Dean Underwood Barrister Hardwicke Building, New Square, Lincolns - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

dean underwood barrister hardwicke building new square
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Dean Underwood Barrister Hardwicke Building, New Square, Lincolns - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Plaster, possession and proportionality A housing case law up-date Dean Underwood Barrister Hardwicke Building, New Square, Lincolns Inn, London WC2A 3SB www.hardwicke.co.uk Topics covered Key cases in housing law : 2011-2012


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Plaster, possession and proportionality

A housing case law up-date Dean Underwood

Barrister

Hardwicke Building, New Square, Lincoln’s Inn, London WC2A 3SB www.hardwicke.co.uk

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Topics covered

  • Key cases in housing law : 2011-2012
  • Implied repair covenants: responsibility for plasterwork
  • Loss of security: ‘only or principal home’?
  • Succession and survivorship: statutory -v- common law rights
  • Statutory, periodic assured shorthold tenancies: when do they start?
  • Tenancy deposit penalties: limits on the court’s powers
  • Human rights defences to possession claims
  • Ending joint tenancies: the rule in Hammersmith LBC v Monk
  • Appeals against possession orders made on grounds of ASB
  • Sentencing for contempt: guidelines for breach of ASBIs

Hardwicke Building, New Square, Lincoln’s Inn, London WC2A 3SB www.hardwicke.co.uk

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Grand v Gill

[2011] 1 WLR 2253; [2011] HLR 37

  • Plaster applied to walls and ceilings
  • Section 11, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
  • Covenant to ‘keep in repair the structure and exterior…’
  • Irvine’s Estate v Moran (1992) 24 HLR 1 overruled
  • Not a decorative finish: part of the structure
  • Landlord responsible for repair of defective plaster

Hardwicke Building, New Square, Lincoln’s Inn, London WC2A 3SB www.hardwicke.co.uk

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Islington LBC v Boyle

[2012] HLR 18

  • Security of tenure
  • Section 81, Housing Act 1985; see also section 1, Housing Act 1988
  • ‘only or principal home’: a principled approach
  • issue of fact, determined in light of all available evidence
  • rebuttable presumption that security lost
  • subjective intention to return not sufficient: need for objective corroboration
  • focus on enduring intention, not ‘fleeting changes of mind’
  • Permission to appeal to Supreme Court refused

Hardwicke Building, New Square, Lincoln’s Inn, London WC2A 3SB www.hardwicke.co.uk

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Solihull MBC v Hickin

[2012] 1 WLR 2295

  • Secure tenancy granted jointly to Mr and Mrs H
  • Mr H left; Mrs H died leaving daughter, E, in occupation
  • S served notice to quit on Mr H
  • E defended possession claim on the basis that
  • she had a right to succeed her mother as tenant - section 89, Housing Act 1985
  • that right displaced Mr H’s common law right to the tenancy by survivorship
  • Supreme Court disagreed:
  • Mr H had become sole tenant by operation of the common law of survivorship
  • Mr H no longer occupied the property as his only or principal home
  • The notice served on him was therefore effective to end his tenancy

Hardwicke Building, New Square, Lincoln’s Inn, London WC2A 3SB www.hardwicke.co.uk

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Lappin v Surace

Romford County Court, 13.06.12

  • Assured shorthold tenancy
  • End of fixed term
  • Section 5, Housing Act 1988
  • Statutory, periodic assured shorthold tenancy
  • Calculating the correct start and end of the period
  • Notice under section 21, Housing Act 1988

Hardwicke Building, New Square, Lincoln’s Inn, London WC2A 3SB www.hardwicke.co.uk

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Gladehurst Properties Ltd v Hashemi

[2011] HLR 36

  • Protection of tenancy deposits
  • Requirements of sections 212-215 Housing Act 2004
  • Landlord’s failure to comply
  • Court’s power to award damages for 3 x value of deposit
  • Power coterminous with tenancy
  • Section 214 amended by Localism Act 2011, section 184

Hardwicke Building, New Square, Lincoln’s Inn, London WC2A 3SB www.hardwicke.co.uk

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Corby BC v Scott - West Kent HA v Haycraft

[2012] HLR 23

  • Introductory and ‘starter’ tenancies
  • Complaints: rent arrears and anti-social behaviour
  • Possession claims met with human rights defence: Article 8
  • Application of:
  • Manchester CC v Pinnock [2010] 3 WLR 1441
  • Hounslow LBC v Powell [2011] 2 AC 186
  • Confirmation of:
  • high threshold for seriously arguable defence
  • importance of summary dismissal of below-threshold defences

Hardwicke Building, New Square, Lincoln’s Inn, London WC2A 3SB www.hardwicke.co.uk

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Riverside Group Ltd v Thomas

[2012] EWHC169 (QB)

  • Starter tenancy granted to vulnerable tenant
  • Complaints of anti-social behaviour
  • Possession claim met with human rights defence: Article 8
  • Application of Pinnock and Powell
  • Confirmation:
  • f high threshold for seriously arguable defence
  • f important policy reasons for use of starter tenancies and quick termination
  • that section 89, Housing Act 1980 not incompatible with Article 8

Hardwicke Building, New Square, Lincoln’s Inn, London WC2A 3SB www.hardwicke.co.uk

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Birmingham CC v Lloyd

[2012] 2 P&CR DG18

  • L moved into brother’s flat when brother died
  • L then ended his own tenancy of other accommodation
  • B’s possession claim met with human rights defence: Article 8
  • Court of Appeal allowed appeal against refusal of possession
  • L was a trespasser and always had been
  • Effect of refusal had been to usurp B’s role in allocating housing
  • Pinnock, Powell and Corby applied

Hardwicke Building, New Square, Lincoln’s Inn, London WC2A 3SB www.hardwicke.co.uk

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Sims v Dacorum BC

[2012] EWCA Civ …

  • Joint tenancies
  • Termination by notice to quit served by one tenant only
  • Common law rule in Hammersmith LBC v Monk [1992] 1 AC 478
  • Whether rule compatible with Article 8 and Article 1, Protocol 1
  • Proposed development of common law:
  • Treat NTQ as a release of one tenant’s interest to the other?
  • Treat service of the notice as the ‘function’ of a trustee?
  • Judgment reserved: watch this space

Hardwicke Building, New Square, Lincoln’s Inn, London WC2A 3SB www.hardwicke.co.uk

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Friendship C.H.A. v Begum

[2011] EWCA Civ 1807

  • Assured tenancy: couple with 7 children
  • Conviction for intent to supply drugs leading to possession claim
  • Appeal against outright possession order
  • Sandwell MBC v Hensley [2008] HLR 22 applied
  • No point suspending when inevitable outcome would be breach
  • Must be cogent evidence that past conduct will cease
  • Court entitled to assume that local authority would comply with duties owed

to children

Hardwicke Building, New Square, Lincoln’s Inn, London WC2A 3SB www.hardwicke.co.uk

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Amicus Horizon Ltd v Thorley

[2012] EWCA Civ 817

  • Anti-social behaviour injunction
  • Section 153A, Housing Act 1996
  • Breach of injunction
  • Committal for contempt
  • Appropriateness of immediate custodial sentence
  • Sentencing Guidelines Council: Definitive Guideline for breach of ASBO

Hardwicke Building, New Square, Lincoln’s Inn, London WC2A 3SB www.hardwicke.co.uk

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Plaster, possession and proportionality

A housing case law up-date

Dean Underwood

Barrister

Hardwicke Building, New Square, Lincoln’s Inn, London WC2A 3SB www.hardwicke.co.uk