detection and linear data model
play

Detection and (Linear) Data Model Jrn Wilms Remeis-Sternwarte & - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Detection and (Linear) Data Model Jrn Wilms Remeis-Sternwarte & ECAP Universitt Erlangen-Nrnberg http://pulsar.sternwarte.uni-erlangen.de/wilms/ joern.wilms@sternwarte.uni-erlangen.de Part 1: Why is X-ray and Gamma-Ray Astronomy


  1. Detection and (Linear) Data Model Jörn Wilms Remeis-Sternwarte & ECAP Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg http://pulsar.sternwarte.uni-erlangen.de/wilms/ joern.wilms@sternwarte.uni-erlangen.de

  2. Part 1: Why is X-ray and Gamma-Ray Astronomy Interesting?

  3. Part 2: Tools of the Trade: Satellites

  4. Earth’s Atmosphere Earth’s atmosphere is opaque for all types of EM radiation except for opti- cal light and radio. Major contributer at high energies: photoabsorption ( ∝ E − 3 ), esp. from Oxygen (edge at ∼ 500 eV). ⇒ If one wants to look at = the sky in other wave- bands, one has to go to space! CXC

  5. The Present XMM-Newton (ESA): launched 1999 Dec 10 Chandra (NASA): launched 1999 Jul 23 Currently Active Missions: X-ray Multiple-Mirror Mission ( XMM-Newton ; ESA), Chandra (USA), Suzaku (Japan, USA), Swift (USA), International Gamma-Ray Laboratory ( INTEGRAL ; ESA), Fermi (USA), AGILE (Italy), MAXI (Japan), ASTROSAT (India), NICER (USA), Spectrum-X-Gamma (RU/D) We are living in the “golden age” of X-ray and Gamma-Ray Astronomy

  6. The Present RadioAstron Longjiang-1/2 Queqiao/NCLE Spitzer Sofia HST Kepler/K2 Gaia TESS Solar Orbiter XMM-Newton Chandra Swift MAXI NuSTAR ASTROSAT POLAR XPNAV-1 NICER Insight-HXMT MVN HaloSat Kanazawa-Sat 3 Spectrum-X-Gamma INTEGRAL AGILE Fermi DAMPE Lomonosov/MVL-300 LOFAR ASKAP/MWA MEERKAT FAST IRAM/NOEMA ALMA APEX VLT H.E.S.S. Advanced LIGO/Virgo KAGRA IceCube/PINGU 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 Year

  7. The Present RadioAstron Longjiang-1/2 Queqiao/NCLE Spitzer Sofia JWST SPHEREx WFIRST HST Kepler/K2 Gaia TESS Solar Orbiter CHEOPS WSO-UV Euclid PLATO Ariel XMM-Newton Chandra Swift MAXI NuSTAR ASTROSAT POLAR XPNAV-1 NICER Insight-HXMT MVN HaloSat Kanazawa-Sat 3 Spectrum-X-Gamma ASO-S IXPE SVOM XRISM Einstein Probe Athena INTEGRAL AGILE Fermi DAMPE Glowbug Lomonosov/MVL-300 M5 LOFAR ASKAP/MWA MEERKAT FAST IRAM/NOEMA SKA ALMA APEX VLT LSST E-ELT H.E.S.S. CTA Advanced LIGO/Virgo KAGRA LIGO-India Einstein Telescope IceCube/PINGU KM3NeT 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 Year

  8. Part 3: Tools of the Trade: Mirrors and Detectors

  9. Introduction How is X-ray astronomy done? Detection process: Imaging Detection Data reduction Data analysis

  10. Introduction How is X-ray astronomy done? Imaging: • Wolter telescopes (soft X-rays up to ∼ 15 keV) • Coded Mask telescopes (above that) • Collimators

  11. Introduction How is X-ray astronomy done? Detectors: • Non-imaging detectors Detectors capable of detecting photons from a source, but without any spatial resolution ⇒ Require, e.g., collimators to limit field of view. = Example: Proportional Counters, Scintillators • Imaging detectors Detectors with a spatial resolution, typically used in the IR, optical, UV or for soft X-rays. Generally behind some type of focusing optics. Example: Charge coupled devices (CCDs), Position Sensitive Proportional Counters (PSPCs)

  12. X-ray Imaging Cassegrain telescope, after Wikipedia Reminder: Optical telescopes are usually reflectors: primary mirror → secondary mirror → detector Main characteristics of a telescope: • collecting area (i.e., open area of telescope, ∼ πd 2 / 4, where d : telescope diameter) • angular resolution, θ = 1.22 λ (1) d if surface roughness and alignment can be ignored

  13. X-ray Imaging Optical telescopes are based on principle that reflection “just works” with metallic surfaces. For X-rays, things are more complicated... Snell’s law of refraction: sin α 1 = n 2 (2) = n sin α 2 n 1 n 1 α where n index of refraction, and α 1,2 angle wrt. 1 surface normal. If n ≫ 1: Total internal reflec- θ tion 1 Total reflection occurs for α 2 = 90 ◦ , i.e. for sin α 1,c = n cos θ c = n (3) ⇐ ⇒ n 2 < n 1 α with the critical angle θ c = π/ 2 − α 1,c . 2 Clearly, total reflection is only possible for n < 1 ⇒ θ c ∼ 50 ◦ = Light in glass at glass/air interface: n = 1 / 1.6 = ⇒ principle behind optical fibers.

  14. X-ray Imaging In general, the index of refraction is given by Maxwell’s relation, n = √ ǫµ (4) where ǫ : dielectricity constant, µ ∼ 1: permeability of the material. For free electrons (e.g., in a metal), (Jackson, 1981, eqs. 7.59, 7.60) shows that p = 4 πnZe 2 � 2 � ω p ω 2 ǫ = 1 − with (5) ω m e where ω p : plasma frequency, n : number density of atoms, Z : nuclear charge. (i.e., nZ : number density of electrons) With ω = 2 πν = 2 πc/λ , Eq. (5) becomes ǫ = 1 − nZe 2 πm e c 2 λ 2 = 1 − nZr e λ 2 (6) π r e = e 2 /m e c 2 ∼ 2.8 × 10 − 13 cm is the classical electron radius.

  15. X-ray Imaging � 1 − nZr e λ 2 ∼ 1 − nZr e ρ r e 2 π λ 2 = 1 − 2 π λ 2 =: 1 − δ (7) n = ( A/Z ) m u π Z : atomic number, A : atomic weight ( Z/A ∼ 0.5), ρ : density, m u = 1 amu = 1.66 × 10 − 24 g Critical angle for X-ray reflection: cos θ c = n = 1 − δ (8) Since δ ≪ 1, Taylor (cos x ∼ 1 − x 2 / 2): � 1 / 2 √ � ρ λ 2 δ = 5.6 ′ (9) θ c = 1 g cm − 3 1 nm So for λ ∼ 1 nm: θ c ∼ 1 ◦ .

  16. X-ray Imaging Typical parameters for selected elements Z ρ nZ g cm − 3 e − Å − 3 C 6 2.26 0.680 Si 14 2.33 0.699 Ag 47 10.50 2.755 W 74 19.30 4.678 Au 79 19.32 4.666 After Als-Nielsen & McMorrow (2004, Tab. 3.1) To increase θ c : need material with high ρ ⇒ gold ( XMM-Newton ) or iridium ( Chandra ). = For more information on mirrors etc., see, e.g., Aschenbach (1985), Als-Nielsen & McMorrow (2004), or Gorenstein (2012)

  17. X-ray Imaging 1.0 0.2deg 0.8 0.5deg Reflectivity 0.6 0.4deg X-rays: Total reflec- 0.4 1deg tion only works in the soft X-rays and 0.2 only under grazing incidence 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 ⇒ grazing inci- = Photon Energy [keV] dence optics. Reflectivity for Gold

  18. Wolter Telescopes Hyperboloid Incident paraxial Paraboloid radiation Focus Hyperboloid after ESA To obtain manageable focal lengths ( ∼ 10 m), use two reflections on a parabolic and a hyperboloidal mirror (“Wolter type I ”) (Wolter 1952 for X-ray microscopes, Giacconi & Rossi 1960 for UV- and X-rays). But: small collecting area ( A ∼ πr 2 l/f where f : focal length)

  19. Wolter Telescopes Recycle Mandrel Metrology Super Polished Mandrel Hole Drilling Gold Deposition Mandrel − + Separation (cooled) Cleaning Ni Ni Electroforming Integration Au Handling on Spider Mirror Production Integration (after ESA) Recipe for making an X-ray mirror: 1. Produce mirror negative (“Mandrels”): Al coated with Kanigen nickel (Ni+10% phos- phorus), super-polished [0.4 nm roughness]). 2. Deposit ∼ 50 nm Au onto Mandrel 3. Deposit 0.2 mm–0.6 mm Ni onto mandrel (“electro-forming”, 10 µ m/h) 4. Cool Mandrel with liquid N. Au sticks to Nickel 5. Verify mirror on optical bench. numbers for eROSITA (Arcangeli et al., 2017)

  20. Wolter Telescopes

  21. Wolter Telescopes Characterization of mir- ror quality: Half Energy Width, i.e., circle within 50% of the detected en- ergy are found. Note: energy dependent! for XMM-Newton: 20 ′′ at 1.5 keV, 40 ′′ at 8 keV. for eROSITA: 16 ′′ at 1.5 keV, 15.5 ′′ at 8 keV Ground calibration, e.g., at PANTER

  22. Detection of X-rays Energy Semiconductors: separa- tion of valence band and E Fermi conduction band ∼ 1 eV (=energy of visible light). Absorption of photon in Si: Energy of photon released photo electron(s) + scattering off e − Space + phonons... Number of electron-hole pairs produced: Problem: normal semiconductor: e − -hole pairs recombine immediately

  23. Detection of X-rays Energy “Doping”: moves valence- Acceptors and conduction bands. Connecting “n-type” and E Fermi Donors a “p-type” semiconductor: pn-junction. In pn junction: electron- n-type p-type hole pairs created by ab- sorption of an X-ray are Space separated by field gradient ⇒ electrons can then be collected in potential well away from the junc- = tion and read out.

  24. Detection of X-rays Material Band gap E /pair Z (eV) (eV) Si 14 1.12 3.61 Ge 32 0.74 2.98 CdTe 48–52 1.47 4.43 HgI 2 80–53 2.13 6.5 GaAs 31–33 1.43 5.2 Number of electron-hole pairs produced determined by band gap + “dirt effects” (“dirt effects”: e.g., energy loss going into bulk motion of the detector crystal [“phonons”]) N pair ∼ E photon (10) E pair • optical photons ( E : few eV): ∼ 1 e − -hole-pair per absorption event • X-ray photons: ∼ 1000 e − -hole-pairs per photon But: Since band gap small: thermal noise = ⇒ need cooling (ground based: liquid nitrogen, − 200 ◦ C, in space: more complicated...)

  25. Detection of X-rays Photon Polysilicon electrodes 1 2 3 conductors; ~0.5 m deep µ SiO insulator 2 0.1 m deep µ 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 e _ e _ e _ n−type (+) silicon (depleted) ~2 m µ e _ Atom ~10 m p−type (−) silicon µ (depleted) Potential energy 1 pixel for an electron photoelectrons (~15 m) µ ~250 m µ Photoelectron track p−type (undepleted) After Bradt Two-Dimensional imaging is possible with more complicated semiconduc- tor structures: Charge Coupled Devices (CCDs).

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend