SPE C I ALLY DE SI G N ED E DUC ATI ON SE RVI C E S PRE SE N TE RS: E MMA PAC K ARD& SUZAN N E FI TZG E RALD
TRACKING STUDENT PROGRESS
DATA COLLECTION
PART 2
1
DATA COLLECTION PART 2 1 TRACKING STUDENT PROGRESS SPE C I ALLY - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
DATA COLLECTION PART 2 1 TRACKING STUDENT PROGRESS SPE C I ALLY DE SI G N ED E DUC ATI ON SE RVI C E S PRE SE N TE RS: E MMA PAC K ARD& SUZAN N E FI TZG E RALD HOMEWORK 2 3 4 5 6 REQUESTED DATA SHEET EXAMPLES 7 8 9 10 11
SPE C I ALLY DE SI G N ED E DUC ATI ON SE RVI C E S PRE SE N TE RS: E MMA PAC K ARD& SUZAN N E FI TZG E RALD
TRACKING STUDENT PROGRESS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
After completing this session, participants will be able to:
12
instructional level, using information from their present level of performance.
13
14
EACH PROGRAM SHEET SHOULD INCLUDE:
responses
15
16
PROMPTING
17
PROMPTING: VERBAL VS. NON-VERBAL
to point to a response. Prompt with, ―Point to the clock that shows 9:30.‖
same for both verbal and non-verbal students.
18
PROMPTING: INADVERTENT PROMPTING
students.
19
PLEASE TYPE WHAT YOU SAW INTO THE CHAT BOX.
THAT YOU SEE OR PERHAPS HAVE DONE WHILE WORKING WITH STUDENTS?
20
PROMPTING—ADDITIONAL PROMPTING
program sheet.
21
PROMPTING: FADING PROMPTS
student is as independent as possible.
require additional prompts.
22
CORRECTION PROCEDURES
learned (task analysis)
23
CONSISTENCY
you follow the prompting and correction guidelines provided in the lesson plan. This will ensure consistency.
important teaching procedures of prompting, correction, and reinforcement.
24
REINFORCEMENT
response
25
LEARNING ONE NEW COMPONENT OF A SKILL AT A TIME
components (individualize)
increase success and limit failure and frustration
26
REPETITION
Students benefit from repeated exposure to a new concept. Repeat
contexts
skills
27
planned and embedded throughout the day.
teachable moments that can be built into each day.
28
29
30
31
32
33
DATA SHEETS FROM THE BEGINNING.
INFORMATION DO YOU NEED TO BE ABLE TO EFFECTIVELY RUN THIS PROGRAM? WHAT WOULD YOU INCLUDE ON A PROGRAM SHEET?
34
35
time?
rejects the food?
eats – (lunch time, snack time, special
36
FOR IEP/PROGRESS REPORTING - ACCURACY
the past 10 days and divide by the total number
37
SUMMARIZING DATA - DAILY
percentage of correct trials, in this example use the graph provided on the right hand side
corresponding number for that day i.e., 40%.
38
39
FOR IEP/PROGRESS REPORTING - ACCURACY
formula below:
responses over the past 12 days (i.e., 68)
40
3 + 5 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 6 + 7 + 5 + 7 + 6 + 8 + 6 = 68
41
FOR IEP/PROGRESS REPORTING - ACCURACY
response (i.e., 120).
42
10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 = 120
43
FOR IEP/PROGRESS REPORTING - ACCURACY
the total number possible (i.e., 120) to get the average (i.e., 57%)
44
FOR IEP/PROGRESS REPORTING - ACCURACY Example progress report
count money using next-dollar strategy from $.01 to $5.00 with 70% accuracy.
the objective but has not met the long-term goal.
45
FOR IEP/PROGRESS REPORTING - FREQUENCY
the past ten days. Divide by ten to get an average frequency rate.
46
FOR IEP/PROGRESS REPORTING - LATENCY/DURATION
Divide by ten to get an average time.
47
28+27+20+30+30+35+31+33+29+35+22+32+26+38+31+34+28+39+24+30+34+28=664
48
FOR IEP/PROGRESS REPORTING – LATENCY/DURATION
days to get the average time across 10 days (i.e., 66.4 minutes)
49
FOR IEP/PROGRESS REPORTING – LATENCY/DURATION
Example progress report
the objective but has not met the long-term goal.
50
FOR IEP/PROGRESS REPORTING - FLUENCY
Divide by ten to get an average time. And/or
past ten days. Divide by ten to get an average number of prompts.
51
FOR IEP/PROGRESS REPORTING - FLUENCY
bottom of the data sheet.
52
53
FOR IEP/PROGRESS REPORTING - FLUENCY
formula below:
day (i.e., 50)
54
17 + 9 + 10 + 7 + 7 = 50
55
FOR IEP/PROGRESS REPORTING - FLUENCY
by the total number of days (i.e., 5) to get the average number of prompts per day (i.e., 10)
56
FOR IEP/PROGRESS REPORTING – FLUENCY
Example progress report
the objective but has not met the long-term goal.
57
student is not progressing.
mastery is achieved.
58
students?
59
Educators) run programs to check for reliability.
strategies and data collection.
mark data following a correction procedure.
directions are clear.
60
61
62
63
Made Simple and Easy by RinaMarie Leon-Guerrero, Chris Matsumoto and Jaime Martin
for Functional Academics
Suzanne Fitzgerald & Emma Packard suzanne.fitzgerald@styer-fitzgerald.com ebpackard@msn.com
64