detector physics measurements in microboone
play

Detector Physics measurements in MicroBooNE Sowjanya Gollapinni, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Detector Physics measurements in MicroBooNE Sowjanya Gollapinni, UTK (for the MicroBooNE Collaboration) Joint DUNE/SBN Meeting: Lessons Learned, Fermilab, May 15, 2017 The MicroBooNE LArTPC Surface-based, 89-ton active volume liquid argon


  1. Detector Physics measurements in MicroBooNE Sowjanya Gollapinni, UTK (for the MicroBooNE Collaboration) Joint DUNE/SBN Meeting: Lessons Learned, Fermilab, May 15, 2017

  2. The MicroBooNE LArTPC Surface-based, 89-ton active volume liquid argon ● One drift chamber B ● e a m d i r Cathode at -70kV e – c t i o n Drift at 2.56 m – E-field at 273 V/cm – -70 kV Three wire planes ● Cathode Anode 2 induction, 1 collection – 3 mm wire pitch – Drift=2.56 m 3 mm wire plane spacing – PMT and UV Laser System ● Y (up) Collecting cosmic and neutrino Z (beam) ● E = 273 V/cm data since Fall 2015 X (drift) 2

  3. LArTPC Technology LArTPC technology provides particle interactions with unprecedented amount of ● detail and allows exceptional calorimetry and high resolution tracking However, complete understanding of the physics that surrounds the drifting ● electron and precise calibration are essential to achieve physics performance Critical for the SBN and DUNE program – With plenty of data, MicroBooNE is making excellent progress towards this effort! – Neutrino Event Cosmic Event 3

  4. Ionization charge in a LArTPC Precise determination of ionization charge and position, from the point of formation ● to the point of collection, with as less bias as possible is critical for both energy scale reconstruction and detector resolution There are many effects that can impact this ● Image credit: Y.-T. Tsai Ionization 4

  5. Ionization charge in a LArTPC Precise determination of ionization charge and position, from the point of formation ● to the point of collection, with as less bias as possible is critical for both energy scale reconstruction and detector resolution There are many effects that can impact this, E.g., ● – Argon purity (e - lifetime) – Electron-ion recombination Energy scale These effects are not – Space charge – Electronics calibration independent, everything effects everything – which is – Diffusion what makes this – Space charge Position/timing challenging! – Noise Resolution – Wire response 5

  6. This Talk We will focus on, ● Space charge effect ● Electron lifetime measurement ● Electron-ion recombination ● Electron diffusion Example of how these effects are connected: Calorimetry dQ/dx (ADC/cm) → → dQ/dx (e/cm) → → dQ*/dx (e/cm) → → dE/dx (MeV/cm) Purity Electronics Electron-ion correction calibration factor Recombination Correction 6

  7. This Talk We will focus on, ● Space charge effect ● Electron lifetime measurement ● Electron-ion recombination ● Electron diffusion Example of how these effects are connected: Calorimetry m) → d → dQ*/d /dx (e (e/c /cm) → d → dE/d /dx (Me (MeV/c V/cm) dQ/d /dx x (A (ADC/c /cm) m) → → dQ/d /dx x (e/c (e/cm) Purity Electronics Electron-ion correction calibration factor Recombination Correction 7

  8. Space charge effects in MicroBooNE MicroBooNE is surface detector → abundant cosmic rays ● Build up of slow moving Ar + ions in the detector due to, ● for example, cosmic rays, which results in: Local variations of E-field: 12% increase at Cathode; 5% E-field distortions decrease at Anode (central Z slice) Spatial variations in ionization position: Around 5cm distortion along drift; Around 12 to 15 cm along non-drift directions t t n n e e v v e e y y a a r r c c i i m m s s o o C C Spatial distortions (central Z slice) Aro round 20-30 nd 20-30 cosmic mic ra rays in a in a 4.8 ms 8 ms re reado dout 8 win indo dow

  9. Space charge effects in MicroBooNE Space charge effects (SCE) seen in ● LASER Laser data and muon tracks tagged by an external – “small” muon counter (MuCS) Measurement using MuCS tagged tracks ● Pros: “t0” known – Cons: limited angular coverage (this will improve – with the full tagger system now in place) MuCS system coverage Yellow: tracks triggered by MuCS Red: not triggered by MuCS More details in MuCS tracks E. Grammellini's 9 talk

  10. Space charge effects in MicroBooNE Measurement using MuCS tracks Data and MC reasonably agree in terms of ● LASER basic shape and normalization Offset near anode in data: ● Is liquid argon flow pushing the ions near – the anode? Interesting ideas on testing this theory: – e.g. vary pump flow and see how it effects ion SCE MuCS tracks MuCS tracks 10

  11. Space charge effects in MicroBooNE: outlook Read all about our space charge preliminary results in our public note: ● http://www-microboone.fnal.gov/publications/publicnotes/ – MICROBOONE-NOTE-1018-PUB (November, 2016) On-going & Future work to fully characterize/calibrate the SCE in MicroBooNE ● MuCS moved to various Z boundaries and data taken → data currently being analyzed – Using UV laser data to do 3D calibration for space charge – We have the laser data, current focus on developing end-to-end Laser data ● reconstruction Laser system doesn't provide full coverage: plan to fill the gap with additional “t0 ● known” cosmic data such as A-C crossing tracks, A/C piercing tracks etc. Great progress recently towards understanding time dependence of SCE – Stay tuned for more results soon! – Later we will see, SCE significantly impacts lifetime and recombination measurements ● 11

  12. Space charge effects in MicroBooNE Read all about our space charge preliminary results in our public note: ● http://www-microboone.fnal.gov/publications/publicnotes/ – Lessons learned for SBN/DUNE: MICROBO BOONE-N -NOTE-1018 -1018-P -PUB (N (November mber, 2016 2016) – SCE a challenge for any surface-based LArTPCs ● On-going & Future work to fully characterize/calibrate the SCE in MicroBooNE ● Effect will be worse for ProtoDUNE due to longer drift – MuCS moved to various Z boundaries and data taken → data currently being – analyzed Availability of “t0-known” tracks with good phase space coverage ● critical to properly characterize and calibrate this effect in 3D Plan to use UV laser data to do 3D calibration for space charge – Importance of Laser system, Cosmic ray tagger system cannot be – We have the laser data, current focus on developing end-to-end Laser data ● understated reconstruction Requires dedicated studies at the design stage to understand the phase Laser system doesn't provide full coverage: plan to fill the gap with – ● space coverage from TPC tracks additional “t0 known” cosmic data such as A-C crossing tracks, A/C piercing tracks etc. Studies to understand (experimentally) how liquid argon flow impacts – Great progress recently towards understanding time dependence of space ion movement is important – charge effect Stay tuned for more results soon! – Later we will see, SCE significantly impacts lifetime and recombination measurements ● 12

  13. This Talk We will focus on, ● Space charge effect ● Electron lifetime measurement ● Electron-ion recombination ● Electron diffusion Example of how these effects are connected: Calorimetry m) → d → dQ*/d /dx (e (e/c /cm) → d → dE/d /dx (Me (MeV/c V/cm) dQ/d /dx x (A (ADC/c /cm) m) → → dQ/d /dx x (e/c (e/cm) Purity Electronics Electron-ion correction calibration factor Recombination Correction 13

  14. Impurities in argon & charge loss Electro-negative impurities such as (O 2 and H 2 O) can capture drifting electrons and ● result in signal loss electron drift-lifetime Measuring e - lifetime tells us ● Ionization signal loss @ given E-field – O 2 contamination in argon – Electron lifetime and O 2 impurity ● contamination are inversely proportional O 2 Contamination (in ppb) = 0.3/ τ (in ms) MicroBooNE For Example, In MicroBooNE, to achieve 36% signal loss (or 5 ms lifetime at 273 V/cm), ● require O 2 equivalent concentration to be less than 60 ppt 14

  15. Measuring electron lifetime Many ways to measure this: Anode to Cathode charge ratio ● With thin 30 d days ys o of th the e filtrati tion p proces ess Purity Monitors (e.g. ICARUS, MicroBooNE) – Long Cosmic muon tracks (e.g. ICARUS) – < 50 ppt of O 2 Laser (e.g. ArgonTube) – < 100 ppt of O 2 More details in Pur urity Mon Monitor or M. Zuckerbrot's talk MICROBOONE-NOTE-1003-PUB (May 2016) 15

  16. Measuring electron lifetime Many ways to measure this: Anode to Cathode charge ratio ● With thin 30 d days ys o of th the e filtrati tion p proces ess Purity Monitors (e.g. ICARUS, MicroBooNE) – Long Cosmic muon tracks (e.g. ICARUS) – < 50 ppt of O 2 Laser (e.g. ArgonTube) – < 100 ppt of O 2 UV Laser: : would be be gr grea eat if one e ca can do it ● Pur urity Mon Monitor or Uniformity of ionized charge along the – track is important Advantages es Disadvantages es Quick (online) measurement Localized measurement By far the best way to measure ● ● ● purity is using long cosmic muon Doesn't require Cannot always be ● ● tracks reconstructed tracks extrapolated to the entire TPC volume Wide angular coverage ● Great for commissioning & ● S initial data runs when Cannot be used to study R Can represent purity through out ● ● O T reconstruction is still being purity variations in the TPC I the TPC and can be used to N O worked out M understand purity variations over Y Typically at lower E-fields T ● I the entire volume R U 16 P Longevity is a problem ●

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend