D.A. Davidson 12th Annual Engineering & Construction Conference
September 11, 2013
Sue Carter – Executive Vice President and CFO Ivor Harrington – Group President, Gas Monetization Zac Nagle – Vice President, Investor Relations & Communications
D.A. Davidson 12 th Annual Engineering & Construction Conference - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
D.A. Davidson 12 th Annual Engineering & Construction Conference Sue Carter Executive Vice President and CFO Ivor Harrington Group President, Gas Monetization September 11, 2013 Zac Nagle Vice President, Investor Relations &
September 11, 2013
Sue Carter – Executive Vice President and CFO Ivor Harrington – Group President, Gas Monetization Zac Nagle – Vice President, Investor Relations & Communications
This presentation contains “forward-looking statements.” All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements about the benefits of the split-off, the discussions of KBR’s business strategies and KBR’s expectations concerning future operations, profitability, liquidity and capital resources. You can generally identify forward- looking statements by terminology such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “objective,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “projection,” “should” or other similar
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from those in the future that are implied by these forward-looking statements. Many of these factors cannot be controlled or predicted. These risks and other factors include those described under “Risk Factors” in KBR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 20, 2013, Forms 10-Q, recent Current Reports on Forms 8-K, and other Securities and Exchange Commission filings. Those factors, among
projected in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements. As you read and consider this presentation, you should carefully understand that the forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance or results. KBR cautions you that assumptions, beliefs, expectations, intentions and projections about future events may and often do vary materially from actual results. Therefore, KBR cannot assure you that actual results will not differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included in this presentation are made only as of the date of this document. New risks and uncertainties arise from time to time, and KBR cannot predict those events or their impact. KBR assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements after the date of this presentation as a result of new information, future events or developments, except as required by the federal securities laws. Note: All financial statements reflected in this presentation are as of KBR’s 2Q13 earnings conference call on July 26, 2013
2
3
4
Edmonton Calgary Wilmington Arlington Raleigh Charlotte Atlanta Houston Birmingham MMM Rio De Janeiro Monterrey Buenos Aires Gothenburg Greenford Leatherhead Frankfurt Algiers Moscow Atyrau Baku Baghdad Kuwait City Dubai Abu Dhabi Dhahran Lagos Luanda Johannesburg New Delhi Beijing Singapore Jakarta Perth Adelaide Melbourne Canberra Sydney Brisbane Ontario Salt Lake City Doha Dammam Mobile
Gas Monetization
Oil & Gas
Downstream
Technology
5
Infrastructure, Government & Power Services
N.A. Government & Logistics Infrastructure
International Government, Defence & Support Services
Power & Industrial
Minerals
Construction
Industrial Services
Canada Operations
Building Group
Hydrocarbons Gas Monetization
6
Current Gas Mon Projects Progressing Well
Strong Pipeline of LNG Projects and Prospects
transition, then EPCm
Opportunity for GTL in the U.S.
project could reach FEED in 2013
7
U.S. Shale Gas Opportunities
excess of $250 million to be constructed in North America
and technology project in Louisiana
ethylene furnaces using KBR’s SCORE™ technology
for INEOS
Valley Resources
furnace for INEOS
Middle East Remains Robust for Downstream
Growth in Technology
technologies, including ammonia, VCC, and ethylene
China and Delhi, India
(SCORE™)
Expanding Share of Wallet for Oil & Gas
Caspian for EPCm for both onshore and offshore
FLNG Opportunities
8
Canada Operations
Energy’s refinery in Edmonton, AB, Canada
Shell Canada’s Quest Carbon Capture and Storage project
period
Industrial Services
SATORP to provide maintenance services at its Jubail refinery over the next seven years
Building Group
manufacturing markets
U.S. Construction
project provisions taken in fourth quarter 2012
projects
9
North American Government & Logistics
uncertainties and sequestration
defense facilities in Romania
Operations Services
Force, Army Corps of Engineers, Department of State)
International Government, Defence & Support Services
Office for Policing and Crime to provide facilities management integrator services
Metro London and U.K. policing departments
Power & Industrial
project for Kentucky Utilities
for bid or anticipate bidding in 2013
Infrastructure
Saudi Arabia, Oman, UAE and Iraq)
in Australia and the United States
Minerals
10
LNG and GTL Opportunities
bid
discussion with one customer on a proposed GTL facility that could reach FEED in 2013
facilities positions KBR well (Pearl GTL and Escravos GTL)
Technology Awards & Opportunities
year
Downstream Awards & Opportunities
excess of $250 million to be constructed in North America
technology project in Louisiana
Resources
ethylene furnaces using KBR’s SCORE™ technology
furnace for INEOS in Texas
EPC prospects potentially in 2013
Power Awards & Opportunities
for Kentucky Utilities
for bid or anticipate bidding in 2013
21
12
13
80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 6/30/2013 Revenue Backlog Job Income Backlog
Performance Index
14
First Six Months 2011 First Six Months 2012 First Six Months 2013
15.0% 12.2% 12.8%
15
ERP Spend
*Note: For illustrative purposes, 2013 Guidance reflects mid-point of corporate G&A guidance of $230 million to $240 million, which includes $40 million expected ERP spend (per 2Q13 guidance update to ERP spend expected at top end
$150 $160 $170 $180 $190 $200 $210 $220 $230 $240 $250 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Guidance* Corporate G&A $ in Millions
16