Disclaimers Variety of prostheses Selection bias by surgeons - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
disclaimers
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Disclaimers Variety of prostheses Selection bias by surgeons - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 15, 2023 488 likes •722 views

Outcomes Following TSA How Long Will it Last and Can I Play Overhead Sports? Xavier A. Duralde, MD Peachtree Orthopaedic Clinic Atlanta, GA Outcomes Following TSA How Long Will it Last and Can I Play Overhead Sports? Smith + Nephew:

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Outcomes Following TSA

How Long Will it Last and Can I Play Overhead Sports?

Xavier A. Duralde, MD Peachtree Orthopaedic Clinic Atlanta, GA

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outcomes Following TSA

How Long Will it Last and Can I Play Overhead Sports?

Smith + Nephew: Consultant CORR Board GOS Board

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Disclaimers

  • Variety of

prostheses

  • Selection bias by

surgeons

  • Definition of failure
  • Surgical technique
  • Quality of evidence
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Anatomic TSA

  • Torchia, et al Mayo Clinic 1997

–First long term study –113 anatomic TSA; f/u 12.2 years (5-17yrs) Xray f/u 9.7 years

  • 10 year survival 93%; 15 year 87%
  • 44% of glenoids definitely loose
  • Press fit humeral stem shift in 49%; cemented

shift 0%

  • TSA “survival” 87% but only 68% sat@ at 12
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Anatomic TSA

Quotable Longevity

  • Deshmukh, et al, 2005

–> 10 yr fu on 72 patients –Survival to revision

  • 5 year 98%
  • 10 year 93%
  • 15 year 88%
  • 20 year 85%
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Anatomic TSA

Implant Survival vs Glenoid Loosening

  • Walch, et al 2011

– 5 year fu – Revision 0.3%; glenoid loosening 0.3% – 10 year fu – Revision 1.7%; glenoid loosening 51.5%

  • Fox, et al 2013 Mayo

– Implant survival; 5yrs 99% ; 10yrs 93% – Xray stable glenoid; 5yrs 99%; 10yrs 67%

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What About Young Patients?

  • Roberson, et al Systematic

Review TSA in patients <65

–Average fu 9.4 years –Revision rate 17.4% –Glenoid lucency 54% –Survival Rates

  • 5 yr

98-100%

  • 10 yr

62-92%

  • 20 yr

83-89%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

What About Young Patients?

  • Wagner, et al 2017 Mayo

– Role of age –5494 arthroplasties 1970-2012 –3% decrease in risk of revision/year of age between ages

  • f 40-85

–Increase in risk of revision for mechanical failure in patients younger than 50 by 13%/ year

slide-9
SLIDE 9

HHR

Long Term Results

  • Levine, et al 2012

–25 patients with HHR for GH OA –Follow up 17 yrs (13-21) –8 required revision –Patient satisfaction

  • 2.4 yrs

74%

  • 7.9 yrs

61%

  • 17.2yrs 25%
slide-10
SLIDE 10

TSA vs HHR

  • Sperling, et al 2004

–78 HHR; 36 TSA –Minimum fu 15 years –Survival

  • HHR 10yrs 82% 20yrs 75%
  • TSA 10yrs 97% 20yrs 84%

–Revision

  • HHR 22%
  • TSA 14%
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Reverse TSA

  • Bacle, et al 2017 France

–87 RTSA with > 10 yr fu –Prosthetic survival 93% at 10 yrs –Scapular notching 73% –29% complications; 12% rev –Deterioration of Constant score beginning sometime between year 6 to 8

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Return to Sports

What do Surgeons Allow?

  • Allowed: Low impact such as swimming, dancing,

bowling, doubles tennis and bicycling

  • Allowed with experience: Golf, ice skating and

downhill skiing

  • Not recommended: Hockey, rock climbing,

gymnastics, football

  • No consensus: Baseball/softball, lacrosse, rowing,

soccer, weightlifting,

  • Healy 2001; Survey of 35 ASES surgeons
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Return to Sports

What do Surgeons Allow?

  • Magnussen 2011; Survey ASES/SESEC

–Allowed by prosthetic type

  • Swimming

TSA 82%; HA 87%; RTSA 45%

  • Golf

TSA 75%; HA 77%; RTSA 45%

  • Dbls tennis TSA 48%; HA 45%; RTSA 15%
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Return to Sports

What are patients actually doing?

  • 60-97% of patients return to

sport post arthroplasty

  • 84% of those return to upper

extremity sports –Fishing, swimming, golf, fitness, tennis most popular

  • RTS is prosthetic-

type specific

–TSA 93% –HHR 71% –RTSA 75%

– Bulhoff 2014, McCarty 2008, Zarkadas 2011, Lawrence 2012, Garcia 2015, 2016, Liu 2017

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Return to Sports

How safe is it?

  • Jensen and Rockwood 1998

–TSA - 24 golfers compared to 76 nongolfers –No increase in RLL at 52 months

  • Simovitch 2015

–40 patients with RTSA –One zone of lucency on humeral stem in 17% and 7% notching at 43 months

slide-16
SLIDE 16

What Do I Allow?

  • Avoid high impact

–No wood splitting –Occasional tennis –No contact sports

  • OK with:

–Weightlifting (15 reps), RC program –Golf (especially back arm) – No divot for 6 mos –Swimming

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Keeping My Fingers Crossed

  • Don’t worry Doc, I

don’t do sets with more than 225 lbs!

2 years

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Take Home Points

  • 1. Shoulder arthroplasty is a reliable operation

with good reasonable long-term durability

–Survival to revision Anatomic TSA

  • 5 yrs 98% ---------------10 yrs 93%
  • 15 yrs 88%---------------20 yrs 85%
  • 2. aTSA outperforms and outlasts HHR

–Survival

  • HHR

10yrs 82% ----------20yrs 75%

  • TSA

10yrs 97% ---------20yrs 84%

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Take Home Points

  • 3. Glenoid RLL generally appear about 5 years
  • 4. We don’t know the impact of rotator cuff

failure or glenoid RLL will have on longer term studies regarding shoulder implant survival – stay tuned

  • 5. Reverse TSA survival is not too different

from Anatomic TSA

–93% survival at 10 years

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Take Home Points

  • 6. Surgeons allow greater activity after

shoulder arthroplasty when there is no glenoid component but anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty has the highest return to sport of all the types of shoulder arthroplasty

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Take Home Points

  • 7. Most patients (60-97%) return to sport

following arthroplasty with many returning to upper extremity sports

  • 8. There are no long-term studies regarding

the safety of return to sport in terms of implant survival

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Xavier A Duralde, M.D. Peachtree Orthopedics