New Zealand Governance Centre New Zealand Governance Centre SMEs and Family Business Conference
“Detecting Insolvency” “Detecting Insolvency”
David Emanuel 1 4 August 2 0 0 9
Detecting Insolvency Detecting Insolvency David Emanuel 1 4 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
New Zealand Governance Centre New Zealand Governance Centre SMEs and Family Business Conference Detecting Insolvency Detecting Insolvency David Emanuel 1 4 August 2 0 0 9 Outline of presentation Outline of presentation
David Emanuel 1 4 August 2 0 0 9
– (a) The company is able to pay its debts as they become due in the normal course of business; and (b) The value of the company's assets is greater than – (b) The value of the company's assets is greater than the value of its liabilities, including contingent liabilities.
– (a) Agree to the business of the company being carried on in a manner likely to create a substantial carried on in a manner likely to create a substantial risk of serious loss to the company's creditors; or – (b) Cause or allow the business of the company to be carried on in a manner likely to create a substantial risk of serious loss to the company's creditors.
Some things may seem strange. Here is an illustration.
Balance Sheet Debt 100 Assets 300 Equity 200 300 300 Take a high human capital investment company, so there is not much on the balance sheet. Consultancy Biotech IT network company NZRU Consultancy, Biotech, IT, network company, NZRU. Say the cash flows are expected to be 160 USD Say the exchange rate is expected to be 0.6
So the $NZ cash flow is expected to be 266.67 p a Say the required rate of return is 0.1 So the "market value" of the company is 2666.67 Say for ward rates equal spot rates And the company hedges five years expected CFs Initial value of the forward contract is
Now let us assume that the $NZ falls 0.5 Now let us assume that the $NZ falls 0.5 So the unhedged cash flow in $NZ is 320 So the "market value" of the company is 3200 unhedged However the hedge value is now negative However the hedge value is now negative Obligation is to deliver more valuable USDs ‐202.18 So the "market value" of the company is 2997.82 So the value has changed by 12.42%
However the hedge value is now negative However the hedge value is now negative Obligation is to deliver more valuable USDs ‐202.18 So the "market value" of the company is 2997.82 So the value has changed by 12.42% So the value has changed by 12.42% But the book value (balance sheet position) is: Debt 302.18 Assets 300.00 Equity ‐2.18 300.00 300.00
Operating Leases Say the company leases assets. They may have to be valued Say the leases have a present value of 100 Thi ill i INTANGIBLE b 100 This will increase INTANGIBLE assets by 100 And increase liabilities by 100 New book value (balance sheet position) Debt 200 Assets 400 Equity 200 400 400
■ Matched bankrupt and non-bankrupt firms on size and industry industry ■ Z-score = 1.2NWC/ TA + 1.4RE/ TA + 3.3EBIT/ TA + 0.6MVEQ/ BVL + 1.0S/ TA ■ NWC/ TA – short-term liquidity risk ■ RE/ TA – accumulated profitability and relative age of a firm firm ■ EBIT/ TA – ROA, profitability ■ MVEQ/ BVL – market’s assessment of profitability and Q p y risk ■ S/ TA – use of assets to generate sales Z increasing > “good” ■ Z increasing = > “good”
C it l t t i i l
levels should be.
the debt levels should be. Th hi h th th ti th l th t d bt
levels should be.
g , g duration of the debt should be.
more sense there is in borrowing in that currency more sense there is in borrowing in that currency.
that investors are well diversified that investors are well diversified.
(CAPM).
is used by regulators (for example the Commerce Commission). )
measures the risk of an asset as its contribution to the risk of the market portfolio risk of the market portfolio.
case with SMEs and family businesses, she will need a higher return than suggested by the CAPM.
look at what venture capital partnerships require (and don’t always get)). Fi hi i d l f i
that have low beta coefficients but high idiosyncratic risk.
not value the cash flows so highly.
sector and by banks and their regulators sector, and by banks and their regulators.
across the board without it costing a fortune.
business model, and that is not a bad thing.
It is then reasonably straight forward to set yourself up to use DSTs via sensitivity analysis or simulation.
important in many settings.
decentralisation
debate.
knowledge lies and whether it can be transported to the centre without large losses of content occurring.
– The allocation of decision rights – How performance is evaluated – How people are paid