DEVELOPING YOUR MAJOR DONOR PIPELINE: HOW TO ESTABLISH A FORMAL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

developing your major
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

DEVELOPING YOUR MAJOR DONOR PIPELINE: HOW TO ESTABLISH A FORMAL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

DEVELOPING YOUR MAJOR DONOR PIPELINE: HOW TO ESTABLISH A FORMAL QUALIFICATION PROGRAM AFP MD FUNDRAISING DAY June 10, 2019 Chr Chris istin ina Yoo oon, n, PhD Rita Walters Vice President Chief Development Officer Campbell &


slide-1
SLIDE 1

DEVELOPING YOUR MAJOR DONOR PIPELINE: HOW TO ESTABLISH A FORMAL QUALIFICATION PROGRAM

AFP MD FUNDRAISING DAY June 10, 2019

Chr Chris istin ina Yoo

  • on,

n, PhD Vice President Campbell & Company Rita Walters Chief Development Officer Catholic Charities of Baltimore

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

OUTLINE

  • What is qualification?
  • Developing a qualification program
  • Leveraging available resources
  • Addressing common challenges or concerns
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

What are some challenges you face with qualification?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

WHAT IS QUALIFICATION?

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

THE DEVELOPMENT CYCLE

ANNUAL DONORS MAJOR GIFT PROSPECTS MAJOR GIFT DONORS

Identify Steward Solicit Requalify Cultivate Qualify

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

FACTORS AFFECTING DONOR GIVING

Don’t forget timing!

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

THE ART OF FUNDRAISING

Here’s where the magic happens

Organization’s Mission Donor’s Life Mission

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

IT’S A NUMBERS GAME

slide-10
SLIDE 10

DEVELOPING A QUALIFICATION PROGRAM

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

QUALIFICATION APPROACHES

slide-12
SLIDE 12

MAKE CALLS TO FIGURE OUT WHOM TO VISIT

Develop a call list based on specific criteria Create a system for

  • utreach, utilizing

mail, email and phone Be persistent in your

  • utreach!

Use a script for your conversation Capture the conversation in the database Make recommendations for next steps Follow through and stay connected!

slide-13
SLIDE 13

QUALIFICATION TALKING POINTS

  • Thank the donor
  • Find out why they made the gift
  • Describe impact of gift(s)
  • Offer assistance
  • Interested in additional info or a visit?
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

POSSIBLE OUTCOMES

☐ YES! Potential major or planned giving donor and should be visited ☐ No, happy with current level of engagement: keep in annual fund pool ☐ No, unlikely to donate again: disqualify and remove from lists ☐ Unresponsive: keep in annual fund pool

slide-16
SLIDE 16

METRICS TO TRACK SUCCESS

✓ Qualification visits per month ✓ Prospects moved into active management ✓ Prospects moved out of active management ✓ Prospects identified as high-end annual fund prospects ✓ Disqualified prospects

slide-17
SLIDE 17

BEYOND QUALIFICATION

☐ Whatever the donor requested, be sure to follow-up! ☐ Assign a prospect manager ☐ Develop a cultivation plan

slide-18
SLIDE 18

HEALTHY PORTFOLIOS ARE DYNAMIC

Qualification 25% Cultivation & Solicitation 50% Stewardship 25%

slide-19
SLIDE 19

LEVERAGING AVAILABLE RESOURCES

slide-20
SLIDE 20

EXAMPLE 1: HOSPITAL

Approach: Hire three full-time qualification staff and one manager for a high throughput qualification program Result lts in in year on

  • ne:

Overall giving increased by 13% Average gift size increased by 19% Number of contacts increased by 22% Chall allenge: Large pool of prospects and grateful patients with significant capacity

slide-21
SLIDE 21

For full-time qualification program staff Monthly visit goals: ❑ 140 phone calls (35 per week) ❑ 40 visits (10 per week) ❑ 300 mail/email contacts

  • Anticipated results:

❖ 480 total contacts per month ❖ Cycle through 5,000 potential prospects over the course

  • f one year

EXAMPLE 1: HOSPITAL CONT.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

EXAMPLE 2: PERFORMING ARTS ORG

Chall allenge: Large pool of patrons and members with history

  • f a transactional relationship

Approach: Utilize analytics to identify potential major gifts prospects then systematically qualify using existing staff

slide-23
SLIDE 23

EXAMPLE 2: PERFORMING ARTS ORG CONT.

Patrons Members Donors Potential MG Prospects Identified MG Prospects

~600,000 ~100,000 ~7,000 = Top 1% Modeling Analysis of Giving History & Capacity

41% have never made a major gift to the org

slide-24
SLIDE 24

EXAMPLE 3: UNIVERSITY

Approach: Develop a comprehensive pre-qualification strategy through a survey and telefund outreach

➢ Email address? Yes – Survey; No – Telefund

Chall allenge: Large pool of unqualified prospects and a focus

  • n annual giving

➢ 88% of MG prospects have lifetime giving of less than $25,000 ➢ 70% of MG prospects are alumni

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Example 3: University cont.

Planned Giving If disqualified for a major gift: High-end Annual Fund Annual Fund

slide-26
SLIDE 26

EXAMPLE 4: INDEPENDENT SCHOOL

Chall allenge: Need to qualify potential major gift prospects for the campaign, but limited staff capacity Approach: Working in small batches, send letter from the head of school to potential MG prospects with a brief campaign overview, then follow up with phone call from AG Director

slide-27
SLIDE 27

ADDRESSING COMMON CHALLENGES OR CONCERNS

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Declines move the action forward as powerfully as acceptances if you do not become embroiled in

  • interpretations. Declines bring hidden issues to the
  • surface. If you are not fixated on the outcome of

someone saying yes, the awareness of these hidden issues will help you to play the game of making the impossible happen.

  • Tracy Goss, The Last Word on Power
slide-29
SLIDE 29