Data 101 and Springboard Proposal
SOUTHEAST GUIDING COALITION ENROLLMENT AND PROGRAM BALANCING
September 24, 2020 - Slide 1
Data 101 and Springboard Proposal SOUTHEAST GUIDING COALITION - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Data 101 and Springboard Proposal SOUTHEAST GUIDING COALITION ENROLLMENT AND PROGRAM BALANCING September 24, 2020 - Slide 1 September 24, 2020 - Slide 2 Sep. 10 Orientation to virtual meeting platform Sep. 17 Viewing the Coalitions work
SOUTHEAST GUIDING COALITION ENROLLMENT AND PROGRAM BALANCING
September 24, 2020 - Slide 1
September 24, 2020 - Slide 2
Orientation to virtual meeting platform
Viewing the Coalition’s work through the lens of racial equity and social justice
Introduction to data, maps, and the Phase 1 springboard proposal
Begin Phase 1 Coalition workshop
Coalition workshop and initial proposal for open house
Virtual open house – Coalition representatives will be present to share thinking behind initial proposal
Coalition workshop
Coalition workshop
Coalition workshop and revised proposal
Virtual open house – Coalition representatives will be present to share thinking behind latest proposal
Coalition workshop
Coalition workshop and final Phase 1 recommendation
September 24, 2020 - Slide 3
[6:00] Agenda and meeting minutes review [6:05] Follow-up from previous meeting Brief review of meetings to date Reminder of upcoming steps in process [6:15] Data 101 presentation [6:35] Breakout group session to solidify Data 101 concepts [7:05] Break [7:15] Round-up of breakout group discussion [7:25] Presentation of first draft springboard proposal [7:40] Coalition feedback on first draft springboard proposal (survey) [7:50] Breakout group session to discuss first impressions of first draft springboard proposal [8:25] Wrap-up [8:30] Adjourn
September 24, 2020
WHY?
common understanding
approach a multi-year enrollment and program balancing process
In Dropbox or via this link: https://www.pps.net/cms/lib/OR01913224/Centricity/ Domain/4/EnrollmentBalancing_08-11-2020.pdf
September 24, 2020 - Slide 5
KEY DISTRICT-WIDE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
enrollment expected over the next five years (-3.5 percent), there is a considerable upward trend in high schools.
no school has to be over-utilized
schools are near or over capacity. Surplus capacity at Jefferson and Madison high schools can help.
September 24, 2020 - Slide 6
minimizing focus/DLI co-location will result in widespread under-utilization in north, northeast, and southeast
foresight to ensure regional cross-coordination
through interconnectedness with northeast, particularly through the Madison cluster
September 24, 2020 - Slide 7
KEY FINDINGS FOR SOUTHEAST REGION
September 24, 2020 - Slide 8
low utilization (< 65%)
have enrollment well below functional capacity
whose household speaks a language other than English (39.4%).
neighborhood students are co-located with a dual language immersion (DLI) program (Bridger and Lent)
where enrollment for a single grade is below 50 students
notable exceptions being Franklin and Cleveland high schools
Holgate Blvd 52nd Ave Woodstock Blvd Division St Glisan St 60th Ave 82nd Ave I-205
September 24, 2020 - Slide 10
10,857 10,804 10,787 10,700 10,422 10,237 4,666 4,845 4,783 4,766 4,881 4,931 5,450 5,488 5,538 5,731 5,947 5,872
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20
Historical Enrollment by Grade Group, 2014-2019
Cleveland, Franklin, and Madison Clusters
Grade K-5 Grade 6-8 Grade 9-12
Adapted from Portland State University Population Research Center, 2020.
September 24, 2020 - Slide 11
10,144 9,937 9,819 9,560 9,345
4,915 4,850 4,734 4,693 4,592 5,995 6,133 6,164 6,220 6,272
2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
Enrollment Forecast by Grade Group, 2020-2024
Cleveland, Franklin, and Madison Clusters
Grade K-5 Grade 6-8 Grade 9-12
Adapted from Portland State University Population Research Center, 2020.
September 24, 2020 - Slide 12
Adapted from Portland State University Population Research Center, 2020.
Franklin 9- 12 Lane 6-8
8 Arleta K-8 Arleta K-8 Bridger K-8 Creston K-8 Lent K-8 Marysville K-8 Sunnyside K-8 Atkinson K- 5 Glencoe K- 5 Kelly K-5 Woodmere K-5 2015-16 1,570 481 694 456 456 476 392 564 390 574 435 500 610 312 2016-17 1,612 443 730 457 457 500 356 523 358 602 432 492 604 303 2017-18 1,745 454 718 454 454 531 372 530 380 604 420 489 532 286 2018-19 1,856 433 741 490 490 504 361 507 392 581 419 451 498 301 2019-20 1,936 432 724 526 526 516 375 475 383 549 391 449 476 273
400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 Enrollment
Historical Enrollment by School, 2015-2019
Franklin Cluster
September 24, 2020 - Slide 13
Adapted from Portland State University Population Research Center, 2020.
Franklin 9- 12 Lane 6-8
8 Arleta K-8 Bridger K-8 Creston K-8 Lent K-8 Marysville K- 8 Sunnyside K-8 Atkinson K-5 Glencoe K-5 Kelly K-5 Woodmere K-5 2020-21 1,977 431 735 547 519 383 455 407 528 384 434 477 273 2021-22 2,021 413 701 538 506 397 442 422 528 373 420 470 268 2022-23 2,053 390 690 536 517 379 424 412 514 368 420 479 266 2023-24 2,029 366 694 531 500 373 403 403 494 355 402 482 261 2024-25 2,065 357 696 516 486 361 384 386 484 343 391 479 257
1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Enrollment
Enrollment Forecast by School, 2020-2024
Franklin Cluster
September 24, 2020 - Slide 14
*Bridger K students are currently at the Holladay Annex (75 capacity, in addition to 510 main campus capacity). This is not desired for future use.
September 24, 2020 - Slide 15
From PPS student information system, October 2019. Neighborhood-to-neighborhood transfers only. Does not include enrollment from co-located focus programs.
400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000
Abernethy K-5 Buckman K-5 Cleveland 9-12 Grout K-5 Hosford 6-8 Lewis K-5 Whitman K-5 Woodstock K-5
PPS Students
2019 Capture Rate for Neighborhood Schools
Cleveland Cluster
Reside Reside and Attend
85.6% 82.5% 81.6% 69.0% 67.8% 82.6% 60.6% 79.1%
Note: Capture rate is the proportion of resident students enrolled in PPS who attend their neighborhood school. Does not include students enrolled in focus / DLI programs located at their neighborhood school. Also Note: The “why” behind these rates is driven by the will, desire, and ability of families to choose to opt out of their neighborhood
doesn’t apply uniformly across schools.
September 24, 2020 - Slide 16
Note: Transfers out are a component of a neighborhood program’s capture
not but are indicative
draw from outside its neighborhood. From PPS student information system, October 2019. Does not include enrollment from co-located focus programs. *Buckman enrolls a portion of its students via lottery.
100 150 200 250 300
Abernethy K-5 Buckman K-5 Cleveland 9-12 Grout K-5 Hosford 6-8 Lewis K-5 Whitman K-5 Woodstock K-5
PPS Students
2019 Transfers for Neighborhood Schools
Cleveland Cluster
Transfer In Transfer Out
+17 =
+35
+228* +1
Holgate Blvd 52nd Ave Woodstock Blvd Division St Glisan St 60th Ave 82nd Ave I-205
September 24, 2020 - Slide 18
1. When considering optimizing use of facilities, what opportunities do you see for addressing over- and under-utilization and/or phasing out modular classrooms? 2. When considering equitable programming, what grade reconfiguration
schools? 3. When considering program co-location, what opportunities do you see for unifying focus programs?
September 24, 2020 - Slide 19
PURPOSE AND INTENT
task and the options are virtually limitless
process by providing a foundation for improvement
and Program Balancing and FLO Analytics
first of many permutations
September 24, 2020 - Slide 20
SCHOOL BY SCHOOL IMPACT
School Change from Existing Conditions Kellogg
Marysville
Harrison Park
September 24, 2020 - Slide 21
SCHOOL BY SCHOOL IMPACT
School Change from Existing Conditions Bridger
needed
is within its new attendance area)
neighborhood
September 24, 2020 - Slide 22
SCHOOL BY SCHOOL IMPACT
School Change from Existing Conditions Arleta
attendance area)
Marysville
and assist with Bridger utilization)
Lent
September 24, 2020 - Slide 23
SCHOOL BY SCHOOL IMPACT
School Change from Existing Conditions
Creston
Vestal
St.
Atkinson
neighborhood cohort at Franklin) Sunnyside
Woodstock
September 24, 2020 - Slide 24
SCHOOL BY SCHOOL IMPACT
School Change from Existing Conditions
Hosford
Franklin
Cleveland
Madison
Creative Science
September 24, 2020 - Slide 25
September 24, 2020 - Slide 26
First Draft Springboard Proposal – Utilization and Programs
September 24, 2020 - Slide 27
*Bridger K students are currently at the Holladay Annex (75 capacity, in addition to 510 main campus capacity). This is not desired for future use and the option assumes K students are at the main campus. **Space was evaluated for Pre-K (2 classrooms) based on the schools reported functional capacity without modulars. Note: Enrollment estimates are based on where students live for neighborhood programs and current enrollment for focus/immersion programs. Students participating in focus/immersion programs are included in the counts for the school that houses the program. Out-of-district students are included in the counts of the school in which they attend
First Draft Springboard Proposal – Utilization and Programs (cont’d)
September 24, 2020 - Slide 28
*Bridger K students are currently at the Holladay Annex (75 capacity, in addition to 510 main campus capacity). This is not desired for future use and the option assumes K students are at the main campus. **Space was evaluated for Pre-K (2 classrooms) based on the schools reported functional capacity without modulars. Note: Enrollment estimates are based on where students live for neighborhood programs and current enrollment for focus/immersion programs. Students participating in focus/immersion programs are included in the counts for the school that houses the program. Out-of-district students are included in the counts of the school in which they attend
First Draft Springboard Proposal – Demographics
September 24, 2020 - Slide 29
Note: Enrollment estimates are based on where students live for neighborhood programs and current enrollment for focus/immersion programs. Students participating in focus/immersion programs are included in the counts for the school that houses the program. Out-of-district students are included in the counts of the school in which they attend or are expected to attend based on the option parameters. These assumptions are subject to change based on the Coalition's needs.
First Draft Springboard Proposal – Demographics (cont’d)
September 24, 2020 - Slide 30
Note: Enrollment estimates are based on where students live for neighborhood programs and current enrollment for focus/immersion programs. Students participating in focus/immersion programs are included in the counts for the school that houses the program. Out-of-district students are included in the counts of the school in which they attend or are expected to attend based on the option parameters. These assumptions are subject to change based on the Coalition's needs.
September 24, 2020 - Slide 31
STRENGTHS IN ADDRESSING OUTCOME GOALS
programming)
to Franklin (Outcome Goal: Fewer program co-locations)
equitable programming)
creating more parity between the three high schools (Outcome Goal: Optimize the use of facilities)
September 24, 2020 - Slide 32
WEAKNESSES IN ADDRESSING OUTCOME GOALS
facilities)
Goals: Optimize the use of facilities, support equitable programming)
facilities, support equitable programming)
Language programs (Outcome Goals: Fewer program co-locations)
September 24, 2020 - Slide 33
Your facilitator will post a link to a survey about the springboard proposal. Please take 10 minutes to begin filling it out. Please submit it by Friday, October 2.
Reminder: you can access this presentation later on website and in Dropbox!
September 24, 2020 - Slide 34
Optimize the use of facilities to enhance PK-12 learning environments for all students. PPS wants to be a good steward of public assets and phase out portable classrooms when possible to create connected, safer schools. Support equitable programming to improve the student experience across all grade levels, and particularly in middle grades. This process will support continued educational program redesign at the middle grade levels, to include reconfiguration of identified K-8 neighborhood schools to K-5 elementary schools and creating new comprehensive middle schools while maintaining some regional K-8 school options to support pathway continuity (e.g., Dual Language Immersion). Minimize program co-locations to reduce isolation and program inequities by creating fewer shared facilities and co-located programs at K-5, K-8, and 6-8 schools.
September 24, 2020 - Slide 35
September 24, 2020 - Slide 36
Reminder: you can access this presentation later on website and in Dropbox!