description of admissibility
play

Description of admissibility Definition J is I -admissible if J v ( - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Description of admissibility Definition J is I -admissible if J v ( I ). Lemma This is equivalent to IO Y = E I , with J = J and I an ideal. Indeed, on Y the center J becomes E , in particular principal. Dan


  1. Description of admissibility Definition J is I -admissible if J ≤ v ( I ). Lemma This is equivalent to IO Y ′ = E ℓ I ′ , with J = ¯ J ℓ and I ′ an ideal. Indeed, on Y ′ the center J becomes E ℓ , in particular principal. Dan Abramovich Admissibility and coefficient ideals New York, July 27, 2020 1 / 2

  2. Description of admissibility Definition J is I -admissible if J ≤ v ( I ). Lemma This is equivalent to IO Y ′ = E ℓ I ′ , with J = ¯ J ℓ and I ′ an ideal. Indeed, on Y ′ the center J becomes E ℓ , in particular principal. E ℓ ⊇ IO Y ′ . ♠ So on Y ′ , we have J ≤ v ( I ) ⇔ This is more subtle in Quek’s theorem! Dan Abramovich Admissibility and coefficient ideals New York, July 27, 2020 1 / 2

  3. Description of admissibility Definition J is I -admissible if J ≤ v ( I ). Lemma This is equivalent to IO Y ′ = E ℓ I ′ , with J = ¯ J ℓ and I ′ an ideal. Indeed, on Y ′ the center J becomes E ℓ , in particular principal. E ℓ ⊇ IO Y ′ . ♠ So on Y ′ , we have J ≤ v ( I ) ⇔ This is more subtle in Quek’s theorem! Write J = ( x a 1 1 , . . . , x a k k ) and I = ( f 1 , . . . , f m ). Expand f i = � c α x α 1 1 · · · x α 1 n . J < v ( I ) ⇔ v J ( f i ) ≥ 1 for all i Dan Abramovich Admissibility and coefficient ideals New York, July 27, 2020 1 / 2

  4. Description of admissibility Definition J is I -admissible if J ≤ v ( I ). Lemma This is equivalent to IO Y ′ = E ℓ I ′ , with J = ¯ J ℓ and I ′ an ideal. Indeed, on Y ′ the center J becomes E ℓ , in particular principal. E ℓ ⊇ IO Y ′ . ♠ So on Y ′ , we have J ≤ v ( I ) ⇔ This is more subtle in Quek’s theorem! Write J = ( x a 1 1 , . . . , x a k k ) and I = ( f 1 , . . . , f m ). Expand f i = � c α x α 1 1 · · · x α 1 n . J < v ( I ) ⇔ v J ( f i ) ≥ 1 for all i � α j a j ≥ 1 for all i and α such that c α � = 0. ⇔ Dan Abramovich Admissibility and coefficient ideals New York, July 27, 2020 1 / 2

  5. Consequences J is I 1 , I 2 -admissible ⇒ J is I 1 + I 2 -admissible. J is I -admissible ⇒ J a is I a -admissible. J is I -admissible ⇒ J 1 − 1 a 1 is D ( I )-admissible. Dan Abramovich Admissibility and coefficient ideals New York, July 27, 2020 2 / 2

  6. Consequences J is I 1 , I 2 -admissible ⇒ J is I 1 + I 2 -admissible. J is I -admissible ⇒ J a is I a -admissible. J is I -admissible ⇒ J 1 − 1 a 1 is D ( I )-admissible. Proof. = � α i � � ∂ x α a i − 1 a j ≥ 1 − 1 a 1 . v J ∂ x j Dan Abramovich Admissibility and coefficient ideals New York, July 27, 2020 2 / 2

  7. Consequences J is I 1 , I 2 -admissible ⇒ J is I 1 + I 2 -admissible. J is I -admissible ⇒ J a is I a -admissible. J is I -admissible ⇒ J 1 − 1 a 1 is D ( I )-admissible. Proof. = � α i � � ∂ x α a i − 1 a j ≥ 1 − 1 a 1 . ♠ v J ∂ x j Combining: Proposition A center J is I -admissible if and only if J ( a 1 − 1)! is C ( I , a 1 ) -admissible. Dan Abramovich Admissibility and coefficient ideals New York, July 27, 2020 2 / 2

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend