dan kolberg p e
play

Dan Kolberg, P.E. Local Governm ental Specialist W isconsin DNR, - PDF document

The Strategic Roles of WIS Counties in Brownfields Redevelopment May 1, 2008 Presented for WACCC by: Dan Kolberg , P.E., LGU Specialist Wisconsin DNR, Brownfields Section Bruce Keyes , Partner Foley & Lardner LLP Presenters Dan


  1. The Strategic Roles of WIS Counties in Brownfields Redevelopment – May 1, 2008 Presented for WACCC by: Dan Kolberg , P.E., LGU Specialist Wisconsin DNR, Brownfields Section Bruce Keyes , Partner Foley & Lardner LLP Presenters Dan Kolberg, P.E. Local Governm ental Specialist W isconsin DNR, Brow nfields Section ( 6 0 8 ) 2 6 7 -7 5 00 dan.kolberg@w isconsin.gov 1

  2. Presenters Bruce Keyes, Partner Foley & Lardner LLP Environmental Regulation and Real Estate Practices (414) 297-5815 bkeyes@foley.com Today’s Presentation � Brownfields Intro. - Dan � County Experiences – Dan � Example Projects – Bruce � Tools Available to Cos. – Dan � Economics & Issues – Bruce � Q & A and Discussion - All 2

  3. Wisconsin’s Brownfields Initiative Budget initiative reflected : Brownfields is an economic development initiative with an environmental component. Brownfield Basics � A brownfield is … � An abandoned or under-utilized industrial or commercial property � With real or perceived contamination � That hinders the reuse of the property � WDNR estimates up to 10,000 brownfield properties in the state � Many are known to be tax delinquent � The RR Program’s goal: To assist local governments with the reuse of contaminated properties. 3

  4. Environmental contamination is…. � A hazardous substance that has been discharged into the water, land or air. � It can come from industrial, commercial, transportation or other sources. � Significant environmental contamination has the potential to impact human health, safety, welfare, and/or the environment. Benefits Of Brownfields Redevelopment � Blight Elimination � Environmental Clean-up � Protect Health and Safety � Infrastructure Re-use � Job Creation � Tax Generation � Smart Growth � Setting Positive Examples � Creation of Teamwork 4

  5. County Experiences How have Wisconsin’s counties been dealing with brownfields? Summary of County Activities � Comprehensive � Obtain grants planning & zoning � Partner with rede- � ID brownfields velopment teams � Promote economic � Assist other LGUs development � Tax foreclosures � Acquire properties � Tax cancellations � Develop lands � Property transfers � Create parks/ trails 5

  6. County Accomplishments � 50 SAG Grants to � 11 Tax cancella- 3 2 different cos. tions (s. 75.105) � Douglas Co. 4 � 16 Tax foreclosure � Chippewa, assignments Outagamie, and (s. 75.106) Winnebago 3 ea. � Tax foreclosures � Acquisitions with and transfers LGU exemptions (s. 75.17) � Numerous GLCL Example County Projects Adam s County Colum bia Co. � Idle 15 years � Work w/ WI Dells � Co. $30K SAG � Green team mtg. � Co. acquired - � Address liabilities– Taxes as match LGU exemptions � Assess, tanks, � Tax foreclosure demolition - Sold � City SAG w/ taxes � Assessed value - � Assess dry cleaner $9000 - $161,000 � Possible work w/ � 2 Vacation Homes other LGUs 6

  7. County Roles with Brownfields � Tax Authority � Address Tax Delinquent Properties � Comprehensive Planning & Zoning � Identify Brownfields � Establish Land Use Directions � Encourage Economic Development � Partner with Redevelopment Teams (Incl. LGUs & Developers) Key Points for County Corp. Counsels � Liability Protection/ Civil Immunity � Tax Incentives for Clean-ups � SAG and other grant programs � LGU Cause of Action – Strong Tool � Laws to Help Counties! � Talk with DNR for Assistance. � Talk with other counties to share experiences! 7

  8. Example Brownfield Redevelopment Projects By Bruce Keyes 8

  9. Why should I take the first step? Pros � Smart growth � Infill efficiency � Tax base � It’s the right thing to do � Com m unity health � Availability of responsible parties � Conditions w orsen over tim e What keeps me from acting? � Cons � Low value of land � Low demand/ economy � Potential costs � High brain damage 9

  10. 10

  11. 11

  12. The “Brownfield” Deal – Categories of Properties � Market driven – intrinsic value is greater than impairments – redevelopment occurs with no additional intervention � Marginal – environmental, geotechnical, site or ownership issues – market driven as costs reduced or values increased � Brownfields – environm ental and site problems are so great that property will not be redeveloped without a major infusion of public or responsible party funds 12

  13. Clintonville - Wisconsin Clock � Tax delinquent � Suspect contamination � Asbestos deteriorating � EPA assisted with removal action � Tax enhanced elderly housing developer interested in site � Lisa Kotter – the City champion Clintonville Current Sources and Uses Estimate Redevelopment Project State & Local SAG Funding Total Cost Description In-kind Buyer Funding City General Funds (Estimated) Grant Funds County Funds Contribution by City Phase II $ 2,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ - $ - $ - Phase II $ 18,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ - $ - $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 NR 716 Investigation $ 30,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 30,000.00 Demolition $ 95,000.00 $ 64,799.00 $ - $ 30,000.00 $ - $ - Asbestos Abatement $ 60,000.00 $ 17,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 43,000.00 Petroleum Tank $ 5,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000.00 Payment/Cancellation of Deliquent Taxes $ 55,000.00 $ - $ 55,000.00 $ - $ - $ - Acquisition Cost $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000.00 $ (100,000.00) Site Maintenance $ 2,000.00 $ - $ - $ 2,000.00 $ - $ - Legal $ 45,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 45,000.00 Inventory & Equipment Sales $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTALS $ 312,000.00 $ 99,799.00 $ 57,000.00 $ 32,000.00 $ 109,000.00 $ 32,000.00 Liens Total Cost Mortgage $ - U.S. EPA Costs $ - TOTALS $ - ** City Costs & (Revenues) 13

  14. Central Wisconsin Site � Industrial Park � Bankrupt prior owners/ causers � Low intrinsic value � But… � Contamination is spreading � Proactive current owner � Located user for site � Strong support from state Racine � Obsolete structures � But favorable economics on demolition � Interim user until redevelopment is ripe � City controlling cleanup schedule � Environmental issues not as bad as feared � Final remedy will be implemented in context of redevelopment 14

  15. Lessons learned � The best solutions come when there is a viable seller – don’t let it become a brownfield! � Identifying an end use is helpful; � Every project will have heroes and villains � The heroes get projects done despite the villains Lessons learned � True Brownfield deals are very complex and take time � There are resources at your disposal- EPA, DNR, Commerce, and statutory tools (condemnation, cost recovery, foreclosure, etc.). � Any of the “tools” will work for small projects � The right project team is worth its weight in gold. � The transaction costs can total 30% of project cost 15

  16. Budget – $14M Project $3.5M Extraordinary Costs 16

  17. Additional Lessons Learned � Developers often need certainty; � If not certainty, then a commitment and confidence in their public partner; What Tools are Available to Help Counties? By Dan Kolberg 17

  18. Wisconsin’s Brownfields Initiative Assisting local Governm ents ( incl. cos.) w ith the reuse of properties. Goals of BF Initiative � Help LGUs to understand that they are the key to successful redevelopment � Encourage more parties to cleanup their properties � Move properties through system quickly � Achieve redevelopment without sacrificing public health and environmental protection 18

  19. Legal Tools for Cleanup and Redevelopment � Liability Exemptions (ss. 292.11 & 292.23 SS.) � Ability to Recover Costs (s. 292.33 and 292.35 SS.) � Civil Immunity (s. 292.26, SS.) � Delinquent Property Tax Tools � Inspection Authorities (Chs. 66 and 75, SS.) � Cancellation of Taxes (s. 75.105, SS.) � Assignment of Foreclosure Judgment (s. 75.106, SS.) � County Property Transfer (s. 75.17, SS.) Overview of the LGU Exemption 19

  20. Overview of the Exemption Eligible acquisition includes: • tax delinquency • bankruptcy proceedings • condemnation • eminent domain • escheat • slum clearance or blight elimination • using Stewardship funds, if signed cleanup agreement VOLUNTARY PARTY LIABILITY EXEMPTION (VPLE) 20

  21. Who can enter the VPLE Process? � Any person who submits application and pays fees. � A person may be an individual, business, developers, or government unit � A contaminant release must be documented on the property What must a VP do? VP is required to: • Investigate property & discharges that migrate off-site • Remediate discharges • Maintain property as required 21

  22. What is reward at end of VPLE process? Certificate of Completion: • Awarded once DNR approves site investigation and cleanup. • Provides “finality” to person’s liability. • Exempt from spill law and certain provisions in other state laws. Local Government Cost Recovery Tool A tool to give local governments clear authority to recover environmental costs. (s. 292.33, Stats.) 22

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend