Development of NDI Tools for Detecting Cracks in MD88 Vertical - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

development of ndi tools for detecting cracks in md88
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Development of NDI Tools for Detecting Cracks in MD88 Vertical - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Development of NDI Tools for Detecting Cracks in MD88 Vertical Stabilizer Holes with Bushings David Piotrowski Delta TechOps Principal Engineer Dr. Yushi Sun IMTT John Bohler Delta TechOps Level III-ET Outline 2009 Presentation at ATA


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Development of NDI Tools for Detecting Cracks in MD88 Vertical Stabilizer Holes with Bushings

David Piotrowski Delta TechOps Principal Engineer

  • Dr. Yushi Sun

IMTT John Bohler Delta TechOps Level III-ET

slide-2
SLIDE 2

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 2

Outline

  • 2009 Presentation at ATA
  • Inspection Results Update
  • RFEC through bushings
  • Desired instead of large repair
  • Promising capability demonstrated
  • Now at POD stage
  • ADs 2011-15-01/2011-12-12
  • AMOC required
  • Summary
slide-3
SLIDE 3

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 3

Location of Interest: ZFS=52.267

Significant vibration issues

slide-4
SLIDE 4

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 4

Previous discovery/investigation

slide-5
SLIDE 5

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 5

2009 Presentation Review

Delta „above and beyond‟ actions

slide-6
SLIDE 6

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 6

2009 Presentation Review

SB, SSID development/validations

slide-7
SLIDE 7

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 7

  • All visual inspections complete –no findings.
  • All one-time x-ray inspections complete –no findings.
  • Six aircraft targeted for early BHEC inspections –two aircraft cracked
  • Previous damage or repairs noted in area (pulled fasteners, cracks, etc)
  • Entire fleet is to receive combined BHEC, LFEC and HFEC at Letter Checks
  • 31 aircraft found with LE „distress‟; Repaired
  • 17 aircraft cracked (BHEC); repaired with bushings
  • Bushing repair is preferred over cut-out and splicing the spar cap
  • One aircraft found cracked at hole, 2 fasteners outside BHEC inspection area
  • Boeing SB MD88-55-066 (VS to fuselage attach points) cancelled “the SB has

become invalid”

  • Boeing SB MD88-55A067 Issued = AD 2011-15-01
  • Boeing SB MD90-55A014 Issued = AD 2011-12-12

Initial Inspection Results

Not an „isolated incident‟

slide-8
SLIDE 8

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 8

  • First tests were done with two sets of RFEC probe units and promising results

were seen from both of the sets

  • There was unfinished work in the 1st run of the test – lack of no-notch bushed hole in the

test standard

  • Specimen with no-notch holes was made.
  • The test results has confirmed that the 2nd RFEC probe unit is capable of detecting the

0.025” and 0.050” long EDM notches made on the NDT test standard.

  • However, effects from different hole-edge and Hole-hole distances were unknown.
  • Next, the probe was tweaked to minimize the effects from hole-hole distance

variation and hole-edge distance variation. ‒ Results good

  • Finally, the probe was modified to minimize noise from no-notch holes and to

maximize S/N ratio. The noise is primarily caused by that the no-notch hole diameters are about 0.002” – 0.003” greater than the diameters made in the notched holes.

  • Frequency range of 0.4kHz to 10.0kHz

Feasibility Study

Feasibility and optimization

slide-9
SLIDE 9

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 9

Standard Designed

Hole diameter = 0.390” Bush to 0.199-0.202” EDM Notch = 0.025” Hole diameter = 0.390” Bush to 0.199-0.202” EDM Notch = 0.050” Hole diameter = 0.250” Bush to 0.199-0.202” EDM Notch = 0.025” Hole diameter = 0.250” Bush to 0.199-0.202” EDM Notch = 0.050”

Reference Standards

Reference Standard made

slide-10
SLIDE 10

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 10

1st standard with EDM notches

Hole L1 – 0.025” bushing & 0.025” EDM Hole L4 – 0.025” bushing & 0.050” EDM Hole U3 – 0.095” bushing & 0.025” EDM Hole U6 – 0.095” bushing & 0.050” EDM

2nd standard without notches

Hole L1 – 0.025” Al 7075-T6 bushing Hole L4 – 0.025” Al 7075-T6 bushing Hole U3 – 0.095” Al 7075-T6 bushing Hole U6 – 0.095” Al 7075-T6 bushing L1 L1 L4 L4 U6 U6 U3 U3

Two standards made

Reference Standards

Different bushing thicknesses used

slide-11
SLIDE 11

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 11

Complete Through-Bushing Inspection System

slide-12
SLIDE 12

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 12

Rotational GRFEC Probe Unit RF2 ROT BH 200

Rotational Guide Probe Carriage Probe Head

Probes

slide-13
SLIDE 13

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 13

Feasibility Results

All EDM notches detected

slide-14
SLIDE 14

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 14

Feasibility Results

Impedance plane differences = good

0.025” Thick Bushing @ f= 1.0KHz

No EDM 0.025” EDM 0.050” EDM

slide-15
SLIDE 15

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 15

Feasibility Results

Even for thicker bushings

0.095” Thick Bushing @ f = 1.0kHz

No EDM 0.025” EDM 0.050” EDM

slide-16
SLIDE 16

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 16

Summary

  • Significant issue on MD80/90 tails
  • Delta/Boeing collaboration crucial to industry safety
  • Inspection Collaboration
  • SB development
  • SSID validation
  • Proactive fleet actions at Delta
  • On-going repetitive inspections
  • Continued vigilance
  • Find it early, using bushings instead of large repair
  • Bushings need to be removed for visual, BHEC
  • RFEC to the rescue!
  • Extremely promising results from IMTT
  • Potential other applications (ForcemateTM bushings)
  • Ready for next steps (POD study) toward AMOCs
slide-17
SLIDE 17

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 17

Questions?

Thank you for your attention.