determining pavement design criteria for recycled
play

Determining Pavement Design Criteria for Recycled Aggregate Base and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Determining Pavement Design Criteria for Recycled Aggregate Base and Large Stone Subbase Bora Cetin Haluk Sinan Coban Tuncer Edil William Likos Junxing Zheng Halil Ceylan Ashley Buss MnDOT Project TPF-5(341) Monthly Meeting December 10,


  1. Determining Pavement Design Criteria for Recycled Aggregate Base and Large Stone Subbase Bora Cetin Haluk Sinan Coban Tuncer Edil William Likos Junxing Zheng Halil Ceylan Ashley Buss MnDOT Project TPF-5(341) Monthly Meeting December 10, 2019

  2. RESEARCH TEAM Michigan State University ➢ Principal Investigator – Bora Cetin Assistant Professor – Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Iowa State University ➢ Principal Investigator – Halil Ceylan Professor – Department of Civil, Construction & Environmental Engineering ➢ Co-Principal Investigator – Ashley Buss Assistant Professor – Department of Civil, Construction & Environmental Engineering ➢ Co-Principal Investigator – Junxing Zheng Assistant Professor – Department of Civil, Construction & Environmental Engineering ➢ Research Personnel – Haluk Sinan Coban PhD Candidate – Department of Civil, Construction & Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison ➢ Co-Principal Investigator – William Likos Professor – Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering ➢ Co-Principal Investigator – Tuncer B. Edil Professor Emeritus – Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 2 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 2

  3. AGENCY MEMBERS ➢ MnDOT ➢ Caltrans ➢ MDOT ➢ IDOT ➢ LRRB ➢ MoDOT ➢ WisDOT ➢ NDDOT ➢ Iowa DOT 3 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 3

  4. ASSOCIATE MEMBERS ➢ ➢ Aggregate & Ready Mix of MN Collaborative Aggregates LLC ➢ ➢ Asphalt Pavement Alliance (APA) American Engineering Testing, Inc. ➢ ➢ Braun Intertec Center for Transportation Infrastructure Systems (CTIS) ➢ ➢ Infrasense Asphalt Recycling & Reclaiming Association (ARRA) ➢ ➢ Diamond Surface Inc. First State Tire Recycling ➢ ➢ Flint Hills Resources BASF Corporation ➢ ➢ International Grooving & Grinding Association (IGGA) Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute at North Dakota ➢ State University Midstate Reclamation & Trucking ➢ 3M ➢ MN Asphalt Pavement Association ➢ Pavia Systems, Inc. ➢ Minnesota State University - Mankato ➢ ➢ All States Materials Group National Concrete Pavement Technology Center ➢ ➢ Payne & Dolan, Inc. Roadscanners ➢ ➢ Caterpillar University of Minnesota - Duluth ➢ ➢ The Dow Chemical Company University of New Hampshire ➢ ➢ The Transtec Group Mathy Construction Company ➢ Testquip LLC ➢ Michigan Tech Transportation Institute (MTTI) ➢ Hardrives, Inc. ➢ University of Minnesota ➢ ➢ Husky Energy National Center for Asphalt Technology (NCAT) at Auburn ➢ University Asphalt Materials & Pavements Program (AMPP) ➢ ➢ GSE Environmental Concrete Paving Association of MN (CPAM) ➢ ➢ Helix Steel MOBA Mobile Automation ➢ ➢ Ingios Geotechnics Geophysical Survey Systems ➢ ➢ WSB Leica Geosystems ➢ ➢ Cargill University of St. Thomas ➢ ➢ PITT Swanson Engineering Trimble ➢ University of California Pavement Research Center 4 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 4

  5. OUTLINE • Follow-up • Test cells & materials • Tasks 5 & 6 5 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 5

  6. FOLLOW-UP • Task 1 – Literature review and recommendations Green – Completed • Task 2 – Tech transfer “state of practice” Red – In Progress • Task 3 – Construction monitoring and reporting • Task 4 – Laboratory testing • Task 5 – Performance monitoring and reporting • Task 6 – Instrumentation • Task 7 – Pavement design criteria • Task 8 & 9 – Draft/final report 6 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 6

  7. TEST CELLS Recycled Aggregate Base Large Stone Subbase Large Stone Subbase with Geosynthetics 185 186 188 189 127 227 328 428 528 628 728 3.5 in 3.5 in 3.5 in 3.5 in 3.5 in 3.5 in 3.5 in 3.5 in 3.5 in 3.5 in 3.5 in Superpave Superpave Superpave Superpave Superpave Superpave Superpave Superpave Superpave Superpave Superpave 6 in 6 in 6 in 6 in 6 in 6 in 6 in Class 6 Class 6 Class 5Q Class 5Q Class 5Q Class 5Q Class 5Q Aggregate Aggregate Aggregate Aggregate Aggregate Aggregate Aggregate 12 in 12 in 12 in 12 in Coarse Fine Limestone RCA+RAP RCA RCA 9 in 9 in 9 in 9 in 9 in LSSB LSSB LSSB LSSB LSSB 18 in 18 in 3.5 in 3.5 in 3.5 in 3.5 in LSSB LSSB S. Granular S. Granular S. Granular S. Granular (1 lift) (1 lift) TX+GT BX+GT Borrow Borrow Borrow Borrow TX BX Sand Sand Clay Loam Clay Loam Clay Loam Clay Loam Clay Loam Clay Loam Clay Loam TX = Triaxial Geogrid S. Granular Borrow = Select Granular Borrow BX = Biaxial Geogrid GT = Nonwoven Geotextile Clay Loam Clay Loam 7 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 7

  8. MATERIALS 8 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 8

  9. TASKS 5 & 6 • Falling weight deflectometer (FWD) Green – Completed • Frost monitoring Red – In Progress • International roughness index (IRI) • Rutting • Environmental monitoring – Weather data – Temperature sensors – Moisture sensors 9 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 9

  10. TASKS 5 & 6 Weather Data • Air temperature 10 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 10

  11. TASKS 5 & 6 Weather Data • Precipitation 11 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 11

  12. TASKS 5 & 6 Weather Data • Relative humidity 12 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 12

  13. TASKS 5 & 6 Weather Data • Average wind speed 13 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 13

  14. TASKS 5 & 6 Sensor Monitoring • Thermocouples 188 3.5 in Superpave 12 in Limestone 3.5 in S. Granular Borrow Clay Loam 14 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 14

  15. TASKS 5 & 6 Sensor Monitoring • Moisture probes 188 3.5 in Superpave 12 in Limestone 3.5 in S. Granular Borrow Clay Loam 15 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 15

  16. TASKS 5 & 6 Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) OUTSIDE LANE (+) INSIDE LANE (-) Cell Test Station Number Points OWP MID IWP IWP MID OWP 16368 Start 16379 1 o o 16409 2 o o 185 16439 3 o o 16469 4 o o 12 in. 16499 5 o o Coarse RCA 16529 6 o o 16559 7 o o 16569 End IWP = Inner wheel path MID = Midlane OWP = Outer wheel path Dynatest Model 8002 FWD 16 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 16

  17. TASKS 5 & 6 Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) • After paving • Composite analysis • Layered analysis – Asphalt – Base+subbase – Subgrade Asphalt Base+ Subbase Composite Subgrade 17 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 17

  18. TASKS 5 & 6 Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) Maximum deflection Composite E FWD 188 3.5 in Superpave 12 in Limestone 3.5 in S. Granular Borrow Clay Loam 18 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 18

  19. TASKS 5 & 6 Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) Asphalt E FWD Base+Subbase E FWD 188 3.5 in Superpave 12 in Limestone 3.5 in S. Granular Borrow Clay Loam 19 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 19

  20. TASKS 5 & 6 Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) Subgrade E FWD 188 3.5 in Superpave 12 in Limestone 3.5 in S. Granular Borrow Clay Loam 20 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 20

  21. TASKS 5 & 6 Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) Maximum Deflection Composite E FWD 188 3.5 in Superpave 12 in Limestone 3.5 in S. Granular Borrow Clay Loam 21 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 21

  22. TASKS 5 & 6 Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) Asphalt E FWD Base+subbase E FWD 188 3.5 in Superpave 12 in Limestone 3.5 in S. Granular Borrow Clay Loam 22 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 22

  23. TASKS 5 & 6 Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) Subgrade E FWD 188 3.5 in Superpave 12 in Limestone 3.5 in S. Granular Borrow Clay Loam 23 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 23

  24. Thank You! QUESTIONS?? 24 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 24

  25. TASKS 5 & 6 Sensor Monitoring • Moisture probes 25 Iowa State University University of Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State University Slide 25

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend