Differentiation Update
Elementary & Secondary
NOVEMBER 2013
Where !have !we !been !and !where !are !we !going?
Differentiation Update Where !have !we !been !and !where !are !we - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
NOVEMBER 2013 Differentiation Update Where !have !we !been !and !where !are !we !going? Elementary & Secondary Outline ELEMENTARY SECONDARY Purpose Purpose Background Background Professional Development Role of District Coach Years
Elementary & Secondary
NOVEMBER 2013
Where !have !we !been !and !where !are !we !going?
Outline
Purpose Background
Role of District Coach Year 3 of the Journey Differentiation Defined What Teachers Say SupportFindings
Grade Level Distribution Subject Area Distribution Surveys Principals Campus CoachesStrengths & Challenges Next Steps/Recommendations
OUTLINEPurpose Background
Professional Development Years 1 & 2 Year 3 Stages of ImplementationFindings
Differentiated Instruction PLC Observation Strategic PlanningStrengths & Challenges Next Steps/Recommendations
ELEMENTARY SECONDARY
Meet our Teams
District-Level Coaches Elementary Secondary
Melanie Yungclas Susi Del Rio Chris Bremer
Background Findings Strengths & Challenges Next Steps/Recommendations
Background
Role of the District Coach Year 3 of the Journey Differentiation Defined What Teachers Say Support
ElementaryRole of District Coach
Campus
Weekly Teacher Support Weekly Student Support
District
Professional Development Mentoring
BACKGROUNDYear 3 of the Journey
Differentiating for Elementary Campuses
All campuses continue to make progress by using their customized road maps.
Year 1 Year 3 Year 2
BACKGROUNDPilot
Elementary Background
Pilot
Spring 2011
Year 1
2011-2012
Year 2
2012-3013
Year 3
2013-2014
Prairie Creek Skyview Arapaho Classical Bowie Dover Hamilton Park Lake Highlands Mark Twain MST Merriman Park Spring Creek Springridge Audelia Creek Big Springs Dartmouth Dobie Greenwood Hills Jess Harben Mohawk Moss Haven Northrich O.Henry RISD Academy Terrace Stults Wallace Aikin Brentfield Canyon Creek Carolyn Bukhair
Forest Lane Academy
Forestridge Northlake Northwood Hills Prestonwood Heights Richland Spring Valley Thurgood Marshall White Rock Yale
BACKGROUNDYear 3 of the Journey
Differentiating for Elementary Campuses
Every school starts in a different place. Every school’s journey takes a different avenue.
The destination does not change.
BACKGROUNDDifferentiation Defined
Differentiation Is Not
Every Lesson, Every Day, Every Child A Program Extra Work
Differentiation Is
Best Practices Individual Learning Styles & Profiles Visual, Manipulative and Interactive Activities
BACKGROUNDDifferentiation Includes
Pre-Assessment Connection to Core Curriculum Respectful Tasks
Stations/Centers/Menus Guided Practice Independent Practice
BACKGROUNDWhat Teachers Say
Initial Thoughts Student Engagement Teacher Growth Advice
BACKGROUNDYear 3 Participants
Visited Year 3 Campuses Four Times Prior to Start of Year
Different Levels of Readiness Initiative to Explore New Strategies Minimal Reluctance to Change
BACKGROUNDSupport
Professional Development Collaborative Planning Building Capacity Campus-Level Coaches “Circle-Back” Campuses
BACKGROUNDSupport: Professional Development
Wednesday Collaborative Planning Campus Staff Meetings District-Level Coaches Campus-Level Coaches Special Sessions
Spring Math Differentiation Training
BACKGROUNDSupport: Collaborative Planning
Four Meetings Throughout the Year
K-2nd Grade 3rd-4th Grade 5th-6th Grade
Open Invitation
Year 3 Participants Year 1 & 2 Participants Select Specialists
BACKGROUNDSupport: Building Capacity
Campus-Level Coaches
Identified by District-Level Coaches and Principals Characteristics of an Effective Coach
Complete Understanding of Differentiation “Big Ideas” Effective Implementation of Differentiation “Big Ideas” Ability to Coach Other Teachers
BACKGROUNDSupport: Campus-Level Coaches
District-Level Coaches Make & Take Meetings Differentiation Is - Differentiation Is Not Differentiation of the Core Pre-Assessment Tiered Activities
BACKGROUNDSupport: “Circle-Back” Campuses
Identification Rationale
Teacher Changes Administrator Changes
Plan
Professional Development at Staff Meetings Open Invitation to Collaborative Planning
BACKGROUNDFindings
Grade Level Distribution Subject Area Distribution Surveys Principals Campus Coaches
ElementaryParticipants by Grade Level
9% 11% 20% 18% 18% 15% 8%
K 6 5 1 4 2 3
FINDINGSThis pie chart illustrates the grade levels of the teachers that have participated in the initiative.
Subject Area Distribution
4% 30% 66%
READING MATH SCIENCE*
FINDINGSThis pie chart illustrates the subject areas differentiated in the classrooms of teachers that have participated in the initiative.
*The Elementary Science curriculum includes the elements of a Differentiated Core: Visual, Manipulative and Interactive.Surveys: Principals
Survey Topics Needs Assessment Plan for Continued Implementation System for Monitoring
FINDINGSSurveys: Campus-Level Coaches
Survey Topics Challenges Frequency of Presentations to Staff Topics Covered at Staff Meetings
Renzulli Learning & Learning Styles Pre-Assessment Connection to Core Curriculum Stations/Centers/Menus Tiered Activities
FINDINGSStrengths & Challenges
ElementaryStrengths
3rd Year of Initiative 100% Campus Participation (various stages) Strong Professional Development Campus-Level Coaches (Year 1 & 2) Strategic Plan to Build Capacity
Challenges
Expanding the Initiative Fostering Instructional Knowledge Across Grade Levels Maintaining Capacity/Attrition
STRENGTHS/CHALLENGESNext Steps/ Recommendations
ElementaryExpand Initiative Maintain Support Provide Professional Development Continue “Circle-Back” Plan Reconfigure District-Level Coach Schedule
Support
Evaluate Unique Needs of Campuses Differentiate Support of Campuses
Communication
Solicit Feedback Principals Participants
Professional Development
Principals Teachers Support Staff Curriculum
Next Steps Recommendations
NEXT STEPS/RECOMMENDATIONSBackground Findings Strengths & Challenges Next Steps/Recommendations
Background
Professional Development Years 1& 2 Year 3 Stages of Implementation
SecondaryBackground
Non-Negotiables of Differentiated Instruction
High Quality Curriculum Respectful Tasks Flexible Grouping Ongoing Assessment Community
Teachers Can Differentiate
Content Process Product
According To...
Student Readiness Student Interest Learning Profile
BACKGROUNDBackground
Years 1 & 2 2011-2012 and 2012-2013
Professional Development
Fall Symposium on DI Campus Site-Based Training on DI Summer Leadership Conference
DI Updates
BACKGROUNDBackground
Year 3 2013-14
Professional Development
Fall Symposium 2013 Campus Site-Based Training on “DI 101” and “201” DI Updates 6-Hour Online DI Update DI Cadre DI Team Training District Wide Day DI Sessions for ELA and Math Site-Based New Teacher DI Training
BACKGROUNDStages of Implementation
Novice (Years 1 & 2)
DI Theory and Foundational Learning Development of Growth Mindset Study Specific Examples of DI Low-Risk Implementation Strategies
Apprentice (Year 3)
Opportunities to Articulate the Rationale, Principles, and Methods of DI Critical Analysis of DI Implementation Collaboration to Identify Strategic DI Opportunities
BACKGROUNDSecondary Background
20% 80%
DI Training: Framework, Research, and Vocabulary DI Training: Critical Discussions, Analysis, and Modeling
NOVICE YEARS 1 & 2
2011-2013
75% 25%
APPRENTICE YEAR 3
2013-2014
BACKGROUNDFindings
Differentiated Instruction PLC Observation Strategic Planning
SecondaryFindings
Effective Differentiated Instruction is enhanced by
methods of instruction through Professional Learning Communities (PLCs). Evidence
PLC teams meet regularly focusing on differentiated instruction. Variety of teams (administrators, specialists, teachers) participate in consistent and critical conversations about instruction and the individual student experience.
FINDINGSDI through PLC
AJH PLC BHS STEM PLC PJH PLC INSTRUCTIONAL SPECIALISTS CORE AREA PLC
FINDINGSFindings
Effective Differentiated Instruction is the result of
implementation. Evidence
Site-Based “DI 201” Professional Development DI Cadre 6 Hour Online DI Update
FINDINGSDI Cadre
FINDINGSFindings
Effective Differentiated Instruction is the result of strategic planning. Evidence
Site-Based DI Team Collaboration between Central DI Coaching Team, DI Cadre, Principal/Central DI PLC Development of DI SMART Goals
FINDINGSPearce HS SMART Goal for DI
FINDINGSStrengths & Challenges
SecondaryStrengths
District Lead Supports Campuses PLCs Facilitate Discussions Campus Teams Build Capacity Principal PLC Offers Collaboration Cadre Offers Analysis and Critical Conversations
Challenges
Extending Clear Learning Goals to All Curriculum Areas Aligning with Other District Initiatives such as Project Based Learning (PBL)
STRENGTHS/CHALLENGESNext Steps/ Recommendations
SecondaryNext Steps Recommendations
Progress Measures/Data
SMART Goals Surveys (Teacher/Student) State and National Assessment Results
Professional Learning Communities
Connection between DI and PLC
Curriculum
Clear Learning Goals
Professional Development
Tomlinson Model District DI Symposium (DI Teams)
Expand Initiative Maintain Support Provide Professional Development
NEXT STEPS/RECOMMENDATIONSElementary & Secondary
NOVEMBER 2013
Where !have !we !been !and !where !are !we !going?