DELIRIOUS NEW WORLD Static City and the Engineering of Collective - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
delirious new world
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

DELIRIOUS NEW WORLD Static City and the Engineering of Collective - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aug 29, 2023 94 likes •1.06k views

DELIRIOUS NEW WORLD Static City and the Engineering of Collective Spaces of Otherness Eka Swadiansa The world is changing. The Earth is crumbling. And if the world is confined as Mother Nature and human being; then the destruction of the planet

slide-1
SLIDE 1

DELIRIOUS NEW WORLD

Static City and the Engineering of Collective Spaces of Otherness

Eka Swadiansa

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The world is changing. The Earth is crumbling. And if the world is confined as Mother Nature and human being; then the destruction of the planet will also means the downfall of the human civilization. However through science and history, it is rational enough to imagine that even the extinction of the millions years old humankind will not bring total annihilation to the billions years old Earth. It is the human world that needs to be save, not necessary the planet itself. Because even after worst case scenario of human extinction happened, nature will most likely find its way. To heal itself, and finally move on with or without the presence of human civilization (Ecological premise).

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Human civilization is a paradox. Naturally progress over one entity would always means degradation on the other. Catastrophic turmoil was generated when generations after generations of human being failed to see this paradox, only to be deceived by what they believed to be the ever-growing (economic) progress. Progress are engineered to enhance competitiveness. Competition will not exist when there is no more habitat to live in. However superior or inferior nation, group of nations, race… are, we are all living on a single Spaceship Earth (Economic premise).

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Shanghai Beijing Istanbul Mumbai Moscow Sao Paulo Seoul Jakarta Tokyo Mexico City New York City London Hong Kong Los Angeles Paris Chicago Toronto Milan Rome Frakfurt 1 3 5 8 9 12 15 16 18 19 21 23 32 64 80 80 80 80 80 80

Millions

CITY PROPER BY POPULATION

slide-12
SLIDE 12

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Shanghai Beijing Istanbul Mumbai Moscow Sao Paulo Seoul Jakarta Tokyo Mexico City New York City London Hong Kong Los Angeles Paris Chicago Toronto Milan Rome Frakfurt 7 8 24 13 16 11 6 2 1 12 9 32 46 19 29 37 53 71 102 254

Millions

URBAN AREA BY POPULATION

slide-13
SLIDE 13

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Shanghai Beijing Istanbul Mumbai Moscow Sao Paulo Seoul Jakarta Tokyo Mexico City New York City London Hong Kong Los Angeles Paris Chicago Toronto Milan Rome Frakfurt 3 13 24 9 17 12 6 4 2 10 11 23 50 15 28 36 53 76 80 80

Millions

AGGLOMERATION BY POPULATION

slide-14
SLIDE 14

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Shanghai Beijing Istanbul Mumbai Moscow Sao Paulo Seoul Jakarta Tokyo Mexico City New York City London Hong Kong Los Angeles Paris Chicago Toronto Milan Rome Frakfurt

Millions

URBAN POPULATION

Series1 Series2 Series3

City Proper Urban Area Agglome- ration

slide-15
SLIDE 15

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Tokyo(Keihin) Jakarta(DKI) Karachi Manila(Metro Manila) Delhi Seoul(Sudogwon) Shanghai Beijing New York City Guangzhou(Guangfo) Sao Paulo Mexico City Mumbai Osaka(Keihanshin) Lagos Moscow Dhaka Lahore Los Angeles Bangkok 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Millions

URBAN AREA BY POPULATION 2

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Agglomeration, Case Study: Tokyo

Ebisu (1990) Odaiba (1990-2000) Roppongi Hills (2003) Omotesando Hills (2005) Shiodome (2006) Tokyo Midtown (2008) Akasaka Sacas (2008) Agglomeration = Degeneration

slide-18
SLIDE 18

amoatlas

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Agglomeration/Degeneration, Case Study: Tokyo

Ebisu (1990) Odaiba (1990-2000) Roppongi Hills (2003) Omotesando Hills (2005) Shiodome (2006) Tokyo Midtown (2008) Akasaka Sacas (2008) Agglomeration = Daily Commuting Daily Commuting = Massive Energy Use

slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

THE FLAWS Implementing Eurocentric Theories in the Developing World

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Swadiansa E. et al. (2012), “From Urban Studies to Urban Architecture: Critiques on the Use of Eurocentric Theories in Shaping thr Emerging Cities,” in Kudhori D. and Kamino Y. et al., ed., Towards A Sustainable Ecology: Global Challenges and Local Responses in Africa and Asia. Pp. 235-243. Beijing: Alliance, Casablanca: Africa Challenge, Malang: UB Press, Paris: GRIC Le Havre, Tokyo: OISCA

  • International. ISBN: 978-602-203-274-8.
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Magnitude Escalation: Differences and Diversion

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Magnitude Escalation: Century old Theories

slide-31
SLIDE 31

STATIC CITY

RADICAL PLANNING FOR THE EVER-CHANGING J-BRICK & NEXT-X MEGACITIES

COHORT 18 LEAD Associate Training November 18th 2013 / Surya University

Abstract Part 1 – Historical Dialectics Part 2 – Geo Politic, Demography, Macro Economy Part 3 – Radical Urban Design Part 4 – Totalitarian Urban Architecture Conclusion

Urban Theories started from Urban Studies Urban Studies: Social Inquiries on 19th Century European Early Urban Life Some Urban Studies highlights were: Community Structure (Robert & Helen Lynd) Communal Power (Hunter Floyd & Robert Alan Dahl) Elite Theories (John Rex & Robert Moore) One of Urban Studies key hypothesis was: Whose City? (Robert Dahl)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

STATIC CITY

RADICAL PLANNING FOR THE EVER-CHANGING J-BRICK & NEXT-X MEGACITIES

COHORT 18 LEAD Associate Training November 18th 2013 / Surya University

Abstract Part 1 – Historical Dialectics Part 2 – Geo Politic, Demography, Macro Economy Part 3 – Radical Urban Design Part 4 – Totalitarian Urban Architecture Conclusion

When Community & Power had reached their balance Urban Studies was then developed into Urban Planning with fundamental thoughts based on the question of Why City?

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Ebenezer Howard The Three Magnets & The Master Key

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Ebenezer Howard Garden City

slide-35
SLIDE 35
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Letchworth

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Hampstead

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Arthuro Soria Mata Linear City

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Washington

slide-40
SLIDE 40

London

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Frank Lloyd Wright Broadacre City

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Frank Lloyd Wright Broadacre City

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Frank Lloyd Wright Broadacre City

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Le Corbusier Radiant City

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Le Corbusier Radiant City

slide-46
SLIDE 46
slide-47
SLIDE 47
slide-48
SLIDE 48

Pruitt Igoe

slide-49
SLIDE 49

STATIC CITY

RADICAL PLANNING FOR THE EVER-CHANGING J-BRICK & NEXT-X MEGACITIES

COHORT 18 LEAD Associate Training November 18th 2013 / Surya University

Abstract Part 1 – Historical Dialectics Part 2 – Geo Politic, Demography, Macro Economy Part 3 – Radical Urban Design Part 4 – Totalitarian Urban Architecture Conclusion

Early influential Postmodern critics: Homogenic Hegemony (David Harvey) Spaces of Heterotopias (Michel Foucault) Urban Regional Planning: The Non-planning Masterplanning (Peter Hall, Cedric Price, Reyner Banham, Peter Barker) Urban Design = regionalized Urban Planning Urban Design = more focused Urban Planning Urban Design = planning + architecture + landscape

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Collin Rowe & Fred Koetter Collage City

slide-51
SLIDE 51

STATIC CITY

RADICAL PLANNING FOR THE EVER-CHANGING J-BRICK & NEXT-X MEGACITIES

COHORT 18 LEAD Associate Training November 18th 2013 / Surya University

Abstract Part 1 – Historical Dialectics Part 2 – Geo Politic, Demography, Macro Economy Part 3 – Radical Urban Design Part 4 – Totalitarian Urban Architecture Conclusion

Urban Design: much smaller than urban planning, much bigger than architecture Jerde Partnership

slide-52
SLIDE 52
slide-53
SLIDE 53
slide-54
SLIDE 54
slide-55
SLIDE 55
slide-56
SLIDE 56
slide-57
SLIDE 57

STATIC CITY

RADICAL PLANNING FOR THE EVER-CHANGING J-BRICK & NEXT-X MEGACITIES

COHORT 18 LEAD Associate Training November 18th 2013 / Surya University

Abstract Part 1 – Historical Dialectics Part 2 – Geo Politic, Demography, Macro Economy Part 3 – Radical Urban Design Part 4 – Totalitarian Urban Architecture Conclusion

slide-58
SLIDE 58

STATIC CITY

RADICAL PLANNING FOR THE EVER-CHANGING J-BRICK & NEXT-X MEGACITIES

COHORT 18 LEAD Associate Training November 18th 2013 / Surya University

Abstract Part 1 – Historical Dialectics Part 2 – Geo Politic, Demography, Macro Economy Part 3 – Radical Urban Design Part 4 – Totalitarian Urban Architecture Conclusion

Advance Urbanism: City Within Building >>> Advancement of Radiant City Within City >>> Advancement of Broadacre

slide-59
SLIDE 59

THE RESULT

slide-60
SLIDE 60
slide-61
SLIDE 61
slide-62
SLIDE 62

So So do

  • th

these mak ake us s th the bad ad guys? s?

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Agglomeration = Movement = Spatial Hunger = Energy Hunger

slide-64
SLIDE 64

THE OTHER (NORTHERN) TRUTH Detroit

slide-65
SLIDE 65
slide-66
SLIDE 66
slide-67
SLIDE 67

Urban Architecture: the Framework

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Urban Theories:

Urban Studies Urban Planning Urban Design Urban Architecture smaller scale larger impact

slide-69
SLIDE 69

THE ALTERNATIVES Proposals to Kyoto & Osaka

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Degeneration, Case Study: Kyoto

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-80
SLIDE 80

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-82
SLIDE 82

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-84
SLIDE 84

Reorientation, Case Study: Osaka

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-86
SLIDE 86

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-87
SLIDE 87

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-89
SLIDE 89

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-90
SLIDE 90

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-91
SLIDE 91

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-92
SLIDE 92

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-93
SLIDE 93

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-94
SLIDE 94

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org

slide-95
SLIDE 95

Institute for East Asian Architecture and Urbanism in Kyoto www.East-Asian-Architecture.org