SLIDE 1
Daniel L. Moody, Member IEEE 2009 Presentation by Christina - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Daniel L. Moody, Member IEEE 2009 Presentation by Christina - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Daniel L. Moody, Member IEEE 2009 Presentation by Christina Christodoulakis Visual Languages Cave art Lascaux cave, France ~17.300 years old Anatomy of visual language Graphical symbols Visual syntax Compositional rules
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
Anatomy of visual language
- Graphical symbols
- Compositional rules
- Definitions of symbols
1D (lines), 2D (areas), 3D (volumes), text (labels), spatial relationships
Visual syntax
SLIDE 4
What makes a good visual notation?
SLIDE 5
What makes a good visual notation?
Cogn gniti tive ve effectivenes iveness speed, ease and accuracy with which the human mind processes A visual notation must
a.
Effectively communicate with business stakeholders
b.
Support design and problem solving by sw engineers
SLIDE 6
It’s location location location baby.
VS VS
The same? Different? What is intuitive?
SLIDE 7
Visual dialects
SLIDE 8
Visual dialects
SLIDE 9
SLIDE 10
Design space
SLIDE 11
Design Space
- Primary Notation
Formal definition. Set of symbols with prescribed meanings
- Secondary Notation
Visual variables (reinforcive or claritive nature)
- Visual Noise
Accidental secondary notation (result in distortion of intended message)
SLIDE 12
Solution Space Human graphical information processing
Seein eing (automatic and executed in parallel) Under derstan andin ding
SLIDE 13
Each principle has:
- Name
- Semantic
definition
- Operational
definition
- Design strategies
- Exemplars and
counter exemplars
SLIDE 14
- 1. Semiotic Clarity
SLIDE 15
Sym ymbol bol Re Redundancy dancy: multiple graphical symbols represent same semantic construct
SLIDE 16
Sym ymbol bol Ov Over erloa load: d: different constructs are represented by the same symbol (ambiguity)
SLIDE 17
Sym ymbol bol Ex Exce cess: s: symbols don’t correspond to semantic constructs
SLIDE 18
Sym ymbol bol Def efici cit: t: semantic constructs are not represented by symbols
?
SLIDE 19
- 2. Perceptual Discriminability
SLIDE 20
- 2. Perceptual Discriminability
SLIDE 21
- 2. Perceptual Discriminability
SLIDE 22
SLIDE 23
SLIDE 24
Can I get you one of these?
SLIDE 25
- 2. Perceptual Discriminability
SLIDE 26
- 3. Semantic Transparency
SLIDE 27
- 3. Semantic Transparency
SLIDE 28
- 3. Semantic Transparency
SLIDE 29
- 3. Semantic Transparency
SLIDE 30
- 4. Complexity Management
SLIDE 31
- 4. Complexity Management
SLIDE 32
- 4. Complexity Management
SLIDE 33
- 5. Cognitive Integration
Conceptual integration
SLIDE 34
- 5. Cognitive Integration
Perceptual integration
Orientation Route choice Route monitoring Destination recognition
SLIDE 35
- 6. Visual Expressiveness
SLIDE 36
- 6. Visual Expressiveness
SLIDE 37
- 6. Visual Expressiveness
SLIDE 38
- 6. Visual Expressiveness
SLIDE 39
- 7. Dual Coding
Perceptual Discriminability and Visual Expressiveness say no to text However when we use both, information is encoded in separate systems in working memory and referential connections are strengthened
SLIDE 40
- 7. Dual Coding
SLIDE 41
- 8. Graphic Economy
Everything does not have to be in a diagram! More is not necessarily better.
SLIDE 42
- 9. Cognitive fit
Know thy audience
- Novices have trouble recalling multiple symbols
- Novices have trouble discriminating between
symbols
- Novices are affected by complexity
Know thy medium
- Whiteboard? Paper? Computer program?
SLIDE 43
- 10. Combining principles
SLIDE 44
Conclusions and significance Visual syntax has been undervalued or
ignored
Key points:
- Design goal
- Descriptive theory
- Prescriptive theory