Measurement of the ZZ production cross section at 13 TeV with the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

measurement of the zz production cross section at 13 tev
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Measurement of the ZZ production cross section at 13 TeV with the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Measurement of the ZZ production cross section at 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 101801 (2016) Stefan Richter (UCL, CERN) Jonatan Rosten (Cambridge) IoP HEPP & APP conference 21-23 March 2016 University of Sussex


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Measurement of the ZZ production cross section at 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

  • Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 101801 (2016)

Stefan Richter (UCL, CERN) Jonatan Rosten (Cambridge) IoP HEPP & APP conference 21-23 March 2016 University of Sussex

slide-2
SLIDE 2

In short

Measure fiducial inclusive cross section for ZZ at √s = 13 TeV in the four-lepton channel, using 3.2 fb−1 of data “Z” = Z/γ ∗ with mass between 66–116 GeV

(CMS uses 60–120 GeV)

ℓ = e, µ Also extrapolate to ‘total’ phase space and all Z boson decays

Paper: Phys. Rev. Let. 116, 101801 (2016)

2

Stefan Richter

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Cambridge

Introduction

Motivations:

  • Good test of the electroweak sector of the Standard

Model at unprecedented energy

  • Important background to searches for rare multilepton

final states (like H→ZZ)

  • First step towards differential cross sections, aTGCS, etc.

3

Jonatan Rosten

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Cambridge

Introduction

q q Z Z g g Z Z

Two examples of important Feynman diagrams

Three leptonic channels: 4e, 2e2µ, 4µ Clean channel, small backgrounds Small cross section: statistically limited

4

Jonatan Rosten

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Fiducial lepton definition

Generator-level

Prompt final-state muons and electrons ‘Dressing’ to account for Bremsstrahlung: add four-momenta

  • f prompt photons within ∆R =
  • (∆η)2 + (∆ϕ)2 = 0.1

p⊥ > 20 GeV |η| < 2.7

5

Stefan Richter

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Lepton selection

Reconstructed

Lepton identification

Electrons: electromagnetic calorimeter deposits + tracking info Muons: tracking and/or muon spectrometer info, calorimeter signature consistent with muon

p⊥ > 20 GeV |η| < 2.47 (electrons) or 2.7 (muons) Associated with primary vertex

Transverse impact parameter significance |d0/σ (d0)| < 5 (electrons) or 3 (muons) Longitudinal impact parameter w.r.t. primary vertex |z0 sin θ | < 0.5 mm

Isolated from other tracks/energy deposits

6

Stefan Richter

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Event selection

Same for fiducial and reconstructed except for some reconstruction quality requirements Exactly 4 leptons in 2 same-flavour opposite-charge pairs ∆Rℓℓ > 0.2 If 4 same-flavour leptons, form pairs such that |m12 − mZ| + |m34 − mZ| is minimised Z candidate selection: 66 GeV < m12,m34 < 116 GeV

In reconstructed: single-muon or dielectron trigger matched by selected leptons, hard-scatering vertex, and at most 1 muon without inner-detector

  • r muon-system track (standalone, calorimeter-tagged )

7

Stefan Richter

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Candidate event (dilepton masses 95 and 88 GeV)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Cambridge

Backgrounds

Two types of backgrounds, Irreducible and Fake leptons Irreducible backgrounds have four genuine leptons Triboson processes (ZZZ, WZZ, etc) ZZ→[4τ, 2τ2l] tuZ

  • Well modelled in MC

9

Jonatan Rosten

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Cambridge

Fake lepton backgrounds

Fake lepton backgrounds: jets can be misidentified as leptons One or two identified leptons might be jets

  • Not modelled well in MC, use data driven

“fake factor” method

  • Equivalent to the matrix method, except no

leptons faking jets

10

Jonatan Rosten

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Cambridge

Fake factor

Control region of leptons with inverted definition cuts

Lepton-like Jet-like Electrons Pass ID and ISO cut Fail ID xor ISO cut Muons Pass d0 and ISO cut Fail d0 or ISO cut

Assumption: Three lepton events are from Z+fake leptons (except ZZ, WZ)

  • Go through data, find Z+lepton events, save info on

jet-like and lepton-like leptons

11

Jonatan Rosten

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Cambridge

Data driven background

  • Nmisid. leptons

bkg

=

  • N``` j − N``` j

ZZ

  • × Fmis-ID −
  • N`` jj − N`` j j

ZZ

  • × F2

mis-ID

Assume fake rate is the same for second fake Done in p and η bins, for each channel

T

Fmis-ID = L J

12

Jonatan Rosten

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Cambridge

Background yields

Channel ZZ ! 2`2τ, 4τ ZZZ, WZZ, WWZ t¯ tZ Background with 1–2 Total Total 4` 0.07 ± 0.02 0.17 ± 0.05 0.30 ± 0.09 0.09+1.08

−0.04

0.62+1.08

−0.11

Data driven

√s = 13 TeV, 3.2 fb-1

13

Jonatan Rosten

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Cambridge

Yields

In 2015, LHC delivered 3.2 ± 0.2 fb-1 of useful √s = 13 TeV, 25 ns data

±

−2.2

± ± Expected background 0.20 ± 0.05 0.25+0.40

−0.05

0.17+1.00

−0.04

0.62+1.08

−0.11

Channel 4e 2e2µ 4µ Total 4` Observed 15 29 18 62

2.2

14

Jonatan Rosten

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Dilepton masses (before on-shell requirement)

Z candidate mass [GeV]

T,ll

p Subleading- 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Z candidate mass [GeV]

T,ll

p Leading- 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Data 4l → ZZ

ATLAS

  • 1

= 13 TeV, 3.2 fb s

  • 0.11

+1.08

Expected background: 0.62

  • Phys. Rev. Let. 116, 101801 (2016)

15

Stefan Richter

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Four-lepton mass

[GeV]

4l

m Mass of four-lepton system 200 300 400 500 600 700 Events / 20 GeV 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Data 4l → ZZ → q q 4l → ZZ → gg Prediction uncertainty

ATLAS

  • 1

= 13 TeV, 3.2 fb s

  • 0.11

+1.08

Expected background: 0.62

  • Phys. Rev. Let. 116, 101801 (2016)

16

Stefan Richter

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Four-lepton p⊥

[GeV]

T,4l

p Transverse momentum of four-lepton system 50 100 150 200 250 Events / 10 GeV 5 10 15 20 25

Data 4l → ZZ → q q 4l → ZZ → gg Prediction uncertainty

ATLAS

  • 1

= 13 TeV, 3.2 fb s

  • 0.11

+1.08

Expected background: 0.62

  • Phys. Rev. Let. 116, 101801 (2016)

17

Stefan Richter

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Four-lepton rapidity

4l

y Rapidity of four-lepton system 3 − 2 − 1 − 1 2 3 Events / 0.2 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Data 4l → ZZ → q q 4l → ZZ → gg Prediction uncertainty

ATLAS

  • 1

= 13 TeV, 3.2 fb s

  • 0.11

+1.08

Expected background: 0.62

  • Phys. Rev. Let. 116, 101801 (2016)

18

Stefan Richter

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Correction factor CZZ

Corrects measured cross section for detector effects CZZ ≡ selected reconstructed events fiducial events Determined using simulated signal samples

4e 2e2µ 4µ CZZ 0.55 ± 0.02 0.63 ± 0.02 0.81 ± 0.03

Relative uncertainties in %:

Source 4e 2e2µ 4µ Statistical 0.7 0.5 0.5 Theory (generator, PDFs) 2.5 2.5 2.5 Experimental efficiencies 2.3 2.2 2.0 Momentum scales and resolutions 0.4 0.2 0.1 Total 3.5 3.3 3.2

19

Stefan Richter

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Extrapolation factor AZZ

Extrapolates fiducial cross section to total phase space AZZ ≡ fiducial events

  • n-shell events = 0.39 ± 0.02

Determined using simulated signal samples Relative uncertainties in %:

Source Uncertainty Statistical 0.9 Generator 3.4 Parton shower 0.8 PDFs 0.8 QCD scales 0.3 Total 3.7

20

Stefan Richter

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Cambridge

Cross section extraction

Nchan

exp = σfid chan L Cchan ZZ

+ Nchan

DD + Nchan Irr

Nchan

exp = σtot ZZ L Cchan ZZ Achan ZZ BRchan + Nchan DD + Nchan Irr

Likelihood model, poisson distributions model for statistical part

  • Multiplied by Gaussians for systematic uncertainties

Lstat = Y

chan

Pois(N chan

  • bs , N chan

exp )

21

Jonatan Rosten

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Cambridge

Cross section results

Measurement O(α2

s) prediction

σfid

ZZ!e+e−e+e−

8.4 +2.4

−2.0(stat.) +0.4 −0.2(syst.) +0.5 −0.3(lumi.) fb

6.9+0.2

−0.2 fb

σfid

ZZ!e+e−µ+µ−

14.7 +2.9

−2.5(stat.) +0.6 −0.4(syst.) +0.9 −0.6(lumi.) fb

13.6+0.4

−0.4 fb

σfid

ZZ!µ+µ−µ+µ−

6.8 +1.8

−1.5(stat.) +0.3 −0.3(syst.) +0.4 −0.3(lumi.) fb

6.9+0.2

−0.2 fb

σfid

ZZ!`+`−`0+`0−

29.7 +3.9

−3.6(stat.) +1.0 −0.8(syst.) +1.7 −1.3(lumi.) fb

27.4+0.9

−0.8 fb

σtot

ZZ

16.7 +2.2

−2.0(stat.) +0.9 −0.7(syst.) +1.0 −0.7(lumi.) pb

15.6+0.4

−0.4 pb

theory

σ /

data

σ 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2

Measurement

  • Tot. uncertainty
  • Stat. uncertainty

prediction

2 s

α σ 1 ± σ 2 ± Theory: PLB 750 (2015) 407 CT10 NNLO

Combined 4µ 2 µ e2 4e ATLAS Preliminary Fiducial 4l → ZZ → pp

  • 1

= 13 TeV, 3.2 fb s

theory

σ /

data

σ 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2

Measurement

  • Tot. uncertainty
  • Stat. uncertainty

prediction

2 s

α σ 1 ± σ 2 ± Theory: PLB 750 (2015) 407 CT10 NNLO

Combined 4µ 2 µ e2 4e ATLAS Fiducial 4l → ZZ → pp

  • 1

= 13 TeV, 3.2 fb s

Comparison with NNLO

22

Jonatan Rosten

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Cambridge

Cross section results

[TeV] s 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 [pb]

tot ZZ

σ 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

) p ZZ (p ZZ (pp) =13 TeV) s LHC Data 2015 ( =8 TeV) s LHC Data 2012 ( =7 TeV) s LHC Data 2011 ( =1.96 TeV) s Tevatron Data (

  • 1

66-116 GeV) 3.2 fb

ll

llll (m → ATLAS ZZ

  • 1

66-116 GeV) 19.6 fb

ll

llll (m → CMS ZZ

  • 1

66-116 GeV) 20.3 fb

ll

) (m ν ν ll(ll/ → ATLAS ZZ

  • 1

66-116 GeV) 4.6 fb

ll

) (m ν ν ll(ll/ → ATLAS ZZ

  • 1

60-120 GeV) 5.0 fb

ll

llll (m → CMS ZZ

  • 1

) (on-shell) 9.7 fb ν ν ll(ll/ → CDF ZZ

  • 1

60-120 GeV) 8.6 fb

ll

) (m ν ν ll(ll/ → D0 ZZ

ATLAS

MCFM, CT14 NLO

work in progress

Total cross section, comparison with NLO

23

Jonatan Rosten

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Theory considerations

NNLO prediction: [arXiv:1507.06257] Correction for final-state photon radiation: decrease fiducial cross section by ∼4% Double parton scatering (∼1%) in measurement, not in prediction NLO corrections to loop-induced process (NNNLO) could increase prediction by ∼4–5%

[arXiv:1509.06734]

NLO-α electroweak corrections could decrease prediction by ∼7–8%

[arXiv:1601.07787], [arXiv:1305.5402]

24

Stefan Richter

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Conclusions

ZZ production cross section measured at √s = 13 TeV Total uncertainty ca. 15%, statistically dominated Agreement with NNLO Standard Model prediction Measurement uncertainty of similar size as gg-initiated loop-induced production ! start to be sensitive! Future goals with more data:

  • differential cross sections
  • search for anomalous gauge couplings
  • double parton scatering contribution
  • also 2ℓ2ν and 2ℓ2q channels
  • ...

Thank you! Qestions?

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Cambridge

8 TeV analysis

√s = 8 TeV Total of 321 events in 20.3fb-1 of 8 TeV data

Subleading lepton pair mass [GeV] 50 100 150 200 250 Leading lepton pair mass [GeV] 50 100 150 200 250

  • 1

L dt = 20.3 fb

= 8 TeV s Internal ATLAS Data

  • l

+

l

  • l

+

l → ZZ

work in progress 26

Jonatan Rosten

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Cambridge

8 TeV analysis

  • work in progress

√s = 8 TeV Total of 321 events in 20.3fb-1 of 8 TeV data

27

Jonatan Rosten

27