Development of a robust continuum fighting technique for Belle II - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

development of a robust continuum fighting technique for
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Development of a robust continuum fighting technique for Belle II - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Development of a robust continuum fighting technique for Belle II Gagan Mohanty TIFR, Mumbai DHEP Seminar February Belle II General Meeting 2, 2012 @ Bad Aibling, Munich July 22-26,2012 What is the fuss about? Belle II aims to precisely


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Development of a robust continuum fighting technique for Belle II

Gagan Mohanty TIFR, Mumbai

DHEP Seminar February 2, 2012 July 22-26,2012 Belle II General Meeting @ Bad Aibling, Munich

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What is the fuss about?

 Belle II aims to precisely examine the whole pattern of CP violation and to search for several SM-suppressed decays in the B meson system in its pursuit for the holy-grail of new physics beyond the SM uds:cc:bb = 2.1:1.3:1.1

2

 Most dominant background is from e+e− → qq (q = u,d,s,c) continuum events – roughly ¼ times BF(B→X) at the Υ(4S) resonance

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What is the current baseline?

 We mostly make use of the difference in event topology to distinguish spherical BB events from the jet-like continuum background  Typical event-shape variables used are:

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Add B-decay variables to the list

 Further discrimination is provided by the fact that in one side we have a B decay while prompt, continuum events on the other side  Two variables of interest:

  • Distance along the z-axis between the reconstructed B vertex and that of

rest-of-the-event “recoil B”

  • Product of flavor tagging output and quality factor (q.r)

4

 Colour legends are swapped between two plots (in the left plot signal is blue and continuum is red while in the right plot it is other way around)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Let’s look at q.r in some detail

5

 The philosophy behind flavor tagging is to distinguish between B0 vs. B0; not really optimized to separate continuum from B-decay events

slide-6
SLIDE 6

What do we plan to do?

 The plan is to go behind each and every variable we think can provide useful discrimination against the continuum background  Some variables we have thought about are

 The number of kaons (they are expected to be produced in “pairs” for  The number of kaons (they are expected to be produced in “pairs” for the continuum background, especially for e+e− → ss events)  Energy spectra of leptons (in BB events they mostly originate from a semi-leptonic decay and are expected to have higher momentum than that in continuum)  Momentum of the daughter pions (they are relatively softer if their mother is a D* meson inside the charm continuum)

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

One typical variable

 Plots below show energy distributions for leptons (electrons/muons in the top/bottom row) from e+e− → uu, dd, ss (left), cc (middle) and a typical BB event (right)

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Closing remarks

 We have just started this project few months back, actually due credit to Bruce Yabsley as the original proposer  Need to put some more effort V.Gaur and another student would spend some time with this project  Hope to have some more news by the November B2GM

Thanks for your kind attention

8