Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms William M. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

deformation spaces of 3 dimensional affine space forms
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms William M. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms William M. Goldman Department of Mathematics University of Maryland Hyperbolicity in Geometry, Topology and Dynamics A workshop and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

William M. Goldman

Department of Mathematics University of Maryland

Hyperbolicity in Geometry, Topology and Dynamics A workshop and celebration of Caroline Series’ 60th birthday University of Warwick 26 July, 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Complete affine 3-manifolds

A complete affine manifold Mn is a quotient M = Rn/Γ where Γ is a discrete group of affine transformations acting properly and freely. Which kind of groups Γ can occur? Two types when n = 3:

Γ is solvable: M3 is finitely covered by an iterated fibration of circles and cells. Γ is free: M3 is (conjecturally) an open solid handlbody with complete flat Lorentzian structure.

First examples discovered by Margulis in early 1980’s Closely related to hyperbolic geometry on surfaces

slide-3
SLIDE 3

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Complete affine 3-manifolds

A complete affine manifold Mn is a quotient M = Rn/Γ where Γ is a discrete group of affine transformations acting properly and freely. Which kind of groups Γ can occur? Two types when n = 3:

Γ is solvable: M3 is finitely covered by an iterated fibration of circles and cells. Γ is free: M3 is (conjecturally) an open solid handlbody with complete flat Lorentzian structure.

First examples discovered by Margulis in early 1980’s Closely related to hyperbolic geometry on surfaces

slide-4
SLIDE 4

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Complete affine 3-manifolds

A complete affine manifold Mn is a quotient M = Rn/Γ where Γ is a discrete group of affine transformations acting properly and freely. Which kind of groups Γ can occur? Two types when n = 3:

Γ is solvable: M3 is finitely covered by an iterated fibration of circles and cells. Γ is free: M3 is (conjecturally) an open solid handlbody with complete flat Lorentzian structure.

First examples discovered by Margulis in early 1980’s Closely related to hyperbolic geometry on surfaces

slide-5
SLIDE 5

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Complete affine 3-manifolds

A complete affine manifold Mn is a quotient M = Rn/Γ where Γ is a discrete group of affine transformations acting properly and freely. Which kind of groups Γ can occur? Two types when n = 3:

Γ is solvable: M3 is finitely covered by an iterated fibration of circles and cells. Γ is free: M3 is (conjecturally) an open solid handlbody with complete flat Lorentzian structure.

First examples discovered by Margulis in early 1980’s Closely related to hyperbolic geometry on surfaces

slide-6
SLIDE 6

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Complete affine 3-manifolds

A complete affine manifold Mn is a quotient M = Rn/Γ where Γ is a discrete group of affine transformations acting properly and freely. Which kind of groups Γ can occur? Two types when n = 3:

Γ is solvable: M3 is finitely covered by an iterated fibration of circles and cells. Γ is free: M3 is (conjecturally) an open solid handlbody with complete flat Lorentzian structure.

First examples discovered by Margulis in early 1980’s Closely related to hyperbolic geometry on surfaces

slide-7
SLIDE 7

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Complete affine 3-manifolds

A complete affine manifold Mn is a quotient M = Rn/Γ where Γ is a discrete group of affine transformations acting properly and freely. Which kind of groups Γ can occur? Two types when n = 3:

Γ is solvable: M3 is finitely covered by an iterated fibration of circles and cells. Γ is free: M3 is (conjecturally) an open solid handlbody with complete flat Lorentzian structure.

First examples discovered by Margulis in early 1980’s Closely related to hyperbolic geometry on surfaces

slide-8
SLIDE 8

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Complete affine 3-manifolds

A complete affine manifold Mn is a quotient M = Rn/Γ where Γ is a discrete group of affine transformations acting properly and freely. Which kind of groups Γ can occur? Two types when n = 3:

Γ is solvable: M3 is finitely covered by an iterated fibration of circles and cells. Γ is free: M3 is (conjecturally) an open solid handlbody with complete flat Lorentzian structure.

First examples discovered by Margulis in early 1980’s Closely related to hyperbolic geometry on surfaces

slide-9
SLIDE 9

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Complete affine 3-manifolds

A complete affine manifold Mn is a quotient M = Rn/Γ where Γ is a discrete group of affine transformations acting properly and freely. Which kind of groups Γ can occur? Two types when n = 3:

Γ is solvable: M3 is finitely covered by an iterated fibration of circles and cells. Γ is free: M3 is (conjecturally) an open solid handlbody with complete flat Lorentzian structure.

First examples discovered by Margulis in early 1980’s Closely related to hyperbolic geometry on surfaces

slide-10
SLIDE 10

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Euclidean manifolds

If M compact, then Γ finite extension of a subgroup of translations Γ ∩ Rn = Λ ∼ = Zn (Bieberbach 1912); M finitely covered by flat torus Rn/Λ (where Λ ⊂ Rn lattice).

slide-11
SLIDE 11

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Euclidean manifolds

If M compact, then Γ finite extension of a subgroup of translations Γ ∩ Rn = Λ ∼ = Zn (Bieberbach 1912); M finitely covered by flat torus Rn/Λ (where Λ ⊂ Rn lattice).

slide-12
SLIDE 12

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Euclidean manifolds

If M compact, then Γ finite extension of a subgroup of translations Γ ∩ Rn = Λ ∼ = Zn (Bieberbach 1912); M finitely covered by flat torus Rn/Λ (where Λ ⊂ Rn lattice).

slide-13
SLIDE 13

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Euclidean manifolds

If M compact, then Γ finite extension of a subgroup of translations Γ ∩ Rn = Λ ∼ = Zn (Bieberbach 1912); M finitely covered by flat torus Rn/Λ (where Λ ⊂ Rn lattice).

slide-14
SLIDE 14

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Consequences of Bieberbach theorems

Only finitely many topological types in each dimension. Only one commensurability class. π1(M) is finitely generated. π1(M) is finitely presented. χ(M) = 0.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Consequences of Bieberbach theorems

Only finitely many topological types in each dimension. Only one commensurability class. π1(M) is finitely generated. π1(M) is finitely presented. χ(M) = 0.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Consequences of Bieberbach theorems

Only finitely many topological types in each dimension. Only one commensurability class. π1(M) is finitely generated. π1(M) is finitely presented. χ(M) = 0.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Consequences of Bieberbach theorems

Only finitely many topological types in each dimension. Only one commensurability class. π1(M) is finitely generated. π1(M) is finitely presented. χ(M) = 0.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Consequences of Bieberbach theorems

Only finitely many topological types in each dimension. Only one commensurability class. π1(M) is finitely generated. π1(M) is finitely presented. χ(M) = 0.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Consequences of Bieberbach theorems

Only finitely many topological types in each dimension. Only one commensurability class. π1(M) is finitely generated. π1(M) is finitely presented. χ(M) = 0.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Example: Hyperbolic torus bundles

Mapping torus M3 of automorphism of R2/Z2 induced by hyperbolic A ∈ SL(2, Z) inherits a complete affine structure.

Flat Lorentz metric (A-invariant quadratic form).

Extend Z2 to R2 and A to one-parameter subgroup exp

  • t log(A)
  • to get solvable Lie group G ∼

= R2 ⋊ R acting simply transitively on E. M3 ∼ = Γ\H is a complete affine solvmanifold.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Example: Hyperbolic torus bundles

Mapping torus M3 of automorphism of R2/Z2 induced by hyperbolic A ∈ SL(2, Z) inherits a complete affine structure.

Flat Lorentz metric (A-invariant quadratic form).

Extend Z2 to R2 and A to one-parameter subgroup exp

  • t log(A)
  • to get solvable Lie group G ∼

= R2 ⋊ R acting simply transitively on E. M3 ∼ = Γ\H is a complete affine solvmanifold.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Example: Hyperbolic torus bundles

Mapping torus M3 of automorphism of R2/Z2 induced by hyperbolic A ∈ SL(2, Z) inherits a complete affine structure.

Flat Lorentz metric (A-invariant quadratic form).

Extend Z2 to R2 and A to one-parameter subgroup exp

  • t log(A)
  • to get solvable Lie group G ∼

= R2 ⋊ R acting simply transitively on E. M3 ∼ = Γ\H is a complete affine solvmanifold.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Example: Hyperbolic torus bundles

Mapping torus M3 of automorphism of R2/Z2 induced by hyperbolic A ∈ SL(2, Z) inherits a complete affine structure.

Flat Lorentz metric (A-invariant quadratic form).

Extend Z2 to R2 and A to one-parameter subgroup exp

  • t log(A)
  • to get solvable Lie group G ∼

= R2 ⋊ R acting simply transitively on E. M3 ∼ = Γ\H is a complete affine solvmanifold.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Example: Hyperbolic torus bundles

Mapping torus M3 of automorphism of R2/Z2 induced by hyperbolic A ∈ SL(2, Z) inherits a complete affine structure.

Flat Lorentz metric (A-invariant quadratic form).

Extend Z2 to R2 and A to one-parameter subgroup exp

  • t log(A)
  • to get solvable Lie group G ∼

= R2 ⋊ R acting simply transitively on E. M3 ∼ = Γ\H is a complete affine solvmanifold.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Proper affine actions

Suppose M = Rn/G is a complete affine manifold: For M to be a (Hausdorff) smooth manifold, G must act:

Discretely: (G ⊂ Homeo(Rn) discrete); Freely: (No fixed points); Properly: (Go to ∞ in G = ⇒ go to ∞ in every orbit Gx).

More precisely, the map G × X − → X × X (g, x) − → (gx, x) is a proper map (preimages of compacta are compact).

Discreteness does not imply properness.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Proper affine actions

Suppose M = Rn/G is a complete affine manifold: For M to be a (Hausdorff) smooth manifold, G must act:

Discretely: (G ⊂ Homeo(Rn) discrete); Freely: (No fixed points); Properly: (Go to ∞ in G = ⇒ go to ∞ in every orbit Gx).

More precisely, the map G × X − → X × X (g, x) − → (gx, x) is a proper map (preimages of compacta are compact).

Discreteness does not imply properness.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Proper affine actions

Suppose M = Rn/G is a complete affine manifold: For M to be a (Hausdorff) smooth manifold, G must act:

Discretely: (G ⊂ Homeo(Rn) discrete); Freely: (No fixed points); Properly: (Go to ∞ in G = ⇒ go to ∞ in every orbit Gx).

More precisely, the map G × X − → X × X (g, x) − → (gx, x) is a proper map (preimages of compacta are compact).

Discreteness does not imply properness.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Proper affine actions

Suppose M = Rn/G is a complete affine manifold: For M to be a (Hausdorff) smooth manifold, G must act:

Discretely: (G ⊂ Homeo(Rn) discrete); Freely: (No fixed points); Properly: (Go to ∞ in G = ⇒ go to ∞ in every orbit Gx).

More precisely, the map G × X − → X × X (g, x) − → (gx, x) is a proper map (preimages of compacta are compact).

Discreteness does not imply properness.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Proper affine actions

Suppose M = Rn/G is a complete affine manifold: For M to be a (Hausdorff) smooth manifold, G must act:

Discretely: (G ⊂ Homeo(Rn) discrete); Freely: (No fixed points); Properly: (Go to ∞ in G = ⇒ go to ∞ in every orbit Gx).

More precisely, the map G × X − → X × X (g, x) − → (gx, x) is a proper map (preimages of compacta are compact).

Discreteness does not imply properness.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Proper affine actions

Suppose M = Rn/G is a complete affine manifold: For M to be a (Hausdorff) smooth manifold, G must act:

Discretely: (G ⊂ Homeo(Rn) discrete); Freely: (No fixed points); Properly: (Go to ∞ in G = ⇒ go to ∞ in every orbit Gx).

More precisely, the map G × X − → X × X (g, x) − → (gx, x) is a proper map (preimages of compacta are compact).

Discreteness does not imply properness.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Proper affine actions

Suppose M = Rn/G is a complete affine manifold: For M to be a (Hausdorff) smooth manifold, G must act:

Discretely: (G ⊂ Homeo(Rn) discrete); Freely: (No fixed points); Properly: (Go to ∞ in G = ⇒ go to ∞ in every orbit Gx).

More precisely, the map G × X − → X × X (g, x) − → (gx, x) is a proper map (preimages of compacta are compact).

Discreteness does not imply properness.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Proper affine actions

Suppose M = Rn/G is a complete affine manifold: For M to be a (Hausdorff) smooth manifold, G must act:

Discretely: (G ⊂ Homeo(Rn) discrete); Freely: (No fixed points); Properly: (Go to ∞ in G = ⇒ go to ∞ in every orbit Gx).

More precisely, the map G × X − → X × X (g, x) − → (gx, x) is a proper map (preimages of compacta are compact).

Discreteness does not imply properness.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Margulis Spacetimes

Most interesting examples: Margulis (∼ 1980):

G is a free group acting isometrically on E2+1

L(G) ⊂ O(2, 1) is isomorphic to G. M3 noncompact complete flat Lorentz 3-manifold.

Associated to every Margulis spacetime M3 is a noncompact complete hyperbolic surface Σ2. Closely related to the geometry of M3 is a deformation of the hyperbolic structure on Σ2.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Margulis Spacetimes

Most interesting examples: Margulis (∼ 1980):

G is a free group acting isometrically on E2+1

L(G) ⊂ O(2, 1) is isomorphic to G. M3 noncompact complete flat Lorentz 3-manifold.

Associated to every Margulis spacetime M3 is a noncompact complete hyperbolic surface Σ2. Closely related to the geometry of M3 is a deformation of the hyperbolic structure on Σ2.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Margulis Spacetimes

Most interesting examples: Margulis (∼ 1980):

G is a free group acting isometrically on E2+1

L(G) ⊂ O(2, 1) is isomorphic to G. M3 noncompact complete flat Lorentz 3-manifold.

Associated to every Margulis spacetime M3 is a noncompact complete hyperbolic surface Σ2. Closely related to the geometry of M3 is a deformation of the hyperbolic structure on Σ2.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Margulis Spacetimes

Most interesting examples: Margulis (∼ 1980):

G is a free group acting isometrically on E2+1

L(G) ⊂ O(2, 1) is isomorphic to G. M3 noncompact complete flat Lorentz 3-manifold.

Associated to every Margulis spacetime M3 is a noncompact complete hyperbolic surface Σ2. Closely related to the geometry of M3 is a deformation of the hyperbolic structure on Σ2.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Margulis Spacetimes

Most interesting examples: Margulis (∼ 1980):

G is a free group acting isometrically on E2+1

L(G) ⊂ O(2, 1) is isomorphic to G. M3 noncompact complete flat Lorentz 3-manifold.

Associated to every Margulis spacetime M3 is a noncompact complete hyperbolic surface Σ2. Closely related to the geometry of M3 is a deformation of the hyperbolic structure on Σ2.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Margulis Spacetimes

Most interesting examples: Margulis (∼ 1980):

G is a free group acting isometrically on E2+1

L(G) ⊂ O(2, 1) is isomorphic to G. M3 noncompact complete flat Lorentz 3-manifold.

Associated to every Margulis spacetime M3 is a noncompact complete hyperbolic surface Σ2. Closely related to the geometry of M3 is a deformation of the hyperbolic structure on Σ2.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Margulis Spacetimes

Most interesting examples: Margulis (∼ 1980):

G is a free group acting isometrically on E2+1

L(G) ⊂ O(2, 1) is isomorphic to G. M3 noncompact complete flat Lorentz 3-manifold.

Associated to every Margulis spacetime M3 is a noncompact complete hyperbolic surface Σ2. Closely related to the geometry of M3 is a deformation of the hyperbolic structure on Σ2.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Milnor’s Question (1977)

Can a nonabelian free group act properly, freely and discretely by affine transformations on Rn? Equivalently (Tits 1971): “Are there discrete groups other than virtually polycycic groups which act properly, affinely?”

If NO, Mn finitely covered by iterated S1-fibration Dimension 3: M3 compact = ⇒ M3 finitely covered by T 2-bundle over S1 (Fried-G 1983),

slide-41
SLIDE 41

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Milnor’s Question (1977)

Can a nonabelian free group act properly, freely and discretely by affine transformations on Rn? Equivalently (Tits 1971): “Are there discrete groups other than virtually polycycic groups which act properly, affinely?”

If NO, Mn finitely covered by iterated S1-fibration Dimension 3: M3 compact = ⇒ M3 finitely covered by T 2-bundle over S1 (Fried-G 1983),

slide-42
SLIDE 42

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Milnor’s Question (1977)

Can a nonabelian free group act properly, freely and discretely by affine transformations on Rn? Equivalently (Tits 1971): “Are there discrete groups other than virtually polycycic groups which act properly, affinely?”

If NO, Mn finitely covered by iterated S1-fibration Dimension 3: M3 compact = ⇒ M3 finitely covered by T 2-bundle over S1 (Fried-G 1983),

slide-43
SLIDE 43

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Milnor’s Question (1977)

Can a nonabelian free group act properly, freely and discretely by affine transformations on Rn? Equivalently (Tits 1971): “Are there discrete groups other than virtually polycycic groups which act properly, affinely?”

If NO, Mn finitely covered by iterated S1-fibration Dimension 3: M3 compact = ⇒ M3 finitely covered by T 2-bundle over S1 (Fried-G 1983),

slide-44
SLIDE 44

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Evidence?

Milnor offers the following results as possible “evidence” for a negative answer to this question. Connected Lie group G admits a proper affine action ⇐ ⇒ G is amenable (compact-by-solvable). Every virtually polycyclic group admits a proper affine action.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Evidence?

Milnor offers the following results as possible “evidence” for a negative answer to this question. Connected Lie group G admits a proper affine action ⇐ ⇒ G is amenable (compact-by-solvable). Every virtually polycyclic group admits a proper affine action.

slide-46
SLIDE 46

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Evidence?

Milnor offers the following results as possible “evidence” for a negative answer to this question. Connected Lie group G admits a proper affine action ⇐ ⇒ G is amenable (compact-by-solvable). Every virtually polycyclic group admits a proper affine action.

slide-47
SLIDE 47

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

An idea for a counterexample...

Clearly a geometric problem: free groups act properly by isometries on H3 hence by diffeomorphisms of E3

These actions are not affine.

Milnor suggests: Start with a free discrete subgroup of O(2, 1) and add translation components to obtain a group of affine transformations which acts freely. However it seems difficult to decide whether the resulting group action is properly discontinuous.

slide-48
SLIDE 48

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

An idea for a counterexample...

Clearly a geometric problem: free groups act properly by isometries on H3 hence by diffeomorphisms of E3

These actions are not affine.

Milnor suggests: Start with a free discrete subgroup of O(2, 1) and add translation components to obtain a group of affine transformations which acts freely. However it seems difficult to decide whether the resulting group action is properly discontinuous.

slide-49
SLIDE 49

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

An idea for a counterexample...

Clearly a geometric problem: free groups act properly by isometries on H3 hence by diffeomorphisms of E3

These actions are not affine.

Milnor suggests: Start with a free discrete subgroup of O(2, 1) and add translation components to obtain a group of affine transformations which acts freely. However it seems difficult to decide whether the resulting group action is properly discontinuous.

slide-50
SLIDE 50

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

An idea for a counterexample...

Clearly a geometric problem: free groups act properly by isometries on H3 hence by diffeomorphisms of E3

These actions are not affine.

Milnor suggests: Start with a free discrete subgroup of O(2, 1) and add translation components to obtain a group of affine transformations which acts freely. However it seems difficult to decide whether the resulting group action is properly discontinuous.

slide-51
SLIDE 51

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Lorentzian and Hyperbolic Geometry

R2,1 is the 3-dimensional real vector space with inner product:   x1 y1 z1   ·   x2 y2 z2   := x1x2 + y1y2 − z1z2 and Minkowski space E2,1 is the corresponding affine space, a simply connected geodesically complete Lorentzian manifold. The Lorentz metric tensor is dx2 + dy 2 − dz2. Isom(E2,1) is the semidirect product of R2,1 (the vector group

  • f translations) with the orthogonal group O(2, 1).

The stabilizer of the origin is the group O(2, 1) which preserves the hyperbolic plane H2 := {v ∈ R2,1 | v · v = −1, z > 0}.

slide-52
SLIDE 52

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Lorentzian and Hyperbolic Geometry

R2,1 is the 3-dimensional real vector space with inner product:   x1 y1 z1   ·   x2 y2 z2   := x1x2 + y1y2 − z1z2 and Minkowski space E2,1 is the corresponding affine space, a simply connected geodesically complete Lorentzian manifold. The Lorentz metric tensor is dx2 + dy 2 − dz2. Isom(E2,1) is the semidirect product of R2,1 (the vector group

  • f translations) with the orthogonal group O(2, 1).

The stabilizer of the origin is the group O(2, 1) which preserves the hyperbolic plane H2 := {v ∈ R2,1 | v · v = −1, z > 0}.

slide-53
SLIDE 53

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Lorentzian and Hyperbolic Geometry

R2,1 is the 3-dimensional real vector space with inner product:   x1 y1 z1   ·   x2 y2 z2   := x1x2 + y1y2 − z1z2 and Minkowski space E2,1 is the corresponding affine space, a simply connected geodesically complete Lorentzian manifold. The Lorentz metric tensor is dx2 + dy 2 − dz2. Isom(E2,1) is the semidirect product of R2,1 (the vector group

  • f translations) with the orthogonal group O(2, 1).

The stabilizer of the origin is the group O(2, 1) which preserves the hyperbolic plane H2 := {v ∈ R2,1 | v · v = −1, z > 0}.

slide-54
SLIDE 54

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Lorentzian and Hyperbolic Geometry

R2,1 is the 3-dimensional real vector space with inner product:   x1 y1 z1   ·   x2 y2 z2   := x1x2 + y1y2 − z1z2 and Minkowski space E2,1 is the corresponding affine space, a simply connected geodesically complete Lorentzian manifold. The Lorentz metric tensor is dx2 + dy 2 − dz2. Isom(E2,1) is the semidirect product of R2,1 (the vector group

  • f translations) with the orthogonal group O(2, 1).

The stabilizer of the origin is the group O(2, 1) which preserves the hyperbolic plane H2 := {v ∈ R2,1 | v · v = −1, z > 0}.

slide-55
SLIDE 55

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Lorentzian and Hyperbolic Geometry

R2,1 is the 3-dimensional real vector space with inner product:   x1 y1 z1   ·   x2 y2 z2   := x1x2 + y1y2 − z1z2 and Minkowski space E2,1 is the corresponding affine space, a simply connected geodesically complete Lorentzian manifold. The Lorentz metric tensor is dx2 + dy 2 − dz2. Isom(E2,1) is the semidirect product of R2,1 (the vector group

  • f translations) with the orthogonal group O(2, 1).

The stabilizer of the origin is the group O(2, 1) which preserves the hyperbolic plane H2 := {v ∈ R2,1 | v · v = −1, z > 0}.

slide-56
SLIDE 56

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

A Schottky group

g 1 g 2 A 1 − A2 + A2 + A2 −

Generators g1, g2 pair half-spaces A−

i −

→ H2 \ A+

i .

g1, g2 freely generate discrete group. Action proper with fundamental domain H2 \ A±

i .

slide-57
SLIDE 57

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

A Schottky group

g 1 g 2 A 1 − A2 + A2 + A2 −

Generators g1, g2 pair half-spaces A−

i −

→ H2 \ A+

i .

g1, g2 freely generate discrete group. Action proper with fundamental domain H2 \ A±

i .

slide-58
SLIDE 58

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

A Schottky group

g 1 g 2 A 1 − A2 + A2 + A2 −

Generators g1, g2 pair half-spaces A−

i −

→ H2 \ A+

i .

g1, g2 freely generate discrete group. Action proper with fundamental domain H2 \ A±

i .

slide-59
SLIDE 59

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

A Schottky group

g 1 g 2 A 1 − A2 + A2 + A2 −

Generators g1, g2 pair half-spaces A−

i −

→ H2 \ A+

i .

g1, g2 freely generate discrete group. Action proper with fundamental domain H2 \ A±

i .

slide-60
SLIDE 60

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Flat Lorentz manifolds

Suppose that Γ ⊂ Aff(R3) acts properly and is not solvable. (Fried-G 1983): Let Γ L − → GL(3, R) be the linear part.

L(Γ) (conjugate to) a discrete subgroup of O(2, 1); L injective.

Homotopy equivalence M3 := E2,1/Γ − → Σ := H2/L(Γ) where Σ complete hyperbolic surface.

Mess (1990): Σ not compact .

Γ free; Milnor’s suggestion is the only way to construct examples in dimension three.

slide-61
SLIDE 61

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Flat Lorentz manifolds

Suppose that Γ ⊂ Aff(R3) acts properly and is not solvable. (Fried-G 1983): Let Γ L − → GL(3, R) be the linear part.

L(Γ) (conjugate to) a discrete subgroup of O(2, 1); L injective.

Homotopy equivalence M3 := E2,1/Γ − → Σ := H2/L(Γ) where Σ complete hyperbolic surface.

Mess (1990): Σ not compact .

Γ free; Milnor’s suggestion is the only way to construct examples in dimension three.

slide-62
SLIDE 62

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Flat Lorentz manifolds

Suppose that Γ ⊂ Aff(R3) acts properly and is not solvable. (Fried-G 1983): Let Γ L − → GL(3, R) be the linear part.

L(Γ) (conjugate to) a discrete subgroup of O(2, 1); L injective.

Homotopy equivalence M3 := E2,1/Γ − → Σ := H2/L(Γ) where Σ complete hyperbolic surface.

Mess (1990): Σ not compact .

Γ free; Milnor’s suggestion is the only way to construct examples in dimension three.

slide-63
SLIDE 63

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Flat Lorentz manifolds

Suppose that Γ ⊂ Aff(R3) acts properly and is not solvable. (Fried-G 1983): Let Γ L − → GL(3, R) be the linear part.

L(Γ) (conjugate to) a discrete subgroup of O(2, 1); L injective.

Homotopy equivalence M3 := E2,1/Γ − → Σ := H2/L(Γ) where Σ complete hyperbolic surface.

Mess (1990): Σ not compact .

Γ free; Milnor’s suggestion is the only way to construct examples in dimension three.

slide-64
SLIDE 64

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Flat Lorentz manifolds

Suppose that Γ ⊂ Aff(R3) acts properly and is not solvable. (Fried-G 1983): Let Γ L − → GL(3, R) be the linear part.

L(Γ) (conjugate to) a discrete subgroup of O(2, 1); L injective.

Homotopy equivalence M3 := E2,1/Γ − → Σ := H2/L(Γ) where Σ complete hyperbolic surface.

Mess (1990): Σ not compact .

Γ free; Milnor’s suggestion is the only way to construct examples in dimension three.

slide-65
SLIDE 65

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Flat Lorentz manifolds

Suppose that Γ ⊂ Aff(R3) acts properly and is not solvable. (Fried-G 1983): Let Γ L − → GL(3, R) be the linear part.

L(Γ) (conjugate to) a discrete subgroup of O(2, 1); L injective.

Homotopy equivalence M3 := E2,1/Γ − → Σ := H2/L(Γ) where Σ complete hyperbolic surface.

Mess (1990): Σ not compact .

Γ free; Milnor’s suggestion is the only way to construct examples in dimension three.

slide-66
SLIDE 66

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Flat Lorentz manifolds

Suppose that Γ ⊂ Aff(R3) acts properly and is not solvable. (Fried-G 1983): Let Γ L − → GL(3, R) be the linear part.

L(Γ) (conjugate to) a discrete subgroup of O(2, 1); L injective.

Homotopy equivalence M3 := E2,1/Γ − → Σ := H2/L(Γ) where Σ complete hyperbolic surface.

Mess (1990): Σ not compact .

Γ free; Milnor’s suggestion is the only way to construct examples in dimension three.

slide-67
SLIDE 67

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Flat Lorentz manifolds

Suppose that Γ ⊂ Aff(R3) acts properly and is not solvable. (Fried-G 1983): Let Γ L − → GL(3, R) be the linear part.

L(Γ) (conjugate to) a discrete subgroup of O(2, 1); L injective.

Homotopy equivalence M3 := E2,1/Γ − → Σ := H2/L(Γ) where Σ complete hyperbolic surface.

Mess (1990): Σ not compact .

Γ free; Milnor’s suggestion is the only way to construct examples in dimension three.

slide-68
SLIDE 68

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Flat Lorentz manifolds

Suppose that Γ ⊂ Aff(R3) acts properly and is not solvable. (Fried-G 1983): Let Γ L − → GL(3, R) be the linear part.

L(Γ) (conjugate to) a discrete subgroup of O(2, 1); L injective.

Homotopy equivalence M3 := E2,1/Γ − → Σ := H2/L(Γ) where Σ complete hyperbolic surface.

Mess (1990): Σ not compact .

Γ free; Milnor’s suggestion is the only way to construct examples in dimension three.

slide-69
SLIDE 69

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Cyclic groups

Most elements γ ∈ Γ are boosts, affine deformations of hyperbolic elements of O(2, 1). A fundamental domain is the slab bounded by two parallel planes. A boost identifying two parallel planes

slide-70
SLIDE 70

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Cyclic groups

Most elements γ ∈ Γ are boosts, affine deformations of hyperbolic elements of O(2, 1). A fundamental domain is the slab bounded by two parallel planes. A boost identifying two parallel planes

slide-71
SLIDE 71

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Cyclic groups

Most elements γ ∈ Γ are boosts, affine deformations of hyperbolic elements of O(2, 1). A fundamental domain is the slab bounded by two parallel planes. A boost identifying two parallel planes

slide-72
SLIDE 72

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Closed geodesics and holonomy

Each such element leaves invariant a unique (spacelike) line, whose image in E2,1/Γ is a closed geodesic. Like hyperbolic surfaces, most loops are freely homotopic to (unique) closed geodesics. γ =   eℓ(γ) 1 e−ℓ(γ)     α(γ)  

ℓ(γ) ∈ R+: geodesic length of γ in Σ2 α(γ) ∈ R: (signed) Lorentzian length of γ in M3.

slide-73
SLIDE 73

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Closed geodesics and holonomy

Each such element leaves invariant a unique (spacelike) line, whose image in E2,1/Γ is a closed geodesic. Like hyperbolic surfaces, most loops are freely homotopic to (unique) closed geodesics. γ =   eℓ(γ) 1 e−ℓ(γ)     α(γ)  

ℓ(γ) ∈ R+: geodesic length of γ in Σ2 α(γ) ∈ R: (signed) Lorentzian length of γ in M3.

slide-74
SLIDE 74

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Closed geodesics and holonomy

Each such element leaves invariant a unique (spacelike) line, whose image in E2,1/Γ is a closed geodesic. Like hyperbolic surfaces, most loops are freely homotopic to (unique) closed geodesics. γ =   eℓ(γ) 1 e−ℓ(γ)     α(γ)  

ℓ(γ) ∈ R+: geodesic length of γ in Σ2 α(γ) ∈ R: (signed) Lorentzian length of γ in M3.

slide-75
SLIDE 75

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Closed geodesics and holonomy

Each such element leaves invariant a unique (spacelike) line, whose image in E2,1/Γ is a closed geodesic. Like hyperbolic surfaces, most loops are freely homotopic to (unique) closed geodesics. γ =   eℓ(γ) 1 e−ℓ(γ)     α(γ)  

ℓ(γ) ∈ R+: geodesic length of γ in Σ2 α(γ) ∈ R: (signed) Lorentzian length of γ in M3.

slide-76
SLIDE 76

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Geodesics on Σ

The unique γ-invariant geodesic Cγ inherits a natural

  • rientation and metric.

γ translates along Cγ by α(γ).

Closed geodesics on Σ ← → closed spacelike geodesics on M3. Orbit equivalence: Recurrent orbits of geodesic flow on UΣ ← → Recurrent spacelike geodesics on M3. (G-Labourie 2011)

slide-77
SLIDE 77

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Geodesics on Σ

The unique γ-invariant geodesic Cγ inherits a natural

  • rientation and metric.

γ translates along Cγ by α(γ).

Closed geodesics on Σ ← → closed spacelike geodesics on M3. Orbit equivalence: Recurrent orbits of geodesic flow on UΣ ← → Recurrent spacelike geodesics on M3. (G-Labourie 2011)

slide-78
SLIDE 78

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Geodesics on Σ

The unique γ-invariant geodesic Cγ inherits a natural

  • rientation and metric.

γ translates along Cγ by α(γ).

Closed geodesics on Σ ← → closed spacelike geodesics on M3. Orbit equivalence: Recurrent orbits of geodesic flow on UΣ ← → Recurrent spacelike geodesics on M3. (G-Labourie 2011)

slide-79
SLIDE 79

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Geodesics on Σ

The unique γ-invariant geodesic Cγ inherits a natural

  • rientation and metric.

γ translates along Cγ by α(γ).

Closed geodesics on Σ ← → closed spacelike geodesics on M3. Orbit equivalence: Recurrent orbits of geodesic flow on UΣ ← → Recurrent spacelike geodesics on M3. (G-Labourie 2011)

slide-80
SLIDE 80

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Geodesics on Σ

The unique γ-invariant geodesic Cγ inherits a natural

  • rientation and metric.

γ translates along Cγ by α(γ).

Closed geodesics on Σ ← → closed spacelike geodesics on M3. Orbit equivalence: Recurrent orbits of geodesic flow on UΣ ← → Recurrent spacelike geodesics on M3. (G-Labourie 2011)

slide-81
SLIDE 81

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Slabs don’t work!

In H2, the half-spaces A±

i are disjoint;

Their complement is a fundamental domain. In affine space, half-spaces disjoint ⇒ parallel! Complements of slabs always intersect, Unsuitable for building Schottky groups!

slide-82
SLIDE 82

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Slabs don’t work!

In H2, the half-spaces A±

i are disjoint;

Their complement is a fundamental domain. In affine space, half-spaces disjoint ⇒ parallel! Complements of slabs always intersect, Unsuitable for building Schottky groups!

slide-83
SLIDE 83

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Slabs don’t work!

In H2, the half-spaces A±

i are disjoint;

Their complement is a fundamental domain. In affine space, half-spaces disjoint ⇒ parallel! Complements of slabs always intersect, Unsuitable for building Schottky groups!

slide-84
SLIDE 84

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Slabs don’t work!

In H2, the half-spaces A±

i are disjoint;

Their complement is a fundamental domain. In affine space, half-spaces disjoint ⇒ parallel! Complements of slabs always intersect, Unsuitable for building Schottky groups!

slide-85
SLIDE 85

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Slabs don’t work!

In H2, the half-spaces A±

i are disjoint;

Their complement is a fundamental domain. In affine space, half-spaces disjoint ⇒ parallel! Complements of slabs always intersect, Unsuitable for building Schottky groups!

slide-86
SLIDE 86

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Slabs don’t work!

In H2, the half-spaces A±

i are disjoint;

Their complement is a fundamental domain. In affine space, half-spaces disjoint ⇒ parallel! Complements of slabs always intersect, Unsuitable for building Schottky groups!

slide-87
SLIDE 87

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Drumm’s Schottky groups

The classical construction of Schottky groups fails using affine half-spaces and slabs. Drumm’s geometric construction uses crooked planes, PL hypersurfaces adapted to the Lorentz geometry which bound fundamental polyhedra for Schottky groups.

slide-88
SLIDE 88

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Crooked polyhedron for a boost

Start with a hyperbolic slab in H2. Extend into light cone in E2,1; Extend outside light cone in E2,1; Action proper except at the origin and two null half-planes.

slide-89
SLIDE 89

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Crooked polyhedron for a boost

Start with a hyperbolic slab in H2. Extend into light cone in E2,1; Extend outside light cone in E2,1; Action proper except at the origin and two null half-planes.

slide-90
SLIDE 90

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Crooked polyhedron for a boost

Start with a hyperbolic slab in H2. Extend into light cone in E2,1; Extend outside light cone in E2,1; Action proper except at the origin and two null half-planes.

slide-91
SLIDE 91

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Crooked polyhedron for a boost

Start with a hyperbolic slab in H2. Extend into light cone in E2,1; Extend outside light cone in E2,1; Action proper except at the origin and two null half-planes.

slide-92
SLIDE 92

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Crooked polyhedron for a boost

Start with a hyperbolic slab in H2. Extend into light cone in E2,1; Extend outside light cone in E2,1; Action proper except at the origin and two null half-planes.

slide-93
SLIDE 93

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Images of crooked planes under a linear cyclic group

The resulting tessellation for a linear boost.

slide-94
SLIDE 94

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Images of crooked planes under a linear cyclic group

The resulting tessellation for a linear boost.

slide-95
SLIDE 95

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Images of crooked planes under an affine deformation

Adding translations frees up the action — which is now proper on all of E2,1.

slide-96
SLIDE 96

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Images of crooked planes under an affine deformation

Adding translations frees up the action — which is now proper on all of E2,1.

slide-97
SLIDE 97

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Images of crooked planes under an affine deformation

Adding translations frees up the action — which is now proper on all of E2,1.

slide-98
SLIDE 98

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

A foliation by crooked planes

slide-99
SLIDE 99

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Linear action of Schottky group

Crooked polyhedra tile H2 for subgroup of O(2, 1).

slide-100
SLIDE 100

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Linear action of Schottky group

Crooked polyhedra tile H2 for subgroup of O(2, 1).

slide-101
SLIDE 101

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Affine action of Schottky group

Carefully chosen affine deformation acts properly on E2,1.

slide-102
SLIDE 102

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Affine action of level 2 congruence subgroup of GL(2, Z)

Proper affine deformations exist even for lattices (Drumm).

slide-103
SLIDE 103

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

An arithmetic example

Minkowski space compactifies into the space of Lagrangian 2-planes in a 4-dimensional symplectic R-vector space (V , ω). Choose two transverse Lagrangian 2-planes L0 and L∞. Minkowski 2 + 1-space E2,1 is the space of Lagrangian 2-planes L ⊂ V transverse to L∞.

Graphs of symmetric maps L0

f

− → L∞. Lorentzian inner product defined by f → Det(f )

R2,1 ← →

  • 2 × 2 symmetric matrices
  • .
slide-104
SLIDE 104

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

An arithmetic example

Minkowski space compactifies into the space of Lagrangian 2-planes in a 4-dimensional symplectic R-vector space (V , ω). Choose two transverse Lagrangian 2-planes L0 and L∞. Minkowski 2 + 1-space E2,1 is the space of Lagrangian 2-planes L ⊂ V transverse to L∞.

Graphs of symmetric maps L0

f

− → L∞. Lorentzian inner product defined by f → Det(f )

R2,1 ← →

  • 2 × 2 symmetric matrices
  • .
slide-105
SLIDE 105

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

An arithmetic example

Minkowski space compactifies into the space of Lagrangian 2-planes in a 4-dimensional symplectic R-vector space (V , ω). Choose two transverse Lagrangian 2-planes L0 and L∞. Minkowski 2 + 1-space E2,1 is the space of Lagrangian 2-planes L ⊂ V transverse to L∞.

Graphs of symmetric maps L0

f

− → L∞. Lorentzian inner product defined by f → Det(f )

R2,1 ← →

  • 2 × 2 symmetric matrices
  • .
slide-106
SLIDE 106

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

An arithmetic example

Minkowski space compactifies into the space of Lagrangian 2-planes in a 4-dimensional symplectic R-vector space (V , ω). Choose two transverse Lagrangian 2-planes L0 and L∞. Minkowski 2 + 1-space E2,1 is the space of Lagrangian 2-planes L ⊂ V transverse to L∞.

Graphs of symmetric maps L0

f

− → L∞. Lorentzian inner product defined by f → Det(f )

R2,1 ← →

  • 2 × 2 symmetric matrices
  • .
slide-107
SLIDE 107

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

An arithmetic example

Minkowski space compactifies into the space of Lagrangian 2-planes in a 4-dimensional symplectic R-vector space (V , ω). Choose two transverse Lagrangian 2-planes L0 and L∞. Minkowski 2 + 1-space E2,1 is the space of Lagrangian 2-planes L ⊂ V transverse to L∞.

Graphs of symmetric maps L0

f

− → L∞. Lorentzian inner product defined by f → Det(f )

R2,1 ← →

  • 2 × 2 symmetric matrices
  • .
slide-108
SLIDE 108

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

An arithmetic example

Minkowski space compactifies into the space of Lagrangian 2-planes in a 4-dimensional symplectic R-vector space (V , ω). Choose two transverse Lagrangian 2-planes L0 and L∞. Minkowski 2 + 1-space E2,1 is the space of Lagrangian 2-planes L ⊂ V transverse to L∞.

Graphs of symmetric maps L0

f

− → L∞. Lorentzian inner product defined by f → Det(f )

R2,1 ← →

  • 2 × 2 symmetric matrices
  • .
slide-109
SLIDE 109

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

An arithmetic example

Minkowski space compactifies into the space of Lagrangian 2-planes in a 4-dimensional symplectic R-vector space (V , ω). Choose two transverse Lagrangian 2-planes L0 and L∞. Minkowski 2 + 1-space E2,1 is the space of Lagrangian 2-planes L ⊂ V transverse to L∞.

Graphs of symmetric maps L0

f

− → L∞. Lorentzian inner product defined by f → Det(f )

R2,1 ← →

  • 2 × 2 symmetric matrices
  • .
slide-110
SLIDE 110

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Minkowski space inside Sp(4, R)

L0 and L∞ dual under symplectic form L0 × L∞

ω

− → R g ∈ GL(L∞) induces linear symplectomorphism of V = L∞ ⊕ L0, represented as block upper-triangular matrices: g ⊕ (g†)−1 = g (g†)−1

  • Translations of Minkowski space correspond to shears: (fixing

L∞ and L/L∞): I2 f I2

  • where L0

f

− → L∞ is a symmetric linear map.

slide-111
SLIDE 111

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Minkowski space inside Sp(4, R)

L0 and L∞ dual under symplectic form L0 × L∞

ω

− → R g ∈ GL(L∞) induces linear symplectomorphism of V = L∞ ⊕ L0, represented as block upper-triangular matrices: g ⊕ (g†)−1 = g (g†)−1

  • Translations of Minkowski space correspond to shears: (fixing

L∞ and L/L∞): I2 f I2

  • where L0

f

− → L∞ is a symmetric linear map.

slide-112
SLIDE 112

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Minkowski space inside Sp(4, R)

L0 and L∞ dual under symplectic form L0 × L∞

ω

− → R g ∈ GL(L∞) induces linear symplectomorphism of V = L∞ ⊕ L0, represented as block upper-triangular matrices: g ⊕ (g†)−1 = g (g†)−1

  • Translations of Minkowski space correspond to shears: (fixing

L∞ and L/L∞): I2 f I2

  • where L0

f

− → L∞ is a symmetric linear map.

slide-113
SLIDE 113

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Minkowski space inside Sp(4, R)

L0 and L∞ dual under symplectic form L0 × L∞

ω

− → R g ∈ GL(L∞) induces linear symplectomorphism of V = L∞ ⊕ L0, represented as block upper-triangular matrices: g ⊕ (g†)−1 = g (g†)−1

  • Translations of Minkowski space correspond to shears: (fixing

L∞ and L/L∞): I2 f I2

  • where L0

f

− → L∞ is a symmetric linear map.

slide-114
SLIDE 114

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Affine deformation of SL(2, Z)

For i = 1, 2, 3 choose three positive integers µ1, µ2, µ3. Then the subgroup Γ of Sp(4, Z) generated by     −1 −2 µ1 + µ2 − µ3 −1 2µ1 −µ1 −1 2 −1     ,     −1 −µ2 −2µ2 2 −1 −1 −2 −1     is a proper affine deformation of a rank two free group.

M3 genus two handlebody and Σ2 triply–punctured sphere. Depicted example is µ1 = µ2 = µ3 = 1.

slide-115
SLIDE 115

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Affine deformation of SL(2, Z)

For i = 1, 2, 3 choose three positive integers µ1, µ2, µ3. Then the subgroup Γ of Sp(4, Z) generated by     −1 −2 µ1 + µ2 − µ3 −1 2µ1 −µ1 −1 2 −1     ,     −1 −µ2 −2µ2 2 −1 −1 −2 −1     is a proper affine deformation of a rank two free group.

M3 genus two handlebody and Σ2 triply–punctured sphere. Depicted example is µ1 = µ2 = µ3 = 1.

slide-116
SLIDE 116

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Affine deformation of SL(2, Z)

For i = 1, 2, 3 choose three positive integers µ1, µ2, µ3. Then the subgroup Γ of Sp(4, Z) generated by     −1 −2 µ1 + µ2 − µ3 −1 2µ1 −µ1 −1 2 −1     ,     −1 −µ2 −2µ2 2 −1 −1 −2 −1     is a proper affine deformation of a rank two free group.

M3 genus two handlebody and Σ2 triply–punctured sphere. Depicted example is µ1 = µ2 = µ3 = 1.

slide-117
SLIDE 117

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Affine deformation of SL(2, Z)

For i = 1, 2, 3 choose three positive integers µ1, µ2, µ3. Then the subgroup Γ of Sp(4, Z) generated by     −1 −2 µ1 + µ2 − µ3 −1 2µ1 −µ1 −1 2 −1     ,     −1 −µ2 −2µ2 2 −1 −1 −2 −1     is a proper affine deformation of a rank two free group.

M3 genus two handlebody and Σ2 triply–punctured sphere. Depicted example is µ1 = µ2 = µ3 = 1.

slide-118
SLIDE 118

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Affine action of level 2 congruence subgroup of GL(2, Z)

Symmetrical example: µ1 = µ2 = µ3 = 1.

slide-119
SLIDE 119

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

The linear part

Mess’s theorem (Σ noncompact) is the only obstruction for the existence of a proper affine deformation: (Drumm 1990) Every noncompact complete hyperbolic surface Σ (with π1(Σ) finitely generated) admits a proper affine deformation. M3 homeomorphic to solid handlebody.

slide-120
SLIDE 120

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

The linear part

Mess’s theorem (Σ noncompact) is the only obstruction for the existence of a proper affine deformation: (Drumm 1990) Every noncompact complete hyperbolic surface Σ (with π1(Σ) finitely generated) admits a proper affine deformation. M3 homeomorphic to solid handlebody.

slide-121
SLIDE 121

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

The linear part

Mess’s theorem (Σ noncompact) is the only obstruction for the existence of a proper affine deformation: (Drumm 1990) Every noncompact complete hyperbolic surface Σ (with π1(Σ) finitely generated) admits a proper affine deformation. M3 homeomorphic to solid handlebody.

slide-122
SLIDE 122

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

The linear part

Mess’s theorem (Σ noncompact) is the only obstruction for the existence of a proper affine deformation: (Drumm 1990) Every noncompact complete hyperbolic surface Σ (with π1(Σ) finitely generated) admits a proper affine deformation. M3 homeomorphic to solid handlebody.

slide-123
SLIDE 123

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Marked Signed Lorentzian Length Spectrum

For every affine deformation Γ

ρ=(L,u)

− − − − − → Isom(E2,1)0, define αu(γ) ∈ R as the (signed) displacement of γ along the unique γ-invariant geodesic Cγ, when L(γ) is hyperbolic. αu is a class function on Γ; When ρ acts properly, |αu(γ)| is the Lorentzian length of the closed geodesic in M3 corresponding to γ; The Margulis invariant Γ α − → R determines Γ up to conjugacy (Charette-Drumm 2004).

slide-124
SLIDE 124

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Marked Signed Lorentzian Length Spectrum

For every affine deformation Γ

ρ=(L,u)

− − − − − → Isom(E2,1)0, define αu(γ) ∈ R as the (signed) displacement of γ along the unique γ-invariant geodesic Cγ, when L(γ) is hyperbolic. αu is a class function on Γ; When ρ acts properly, |αu(γ)| is the Lorentzian length of the closed geodesic in M3 corresponding to γ; The Margulis invariant Γ α − → R determines Γ up to conjugacy (Charette-Drumm 2004).

slide-125
SLIDE 125

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Marked Signed Lorentzian Length Spectrum

For every affine deformation Γ

ρ=(L,u)

− − − − − → Isom(E2,1)0, define αu(γ) ∈ R as the (signed) displacement of γ along the unique γ-invariant geodesic Cγ, when L(γ) is hyperbolic. αu is a class function on Γ; When ρ acts properly, |αu(γ)| is the Lorentzian length of the closed geodesic in M3 corresponding to γ; The Margulis invariant Γ α − → R determines Γ up to conjugacy (Charette-Drumm 2004).

slide-126
SLIDE 126

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Marked Signed Lorentzian Length Spectrum

For every affine deformation Γ

ρ=(L,u)

− − − − − → Isom(E2,1)0, define αu(γ) ∈ R as the (signed) displacement of γ along the unique γ-invariant geodesic Cγ, when L(γ) is hyperbolic. αu is a class function on Γ; When ρ acts properly, |αu(γ)| is the Lorentzian length of the closed geodesic in M3 corresponding to γ; The Margulis invariant Γ α − → R determines Γ up to conjugacy (Charette-Drumm 2004).

slide-127
SLIDE 127

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Marked Signed Lorentzian Length Spectrum

For every affine deformation Γ

ρ=(L,u)

− − − − − → Isom(E2,1)0, define αu(γ) ∈ R as the (signed) displacement of γ along the unique γ-invariant geodesic Cγ, when L(γ) is hyperbolic. αu is a class function on Γ; When ρ acts properly, |αu(γ)| is the Lorentzian length of the closed geodesic in M3 corresponding to γ; The Margulis invariant Γ α − → R determines Γ up to conjugacy (Charette-Drumm 2004).

slide-128
SLIDE 128

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Opposite Sign Lemma

(Margulis 1983) Let ρ be a proper affine deformation. αu(γ) > 0 ∀γ = 1, or αu(γ) < 0 ∀γ = 1.

slide-129
SLIDE 129

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Affine deformations

Start with a Fuchsian group Γ0 ⊂ O(2, 1). An affine deformation is a representation ρ = ρu with image Γ = Γu Isom(R2,1)

L

  • Γ0

ρ

  • O(2, 1)

determined by its translational part u ∈ Z 1(Γ0, R2,1). Conjugating ρ by a translation ⇐ ⇒ adding a coboundary to u. Translational conjugacy classes of affine deformations of Γ0 form the vector space H1(Γ0, R2,1).

slide-130
SLIDE 130

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Affine deformations

Start with a Fuchsian group Γ0 ⊂ O(2, 1). An affine deformation is a representation ρ = ρu with image Γ = Γu Isom(R2,1)

L

  • Γ0

ρ

  • O(2, 1)

determined by its translational part u ∈ Z 1(Γ0, R2,1). Conjugating ρ by a translation ⇐ ⇒ adding a coboundary to u. Translational conjugacy classes of affine deformations of Γ0 form the vector space H1(Γ0, R2,1).

slide-131
SLIDE 131

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Affine deformations

Start with a Fuchsian group Γ0 ⊂ O(2, 1). An affine deformation is a representation ρ = ρu with image Γ = Γu Isom(R2,1)

L

  • Γ0

ρ

  • O(2, 1)

determined by its translational part u ∈ Z 1(Γ0, R2,1). Conjugating ρ by a translation ⇐ ⇒ adding a coboundary to u. Translational conjugacy classes of affine deformations of Γ0 form the vector space H1(Γ0, R2,1).

slide-132
SLIDE 132

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Affine deformations

Start with a Fuchsian group Γ0 ⊂ O(2, 1). An affine deformation is a representation ρ = ρu with image Γ = Γu Isom(R2,1)

L

  • Γ0

ρ

  • O(2, 1)

determined by its translational part u ∈ Z 1(Γ0, R2,1). Conjugating ρ by a translation ⇐ ⇒ adding a coboundary to u. Translational conjugacy classes of affine deformations of Γ0 form the vector space H1(Γ0, R2,1).

slide-133
SLIDE 133

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Deformations of hyperbolic structures

Translational conjugacy classes of affine deformations of Γ0 ← → infinitesimal deformations of the hyperbolic surface Σ. Infinitesimal deformations of the hyperbolic structure on Σ comprise H1(Σ, sl(2, R)) ∼ = H1(Γ0, R2,1).

slide-134
SLIDE 134

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Deformations of hyperbolic structures

Translational conjugacy classes of affine deformations of Γ0 ← → infinitesimal deformations of the hyperbolic surface Σ. Infinitesimal deformations of the hyperbolic structure on Σ comprise H1(Σ, sl(2, R)) ∼ = H1(Γ0, R2,1).

slide-135
SLIDE 135

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Deformations of hyperbolic structures

Translational conjugacy classes of affine deformations of Γ0 ← → infinitesimal deformations of the hyperbolic surface Σ. Infinitesimal deformations of the hyperbolic structure on Σ comprise H1(Σ, sl(2, R)) ∼ = H1(Γ0, R2,1).

slide-136
SLIDE 136

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Deformation-theoretic interpretation of Margulis invariant

Suppose u ∈ Z 1(Γ0, R2,1) defines an infinitesimal deformation tangent to a smooth deformation Σt of Σ.

The marked length spectrum ℓt of Σt varies smoothly with t. Margulis’s invariant αu(γ) represents the derivative d dt

  • t=0

ℓt(γ) (G-Margulis 2000).

Γu is proper = ⇒ all closed geodesics lengthen (or shorten) under the deformation Σt. Converse: When Σ is homeomorphic to a three-holed sphere

  • r two-holed RP2.
slide-137
SLIDE 137

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Deformation-theoretic interpretation of Margulis invariant

Suppose u ∈ Z 1(Γ0, R2,1) defines an infinitesimal deformation tangent to a smooth deformation Σt of Σ.

The marked length spectrum ℓt of Σt varies smoothly with t. Margulis’s invariant αu(γ) represents the derivative d dt

  • t=0

ℓt(γ) (G-Margulis 2000).

Γu is proper = ⇒ all closed geodesics lengthen (or shorten) under the deformation Σt. Converse: When Σ is homeomorphic to a three-holed sphere

  • r two-holed RP2.
slide-138
SLIDE 138

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Deformation-theoretic interpretation of Margulis invariant

Suppose u ∈ Z 1(Γ0, R2,1) defines an infinitesimal deformation tangent to a smooth deformation Σt of Σ.

The marked length spectrum ℓt of Σt varies smoothly with t. Margulis’s invariant αu(γ) represents the derivative d dt

  • t=0

ℓt(γ) (G-Margulis 2000).

Γu is proper = ⇒ all closed geodesics lengthen (or shorten) under the deformation Σt. Converse: When Σ is homeomorphic to a three-holed sphere

  • r two-holed RP2.
slide-139
SLIDE 139

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Deformation-theoretic interpretation of Margulis invariant

Suppose u ∈ Z 1(Γ0, R2,1) defines an infinitesimal deformation tangent to a smooth deformation Σt of Σ.

The marked length spectrum ℓt of Σt varies smoothly with t. Margulis’s invariant αu(γ) represents the derivative d dt

  • t=0

ℓt(γ) (G-Margulis 2000).

Γu is proper = ⇒ all closed geodesics lengthen (or shorten) under the deformation Σt. Converse: When Σ is homeomorphic to a three-holed sphere

  • r two-holed RP2.
slide-140
SLIDE 140

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Deformation-theoretic interpretation of Margulis invariant

Suppose u ∈ Z 1(Γ0, R2,1) defines an infinitesimal deformation tangent to a smooth deformation Σt of Σ.

The marked length spectrum ℓt of Σt varies smoothly with t. Margulis’s invariant αu(γ) represents the derivative d dt

  • t=0

ℓt(γ) (G-Margulis 2000).

Γu is proper = ⇒ all closed geodesics lengthen (or shorten) under the deformation Σt. Converse: When Σ is homeomorphic to a three-holed sphere

  • r two-holed RP2.
slide-141
SLIDE 141

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Deformation-theoretic interpretation of Margulis invariant

Suppose u ∈ Z 1(Γ0, R2,1) defines an infinitesimal deformation tangent to a smooth deformation Σt of Σ.

The marked length spectrum ℓt of Σt varies smoothly with t. Margulis’s invariant αu(γ) represents the derivative d dt

  • t=0

ℓt(γ) (G-Margulis 2000).

Γu is proper = ⇒ all closed geodesics lengthen (or shorten) under the deformation Σt. Converse: When Σ is homeomorphic to a three-holed sphere

  • r two-holed RP2.
slide-142
SLIDE 142

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Extensions of the Margulis invariant

αu extends to parabolic L(γ) given decorations of the cusps (Charette-Drumm 2005). (Margulis 1983) αu(γn) = |n|αu(γ).

Therefore αu(γ)/ℓ(γ) is constant on cyclic (hyperbolic) subgroups of Γ. Such cyclic subgroups correspond to periodic orbits of the geodesic flow Φ of UΣ. Margulis invariant extends to continuous functional Ψu(µ) on the space C(Σ) of Φ-invariant probability measures µ on UΣ. (G-Labourie-Margulis 2010)

When L(Γ) is convex cocompact, Γu acts properly ⇐ ⇒ Ψu(µ) = 0 for all invariant probability measures µ. C(Σ) connected = ⇒ Either Ψu(µ) are all positive or all negative.

slide-143
SLIDE 143

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Extensions of the Margulis invariant

αu extends to parabolic L(γ) given decorations of the cusps (Charette-Drumm 2005). (Margulis 1983) αu(γn) = |n|αu(γ).

Therefore αu(γ)/ℓ(γ) is constant on cyclic (hyperbolic) subgroups of Γ. Such cyclic subgroups correspond to periodic orbits of the geodesic flow Φ of UΣ. Margulis invariant extends to continuous functional Ψu(µ) on the space C(Σ) of Φ-invariant probability measures µ on UΣ. (G-Labourie-Margulis 2010)

When L(Γ) is convex cocompact, Γu acts properly ⇐ ⇒ Ψu(µ) = 0 for all invariant probability measures µ. C(Σ) connected = ⇒ Either Ψu(µ) are all positive or all negative.

slide-144
SLIDE 144

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Extensions of the Margulis invariant

αu extends to parabolic L(γ) given decorations of the cusps (Charette-Drumm 2005). (Margulis 1983) αu(γn) = |n|αu(γ).

Therefore αu(γ)/ℓ(γ) is constant on cyclic (hyperbolic) subgroups of Γ. Such cyclic subgroups correspond to periodic orbits of the geodesic flow Φ of UΣ. Margulis invariant extends to continuous functional Ψu(µ) on the space C(Σ) of Φ-invariant probability measures µ on UΣ. (G-Labourie-Margulis 2010)

When L(Γ) is convex cocompact, Γu acts properly ⇐ ⇒ Ψu(µ) = 0 for all invariant probability measures µ. C(Σ) connected = ⇒ Either Ψu(µ) are all positive or all negative.

slide-145
SLIDE 145

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Extensions of the Margulis invariant

αu extends to parabolic L(γ) given decorations of the cusps (Charette-Drumm 2005). (Margulis 1983) αu(γn) = |n|αu(γ).

Therefore αu(γ)/ℓ(γ) is constant on cyclic (hyperbolic) subgroups of Γ. Such cyclic subgroups correspond to periodic orbits of the geodesic flow Φ of UΣ. Margulis invariant extends to continuous functional Ψu(µ) on the space C(Σ) of Φ-invariant probability measures µ on UΣ. (G-Labourie-Margulis 2010)

When L(Γ) is convex cocompact, Γu acts properly ⇐ ⇒ Ψu(µ) = 0 for all invariant probability measures µ. C(Σ) connected = ⇒ Either Ψu(µ) are all positive or all negative.

slide-146
SLIDE 146

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Extensions of the Margulis invariant

αu extends to parabolic L(γ) given decorations of the cusps (Charette-Drumm 2005). (Margulis 1983) αu(γn) = |n|αu(γ).

Therefore αu(γ)/ℓ(γ) is constant on cyclic (hyperbolic) subgroups of Γ. Such cyclic subgroups correspond to periodic orbits of the geodesic flow Φ of UΣ. Margulis invariant extends to continuous functional Ψu(µ) on the space C(Σ) of Φ-invariant probability measures µ on UΣ. (G-Labourie-Margulis 2010)

When L(Γ) is convex cocompact, Γu acts properly ⇐ ⇒ Ψu(µ) = 0 for all invariant probability measures µ. C(Σ) connected = ⇒ Either Ψu(µ) are all positive or all negative.

slide-147
SLIDE 147

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Extensions of the Margulis invariant

αu extends to parabolic L(γ) given decorations of the cusps (Charette-Drumm 2005). (Margulis 1983) αu(γn) = |n|αu(γ).

Therefore αu(γ)/ℓ(γ) is constant on cyclic (hyperbolic) subgroups of Γ. Such cyclic subgroups correspond to periodic orbits of the geodesic flow Φ of UΣ. Margulis invariant extends to continuous functional Ψu(µ) on the space C(Σ) of Φ-invariant probability measures µ on UΣ. (G-Labourie-Margulis 2010)

When L(Γ) is convex cocompact, Γu acts properly ⇐ ⇒ Ψu(µ) = 0 for all invariant probability measures µ. C(Σ) connected = ⇒ Either Ψu(µ) are all positive or all negative.

slide-148
SLIDE 148

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Extensions of the Margulis invariant

αu extends to parabolic L(γ) given decorations of the cusps (Charette-Drumm 2005). (Margulis 1983) αu(γn) = |n|αu(γ).

Therefore αu(γ)/ℓ(γ) is constant on cyclic (hyperbolic) subgroups of Γ. Such cyclic subgroups correspond to periodic orbits of the geodesic flow Φ of UΣ. Margulis invariant extends to continuous functional Ψu(µ) on the space C(Σ) of Φ-invariant probability measures µ on UΣ. (G-Labourie-Margulis 2010)

When L(Γ) is convex cocompact, Γu acts properly ⇐ ⇒ Ψu(µ) = 0 for all invariant probability measures µ. C(Σ) connected = ⇒ Either Ψu(µ) are all positive or all negative.

slide-149
SLIDE 149

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Extensions of the Margulis invariant

αu extends to parabolic L(γ) given decorations of the cusps (Charette-Drumm 2005). (Margulis 1983) αu(γn) = |n|αu(γ).

Therefore αu(γ)/ℓ(γ) is constant on cyclic (hyperbolic) subgroups of Γ. Such cyclic subgroups correspond to periodic orbits of the geodesic flow Φ of UΣ. Margulis invariant extends to continuous functional Ψu(µ) on the space C(Σ) of Φ-invariant probability measures µ on UΣ. (G-Labourie-Margulis 2010)

When L(Γ) is convex cocompact, Γu acts properly ⇐ ⇒ Ψu(µ) = 0 for all invariant probability measures µ. C(Σ) connected = ⇒ Either Ψu(µ) are all positive or all negative.

slide-150
SLIDE 150

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

The Deformation Space

Deformation space of marked Margulis space-times corresponding to surface S fibers over space of marked hyperbolic structures S − → Σ on S. Fiber is subspace of H1(Σ, R2,1) (all affine deformations) consisting of proper affine deformations Σ.

Nonempty (Drumm 1989).

(G-Labourie-Margulis 2010) Convex domain in H1(Σ, R2,1) defined by generalized Margulis functionals of measured geodesic laminations on Σ.

slide-151
SLIDE 151

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

The Deformation Space

Deformation space of marked Margulis space-times corresponding to surface S fibers over space of marked hyperbolic structures S − → Σ on S. Fiber is subspace of H1(Σ, R2,1) (all affine deformations) consisting of proper affine deformations Σ.

Nonempty (Drumm 1989).

(G-Labourie-Margulis 2010) Convex domain in H1(Σ, R2,1) defined by generalized Margulis functionals of measured geodesic laminations on Σ.

slide-152
SLIDE 152

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

The Deformation Space

Deformation space of marked Margulis space-times corresponding to surface S fibers over space of marked hyperbolic structures S − → Σ on S. Fiber is subspace of H1(Σ, R2,1) (all affine deformations) consisting of proper affine deformations Σ.

Nonempty (Drumm 1989).

(G-Labourie-Margulis 2010) Convex domain in H1(Σ, R2,1) defined by generalized Margulis functionals of measured geodesic laminations on Σ.

slide-153
SLIDE 153

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

The Deformation Space

Deformation space of marked Margulis space-times corresponding to surface S fibers over space of marked hyperbolic structures S − → Σ on S. Fiber is subspace of H1(Σ, R2,1) (all affine deformations) consisting of proper affine deformations Σ.

Nonempty (Drumm 1989).

(G-Labourie-Margulis 2010) Convex domain in H1(Σ, R2,1) defined by generalized Margulis functionals of measured geodesic laminations on Σ.

slide-154
SLIDE 154

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

The Deformation Space

Deformation space of marked Margulis space-times corresponding to surface S fibers over space of marked hyperbolic structures S − → Σ on S. Fiber is subspace of H1(Σ, R2,1) (all affine deformations) consisting of proper affine deformations Σ.

Nonempty (Drumm 1989).

(G-Labourie-Margulis 2010) Convex domain in H1(Σ, R2,1) defined by generalized Margulis functionals of measured geodesic laminations on Σ.

slide-155
SLIDE 155

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

The Crooked Plane Conjecture

Conjecture: Every Margulis spacetime M3 admits a fundamental polyhedron bounded by disjoint crooked planes.

Corollary: (Tameness) M3 ≈ open solid handlebody.

Proved when χ(Σ) = −1 (that is, rank(π1(Σ)) = 2). (Charette-Drumm-G 2010) Four possible topologies for Σ:

Three-holed sphere; Two-holed cross-surface (projective plane); One-holed Klein bottle; One-holed torus.

If ∂Σ has b components, then the Fricke space F(Σ) ≈ [0, ∞)b × (0, ∞)3−b.

slide-156
SLIDE 156

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

The Crooked Plane Conjecture

Conjecture: Every Margulis spacetime M3 admits a fundamental polyhedron bounded by disjoint crooked planes.

Corollary: (Tameness) M3 ≈ open solid handlebody.

Proved when χ(Σ) = −1 (that is, rank(π1(Σ)) = 2). (Charette-Drumm-G 2010) Four possible topologies for Σ:

Three-holed sphere; Two-holed cross-surface (projective plane); One-holed Klein bottle; One-holed torus.

If ∂Σ has b components, then the Fricke space F(Σ) ≈ [0, ∞)b × (0, ∞)3−b.

slide-157
SLIDE 157

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

The Crooked Plane Conjecture

Conjecture: Every Margulis spacetime M3 admits a fundamental polyhedron bounded by disjoint crooked planes.

Corollary: (Tameness) M3 ≈ open solid handlebody.

Proved when χ(Σ) = −1 (that is, rank(π1(Σ)) = 2). (Charette-Drumm-G 2010) Four possible topologies for Σ:

Three-holed sphere; Two-holed cross-surface (projective plane); One-holed Klein bottle; One-holed torus.

If ∂Σ has b components, then the Fricke space F(Σ) ≈ [0, ∞)b × (0, ∞)3−b.

slide-158
SLIDE 158

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

The Crooked Plane Conjecture

Conjecture: Every Margulis spacetime M3 admits a fundamental polyhedron bounded by disjoint crooked planes.

Corollary: (Tameness) M3 ≈ open solid handlebody.

Proved when χ(Σ) = −1 (that is, rank(π1(Σ)) = 2). (Charette-Drumm-G 2010) Four possible topologies for Σ:

Three-holed sphere; Two-holed cross-surface (projective plane); One-holed Klein bottle; One-holed torus.

If ∂Σ has b components, then the Fricke space F(Σ) ≈ [0, ∞)b × (0, ∞)3−b.

slide-159
SLIDE 159

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

The Crooked Plane Conjecture

Conjecture: Every Margulis spacetime M3 admits a fundamental polyhedron bounded by disjoint crooked planes.

Corollary: (Tameness) M3 ≈ open solid handlebody.

Proved when χ(Σ) = −1 (that is, rank(π1(Σ)) = 2). (Charette-Drumm-G 2010) Four possible topologies for Σ:

Three-holed sphere; Two-holed cross-surface (projective plane); One-holed Klein bottle; One-holed torus.

If ∂Σ has b components, then the Fricke space F(Σ) ≈ [0, ∞)b × (0, ∞)3−b.

slide-160
SLIDE 160

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

The Crooked Plane Conjecture

Conjecture: Every Margulis spacetime M3 admits a fundamental polyhedron bounded by disjoint crooked planes.

Corollary: (Tameness) M3 ≈ open solid handlebody.

Proved when χ(Σ) = −1 (that is, rank(π1(Σ)) = 2). (Charette-Drumm-G 2010) Four possible topologies for Σ:

Three-holed sphere; Two-holed cross-surface (projective plane); One-holed Klein bottle; One-holed torus.

If ∂Σ has b components, then the Fricke space F(Σ) ≈ [0, ∞)b × (0, ∞)3−b.

slide-161
SLIDE 161

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

The Crooked Plane Conjecture

Conjecture: Every Margulis spacetime M3 admits a fundamental polyhedron bounded by disjoint crooked planes.

Corollary: (Tameness) M3 ≈ open solid handlebody.

Proved when χ(Σ) = −1 (that is, rank(π1(Σ)) = 2). (Charette-Drumm-G 2010) Four possible topologies for Σ:

Three-holed sphere; Two-holed cross-surface (projective plane); One-holed Klein bottle; One-holed torus.

If ∂Σ has b components, then the Fricke space F(Σ) ≈ [0, ∞)b × (0, ∞)3−b.

slide-162
SLIDE 162

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

The Crooked Plane Conjecture

Conjecture: Every Margulis spacetime M3 admits a fundamental polyhedron bounded by disjoint crooked planes.

Corollary: (Tameness) M3 ≈ open solid handlebody.

Proved when χ(Σ) = −1 (that is, rank(π1(Σ)) = 2). (Charette-Drumm-G 2010) Four possible topologies for Σ:

Three-holed sphere; Two-holed cross-surface (projective plane); One-holed Klein bottle; One-holed torus.

If ∂Σ has b components, then the Fricke space F(Σ) ≈ [0, ∞)b × (0, ∞)3−b.

slide-163
SLIDE 163

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

The Crooked Plane Conjecture

Conjecture: Every Margulis spacetime M3 admits a fundamental polyhedron bounded by disjoint crooked planes.

Corollary: (Tameness) M3 ≈ open solid handlebody.

Proved when χ(Σ) = −1 (that is, rank(π1(Σ)) = 2). (Charette-Drumm-G 2010) Four possible topologies for Σ:

Three-holed sphere; Two-holed cross-surface (projective plane); One-holed Klein bottle; One-holed torus.

If ∂Σ has b components, then the Fricke space F(Σ) ≈ [0, ∞)b × (0, ∞)3−b.

slide-164
SLIDE 164

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

The Crooked Plane Conjecture

Conjecture: Every Margulis spacetime M3 admits a fundamental polyhedron bounded by disjoint crooked planes.

Corollary: (Tameness) M3 ≈ open solid handlebody.

Proved when χ(Σ) = −1 (that is, rank(π1(Σ)) = 2). (Charette-Drumm-G 2010) Four possible topologies for Σ:

Three-holed sphere; Two-holed cross-surface (projective plane); One-holed Klein bottle; One-holed torus.

If ∂Σ has b components, then the Fricke space F(Σ) ≈ [0, ∞)b × (0, ∞)3−b.

slide-165
SLIDE 165

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Functionals α(γ) when Σ ≈ three-holed sphere

Charette-Drumm-Margulis functionals of ∂Σ completely describe deformation space as (0, ∞)3.

slide-166
SLIDE 166

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Functionals α(γ) when Σ ≈ three-holed sphere

Charette-Drumm-Margulis functionals of ∂Σ completely describe deformation space as (0, ∞)3.

slide-167
SLIDE 167

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Functionals α(γ) when Σ ≈ two-holed RP2.

Deformation space is quadrilateral bounded by the four lines defined by CDM-functionals of ∂Σ and the two

  • rientation-reversing interior simple loops.
slide-168
SLIDE 168

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Functionals α(γ) when Σ ≈ one-holed torus

Properness region bounded by infinitely many intervals, each corresponding to simple loop.

slide-169
SLIDE 169

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Structure of the boundary

∂-points lie on intervals or are points of strict convexity (irrational laminations) (G-Margulis-Minsky). Birman-Series argument = ⇒ For 1-holed torus, these points

  • f strict convexity have Hausdorff dimension zero.
slide-170
SLIDE 170

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Structure of the boundary

∂-points lie on intervals or are points of strict convexity (irrational laminations) (G-Margulis-Minsky). Birman-Series argument = ⇒ For 1-holed torus, these points

  • f strict convexity have Hausdorff dimension zero.
slide-171
SLIDE 171

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Structure of the boundary

∂-points lie on intervals or are points of strict convexity (irrational laminations) (G-Margulis-Minsky). Birman-Series argument = ⇒ For 1-holed torus, these points

  • f strict convexity have Hausdorff dimension zero.
slide-172
SLIDE 172

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Realizing an ideal triangulation by crooked planes

Properness region tiled by triangles. Triangles ← → ideal triangulations of Σ. Flip of ideal triangulation ← → moving to adjacent triangle.

slide-173
SLIDE 173

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Realizing an ideal triangulation by crooked planes

Properness region tiled by triangles. Triangles ← → ideal triangulations of Σ. Flip of ideal triangulation ← → moving to adjacent triangle.

slide-174
SLIDE 174

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Realizing an ideal triangulation by crooked planes

Properness region tiled by triangles. Triangles ← → ideal triangulations of Σ. Flip of ideal triangulation ← → moving to adjacent triangle.

slide-175
SLIDE 175

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Realizing an ideal triangulation by crooked planes

Properness region tiled by triangles. Triangles ← → ideal triangulations of Σ. Flip of ideal triangulation ← → moving to adjacent triangle.

slide-176
SLIDE 176

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Functionals α(γ) when Σ ≈ one-holed Klein bottle

Properness region bounded by infinitely many intervals, each defined by CDM-invariants of simple orientation-reversing loops, arranged cyclically, and the one orientation-preserving interior simple loop.

slide-177
SLIDE 177

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Functionals α(γ) when Σ ≈ one-holed Klein bottle

Properness region bounded by infinitely many intervals, each defined by CDM-invariants of simple orientation-reversing loops, arranged cyclically, and the one orientation-preserving interior simple loop.

slide-178
SLIDE 178

university-logo Deformation spaces of 3-dimensional affine space forms

Happy Birthday, Caroline!!!