Dependence of near-surface permafrost inertia on direction, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

dependence of near surface permafrost inertia on
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Dependence of near-surface permafrost inertia on direction, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dependence of near-surface permafrost inertia on direction, intensity, and temporal scale of global surface temperature change A.V. Eliseev, P.F. Demchenko, M.M. Arzhanov, and I.I. Mokhov A.M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics RAS


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Dependence of near-surface permafrost inertia on direction, intensity, and temporal scale of global surface temperature change

A.V. Eliseev, P.F. Demchenko, M.M. Arzhanov, and I.I. Mokhov A.M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics RAS

ENVIROMIS-2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Motivation (1)

  • Global warming, observed in the late 20th century and expected to continue

in the 21st century, may lead to degradation of near-surface and deep

  • permafrost. Due to climate inertia, this degradation is able continue during

next several centuries provided that anthropogenic GHG emissions are continued and sufficiently strong.

  • However, after cessation of these emissions and subsequent decay of

anthropogenic forcing agents, climate is expected to return to initial state with respective return to permafrost

Basic question

Is relation between the climate state and permafrost extent depends on direction of climate change? If yes, does this relationship also depend on time scale and intensity of imposed external forcing?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Motivation (2): Dependence of potential continious permafrost extent sensitivity on global warming rate [Demchenko et al., 2006]

kcont = Scont,0

  • 1 dScont / dTgl

Scont - extent of potential continious permafrost (calculated based on monthly mean SAT) Scont,0 - reference value of Scont Tgl - globally averaged SAT EXP, LIN - series of the simulations with the IAP RAS CM forced by the idealised scenarios for qCO2 A2-GHG, A2-CO2, B2-GHG, B2-CO2, IS92a-GHG, IS92a-CO2 - simulations with the IAP RAS CM forced by the anthropogenic scenarios for the 21st century adapted either from the IPCC FAR or from the IPCC TAR Paleo is derived from the empirically estimated differences between the Holocene Optimum and the Eemian Interglacial [Velichko and Nechaev, 1992]

slide-4
SLIDE 4

General structure of the IAP RAS CM

ATMOSPHERE

insolation

OCEAN VEGETATION

(prescribed ecozones, interactive carbon cycle)

SOIL ICE SHEETS

(prescribed)

PERMAFROST

heat, moisture, momentum, CO2

SEA ICE

clouds (single effective layer)

strato- and mesosphere free troposphere boundary layer

large-scale circulation, synoptic-scale processes are parametrised heat, moisture, CO2, CH4

SNOW

run

  • ff

litterfall

mixed layer deep ocean bottom friction layer

in the whole ocean the following processes are considered: heat transport, large-scale circulation, synoptic-scale processes are parametrised, prescribed salinity precipitation s h

  • r

t w a v e r a d i a t i

  • n

l

  • n

g w a v e r a d i a t i

  • n

convection concentrations N2O, freons, tropospheric and stratospheric aerosols anthropogenic emissions СО2 and CH4

DSS: Deep Soil Simulator

(thermal and hydrological processes, CH4 emissions from wetlands)

SEDIMENTS

(thermal processes, CH4 in clathrates) heat, CH4

Horizontal resolution: 4.5o * 6.0o Turnaround time: ~ 17 sec per model year (Intel Core2 Quad 9400)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

snow

  • rganics

(2 m in peatlands, 0.1 m elsewhere) mineral soil

General structure of the DSS [Arzhanov et al., 2009]

60 m d snow input

  • utput

frozen (relic permafrost) unfrozen (talik) frozen (near-surface permafrost) unfrozen (active layer)

at the lower boundary: Fheat=const (typically, =0) Fwater=0 d AL d PT Tair RLW,d RSW,tot Pr E Fsens Tsnow (z) Tground (z), Wground (z) r u n

  • f

f RLW,u Governing equations:

  • heat transport

(diffusion);

  • moisture

transport (Richard equation); Parameters depend on

  • soil type,
  • soil state

(frozen/unfrozen,

  • soil moisture

content W. Δz: adaptive grid: = 5 cm in the upper 10 m of soil column; decreased to 1 cm near frost front

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Simulations: AR5 EMIC

Protocol: AR5 EMIC (http://climate.uvic.ca/EMICAR5) Duration: 850-4000 External forcings:

  • atmospheric concentrations of CO2, CH4, and N2O;
  • tropospheric burdens of sulphate aerosols;
  • total solar irradiance;
  • stratospheric aerosol optical depth;
  • change in surface albedo due to land use.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Globally averaged annual mean TOA radiative forcing

850-2300 2300-4000 (RCP 8.5 as an example) historic RCP 2.6 RCP 4.5 RCP 6.0 RCP 8.5 qCO2 returns to PI value in 3000-3100 qCO2 returns to PI value in 3000-4000 qCO2 is calculated by the model in 3000- 4000 assuming ECO2,ant=0

  • ther agents are fixed at the values for

year 2300 W/m2 W/m2 year year

slide-8
SLIDE 8

historic RCP 2.6 RCP 4.5 RCP 6.0 RCP 8.5

  • bs. (ΔTg: HadCRUT3;

Sp: [Zhang et al., 1999; Tarnocai et al., 1999] ΔTg, K Sp, mln km2

Globally averaged annual mean SAT and extent of near-surface permafrost: 850-2300

year year

slide-9
SLIDE 9

qCO2 returns to PI value in 3000-3100 qCO2 returns to PI value in 3000-4000 qCO2 is calculated by the model in 3000- 4000 assuming ECO2,ant=0 Sp, mln km2 ΔTg, K

Globally averaged annual mean SAT and extent of near-surface permafrost: RCP 6.0, 2300-4000

year year

slide-10
SLIDE 10

qCO2 returns to PI value in 3000-3100 qCO2 returns to PI value in 3000-4000 qCO2 is calculated by the model in 3000- 4000 assuming ECO2,ant=0 Sp, mln km2 ΔTg, K

Globally averaged annual mean SAT and extent of near-surface permafrost: RCP 8.5, 2300-4000

year year

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Modelled near-surface permafrost-covered area vs. globally averaged annual mean SAT

RCP 2.6 RCP 4.5 RCP 6.0 qCO2 returns to PI value in 3000- 3100 qCO2 returns to PI value in 3000- 4000 qCO2 is calculated by the model in 3000-4000 assuming ECO2,ant=0 Sp, mln km2 Sp, mln km2 Tg, K Tg, K RCP 8.5

slide-12
SLIDE 12

κ = d Sp / d T g [mln km 2 K-1] (only when q CO2 returns to PI value in 3000-3100)

RCP 4.5 RCP 2.6 RCP 6.0 RCP 8.5 all dTg / dt > 0 dTg / dt < 0 mean ± 2 * STD

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Near-surface permafrost mask (RCP 8.5; q CO2 returns to PI value in 3000-3100)

dTg/dt > 0 dTg/dt < 0 difference For every individual year in every grid cell: M=1 if permafrost is diagnosed, M=0

  • therwise.

Then composites of M are constructed by averaging in 288.4 K < Tg < 290.0 K (this range depends on the RCP scenario) when hysteresis branches in coordinates (Tg, Sp) are separated. 0.75 0.5 0.25

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Area covered by continious potential permafrost (as calculated based on monthly mean local SAT)

  • vs. globally averaged annual mean SAT

RCP 2.6 RCP 4.5 RCP 6.0 RCP 8.5 qCO2 returns to PI value in 3000- 3100 qCO2 returns to PI value in 3000- 4000 qCO2 is calculated by the model in 3000-4000 assuming ECO2,ant=0 Sp, mln km2 Sp, mln km2 Tg, K Tg, K

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Tentative mechanism for permafrost hysteresis

  • 1. dT g/dt > 0

seasonal thaw talik develops frozen unfrozen

  • 2. dT g/dt < 0

talik exists talik disappears Talik generally delays soil response to atmospheric forcing Longer impact of talik on soil state in the case of global cooling in comparison to the case of global warming Permafrost hysteresis

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Amplification through hydrological cycle: Composite differences for July (RCP 8.5; qCO2 returns to PI value in 3000-3100)

soil moisture content in the upper 7 cm of soil column [m/m] cloud amount [] radiation budget at the surface [W/m2] ΔM = 0.25

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Therefore:

  • The relationship between globally averaged surface air temperature Tg

and the near-surface permafrost extent Sp is multivalued.

  • This transient permafrost hysteresis is visible more clearly for more

aggressive anthropogenic scenarios. In contrast, it does not depend on the way how qCO2 returns to the PI value, at least among studied here scenarios.

  • It is likely to related to the impact of phase transitions of soil moisture on

apparent heat capacity of soil. This mechanism is amplified via atmospheric hydrological feedbacks and radiative budget at the surface. It is tempting to study this mechanism in a systematic way

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Simulations: Idealised

Duration: ( 45 simulations ) * ( model years 1-3000 ) = 135,000 years External forcings: periodically varying qCO2: qCO2 = qCO2,0 exp [ A sin ( 2 π t / P) ], qCO2,0 = 500 ppmv A = 0.1, P = 100 yr A = 0.1, P = 1000 yr A = 0.5, P = 100 yr A = 0.5, P = 1000 yr Model versions:

  • standard, specific latent heat of freezing L = L0 = 3.34*105 J / kg;
  • L = L0 / 10 in soil;
  • L = L0 / 100 in soil;

qCO2, ppmv

year

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Tg, K Sp, mln km2 Tg, K Sp, mln km2

P = 100 yr, A = 0.1 P = 1000 yr, A = 0.5

standard version L = L0 / 10 L = L0 / 100 model year model year

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Hysteresis of near-surface permafrost: dependence on type of external forcing (standard model version)

qCO2 returns to PI value in 3000-3100 qCO2 returns to PI value in 3000-4000 qCO2 is calculated by the model in 3000-4000 assuming ECO2,ant=0

Tg, K Sp, mln km2 Tg, K Sp, mln km2 RCP 8.5 idealised: P = 1000 yr, A = 0.5

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Between-branches difference of near-surface permafrost mask ( standard version)

0.25 0.5 0.75 idealised simulation P = 1000 yr, A=0.3 RCP 8.5 qCO2 returns to PI value in 3000-3100

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Amplification mechanism via hydrological cycle: dependence on type of external forcing. Moisture content in the upper 7 cm of soil column [m/m] (standard model version)

  • 0.2 -0.1 -0.05

idealised simulation P = 1000 yr, A=0.3 RCP 8.5 qCO2 returns to PI value in 3000-3100 This mechanism is likely not important for permafrost hysteresis. However, it does amplify the separation between the hysteresis branches. ΔM = 0.25

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Hysteresis of near-surface permafrost: dependence on model version ( P = 1000 yr, A = 0.5 )

standard ( L = L 0 ) L = L 0 / 10 L = L 0 / 100 Consistent with the tentative mechanism proposed above Sp, mln km2 Sp, mln km2 Sp, mln km2 Tg, K Tg, K Tg, K

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Between-branches difference of near-surface permafrost mask ( P = 1000 yr, A = 0.5)

0.25 0.5 0.75 standard version (L = L0) L = L0 / 10

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Hysteresis of near-surface permafrost: dependence on time scale of external forcing ( standard version of the model, A = 0.5 )

For total area, relatively weak dependence on time scale P = 100 yr P = 200 yr P = 500 yr Sp, mln km2 Sp, mln km2 Sp, mln km2 Tg, K Tg, K Tg, K

slide-26
SLIDE 26

0.25 0.5 0.75 P = 100 yr P = 500 yr Regionally, separation of hysteresis branches is more pronounced at larger time scales

Between-branches difference

  • f near-surface permafrost mask:

( standard version of the model, A = 0.5 )

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Hysteresis of near-surface permafrost: dependence on amplitude of external forcing ( standard version of the model, P = 1000 yr )

Separation of hysteresis branches becomes more pronounced at larger amplitudes A = 0.1 A = 0.3 A = 0.5 Sp, mln km2 Sp, mln km2 Sp, mln km2 Tg, K Tg, K Tg, K

slide-28
SLIDE 28

0.25 0.5 0.75

Between-branches difference

  • f near-surface permafrost mask:

( standard version of the model, P = 1000 yr )

A=0.1 A=0.5 A=0.3

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Is transience important ? Additional simulations.

Duration: ( 3 simulations ) * ( model years 1-24,300 ) = 72,900 years External forcing: stepwise varying qCO2: Model versions:

  • standard, specific latent heat of freezing L = L0 = 3.34*105 J / kg;
  • L = L0 / 10 in soil;
  • L = L0 / 100 in soil;

qCO2, ppmv

spin-up, 200 yr processing, 100 yr

year

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Hysteresis of near-surface permafrost: dependence on model version ( stepwise q CO2 )

standard ( L = L 0 ) L = L 0 / 10 L = L 0 / 100 For total area, transience suppresses hysteresis Sp, mln km2 Sp, mln km2 Sp, mln km2 Tg, K Tg, K Tg, K

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Between-branches difference in permafrost mask ( stepwise q CO2 )

standard version (L = L0) L = L0 / 10 0.25 0.5 0.75

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Between-branches difference in soil moisture content in the upper 7 cm of soil column [m/m] ( stepwise q CO2 ; standard model version)

ΔM = 0.25

  • 0.2
  • 0.1
  • 0.05
slide-33
SLIDE 33

κ = d S p / d T g [mln km 2 K-1] (periodically varying q CO2; standard model version)

P = 100 yr P = 200 yr P = 300 yr P = 500 yr P = 1000 yr

near- surface permafrost potential continious permafrost mean ± 2*STD A = . 1 A = . 3 A = . 5 A = . 1 A = . 3 A = . 5 A = . 1 A = . 3 A = . 5

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Conclusions

  • In the IAP RAS CM simulations forced by the return-to-preindustrial

continuations of the RCP scenarios, a possibility of hysteresis in dependence of near-surface permafrost (NSP) extent Sp on global temperature Tg is shown: in some temperature range which depends on imposed scenario of external forcing, for a given value of Tg, NSP area is larger in the case of warming climate than in the case when climate cools. This hysteresis is due to dependence of soil state in the regions of extra-tropical wetlands and near the contemporary NSP boundaries on sign of climatic external forcing.

  • In the simulations forced by the periodically-varying qCO2, it is exhibited that

multivalued dependence of Sp on Tg is related to the impact of phase transitions of soil water on apparent inertia of the system owing to talik

  • formation. This mechanism is amplified by the respective changes in soil and

atmospheric hydrological cycle and associated radiation transfer in the

  • atmosphere. Transience is not important for the NSP hysteresis.
  • In addition, it is shown that potential permafrost may approximate the real

permafrost only at millennia and longer time scale. At centennial and shorter scales, sensitivity of potential permafrost drastically overestimate those for real

  • permafrost. This poses limitations on palaeoclimate permafrost reconstructions

based only on SAT.