Diabetes 101
Joint Task Force on Diabetes Prevention and Awareness
March 8th, 2012 Thomas L. O’Connell, MD
UNC Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology thomas_oconnell@med.unc.edu
Diabetes 101 Joint Task Force on Diabetes Prevention and Awareness - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Diabetes 101 Joint Task Force on Diabetes Prevention and Awareness March 8 th , 2012 Thomas L. OConnell, MD UNC Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology thomas_oconnell@med.unc.edu What is Diabetes? Diabetes is a group of
Joint Task Force on Diabetes Prevention and Awareness
March 8th, 2012 Thomas L. O’Connell, MD
UNC Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology thomas_oconnell@med.unc.edu
National Diabetes Fact Sheet, CDC, 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/factsheet11.htm
Type 1 (<10%) β-cell destruction with lack of insulin Type 2 (>90%) Insulin resistance + insulin deficiency Other specific types
Adapted from The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:1183-1197.
100 200 150 300 250 350
5 10 15 20 25 30 100 200 50 150 *Postprandial glucose Fasting glucose Insulin resistance Insulin level Years
At risk for diabetes b-cell dysfunction
250 Glucose (mg/dL) % Relative to Normal
* Post Prandial = 1-2 h ppg Bergenstal RM et al. Management of Type 2 Diabetes in Endocrinology. 4th Edition; Philadelphia, 2001
diabetes, usually type 2, immediately following pregnancy
the next 10 to 20 years
National Diabetes Fact Sheet, CDC, 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/factsheet11.htm
A1C 6.5%. The test should be performed in a laboratory using a method that is NGSP certified and standardized to the DCCT assay.* OR FPG 126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l). Fasting is defined as no caloric intake for at least 8 h.* OR 2-h plasma glucose 200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l) during an OGTT. The test should be performed as described by the World Health Organization, using a glucose load containing the equivalent of 75 g anhydrous glucose dissolved in water.* OR In a patient with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis, a random plasma glucose 200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l)
* In the absence of unequivocal hyperglycemia, should be confirmed by repeat testing.
and have additional risk factors:
– physical inactivity – first-degree relative with diabetes – members of a high-risk ethnic population (e.g., African American, Latino, Native American, Asian American, Pacific Islander) – women who delivered a baby weighing >9 lb or were diagnosed with GDM – hypertension (≥140/90 mmHg or on therapy for hypertension) – HDL cholesterol level <35 mg/dl and/or a triglyceride level >250 mg/dl – women with polycystic ovary syndrome – A1C ≥5.7%, IGT, or IFG on previous testing – other clinical conditions associated with insulin resistance (e.g., severe obesity, acanthosis nigricans) – history of CVD
consideration of more frequent testing depending on initial results and risk status. *At-risk BMI may be lower in some ethnic groups.
National Diabetes Fact Sheet, CDC, 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/factsheet11.htm
Estimated percentage of people aged 20 years or older with diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes, by age group, United States, 2005-2008
Source: 2005–2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
National Diabetes Fact Sheet, CDC, 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/factsheet11.htm
Daily Annually Cost $476,712,329 $174,000,000,000 New cases 4,658 1,700,000 Deaths 641 234,000 Amputations 195 71,000 ESRD 129 47,000 Blindness 66 24,000
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2007. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008.
Harris MI. Clin Invest Med 1995;18:231-239 Nelson RG et al. Adv Nephrol Necker Hosp 1995;24:145-156 World Health Organization, 2002;Fact Sheet N° 138
Retinopathy
Microvascular Macrovascular
Nephropathy Neuropathy Stroke Peripheral Vascular Disease Heart Disease
– kidney failure
kidney disease in 2008
diabetic retinopathy in 2005-2008
– nontraumatic lower-limb amputations
performed in people with diabetes in 2006
National Diabetes Fact Sheet, CDC, 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/factsheet11.htm
periodontal disease
have impaired sensation in the feet
National Diabetes Fact Sheet, CDC, 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/factsheet11.htm
Comparing intensive to conventional treatment for type 1 diabetes, DCCT achieved separation of A1C and BS
A1C separation, 9.0 vs 7.1 % Average BS separation, 231 vs 155 mg/dL
Rate per 100 person- years
24 20 16 12 8 4 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Mean HbA1c = 11% 10% 9% 8% 7%
Time during study (y)
DCCT Research Group. Diabetes. 1995;44:968-983.
In the DCCT, compared to conventional therapy, intensive therapy reduced the cumulative incidence of 3-step worsening of retinal photos
Primary prevention cohort Secondary intervention cohort
– 76% reduction of new onset – 54% reduction of progression
– 39% reduction of occurrence of microalbuminuria – 54% reduction of occurrence of albuminuria
– 60% reduction of occurrence
infarction and in all cause mortality
peripheral vascular disease
Stratton IM, et al. BMJ. 2000;321:405-412. *P<0.0001
DCCT Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977-986. Ohkubo Y, et al. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1995;28:103-117. UKPDS 33: Lancet 1998; 352, 837-853.
HbA1c Retinopathy Nephropathy Neuropathy Cardiovascular disease DCCT 9 7.2% 63% 54% 60% 41% (NS) Kumamoto 9 7% 69% 70% Improved
National Diabetes Fact Sheet, CDC, 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/factsheet11.htm
10 20 30 40 50 No prior MI Prior MI No prior MI Prior MI
3.5 18.8 20.2 45.0 P<0.001 P<0.001 7-Year Incidence of MI
n=1304 n=69 n=890 n=169
Diabetic Patients Nondiabetic Patients
Type 2 Diabetes and CHD: After 7 yr followup, the presence of diabetes is as great a risk factor for MI, as is a history among nondiabetics of having a prior MI
More recent studies suggest that this is perhaps only true for those with fairly long-standing diabetes – duration over ten years. The risk is about 2-3 times that of non-diabetic individuals without CAD.
Haffner SM et al. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:229; Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:404
27 45 23 19
10 20 30 40 50 Placebo Simvastatin Placebo Simvastatin n=202
32%
Risk Reduction Patients With Major Coronary Event (%)
55%
Risk Reduction
Pyörälä et al. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:614
n=4242
*CHD death or nonfatal MI
Nondiabetic Patients Diabetic Patients
After median 8.8 years post-trial follow-up Aggregate Endpoint 1997 2007 Any diabetes related endpoint RRR: 12% 9% P: 0.029 0.040 Microvascular disease RRR: 25% 24% P: 0.009 0.001 Myocardial infarction RRR: 16% 15% P: 0.052 0.014 All-cause mortality RRR: 6% 13% P: 0.44 0.007
RRR = Relative Risk Reduction P = Log Rank
Holman RR, et al. New England Journal of Medicine 2008; 359:1577-1589
National Diabetes Fact Sheet, CDC, 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/factsheet11.htm
Diabetes Care 30: S4-41, 2007 (http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/reprint/30/suppl_1/S4) http://www.aace.com/pub/press/releases/diabetesconsensuswhitepaper.php
Goal ADA ACE
Premeal plasma glucose (mg/dl) 70-130 <110 Postprandial plasma glucose (mg/dl) (<180) <140 A1C <7% ≤6.5%
National Diabetes Fact Sheet, CDC, 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/factsheet11.htm
* For all three tests, risk is continuous, extending below the lower limit of the range and becoming disproportionately greater at higher ends of the range.
† IFG = impaired fasting glucose, IGT = impaired glucose tolerance
National Diabetes Fact Sheet, CDC, 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/factsheet11.htm
Study Subjects Intervention Relative Risk Reduction DaQing Finnish DPS US DPP IGT IGT IGT+“IFG” Diet or Exercise or Both Lifestyle Lifestyle 64%/53%/61% 58% 58% US DPP STOP-NIDDM EDIT TRIPOD XENDOS DREAM ACT-NOW ORIGIN NAVIGATOR IGT+“IFG” IGT IFG Prior GDM IGT IGT IGT IFG + IGT IGT + IFG Metformin Acarbose Metformin or Acarbose or Both Troglitazone Orlistat Rosiglitazone or Ramipril or Both Pioglitazone Glargine or Fish oil or Both Nateglinide or Valsartan or Both 31% 25% NS 35% 45% 61%/NS 72% ~2012 NS/16%
Behavior Medication*
Li et al., Lancet 2008;371:1783-1789. ADA Position Statement on the Prevention or Delay of Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes
2006;368:1096-1105. DREAM Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1551-1562. DeFronzo RA, et al. ADA 68th Scientific Sessions 2008. Origin Trial Investigators. Am Heart J 2008;155:26-32. Navigator. NEJM 2010.
*No drugs are approved for diabetes prevention or delay by FDA.