Disclosures Siblings of Children with I have nothing to disclose. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

disclosures siblings of children with
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Disclosures Siblings of Children with I have nothing to disclose. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

3/9/2018 Disclosures Siblings of Children with I have nothing to disclose. Autism And Other Select Research Topics from the UC Davis MIND Institute UCSF Developmental Disabilities Symposium March 9, 2018 Meghan Miller, Ph.D. Assistant


slide-1
SLIDE 1

3/9/2018 1

Siblings of Children with Autism

And Other Select Research Topics from the UC Davis MIND Institute UCSF Developmental Disabilities Symposium March 9, 2018 Meghan Miller, Ph.D. Assistant Professor UC Davis MIND Institute

  • I have nothing to disclose.

Disclosures

  • MIND Institute activities
  • Early detection of ASD in younger siblings
  • Long-term outcomes of siblings of

children with ASD

– School-age – Adulthood

  • Questions

Overview MIND Institute Activities

slide-2
SLIDE 2

3/9/2018 2

  • Founded by 6 families
  • Research and assessment

clinic opened in 1998

  • MIND Institute complex

completed in 2003

  • MIND scientists currently

conducting 60+ funded research projects

MIND Institute

  • Boys with ASD who experience regression

display increased brain size

  • Folic acid taken preconception/prenatally

can decrease ASD risk, especially in women who are poor metabolizers of folate

  • Animal models of neurodevelopmental

disorders

  • Early markers of, and effective early

interventions for, ASD

Recent scientific achievements

  • PI: David Amaral, Ph.D.
  • Focus on 2 subgroups:

– ASD + anxiety: Identification, CBT+SSRI, neuroimaging and response to treatment – ASD + enlarged brains: Determine which brain systems are most affected; use induced pluripotent stem cells to grow neurons and identify genetic alterations that may be related to enlarged brains

Autism Centers of Excellence

  • S

ite PI: Aubyn S tahmer, Ph.D.

  • Adequate evidence that screening detects

autism

  • Harm from screening likely to be small
  • BUT…inadequate evidence of benefits

(US PS TF) – Lack of treatment studies in screen- detected cases – Overall limitations to treatment research

Autism Centers of Excellence

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3/9/2018 3

Autism Centers of Excellence Autism Centers of Excellence

Universal, S tandardized, High-Fidelity S creening S creen ALL children at 18 month check-up S creen the S AME WAY for all using study procedures Avoid common errors Encourage ALL screen positive families to attend evaluation

Autism Centers of Excellence

After Positive S creen or Provider Concerns:

  • Diagnostic report
  • Community referrals for treatment if not

ASD

No cost evaluation No cost evaluation

  • Early Start Denver Model
  • 20 hours/week, 1-on-1
  • Parent coaching twice a month

If ASD: 1 year intensive treatment If ASD: 1 year intensive treatment

  • Recommendations for community

treatment after study treatment ends

Post-evaluations to chart progress Post-evaluations to chart progress

  • Assessment and

Diagnostic Clinic

  • Social Skills Training

Program for ASD

  • ADHD Program for

Children and Adults

  • Fragile X Research and

Treatment Clinic

Clinics

  • High-Risk Infant Follow-Up Clinic
  • Early Start Denver Model
slide-4
SLIDE 4

3/9/2018 4

  • Centers for Excellence in Developmental

Disabilities (CEDD)

  • Autism Research Training Program (ART P)
  • Leadership Education in

Neurodevelopmental Disorders (LEND)

  • Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics

Education and Outreach Early detection of ASD

  • Early identification 

early treatment  improved outcomes

  • Decrease service

utilization, economic burden

  • Challenges: false

positives, unnecessary treatment

Early detection and diagnosis: Why?

  • Infancy/early childhood: Ideal period in

which to investigate phenomenology of childhood disorders

– Improve accurate, earlier detection – Identify critical time points/domains to be targeted by intervention/prevention efforts – Investigate environmental/contextual and biological causal mechanisms

Turning back the clock

slide-5
SLIDE 5

3/9/2018 5

High-risk infant Low-risk infant Affected sibling Unaffected sibling

Early identification: How?

6 Months 9 Months 18 Months 24 Months 36 Months 12 Months 15 Months School- age

… Variety of eye tracking, behavioral, developmental, symptom measures Diagnostic

  • utcomes

determined

Infant sibling design

  • Recurrence risk
  • Patterns of onset
  • Early behavioral and biological markers
  • Targets for intervention and prevention

What can we learn from infant siblings?

  • Previously thought to be 3-10%
  • More recently: 18.7% recurrence risk

Recurrence risk

Ozonoff et al. (2011), Pediatrics

slide-6
SLIDE 6

3/9/2018 6

Social Communication

  • Eye gaze
  • Vocalizations
  • Social smiles
  • Response to name

Early behavioral markers of ASD

Ozonoff et al. (2010), JAACAP

Emergence of social communication behaviors

Response to name

  • Names as social cues for orienting to

salient aspects of environment

  • Diminished response to name consistently

identified by 12 months via retrospective

  • r paper-pencil measures
  • Little known regarding developmental

progressions; direct assessment (vs. parent report)

Miller et al. (2017), Journal of Pediatrics 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 6 9 12 15 18 24 Percent receiving failing score Age (months) Low-Risk Non-ASD High-Risk Non-ASD ASD

* ** ** ** **

Response to name

  • Response to

name probe from AOSI

  • Name called up

to 2x per trial (2 trials)

  • Failure = no

response on any trial

slide-7
SLIDE 7

3/9/2018 7

  • Lack of appropriate gaze
  • Lack of warm, joyful

expressions with gaze

  • Lack of sharing enjoyment
  • r interests
  • Lack of alternating to-

and-fro vocalizations with parents

  • Lack of response to name
  • Delayed onset of

babbling past 9 mo

  • Decreased or absent use
  • f pre-speech gestures

(waving, pointing, showing)

  • No single words by 16 mos
  • No two-word utterances

by 24 mos

  • Repetitive movements or

posturing of body, arms, hands, or fingers

  • Loss of language or social

skills at any age

(Dawson et al., 2000; Landa et al., 2013; Osterling & Dawson, 1994; Osterling et al., 2002; Ozonoff et al., 2008; Ozonoff et al., 2010; Ozonoff et al. 2011; Werner & Dawson, 2005; Werner et al., 2000; Zwaigenbaum et al., 2005)

Red flags for ASD in the first years

  • Broader autism phenotype; other

developmental concerns

Ozonoff et al. (2014), JAACAP

What about everyone else? Long-term outcomes of siblings of children with ASD School-age

  • 80% of younger siblings of children with

ASD do not develop autism

  • BUT… ~35% develop other, non-ASD

concerns by school-age

slide-8
SLIDE 8

3/9/2018 8

Miller et al. (2016), Autism Research

6-8 years 8-11 years

School-age School-age/adolescence

  • Follow-up between 12-15 years ongoing

(PI: Ozonoff)

– Psychopathology: ADHD, anxiety, mood – Academic functioning – Pragmatic language abilities – Attention, activity level, response inhibition – Peer relationships and social functioning

  • Key question: What factors early in life

predict non-ASD, non-TD outcomes?

Adulthood

  • 87 adult siblings (mean age: 39 years)
  • Previously evaluated and identified as

“unaffected” or “broader autism phenotype”

  • Unaffected adult siblings:

– Average IQ, numeracy, literacy – Functioning well in jobs, independence, social relationships

  • Adult siblings characterized by BAP:

– Employment and social relationship levels low – Elevated ASD traits and mental health problems

Howlin et al. (2015), JADD

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% P r

  • f

e s s i

  • n

a l / s k i l l e d e m p l

  • y

m e n t C l

  • s

e r e l a t i

  • n

s h i p s O C D s y m p t

  • m

s E p i s

  • d

i c d e p r e s s i

  • n

s y m p t

  • m

s C h r

  • n

i c d e p r e s s i

  • n

s y m p t

  • m

s A n x i e t y A b

  • v

e A D H D t h r e s h

  • l

d

Unaffected BAP

Adulthood

Howlin et al. (2015), JADD

slide-9
SLIDE 9

3/9/2018 9

  • Much progress in early detection of ASD with

clear implications for clinical practice

  • Longer-term outcomes of infant siblings now

coming into focus

– May help identify early predictors of range of later-diagnosed, atypical developmental

  • utcomes (e.g., ADHD)
  • More work needed on resilience and

protective factors among siblings across the lifespan

Summary New: Early Risk Study

AS D-Risk AS D ADHD-Risk ADHD

AS D ADHD

Low- Risk T D

T ypic ally Developing

Heritability: ~0.9 Heritability: ~0.7-0.8

Currently enrolling!

cmstanton@uc davis.edu | 916-703-0429 | www.bit.ly/EarlyRiskStudy

Early Risk and Infant Sibling Study Teams S ally Ozonoff, Ph.D. Gregory S . Young, Ph.D. Ana-Maria Iosif, Ph.D. Devon Gangi, Ph.D. Monique Hill, M.A. Cady S tanton, M.S . Alex Farquhar-Leic ester Alesha Hill Erika S

  • lis

S taff and researc h assistants Partic ipating families Funding Sources

NIMH K99 MH106642 (Miller) NIMH R01 MH068398 (Ozonoff) NIMH R01 MH109541 (Ozonoff) NICHD U54 HD079125 (Abbeduto)

Contact

Meghan Miller, Ph.D. Email: mrhmiller@ucdavis.edu Phone: 916-703-0217

Acknowledgments