Different Methods of Working with Blaise in the Israel Central - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

different methods of working with blaise in the israel
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Different Methods of Working with Blaise in the Israel Central - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Different Methods of Working with Blaise in the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics Shifra Har and Evgenia Luskin International Blaise Users Conference Riga, Latvia June 2009 Table of Contents Introduction Methods of working with


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Different Methods of Working with Blaise in the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics

Shifra Har and Evgenia Luskin

International Blaise Users Conference Riga, Latvia June 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Table of Contents

Introduction

Methods of working with Blaise and

parameters for each method

Advantages and Disadvantages for each

method

Example Conclusion

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Introduction

10 years using Blaise for families and individual

surveys:

Labor force survey, family income survey,

social survey, health survey, first degree graduates survey, crime survey

Population and housing census

Three questionnaire languages: Hebrew, Arabic

and Russian (right to left and left to right)

Combined different modes of data collection:

CAPI, CATI, CADI

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Table of Contents

Introduction

Methods of working with Blaise

and parameters for each method

Advantages and Disadvantages for each

method

Example Conclusion

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Methods of working with Blaise

“Blaise + Manipula” “Blaise + .Net” “.Net + SQL”

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Parameters in the Different Methods

Questionnaire tools Management system tools Database

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

“Blaise + Manipula” Method

Questionnaire language – Blaise Management system language – Manipula Database – Blaise DB

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

“Blaise + .Net” Method

Questionnaire language – Blaise Management system language – .Net Database

Questionnaire data in Blaise DB Management data in SQL DB

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

“.Net + SQL” Method

Questionnaire language – Blaise Management system language – .Net Database

Questionnaire data in SQL DB Management data in SQL DB

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Table of Contents

Introduction Methods of working with Blaise and

parameters for each method

Advantages and Disadvantages

for each method

Example Conclusion

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Advantages and Disadvantages “Blaise + Manipula” Method

Advantages

Quick development Stability and efficiency

Disadvantages

Limitation of Manipula: screen designs, batch

activities

Multi users capabilities

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Advantages and Disadvantages “Blaise + .Net” Method

Advantages

Using the abilities of Blaise for quick

development of questionnaire

Wide opportunities for the screen design,

development options

Management system is much more friendly and

with good performance

Disadvantages

The performance of activities using Blaise tables

is relatively slow compared to SQL tables

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Advantages and Disadvantages “.Net + SQL” Method

Advantages Great performance compared to the first two

methods

Using the Blaise strong abilities as a language for

questionnaire development

Management system is much more friendly and with

good performance

Disadvantages

Creation of an SQL table for questionnaire data Two additional modules for transferring the data

between the Blaise tables and the SQL tables

Long development and debugging time

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Table of Contents

Introduction Methods of working with Blaise and

parameters for each method

Advantages and Disadvantages for each

method

Example

Conclusion

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Example of “.Net + SQL” Method Population Census

Questioning of 20% of the population, 320,000

households

Questionnaire held approximately 300 questions in

three parts:

Questions about the apartment Questions about the household Questions about the individual Developed two SQL tables for questionnaire data: Table with values of answers Table for statuses "response", "don't know" and

"refuse"

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Example of “.Net + SQL “ Method Population Census

Modules for data transfer between Blaise and SQL

were written in C-Sharp

First experience to combine developing tools in the

flow .Net -> Blaise -> .Net

  • Management system was written in .Net
  • Questionnaire in Blaise
  • DLL from DEP for finding and marking of

streets was written in .Net

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Table of Contents

Introduction Methods of working with Blaise and

parameters for each method

Advantages and Disadvantages for each

method

Example

Conclusion

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Conclusion

“Blaise + Manipula” method is good for relatively

small and simple surveys with CATI and/or CADI modes of data collection

  • Example: first degree graduates survey,

public transport satisfaction survey

“Blaise + .Net” method is good for big and

complicated surveys with CAPI mode of data collection

  • Example: labor force survey, social survey
slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Conclusion

“.Net + SQL” method is good for surveys that

require great performance and have enough developing time

  • Example: Census

The best development method for a specific survey

is chosen according to the requirements of that specific survey, the different modes of data collection and other special requests

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

THE END