smooth modes as a tool for operational modal analysis new
play

Smooth Modes as a Tool for Operational Modal Analysis: New - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Smooth Modes as a Tool for Operational Modal Analysis: New Developments Rubens Sampaio PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 1 / 39 Outline Review of Karhunen-Lo`


  1. Smooth Modes as a Tool for Operational Modal Analysis: New Developments Rubens Sampaio PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 1 / 39

  2. Outline Review of Karhunen-Lo` eve History of SOD in modal analysis SOD in operational modal analysis Noise sensitivity of standard SOD New developments Conclusions PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 2 / 39

  3. First part-KLD: Naive look Some history-main applications Main idea of KL decomposition The mathematical problem Construction of the KL basis How to combine KL with Galerkin Reduced model given by KL Practical question: how to compute the KLD An example Different guises of KL; basic ingredients Karhunen-Lo` eve expansion: main hypothesis Karhunen-Lo` eve Theorem Basic properties Applications to Random Mechanics Examples PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 3 / 39

  4. Some history Beginning: works in Statistics and Probability and Spectral Theory in Hilbert Spaces. Some contributions: Kosambi (1943) Lo` eve (1945) Karhunen (1946) Pougachev (1953) Obukhov (1954) Applications: Lumley (1967): method applied to Turbulence (coherent structures, 1970) Sirovich (1987): snapshot method An important book appeared in 1996: Holmes, Lumley, Berkooz. In Solid Mechanics the applications started around 1993. In finite dimension it appears under different guises. PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 4 / 39

  5. Main Applications Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Statistics and image processing Empirical orthogonal functions: Oceanography and Metereology (Lorenz 1956) Factor analysis: Psychology and Economics Data analysis: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Reduced models, through Galerkin approximations Dynamical Systems: to understand the dynamics Signal Analysis PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 5 / 39

  6. Two main purposes of KLD order reduction by projecting high-dimensional data in lower-dimensional space feature extraction by revealing relevant, but unexpected, structure hidden in the data PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 6 / 39

  7. Main idea of KLD In plain words: The key idea of KL is to reduce a large number of interdependent variables to a much smaller number of uncorrelated variables while retaining as much as possible the variation in the original data. PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 7 / 39

  8. Main idea of KL decomposition more precisely Suppose we have an ensemble { u k } of scalar fields, each being a function defined in ( a , b ) ⊂ R . We work in a Hilbert space L 2 (( a , b )). n =1 of L 2 that We want to find a (orthonormal) basis { ψ n } ∞ is optimal for the given data set in the sense that a finite dimensional representation of the form N � u ( x ) = ˆ a k ψ k ( x ) , k =1 for N given, describes a typical member of the ensemble better than representations of the same dimension in any other basis. The notion of typical implies the use of an average over the ensemble { u k } and optimality means maximazing the average normalized projection of u into { ψ n } N n =1 . PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 8 / 39

  9. The mathematical problem Suppose, for simplicity, we have just one function ψ max ψ ∈ L 2 E ( | < u , ψ > | 2 ) � ψ � 2 This implies J ( ψ ) = E ( | < u , ψ > | 2 ) − λ ( � ψ � 2 − 1) d d ε J ( ψ + εφ ) | ε =0 = 0 � b R ( x , y ) ψ ( y ) dy = λψ ( x ) a with R ( x , y ) = E ( u ( x ) u ( y )) PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 9 / 39

  10. Construction of the KL basis Construct R(x,y) from the data Solve the eigenvalue problem: � R ( x , y ) ψ ( y ) dy = λψ ( x ) D to get the pair ( λ i , ψ i ) If u is the field then the N-order approximation of it is u N ( t , x ) = E ( u ( t , x )) + Σ N ˆ i =1 a i ( t ) ψ ( x ) To make predictions use the Galerkin method taking the ψ ’s as trial functions PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 10 / 39

  11. Galerkin projections Suppose we have a dynamical system governed by ∂ v v ∈ { ( a , b ) × D → R n } = A ( v ) ∂ t v (0 , x ) = v 0 ( x ) initial condition B ( v ) = 0 boundary condition The Galerkin method is a discretization scheme for PDE based on separation of variables. One searches solutions in the form: N � v ( x , t ) = ˆ a k ( t ) ψ k ( x ) k =1 PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 11 / 39

  12. Reduced equations The reduced equation is obtained making the error of the approximation orthogonal to the first N KL elements of the basis. ∂ ˆ v errorequation ( t , x ) = ∂ t − A (ˆ v ) errorinicond ( x ) = v (0 , x ) − v 0 ( x ) ˆ < errors , ψ i ( x ) > = 0 i = 1 , ..., N . for � da i D A (Σ N dt ( t ) = n =1 a n ( t ) ψ n ( x )) ψ i ( x ) dx for i = 1 , ..., N � a i (0) = D v 0 ( x ) ψ i ( x ) dx i = 1 , ..., N for PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 12 / 39

  13. History of SOD in modal analysis PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 13 / 39

  14. Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition - Definition The Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition (SOD) consists in an extension of the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (Karhunen-Lo` eve decomposition) with a constraint on the smoothness. When applied to a vector field, the SOD consists in: Find the basis for an orthogonal projection that maintains the maxi- mum variance of the original field and also performs it as smooth as possible in relation to time . PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 14 / 39

  15. Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition - Definition Let x ( t ) = [ x 1 ( t ) , . . . , x n ( t )] T be a real-valued stochastic field with respect to time t ∈ R . It is assumed to be stationary and have zero mean. The orthogonal projection of x ( t ) with respect to the vector ψ is defined as v ( t ) = proj ψ x ( t ) = � x ( t ) , ψ � ψ � ψ � Assuming for simplicity that ψ is an unit vector, the norm of v(t) is � v ( t ) � = � x ( t ) , ψ � PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 15 / 39

  16. Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition - Definition maintains the maximum variance of the original field � � � v ( t ) � 2 �� max ψ E = max ψ { E [ � ψ , x ( t ) � . � x ( t ) , ψ � ] } � � � � ψ T E x ( t ) x T ( t ) = max ψ . ψ performs it as smooth as possible in relation to time � � v i ( t ) � 2 �� min ψ i E � ˙ = min ψ i { E [ � ψ i , ˙ x ( t ) � . � ˙ x ( t ) , ψ i � ] } � � � � ψ T x T ( t ) = min ψ i x ( t ) ˙ . i E ˙ ψ i PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 16 / 39

  17. Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition - Definition This two optimization problems can be brought together to only one maximization problem by creating the function α ( ψ ) as following: � � � � v ( t ) � 2 � E max ψ { α ( ψ ) } = max ψ v ( t ) � 2 ] E [ � ˙ � � ψ T R xx (0) ψ = max ψ . ψ T R ˙ x (0) ψ x ˙ Where R xx (0) and R ˙ x (0) are correlation function matrices defined as: x ˙ � � x ( t + τ ) x T ( t ) R xx ( τ ) = E � � x T ( t ) R ˙ x ( τ ) = E x ( t + τ ) ˙ ˙ x ˙ PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 17 / 39

  18. Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition - Definition The solution of this maximization problem is obtained by finding its stationary point, which leads to the following eigenvalue problem: R xx (0) ψ = λ R ˙ x (0) ψ x ˙ Since R xx (0) and R ˙ x (0) are n × n matrices, this eigenvalue problem leads x ˙ to the set { ψ i } n i =1 , called smooth modes the set { λ i } n i =1 , called smooth values PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 18 / 39

  19. SOD in operational modal analysis Operational modal analysis consists in identify the modal parameters (natural frequencies and vibration modes) of a system under ambient excitation monitoring only its responses (displacements, velocity or acceleration). ? x (t) System To identify the modal parameters using SOD, one has to establish the following relationship: smooth modes ⇔ vibration modes smooth values ⇔ natural frequencies PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 19 / 39

  20. SOD in operational modal analysis Vibration of an undamped MDOF system: The dynamics of a discretized linear conservative mechanical system under ambient excitation can be modeled by the equation M¨ x ( t ) + Kx ( t ) = f ( t ) , where f ( t ) is assumed to be a zero-mean white noise process and the mass matrix M is assumed to be invertible. The acceleration can be expressed as x ( t ) = − M − 1 Kx ( t ) + M − 1 f ( t ) . ¨ Also, the natural frequencies and the normal modes can be extracted by the eigenvalue problem M − 1 K φ = ω 2 φ , where { ω } are the natural frequencies and { φ } the normal modes. PUC-Rio Rubens Sampaio (PUC-Rio rsampaio@puc-rio.br) Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition 20 / 39

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend