discovering structure in unstructured i o
play

Discovering Structure in Unstructured I/O Jun He 1,2 , John Bent 3 , - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Discovering Structure in Unstructured I/O Jun He 1,2 , John Bent 3 , Aaron Torres 4 , Gary Grider 4 , Garth Gibson 5 , Carlos Maltzahn 6 , Xian-He Sun 1 1 Illinois Institute of Technology 2 New Mexico Consortium 3 EMC 4 Los Alamos National


  1. Discovering Structure in Unstructured I/O Jun He 1,2 , John Bent 3 , Aaron Torres 4 , Gary Grider 4 , Garth Gibson 5 , Carlos Maltzahn 6 , Xian-He Sun 1 1 Illinois Institute of Technology 2 New Mexico Consortium 3 EMC 4 Los Alamos National Laboratory 5 Carnegie Mellon University 6 University of California Santa Cruz November 12, 2012

  2. Outline

  3. This presentation focuses on recognizing I/O patterns and representing them compactly. PLFS (Parallel Log-structured File System) accelerates checkpointing significantly, but its internal metadata may grow too big. How to recognize I/O patterns and reduce PLFS metadata size. Pagoda PatternIO.64PE Metadata size is reduced significantly PatternIO.4PE PatternIO.16PE LANL_App3.64PE LANL_App2.MPI-IO_Independent LANL_App2.MPI-IO_Collective and R/W performance is improved. LANL_App2.App_IO_Library LANL_App1.64PE FLASH.8PE FLASH.64PE FLASH.32PE FLASH.16PE BTIO.16PE 1 2 4 6 8 10 50 100 500 1000 3 Metadata Compression

  4. Motivation

  5. Checkpointing is the storage driver in supercomputers. PLFS can improve checkpointing significantly. Up to several orders of magnitude improvement. PLFS transparently transforms N-1 write to N-N write. 5

  6. PLFS internal metadata may grow very big. Proc 0 Proc 1 Hole Logical view Keep Keep writing writing PLFS Reorganization Physical File 0 Physical File 1 Logical Physical Chunk Logical Physical Chunk Length Length Offset Offset ID Offset Offset ID 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 1 3 2 2 0 5 2 1 1 7 4 4 0 11 3 3 1 14 2 8 0 Index.0 16 1 6 1 17 2 10 0 (metadata) 19 2 7 1 21 4 12 0 25 3 9 1 28 2 16 0 31 2 18 0 30 1 12 1 35 4 20 0 33 2 13 1 42 3 24 0 39 3 15 1 Explode 46 3 27 0 50 3 30 0 Index.1 54 3 33 0 (metadata) 6 58 3 36 0

  7. Applications’ I/O has patterns and they can be represented compactly. Pattern of LANL anonymous 3. Colors indicate ranks. 7

  8. Metadata of LANL anonymous 3 is big. After pattern compression, replicated metadata Replicated Metadata metadata (each on Disks reader has a copy) File size

  9. Related Work

  10. Coarse-granularity patterns are not precise enough. Statistics methods are lossy. From 1. Thanks to Phil Carns. From 7. 1. (DARSHAN) P. Carns, K. Harms, W. Allcock, C. Bacon, S. Lang, R. Latham, and R. Ross, “Understanding and improving computational science storage access through continuous characterization,” ACM Transactions on Storage (TOS), vol. 7, no. 3, p. 8, 2011. 2. B. Pasquale and G. Polyzos , “A static analysis of i/o characteristics of scientific applications in a production workload,” in Proceedings of the 1993 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing. ACM, 1993, pp. 388 –397. 3. E. Smirni and D. Reed, “Lessons from characterizing the input/output behavior of parallel scientific applications,” Performance Evaluation, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 27 – 44, 1998. 4. S. Byna , Y. Chen, X. Sun, R. Thakur, and W. Gropp, “Parallel I/O prefetching using MPI file caching and I/O signatures,” in Proceedings of the 2008 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing. IEEE Press, 2008, p. 44. 5. J. He, H. Song, X. Sun, Y. Yin, and R. Thakur, “Pattern - aware file reorganization in mpi -io ,” in Proceedings of the sixth workshop on Parallel Data Storage. ACM, 2011, pp. 43 – 48. 6. T. Madhyastha and D. Reed, “Learning to classify parallel input/output access patterns,” Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 802 – 813, 2002. 7. J. Oly and D. Reed, “Markov model prediction of i/o requests for scientific applications,” in Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Supercomputing. ACM, 2002, pp. 147–155. 8. N. Tran and D. Reed, “Automatic time series modeling for adaptive i/o prefetching,” Parallel and Distributed Systems , IEEE Transactions on, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 362 – 377, 2004. 10

  11. Methods

  12. Sliding window algorithm is effective in discovering pattern. Logical file: Logical offsets: 0 3 7 14 17 21 28 31 35 42 46 50 54 58 3 4 7 3 4 7 3 4 7 4 4 4 4 stride list: Complexity: O(wn) . w is window size. n is input length. 12

  13. Results

  14. Patterns of real applications are explored, as well as benchmarks. Applications explored: LIVE RUN: • Pagoda (PNNL), MPI-Blast, MILC, Montage (NASA), ADIOS (ORNL), • MADBench2 (LBL) TRACE REPLAY: • Alegra (SNL), S3D (SNL), LANL anonymous applications, FLASH, BTIO • Benchmarks explored : PATTERN-IO (NERSC), MPI-TILE-IO (ANL), FS-TEST (LANL) • Example: write patterns of MILC (physics app). In-memory index compression rates by Pattern PLFS (higher is better): (A):37.0; (B):3.0;(C):3.6 14

  15. Write Performance Improvement Footprint Per Index Memory Footprint Pattern.PLFS 6 PLFS.2.2.1 4 10 6 2 0 16 64 256 Number of Originating Writes ( Unchanged Unchanged (A):Open Time (sec) (B):Bandwidth (MB/s) (C):Close T 6 4000 1.5GB/s 30 4 20 Pattern PLFS 2000 PLFS 2.2.1 2 10 0 0 0 16 64 256 16 64 256 16 64 256 Number of Writes (K) Number of Writes (K) Number of W 512 processes with write size of 4K. 15

  16. Read Performance Improvement Bandwidth(M Open Time (A):Uniform Read (B):Uniform Re 80 2000 Pattern PLFS 40 1000 480% PLFS 2.2.1 0 0 Bandwidth (MB/s) 16 64 256 16 64 256 Open Time (sec) Number of Originating Writes (K) Number of Origina (C):Non-uniform Read (D):Non-uniform 80 2000 40 1000 0 0 16 64 256 16 64 256 Number of Originating Writes (K) Number of Origina Uniform read: 512 processes Non-uniform read: 256 processes 16

  17. PLFS metadata can be reduced by up to several orders of magnitude. 1500 Pagoda PatternIO.64PE PatternIO.4PE PatternIO.16PE LANL_App3.64PE LANL_App2.MPI-IO_Independent LANL_App2.MPI-IO_Collective LANL_App2.App_IO_Library LANL_App1.64PE FLASH.8PE FLASH.64PE FLASH.32PE FLASH.16PE BTIO.16PE 1 2 4 6 8 10 50 100 500 1000 Metadata Compression 17

  18. Conclusions & Future Work

  19. The proposed sliding window algorithm is effective on discovering structure and improving I/O performance. Application patterns are studied. I/O structure discovering algorithm and a compact structure representation are proposed. Open Time Bandwidth( (A):Uniform Read (B):Uniform Re 80 2000 Pattern PLFS 40 1000 PLFS 2.2.1 0 0 Bandwidth (MB/s) 16 64 256 16 64 256 Open Time (sec) (D):Non-uniform Metadata is reduced and Number of Originating Writes (K) Number of Origina (C):Non-uniform Read 80 2000 40 I/O performance is improved. 1000 0 0 16 64 256 16 64 256 Number of Originating Writes (K) Number of Origina 19

  20. The proposed techniques have the potential for being applied in other systems. Predictability & Compactness Pre-fetching Block pre-allocation Data layout optimization SciHadoop metadata compression 20

  21. Acknowledgement • Michael Lang (Los Alamos National Laboratory) • Adam Manzanares (California State University) • All the reviewers This work was performed at the Ultrascale Systems Research Center (USRC) at Los Alamos National Laboratory, supported by the U.S. Department of Energy DE-FC02-06ER25750. The publication has been assigned the LANL identifier LA-UR-12-25954. 21

  22. Q & A Jun’s email: junnhe@gmail.com

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend