Detectability of Kilonovae with Zwicky Transient Facility Detection - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

detectability of kilonovae with zwicky transient facility
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Detectability of Kilonovae with Zwicky Transient Facility Detection - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Detectability of Kilonovae with Zwicky Transient Facility Detection and follow-up of Kilonovae with the Zwicky Transient Facility Ana Sagus Carracedo Astronomdagarna 2019 Ana Sagus Carracedo PhD student at Stockholm University Compact


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ana Sagués Carracedo

Detectability of Kilonovae with Zwicky Transient Facility

Astronomdagarna 2019

Detection and follow-up of Kilonovae with the Zwicky Transient Facility

Compact Objects for All, Lund 2020

Ana Sagués Carracedo PhD student at Stockholm University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • Introduction of kilonovae
  • Kilonovae search
  • Survey simulations
  • Serendipitous observations
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Image: NASA

Gravitational wave signal Electromagnetic counterpart

Metzger et al. 2012

Short GRB Kilonova

Virgo Collaboration

Binary neutron star merger (BNS)

Introduction

Introduction

slide-4
SLIDE 4

GW170817

  • Nearby, only 40 Mpc
  • Very well localised
  • Short GRB
  • UV/optical/infrared

kilonova

4

Kasliwal et al. 2017

  • B. P. Abbott et al.

AT2017gfo

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Kilonovae search

Observational challenges

  • Fast-evolving transient
  • Relatively faint (Mabs ~-16)
  • Viewing angle dependence
  • Rare objects
  • Only one event

Iair Arcavi et al. 2017

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Kilonovae search

Observational challenges How can we find them?

  • LIGO/Virgo public alerts
  • Dedicated surveys

Iair Arcavi et al. 2017

  • Fast-evolving transient
  • Relatively faint (Mabs ~-16)
  • Viewing angle dependence
  • Rare objects
  • Only one event
slide-7
SLIDE 7

S190910h S190814bv

Extremely bad! Extremely good!

50% area: 8040 deg2 90% area: 24264 deg2 50% area: 5 deg2 90% area: 23 deg2

7

https://gracedb.ligo.org/superevents/public/O3/

LIGO/Virgo public alerts

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Samuel Oschin/P48 Telescope exterior

ZTF Zwicky Transient Facility

Filters: g, r and i

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Survey simulations

Simsurvey: Python package for simulating the lightcurves obtained by an astronomical transient survey

Survey plan Kilonova model Detection criteria Inputs Output Observed lightcurves that pass the detection criteria

https://simsurvey.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Survey simulations

Simsurvey: Python package for simulating the lightcurves obtained by an astronomical transient survey

Survey plan Kilonova model Detection criteria Inputs Output Observed lightcurves that pass the detection criteria

https://simsurvey.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

In this work:

  • Optimistic survey: g r and i, twice per night,

same depth

  • Viewing angle distribution
  • Detection criteria: 2 detections with S/N >= 5
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Viewing angle dependence

Pole

Equator Bulla et al. 2019

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Pole Equator

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Pole Equator

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Pole Equator

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Pole Equator

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Pole Equator

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Pole Equator

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Pole Equator

gr

Limiting magnitude = 20.5

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Pole Equator

gr gri

Limiting magnitude = 20.5

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Pole Equator

gr gri

Limiting magnitude = 22 !! Distance x2 Volume x8

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Detection criteria : 2 detections S/N>5 in at least two filter. Non-detection within 20 days before and after. Time-period with S/N > 5 less than 25 days

Serendipitous observations of Kilonovae with the ZTF

Preliminary results

Comparing with SNe rates (Gpc-3 yr-1) SN Ia ~30000 SN Ibc ~22500 SN IIn ~7500 SN IIp ~120000

20 months of ZTF data

  • No kilonova detection

Kilonova rate < 4545 Gpc-3 yr-1 Work in progress…

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Dedicated observations required to improve

detection probability.

  • We present a tool that allow us to understand

detections and non-detections, optimize the

  • bserving strategy and estimate rates

Summary