Determining In-Situ Stress Profiles From Logs . Shahab D. Mohaghegh - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

determining in situ stress
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Determining In-Situ Stress Profiles From Logs . Shahab D. Mohaghegh - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SPE 90070 Determining In-Situ Stress Profiles From Logs . Shahab D. Mohaghegh West Virginia University Andrei Popa , Chevron-Texaco Razi Gaskari , WVU Steve W olhart , Pinnacle Technologies Robert Siegfreid , GTI & Sam Am eri ,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Determining In-Situ Stress Profiles From Logs.

Shahab D. Mohaghegh West Virginia University

Andrei Popa, Chevron-Texaco – Razi Gaskari, WVU – Steve W olhart, Pinnacle Technologies – Robert Siegfreid, GTI & Sam Am eri, WVU

SPE 90070 SPE Annual Technical Conference, Houston, TEXAS, September 2004

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

OUTLINE

Introduction Methodology Results & Discussion Conclusions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Introduction

All hydraulic fracturing simulators

require information regarding in-situ stress.

An important factor in designing

successful hydraulic fractures.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Introduction

The contrast between different

formation’s in-situ stress is the controlling factor for the shape of the hydraulic fracture.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Introduction

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Introduction

Lack of accurate in-situ stress values

during the design of a hydraulic fracture can result in as much as 50% error in the actual fracture length upon implementation.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Introduction

Currently there are two methods of

in-situ stress determination:

Direct measurements (Expensive) Calculate from logs (inaccurate)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Introduction

The inaccuracy of calculating in-situ

stress from logs has its roots in lack

  • f incorporating tectonic stress

components in the calculation

Not an easy and inexpensive way to

measure it

Not sure how to incorporate it, even if

available.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Introduction

This paper introduces a new method

for incorporating tectonic stress when modeling in-situ stress from logs.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

OUTLINE

Introduction Methodology Results & Discussion Conclusions

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Methodology

It was identified that formation

lithology is an important input for the model.

This was also shown in previous

studies such as “ABC” method.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Methodology

To deduce formation lithology from

logs a fuzzy system was developed.

The fuzzy system uses three logs and

27 rules in order to decide on the formation lithology.

Gamma Ray Deep Induction Spontaneous Potential

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Methodology

Fuzzy system rules for determining formation lithology.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Methodology

In order to incorporate tectonic stress

component in our analysis two parameters were identified as surrogate:

Spectral Response Acceleration Seismic Zone Factor

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Methodology

Uniform Building Code – 1991Edition Seismic Zone Map of the United States of America

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Methodology

Spectral Response Acceleration

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Methodology

These parameters are borrowed from

structural engineering where tectonic activities play an important role in design.

They have been used as an indicator

  • f tectonic activities in our study.
slide-18
SLIDE 18

18 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Methodology

Neural Networks were used to

develop an in-situ stress model.

Model inputs are:

Logs Formation Lithology Tectonic Stress Component

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Methodology

Inputs to the

Neural Network Model.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

OUTLINE

Introduction Methodology Results & Discussion Conclusions

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Results

Existing models usually perform

reasonably well when applied to the wells that were used for these model’s development.

The real test would be their

performance on wells that were not used during the model development.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Results

Four existing models are tested:

Staged Field Experiment (SFE) # 1 Staged Field Experiment (SFE) # 2 Staged Field Experiment (SFE) # 3 Staged Field Experiment (SFE) # 4

These models were developed for GRI

in the past decades.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Results

All models applied to SFE # 2 measurements.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Results

All models applied to measurements from Ashland SFOT and AT Mast wells.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Results

All models applied to measurements from Hogsback and Anderson Canyon wells.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Results

Neural model applied to measurements from a well that was not used during its development.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Results

Neural model applied to measurements from a well that was not used during its development.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

OUTLINE

Introduction Methodology Results & Discussion Conclusions

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Conclusions

A new model for determining in-situ

stress from logs has been developed and presented.

The new model incorporates tectonic

stress component for in-situ stress determination

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30 SPE 90070

Shahab D. Mohaghegh

Conclusions

The new model is demonstrated to be

superior to the existing techniques.

Neural networks and fuzzy logic were

the main techniques used to develop the new model.