delirious new world
play

DELIRIOUS NEW WORLD Static City and the Engineering of Collective - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

DELIRIOUS NEW WORLD Static City and the Engineering of Collective Spaces of Otherness Eka Swadiansa The world is changing. The Earth is crumbling. And if the world is confined as Mother Nature and human being; then the destruction of the planet


  1. DELIRIOUS NEW WORLD Static City and the Engineering of Collective Spaces of Otherness Eka Swadiansa

  2. The world is changing. The Earth is crumbling. And if the world is confined as Mother Nature and human being; then the destruction of the planet will also means the downfall of the human civilization. However through science and history, it is rational enough to imagine that even the extinction of the millions years old humankind will not bring total annihilation to the billions years old Earth. It is the human world that needs to be save, not necessary the planet itself. Because even after worst case scenario of human extinction happened, nature will most likely find its way. To heal itself, and finally move on with or without the presence of human civilization (Ecological premise).

  3. Human civilization is a paradox. Naturally progress over one entity would always means degradation on the other. Catastrophic turmoil was generated when generations after generations of human being failed to see this paradox, only to be deceived by what they believed to be the ever-growing (economic) progress. Progress are engineered to enhance competitiveness. Competition will not exist when there is no more habitat to live in. However superior or inferior nation, group of nations, race… are, we are all living on a single Spaceship Earth (Economic premise).

  4. CITY PROPER BY POPULATION 40 Millions 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Shanghai Beijing Istanbul Mumbai Moscow Sao Paulo Seoul Jakarta Tokyo Mexico New York London Hong Los Paris Chicago Toronto Milan Rome Frakfurt City City Kong Angeles 1 3 5 8 9 12 15 16 18 19 21 23 32 64 80 80 80 80 80 80

  5. URBAN AREA BY POPULATION 40 Millions 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Shanghai Beijing Istanbul Mumbai Moscow Sao Paulo Seoul Jakarta Tokyo Mexico New York London Hong Los Paris Chicago Toronto Milan Rome Frakfurt City City Kong Angeles 7 8 24 13 16 11 6 2 1 12 9 32 46 19 29 37 53 71 102 254

  6. AGGLOMERATION BY POPULATION 40 Millions 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Shanghai Beijing Istanbul Mumbai Moscow Sao Paulo Seoul Jakarta Tokyo Mexico New York London Hong Los Paris Chicago Toronto Milan Rome Frakfurt City City Kong Angeles 3 13 24 9 17 12 6 4 2 10 11 23 50 15 28 36 53 76 80 80

  7. URBAN POPULATION 40 Millions 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Shanghai Beijing Istanbul Mumbai Moscow Sao Paulo Seoul Jakarta Tokyo Mexico New York London Hong Los Paris Chicago Toronto Milan Rome Frakfurt City City Kong Angeles Series1 Series2 Series3 City Urban Agglome- Proper Area ration

  8. Millions 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 5 Tokyo(Keihin) 1 Jakarta(DKI) 2 Karachi 3 Manila(Metro Manila) 4 Delhi 5 Seoul(Sudogwon) 6 Shanghai 7 URBAN AREA BY POPULATION 2 Beijing 8 New York City 9 10 Guangzhou(Guangfo) 11 Sao Paulo 12 Mexico City 13 Mumbai 14 Osaka(Keihanshin) 15 Lagos 16 Moscow 17 Dhaka 18 Lahore 19 Los Angeles 20 Bangkok

  9. Agglomeration, Case Study: Tokyo Ebisu (1990) Odaiba (1990-2000) Roppongi Hills (2003) Omotesando Hills (2005) Shiodome (2006) Tokyo Midtown (2008) Akasaka Sacas (2008) Agglomeration = Degeneration

  10. amoatlas

  11. Agglomeration/Degeneration, Case Study: Tokyo Ebisu (1990) Odaiba (1990-2000) Roppongi Hills (2003) Omotesando Hills (2005) Shiodome (2006) Tokyo Midtown (2008) Akasaka Sacas (2008) Agglomeration = Daily Commuting Daily Commuting = Massive Energy Use

  12. THE FLAWS Implementing Eurocentric Theories in the Developing World

  13. Swadiansa E. et al. (2012), “From Urban Studies to Urban Architecture: Critiques on the Use of Eurocentric Theories in Shaping thr Emerging Cities,” in Kudhori D. and Kamino Y. et al., ed., Towards A Sustainable Ecology: Global Challenges and Local Responses in Africa and Asia. Pp. 235-243. Beijing: Alliance, Casablanca: Africa Challenge, Malang: UB Press, Paris: GRIC Le Havre, Tokyo: OISCA International. ISBN: 978-602-203-274-8.

  14. Magnitude Escalation: Differences and Diversion

  15. Magnitude Escalation: Century old Theories

  16. Urban Theories started from Urban Studies Urban Studies : Social Inquiries on 19 th Century European Early Urban Life Some Urban Studies highlights were: Community Structure (Robert & Helen Lynd) Communal Power (Hunter Floyd & Robert Alan Dahl) Elite Theories (John Rex & Robert Moore) One of Urban Studies key hypothesis was: Whose City? (Robert Dahl) STATIC CITY Abstract Part 1 – Historical Dialectics RADICAL PLANNING Part 2 – Geo Politic, Demography, FOR THE EVER-CHANGING Macro Economy J-BRICK & NEXT-X MEGACITIES Part 3 – Radical Urban Design Part 4 – Totalitarian Urban Architecture COHORT 18 LEAD Associate Training November 18 th 2013 / Surya University Conclusion

  17. When Community & Power had reached their balance Urban Studies was then developed into Urban Planning with fundamental thoughts based on the question of Why City? STATIC CITY Abstract Part 1 – Historical Dialectics RADICAL PLANNING Part 2 – Geo Politic, Demography, FOR THE EVER-CHANGING Macro Economy J-BRICK & NEXT-X MEGACITIES Part 3 – Radical Urban Design Part 4 – Totalitarian Urban Architecture COHORT 18 LEAD Associate Training November 18 th 2013 / Surya University Conclusion

  18. Ebenezer Howard The Three Magnets & The Master Key

  19. Ebenezer Howard Garden City

  20. Letchworth

  21. Hampstead

  22. Arthuro Soria Mata Linear City

  23. Washington

  24. London

  25. Frank Lloyd Wright Broadacre City

  26. Frank Lloyd Wright Broadacre City

  27. Frank Lloyd Wright Broadacre City

  28. Le Corbusier Radiant City

  29. Le Corbusier Radiant City

  30. Pruitt Igoe

  31. Early influential Postmodern critics: Homogenic Hegemony (David Harvey) Spaces of Heterotopias (Michel Foucault) Urban Regional Planning: The Non-planning Masterplanning (Peter Hall, Cedric Price, Reyner Banham, Peter Barker) Urban Design = regionalized Urban Planning Urban Design = more focused Urban Planning Urban Design = planning + architecture + landscape STATIC CITY Abstract Part 1 – Historical Dialectics RADICAL PLANNING Part 2 – Geo Politic, Demography, FOR THE EVER-CHANGING Macro Economy J-BRICK & NEXT-X MEGACITIES Part 3 – Radical Urban Design Part 4 – Totalitarian Urban Architecture COHORT 18 LEAD Associate Training November 18 th 2013 / Surya University Conclusion

  32. Collin Rowe & Fred Koetter Collage City

  33. Urban Design: much smaller than urban planning, much bigger than architecture Jerde Partnership STATIC CITY Abstract Part 1 – Historical Dialectics RADICAL PLANNING Part 2 – Geo Politic, Demography, FOR THE EVER-CHANGING Macro Economy J-BRICK & NEXT-X MEGACITIES Part 3 – Radical Urban Design Part 4 – Totalitarian Urban Architecture COHORT 18 LEAD Associate Training November 18 th 2013 / Surya University Conclusion

  34. STATIC CITY Abstract Part 1 – Historical Dialectics RADICAL PLANNING Part 2 – Geo Politic, Demography, FOR THE EVER-CHANGING Macro Economy J-BRICK & NEXT-X MEGACITIES Part 3 – Radical Urban Design Part 4 – Totalitarian Urban Architecture COHORT 18 LEAD Associate Training November 18 th 2013 / Surya University Conclusion

  35. Advance Urbanism: City Within Building >>> Advancement of Radiant City Within City >>> Advancement of Broadacre STATIC CITY Abstract Part 1 – Historical Dialectics RADICAL PLANNING Part 2 – Geo Politic, Demography, FOR THE EVER-CHANGING Macro Economy J-BRICK & NEXT-X MEGACITIES Part 3 – Radical Urban Design Part 4 – Totalitarian Urban Architecture COHORT 18 LEAD Associate Training November 18 th 2013 / Surya University Conclusion

  36. THE RESULT

  37. So So do o th these mak ake us s th the bad ad guys? s?

  38. Agglomeration = Movement = Spatial Hunger = Energy Hunger

  39. THE OTHER (NORTHERN) TRUTH Detroit

  40. Urban Architecture: the Framework

  41. Urban Theories: smaller scale Urban Urban Urban Urban Studies Planning Design Architecture larger impact

  42. THE ALTERNATIVES Proposals to Kyoto & Osaka

  43. Degeneration, Case Study: Kyoto

  44. Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

  45. Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

  46. Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

  47. Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

  48. Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

  49. Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

  50. Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend