % 1 3 .3 % 1 6 .4 % 2 1 .7 % 3 6
  • 5 0
%ile (AYP /Me ets ) 1 0 .8 % 1 2 .8 % 1 5 .2 % 1 0 .1 % 1 7 .0 % 2 1
  • 3 5
%ile (At-Ri s k) 1 0 .4 % 7 . 8 % 1 3 .6 % 1 2 .1 % 1 3 .8 % 0 -2 0 %i le (In ten si v e Risk) 9 . 0 % 7 . 8 % 9 . 5 % 1 0 .1 % 8 . 2 % 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 %

Class of 2020

NWEA MAP Spring Mathematics Percentile Band Distribution Over Time
slide-43
SLIDE 43 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th >9 5 %il e (Nat'l M erit Sc h
  • lar)
1 . 5 % 4 . 2 % 1 3 .5 % 1 0 .4 % 9 0
  • 9 5
%ile (Sta te Hon
  • rs)
5 . 7 % 4 . 8 % 1 3 .2 % 9 . 2 % 7 6
  • 8 9
%ile (AP S u c cess ) 1 6 .8 % 4 . 2 % 1 5 .2 % 2 1 .6 % 6 6
  • 7 5
%ile (Col leg e Rea d y ) 1 9 .8 % 1 5 .1 % 1 7 .3 % 1 0 .1 % 5 1
  • 6 5
%ile (HS Re ad y ) 1 8 .3 % 2 1 .8 % 1 2 .3 % 1 6 .4 % 3 6
  • 5 0
%ile (AYP /Me ets ) 1 2 .3 % 1 7 .5 % 1 4 .4 % 1 0 .1 % 2 1
  • 3 5
%ile (At-Ri s k) 1 8 .3 % 1 2 .7 % 7 . 3 % 1 2 .1 % 0 -2 0 %i le (In ten si v e Risk) 7 . 5 % 9 . 7 % 6 . 7 % 1 0 .1 % 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 %

Class of 2021 NWEA MAP Spring Mathematics Percentile Band Distribution Over Time

slide-44
SLIDE 44 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th >9 5 %il e (Nat'l M erit Sc h
  • lar)
7 . 6 % 1 . 8 % 1 . 8 % 9 . 1 % 9 0
  • 9 5
%ile (Sta te Hon
  • rs)
1 0 .1 % 1 3 .4 % 5 . 8 % 1 0 .2 % 7 6
  • 8 9
%ile (AP S u c cess ) 1 9 .6 % 2 1 .7 % 2 0 .7 % 1 8 .6 % 6 6
  • 7 5
%ile (Col leg e Rea d y ) 1 4 .5 % 1 8 .1 % 1 6 .7 % 1 0 .6 % 5 1
  • 6 5
%ile (HS Re ad y ) 1 8 .5 % 1 6 .6 % 1 7 .1 % 1 3 .3 % 3 6
  • 5 0
%ile (AYP /Me ets ) 1 6 .3 % 1 1 .6 % 1 3 .8 % 1 5 .2 % 2 1
  • 3 5
%ile (At-Ri s k) 9 . 1 % 1 1 .2 % 1 2 .7 % 1 3 .6 % 0 -2 0 %i le (In ten si v e Risk) 4 . 3 % 5 . 8 % 1 1 .3 % 9 . 5 % 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 %

Class of 2022

NWEA MAP Spring Mathematics Percentile Band Distribution Over Time
slide-45
SLIDE 45 1 st 2 n d 3 rd >9 5 %il e (Nat'l M erit Sc h
  • lar)
1 1 .9 % 2 . 8 % 7 . 0 % 9 0
  • 9 5
%ile (Sta te Hon
  • rs)
1 3 .1 % 1 1 .6 % 6 . 6 % 7 6
  • 8 9
%ile (AP S u c cess ) 2 4 .2 % 2 9 .6 % 2 2 .5 % 6 6
  • 7 5
%ile (Col leg e Rea d y ) 1 0 .3 % 1 4 .0 % 1 5 .9 % 5 1
  • 6 5
%ile (HS Re ad y ) 2 0 .2 % 1 4 .0 % 1 9 .8 % 3 6
  • 5 0
%ile (AYP /Me ets ) 9 . 5 % 9 . 6 % 1 2 .8 % 2 1
  • 3 5
%ile (At-Ri s k) 6 . 0 % 1 0 .8 % 7 . 8 % 0 -2 0 %i le (In ten si v e Risk) 4 . 5 % 7 . 6 % 7 . 8 % 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2023 NWEA MAP Spring Mathematics Percentile Band Distribution Over Time
slide-46
SLIDE 46

NWEA MAP Spring Reading Average Percentile Band by Starting Cohort Band

slide-47
SLIDE 47 2 n d 3 r d 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th
  • 2 0
%ile (I n ten sive Ri s k) 9 .4 % 1 6 .3 % 2 2 .1 % 2 1 .3 % 1 6 .2 % 2 0 .2 % 2 2 .9 % 2 1 -3 5 %i le (At-Risk) 2 8 .2 % 3 3 .9 % 3 9 .6 % 3 6 .9 % 4 0 .8 % 3 7 .1 % 3 9 .7 % 3 6 -5 0 %i le (AYP /M eets) 4 3 .0 % 5 0 .9 % 4 8 .7 % 5 1 .5 % 4 6 .3 % 4 8 .6 % 5 0 .2 % 5 1 -6 5 %i le (HS R e ad y ) 5 7 .8 % 5 3 .7 % 5 6 .7 % 5 2 .9 % 4 5 .8 % 5 4 .8 % 5 2 .9 % 6 6 -7 5 %i le (Coll e ge Read y) 7 0 .5 % 5 9 .4 % 6 2 .0 % 6 2 .7 % 5 2 .8 % 5 8 .4 % 5 9 .0 % 7 6 -8 9 %i le (AP S u c cess ) 8 1 .8 % 7 3 .6 % 7 6 .0 % 7 4 .4 % 7 0 .6 % 7 0 .0 % 7 2 .5 % 9 0 -9 5 %i le (S tate Hon
  • rs)
9 2 .5 % 8 7 .3 % 8 9 .2 % 8 7 .5 % 8 3 .8 % 8 5 .2 % 8 7 .2 % >9 5 %i le (Na t' l Merit Sch ol ar ) 9 7 .4 % 9 2 .3 % 8 9 .4 % 9 2 .0 % 8 9 .9 % 8 7 .0 % 9 0 .0 % % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2018 NWEA MAP Spring Reading Average Percentile by Starting Cohort Band
slide-48
SLIDE 48 2 n d 3 r d 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th
  • 2 0
%ile (I n ten sive Ri s k) 9 .6 % 1 7 .7 % 2 1 .6 % 2 6 .0 % 2 0 .5 % 1 9 .3 % 2 1 -3 5 %i le (At-Risk) 2 7 .3 % 3 4 .6 % 3 7 .4 % 4 3 .0 % 4 6 .1 % 3 5 .6 % 3 6 -5 0 %i le (AYP /M eets) 4 4 .2 % 4 7 .8 % 4 7 .9 % 5 5 .1 % 4 3 .5 % 4 6 .7 % 5 1 -6 5 %i le (HS R e ad y ) 5 8 .9 % 5 3 .7 % 5 6 .7 % 6 0 .0 % 5 2 .1 % 4 7 .5 % 6 6 -7 5 %i le (Coll e ge Read y) 7 0 .5 % 6 5 .3 % 6 7 .6 % 6 6 .3 % 6 1 .3 % 6 0 .9 % 7 6 -8 9 %i le (AP S u c cess ) 8 3 .3 % 7 7 .1 % 7 8 .9 % 8 1 .0 % 7 3 .9 % 7 7 .6 % 9 0 -9 5 %i le (S tate Hon
  • rs)
9 2 .3 % 8 5 .3 % 8 4 .8 % 8 7 .0 % 8 1 .8 % 8 1 .8 % >9 5 %i le (Na t' l Merit Sch ol ar ) 9 7 .5 % 9 2 .8 % 9 4 .0 % 9 2 .1 % 9 0 .5 % 8 8 .9 % % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2019 NWEA MAP Spring Reading Average Percentile by Starting Cohort Band
slide-49
SLIDE 49 2 n d 3 r d 4 th 5 th 6 th
  • 2 0
%ile (I n ten sive Ri s k) 1 0 .5 % 2 2 .3 % 2 6 .5 % 2 7 .3 % 3 3 .7 % 2 1 -3 5 %i le (At-Risk) 2 8 .6 % 4 1 .2 % 4 0 .9 % 3 8 .8 % 3 9 .7 % 3 6 -5 0 %i le (AYP /M eets) 4 2 .3 % 4 5 .8 % 4 5 .6 % 4 2 .6 % 4 2 .2 % 5 1 -6 5 %i le (HS R e ad y ) 5 7 .5 % 6 0 .0 % 5 9 .0 % 6 1 .4 % 6 2 .4 % 6 6 -7 5 %i le (Coll e ge Read y) 6 9 .9 % 6 9 .7 % 6 9 .7 % 6 8 .4 % 6 6 .2 % 7 6 -8 9 %i le (AP S u c cess ) 8 3 .4 % 7 7 .0 % 7 8 .3 % 7 4 .0 % 7 3 .5 % 9 0 -9 5 %i le (S tate Hon
  • rs)
9 2 .2 % 8 5 .6 % 8 6 .3 % 8 7 .0 % 8 5 .0 % >9 5 %i le (Na t' l Merit Sch ol ar ) 9 7 .6 % 9 0 .5 % 9 1 .6 % 9 1 .8 % 9 4 .0 % % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2020 NWEA MAP Spring Reading Average Percentile by Starting Cohort Band
slide-50
SLIDE 50 2 n d 3 r d 4 th 5 th
  • 2 0
%ile (I n ten sive Ri s k) 8 .4 % 1 7 .9 % 2 0 .6 % 2 6 .1 % 2 1 -3 5 %i le (At-Risk) 2 8 .5 % 3 2 .1 % 4 4 .2 % 4 3 .7 % 3 6 -5 0 %i le (AYP /M eets) 4 4 .1 % 4 7 .5 % 4 7 .9 % 4 5 .6 % 5 1 -6 5 %i le (HS R e ad y ) 5 7 .8 % 5 5 .2 % 5 4 .0 % 5 5 .6 % 6 6 -7 5 %i le (Coll e ge Read y) 7 1 .3 % 6 6 .6 % 6 6 .2 % 6 5 .5 % 7 6 -8 9 %i le (AP S u c cess ) 8 3 .3 % 7 7 .6 % 7 6 .5 % 7 2 .9 % 9 0 -9 5 %i le (S tate Hon
  • rs)
9 2 .2 % 8 4 .4 % 8 5 .3 % 8 6 .0 % >9 5 %i le (Na t' l Merit Sch ol ar ) 9 7 .6 % 9 3 .9 % 9 2 .3 % 9 3 .2 % % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2021 NWEA MAP Spring Reading Average Percentile by Starting Chort Band
slide-51
SLIDE 51 1 s t 2 n d 3 r d 4 th
  • 2 0
%ile (I n ten sive Ri s k) 1 3 .9 % 2 2 .3 % 2 3 .0 % 1 8 .0 % 2 1 -3 5 %i le (At-Risk) 3 0 .1 % 4 0 .8 % 3 3 .6 % 3 0 .8 % 3 6 -5 0 %i le (AYP /M eets) 4 3 .2 % 4 3 .3 % 3 9 .3 % 4 1 .9 % 5 1 -6 5 %i le (HS R e ad y ) 5 9 .1 % 5 5 .1 % 4 7 .5 % 5 3 .9 % 6 6 -7 5 %i le (Coll e ge Read y) 7 0 .9 % 6 4 .4 % 6 0 .7 % 5 6 .4 % 7 6 -8 9 %i le (AP S u c cess ) 8 3 .2 % 7 7 .0 % 6 8 .3 % 6 4 .0 % 9 0 -9 5 %i le (S tate Hon
  • rs)
9 2 .3 % 8 3 .8 % 7 4 .5 % 8 0 .3 % >9 5 %i le (Na t' l Merit Sch ol ar ) 9 7 .7 % 6 0 .7 % 8 6 .9 % 8 8 .5 % % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2022 NWEA MAP Spring Reading Average Percentile by Starting Cohort Band
slide-52
SLIDE 52 1 s t 2 n d 3 r d
  • 2 0
%ile (I n ten sive Ri s k) 1 3 .3 % 1 9 .8 % 3 0 .6 % 2 1 -3 5 %i le (At-Risk) 2 8 .5 % 3 1 .8 % 3 8 .3 % 3 6 -5 0 %i le (AYP /M eets) 4 4 .3 % 4 6 .0 % 4 5 .1 % 5 1 -6 5 %i le (HS R e ad y ) 5 9 .7 % 5 3 .5 % 5 8 .5 % 6 6 -7 5 %i le (Coll e ge Read y) 7 1 .8 % 6 3 .5 % 6 3 .1 % 7 6 -8 9 %i le (AP S u c cess ) 8 3 .5 % 7 2 .2 % 6 9 .7 % 9 0 -9 5 %i le (S tate Hon
  • rs)
9 2 .4 % 7 8 .1 % 7 2 .4 % >9 5 %i le (Na t' l Merit Sch ol ar ) 9 7 .5 % 8 9 .2 % 8 6 .5 % % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2023 NWEA MAP Spring Reading Average Percentile by Starting Cohort Band
slide-53
SLIDE 53

NWEA MAP Spring Math Average Percentile Band by Starting Cohort Band

slide-54
SLIDE 54 2 n d 3 r d 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th
  • 2 0
%ile (I n ten sive Ri s k) 1 1 .5 % 1 2 .4 % 1 5 .0 % 1 4 .5 % 1 1 .8 % 1 5 .4 % 2 1 .9 % 2 1 -3 5 %i le (At-Risk) 2 8 .9 % 2 8 .4 % 2 6 .3 % 2 9 .6 % 2 9 .6 % 3 0 .3 % 3 7 .3 % 3 6 -5 0 %i le (AYP /M eets) 4 4 .8 % 3 7 .6 % 3 3 .2 % 3 4 .5 % 3 3 .8 % 3 3 .6 % 4 2 .2 % 5 1 -6 5 %i le (HS R e ad y ) 5 8 .3 % 4 6 .9 % 4 3 .8 % 4 3 .3 % 4 5 .9 % 4 8 .3 % 5 7 .1 % 6 6 -7 5 %i le (Coll e ge Read y) 6 9 .9 % 5 7 .6 % 5 4 .9 % 5 2 .7 % 4 5 .9 % 5 1 .0 % 5 7 .6 % 7 6 -8 9 %i le (AP S u c cess ) 8 3 .0 % 6 5 .6 % 6 6 .0 % 6 5 .5 % 6 5 .7 % 6 8 .7 % 7 2 .9 % 9 0 -9 5 %i le (S tate Hon
  • rs)
9 2 .9 % 8 1 .5 % 8 0 .0 % 8 2 .4 % 8 0 .7 % 8 1 .1 % 8 5 .0 % >9 5 %i le (Na t' l Merit Sch ol ar ) 9 8 .2 % 9 4 .6 % 9 1 .9 % 9 0 .4 % 8 6 .8 % 8 9 .7 % 9 3 .3 % % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2018 NWEA MAP Spring Mathematics Average Percentile by Starting Cohort Band
slide-55
SLIDE 55 2 n d 3 r d 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th
  • 2 0
%ile (I n ten sive Ri s k) 1 1 .9 % 9 .2 % 1 1 .5 % 1 9 .5 % 1 5 .8 % 2 4 .5 % 2 1 -3 5 %i le (At-Risk) 2 7 .9 % 2 4 .5 % 3 2 .1 % 3 4 .8 % 2 5 .2 % 3 3 .8 % 3 6 -5 0 %i le (AYP /M eets) 4 3 .7 % 3 3 .7 % 2 9 .6 % 4 6 .4 % 3 4 .3 % 3 8 .1 % 5 1 -6 5 %i le (HS R e ad y ) 5 8 .4 % 4 2 .7 % 4 6 .0 % 5 6 .2 % 4 9 .0 % 5 2 .1 % 6 6 -7 5 %i le (Coll e ge Read y) 7 0 .4 % 5 4 .3 % 5 3 .4 % 6 3 .5 % 5 2 .5 % 5 7 .8 % 7 6 -8 9 %i le (AP S u c cess ) 8 1 .6 % 6 6 .9 % 7 1 .5 % 7 5 .6 % 6 7 .5 % 7 0 .1 % 9 0 -9 5 %i le (S tate Hon
  • rs)
9 3 .1 % 8 1 .0 % 8 4 .3 % 8 5 .3 % 8 2 .1 % 8 4 .3 % >9 5 %i le (Na t' l Merit Sch ol ar ) 9 7 .5 % 8 7 .3 % 9 1 .9 % 9 1 .2 % 8 7 .4 % 8 9 .8 % % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2019 NWEA MAP Spring Mathematics Average Percentile by Starting Cohort Band
slide-56
SLIDE 56 2 n d 3 r d 4 th 5 th 6 th
  • 2 0
%ile (I n ten sive Ri s k) 1 1 .4 % 1 8 .2 % 2 1 .9 % 3 0 .3 % 2 9 .4 % 2 1 -3 5 %i le (At-Risk) 2 7 .0 % 3 3 .5 % 3 3 .7 % 3 9 .5 % 3 9 .1 % 3 6 -5 0 %i le (AYP /M eets) 4 4 .4 % 4 7 .5 % 4 9 .9 % 6 0 .4 % 5 6 .3 % 5 1 -6 5 %i le (HS R e ad y ) 5 8 .2 % 5 2 .6 % 5 7 .6 % 6 6 .8 % 6 1 .8 % 6 6 -7 5 %i le (Coll e ge Read y) 7 0 .0 % 6 7 .4 % 7 3 .3 % 8 2 .5 % 7 8 .6 % 7 6 -8 9 %i le (AP S u c cess ) 8 1 .9 % 7 5 .4 % 7 9 .9 % 8 7 .5 % 7 9 .5 % 9 0 -9 5 %i le (S tate Hon
  • rs)
9 2 .5 % 8 2 .5 % 8 7 .8 % 9 1 .6 % 8 3 .7 % >9 5 %i le (Na t' l Merit Sch ol ar ) 9 7 .5 % 9 4 .0 % 9 5 .0 % 9 8 .3 % 9 2 .8 % % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2020 NWEA MAP Spring Mathematics Average Percentile by Starting Cohort Band
slide-57
SLIDE 57 2 n d 3 r d 4 th 5 th
  • 2 0
%ile (I n ten sive Ri s k) 1 0 .4 % 1 8 .2 % 1 8 .0 % 2 4 .4 % 2 1 -3 5 %i le (At-Risk) 2 8 .1 % 3 6 .7 % 3 1 .0 % 3 6 .0 % 3 6 -5 0 %i le (AYP /M eets) 4 5 .2 % 4 6 .3 % 4 7 .3 % 5 5 .7 % 5 1 -6 5 %i le (HS R e ad y ) 5 9 .3 % 5 9 .8 % 6 1 .2 % 7 1 .8 % 6 6 -7 5 %i le (Coll e ge Read y) 7 0 .0 % 6 4 .5 % 6 5 .7 % 7 3 .8 % 7 6 -8 9 %i le (AP S u c cess ) 8 3 .0 % 7 5 .1 % 8 2 .0 % 8 7 .7 % 9 0 -9 5 %i le (S tate Hon
  • rs)
9 3 .1 % 9 1 .9 % 9 4 .4 % 9 5 .8 % >9 5 %i le (Na t' l Merit Sch ol ar ) 9 8 .6 % 9 8 .0 % 9 8 .2 % 9 9 .0 % % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2021 NWEA MAP Spring Mathematics Average Percentile by Starting Cohort Band
slide-58
SLIDE 58 1 s t 2 n d 3 r d 4 th
  • 2 0
%ile (I n ten sive Ri s k) 9 .9 % 3 1 .7 % 2 0 .7 % 3 1 .0 % 2 1 -3 5 %i le (At-Risk) 2 7 .4 % 3 8 .8 % 2 7 .3 % 3 7 .5 % 3 6 -5 0 %i le (AYP /M eets) 4 2 .4 % 4 0 .6 % 3 5 .0 % 3 4 .1 % 5 1 -6 5 %i le (HS R e ad y ) 5 8 .1 % 6 4 .2 % 5 7 .6 % 5 7 .9 % 6 6 -7 5 %i le (Coll e ge Read y) 7 1 .5 % 6 8 .9 % 6 1 .7 % 6 3 .0 % 7 6 -8 9 %i le (AP S u c cess ) 8 3 .7 % 8 0 .7 % 7 5 .4 % 7 8 .8 % 9 0 -9 5 %i le (S tate Hon
  • rs)
9 2 .7 % 8 5 .2 % 8 2 .3 % 8 1 .6 % >9 5 %i le (Na t' l Merit Sch ol ar ) 9 7 .7 % 8 8 .3 % 8 7 .9 % 9 2 .7 % % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2022 NWEA MAP Spring Mathematics Average Percentile by Starting Cohort Band
slide-59
SLIDE 59 1 s t 2 n d 3 r d
  • 2 0
%ile (I n ten sive Ri s k) 1 1 .3 % 1 5 .4 % 3 3 .4 % 2 1 -3 5 %i le (At-Risk) 2 8 .7 % 3 8 .7 % 4 5 .9 % 3 6 -5 0 %i le (AYP /M eets) 4 2 .9 % 4 6 .9 % 4 4 .9 % 5 1 -6 5 %i le (HS R e ad y ) 5 8 .3 % 5 6 .4 % 5 7 .6 % 6 6 -7 5 %i le (Coll e ge Read y) 7 1 .0 % 5 9 .0 % 5 8 .6 % 7 6 -8 9 %i le (AP S u c cess ) 8 2 .8 % 7 6 .6 % 7 7 .0 % 9 0 -9 5 %i le (S tate Hon
  • rs)
9 2 .6 % 8 3 .3 % 8 2 .0 % >9 5 %i le (Na t' l Merit Sch ol ar ) 9 7 .5 % 8 8 .0 % 8 9 .4 % % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Class of 2023 NWEA MAP Spring Math Average Percentile by Starting Cohort Band
slide-60
SLIDE 60

NWEA MAP Spring Reading Median CGI Percentile

slide-61
SLIDE 61 58% 44% 55% 55% 48% 47% 55% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Kinder 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Class of 2018 - NWEA Spring Reading - Median CGI Percentile

slide-62
SLIDE 62 66% 60% 49% 54% 58% 52% 52% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2019 - NWEA Spring Reading - Median CGI Percentile

slide-63
SLIDE 63 46% 57% 61% 56% 54% 59% 59% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2020 - NWEA Spring Reading - Median CGI Percentile

slide-64
SLIDE 64 45% 66% 62% 46% 55% 55% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2021 - NWEA Spring Reading - Median CGI Percentile

slide-65
SLIDE 65 61% 66% 62% 47% 48% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2022 - NWEA Spring Reading - Median CGI Percentile

slide-66
SLIDE 66 61% 69% 57% 51% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2023 - NWEA Spring Reading - Median CGI Percentile

slide-67
SLIDE 67

NWEA MAP Spring Reading Percent Meeting Growth

slide-68
SLIDE 68 62% 47% 57% 57% 51% 49% 55% 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2018 - NWEA Spring Reading - Percent Meeting Growth

slide-69
SLIDE 69 72% 65% 51% 55% 60% 58% 52% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2019 - NWEA Spring Reading - Percent Meeting Growth

slide-70
SLIDE 70 50% 59% 62% 59% 54% 61% 61% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2020 - NWEA Spring Reading - Percent Meeting Growth

slide-71
SLIDE 71 48% 71% 69% 50% 57% 58% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2021 - NWEA Spring Reading - Percent Meeting Growth

slide-72
SLIDE 72 65% 71% 65% 49% 50% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2022 - NWEA Spring Reading - Percent Meeting Growth

slide-73
SLIDE 73 64% 70% 63% 57% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2023 - NWEA Spring Reading - Percent Meeting Growth

slide-74
SLIDE 74

NWEA MAP Spring Math Median CGI Percentile

slide-75
SLIDE 75 53% 30% 37% 51% 52% 52% 52% 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2018 - NWEA Spring Mathematics - Median CGI Percentile

slide-76
SLIDE 76 53% 26% 47% 67% 44% 53% 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2019 - NWEA Spring Mathematics - Median CGI Percentile

slide-77
SLIDE 77 53% 40% 39% 49% 66% 61% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2020 - NWEA Spring Mathematics - Median CGI Percentile

slide-78
SLIDE 78 71% 52% 41% 42% 68% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2021 - NWEA Spring Mathematics - Median CGI Percentile

slide-79
SLIDE 79 76% 67% 44% 48% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2022 - NWEA Spring Mathematics - Median CGI Percentile

slide-80
SLIDE 80 78% 59% 48% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2023 - NWEA Spring Mathematics - Median CGI Percentile

slide-81
SLIDE 81

NWEA MAP Spring Math Percent Meeting Growth

slide-82
SLIDE 82 58% 27% 39% 53% 54% 53% 57% 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2018 - NWEA Spring Mathematics - Percent Meeting Growth

slide-83
SLIDE 83 58% 27% 51% 67% 45% 56% 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2019 - NWEA Spring Mathematics - Percent Meeting Growth

slide-84
SLIDE 84 55% 40% 41% 52% 69% 67% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2020 - NWEA Spring Mathematics - Percent Meeting Growth

slide-85
SLIDE 85 76% 55% 44% 46% 73% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2021 - NWEA Spring Mathematics - Percent Meeting Growth

slide-86
SLIDE 86 80% 67% 47% 52% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2022 - NWEA Spring Mathematics - Percent Meeting Growth

slide-87
SLIDE 87 81% 62% 52% 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 5 0 % 6 0 % 7 0 % 8 0 % 9 0 % 1 0 0 % Kin d er 1 st 2 n d 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th

Class of 2023 - NWEA Spring Mathematics - Percent Meeting Growth

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Summary

— District 34 students’ distribution of percentiles on the Spring

NWEA Assessment have decreased in Reading (1.5%) and increased in Mathematics (8.2%) over the past 5 years.

— Percent of Students meeting Spring NWEA Growth Targets have

decreased in Reading (2.1%) and increased in Mathematics (15.2%)

  • ver the past 5 years.
— Conditional Growth Index Percentiles have remained relatively flat

in Reading and have increased in Mathematics over the past 5 years.

— Conditional Growth Index Percentiles, Growth Targets and Average

RIT Percentiles have increased in both Reading and Mathematics, but more significantly in Mathematics.

slide-89
SLIDE 89

Continuous Improvement for SY19

— Celebrate our high achievement and trend in Mathematics & our IEP

sub-groups in Reading.

— Deeper dive with Principals at July 16th Principal Meeting to begin to

identify Greatest Areas of Need at each of their individual buildings.

— Continue the implementation of the Teaching and Learning Goal 3
  • FastBridgeT

raining with Principals and Building Leaders

  • FBA/BIP T

raining with Principals in June & Support Staff in September

— Continue to work with our staff members to better utilize Matrix

and the NWEA Student Profile Report for IPST meetings and Student Leadership Team meetings.

slide-90
SLIDE 90