Decision on Palermo-Rio Oso 115 kV Line Re-construction Project - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
decision on palermo rio oso 115 kv line re construction
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Decision on Palermo-Rio Oso 115 kV Line Re-construction Project - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dec 22, 2022 184 likes •252 views

Decision on Palermo-Rio Oso 115 kV Line Re-construction Project Gary DeShazo, Director of Regional Transmission - North Board of Governors Meeting General Session May 21-23, 2008 Management is requesting approval of the Management is

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Decision on Palermo-Rio Oso 115 kV Line Re-construction Project

Gary DeShazo, Director of Regional Transmission - North

Board of Governors Meeting General Session May 21-23, 2008

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Management is requesting approval of the Management is requesting approval of the Palermo Palermo-

  • Rio

Rio Oso Oso 115kV line re 115kV line re-

  • construction project

construction project

This project is needed to meet federal reliability standards Standards are mandatory under the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) Estimated cost of $55M Will required a Permit to Construct from the California Public Utilities Commission All components need to be in-service by June 2010

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

The project is located in PG&E The project is located in PG&E’ ’s Yuba s Yuba-

  • Sutter

Sutter service territory service territory

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

This one This one-

  • line diagram shows how the project is

line diagram shows how the project is integrated into the system integrated into the system

< <

60 kV

84 M V A

< <

84 M V A

Pease

115 kV

East M arysville G reenleaf I B

  • gue

Palerm

  • Rio O

so

East N icolaus

N O N O

O livehurst

397 A l 3/0 Cu 3/0 Cu 3/0 Cu 336 A C SR 3/0 Cu

H

  • ncut

N O

R econstruct approxim ately 40 m iles

  • f the Palerm
  • -East

N icolaus 115 kV line and 30 m iles of the Palerm

  • -Bogue 115 kV

line w ith 1113 A A C conductor

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

The project area is impacted by load growth and The project area is impacted by load growth and “ “interconnected interconnected” ” system needs system needs

Long-term planning investigation initiated by the ISO in 2003 Load growth area of 2.8% annually “Interconnected” system needs Parallel flow from California-Oregon Intertie (“COI”) flow Northern California hydro Six other alternatives were assessed The preferred alternative selected by the CAISO: Produces the required level of reliability Provides the highest load-serving capability for the least cost Least environmental impact Best overall benefits (cost-technical-environmental)