cultural resources collaboration and innovation towards
play

Cultural Resources Collaboration and Innovation Towards Continuous - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Cultural Resources Collaboration and Innovation Towards Continuous Improvement: Traffic Signal Upgrades Memorandum of Understanding Eric Duff State Environmental Administrator At GDOT, we are at our best when faced with a challenge 2017


  1. Cultural Resources Collaboration and Innovation Towards Continuous Improvement: Traffic Signal Upgrades Memorandum of Understanding Eric Duff State Environmental Administrator

  2. At GDOT, we are at our best when faced with a challenge… 2017 I-85 Bridge Collapse 2018 Hurricane Michael

  3. Environmental Challenges are no different The Challenge– Statewide Signal Upgrades • Large Survey Areas • Huge Documents • Big Budgets • Extended Schedules 74 page History Report 220 page Archaeology Report

  4. Traffic Operations Signal Upgrades The Traffic Signal Upgrade Program • GDOT is responsible for over 6,000 on-system signals throughout the state • Signalized intersection upgrades from span wires to mast arms, where feasible

  5. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act A Procedural Law • There are four separate required activities under the law that require documentation and coordination with agencies • Typical agency review time is 30 days for each round of review • Change to the Section 106 process requires coordination with SHPO and FHWA

  6. Collaboration Between GDOT Offices and Agencies GDOT Cultural Resources Managers… • Coordinated with Traffic Operations Management • Analyzed Signalization Projects from 2006 with Span Wire to Mast Arm Upgrades • Consulted with SHPO and FHWA

  7. The Innovation: A Memorandum of Understanding with SHPO and FHWA How is this innovative? • Shorter timelines • Less potential for Consistent on-time Section 4(f) project delivery! • Fewer disagreements with agencies • More time spent on the important issues

  8. The Results – Historic Resources Example: Upgrades to 20 Signal Locations Number of Weeks for Survey and Reporting 25 20 20 15 10 5 1 0 Then Now #of Weeks

  9. The Results – Historic Resources Example: Upgrades to 20 Signal Locations Survey and Reporting Costs Survey and Assessment of Effect Costs WITH MOU $2,500 WITH MOU $2,500 WITHOUT MOU $150,000 WITHOUT MOU $225,000 $0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 $140,000 $160,000 $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 Without MOU With MOU Without MOU With MOU Cost Savings: $222,500!

  10. The Results – Archaeological Resources Example: Upgrades to 20 Signal Locations #of Sites 15 13 10 5 2 0 Then Now #of Sites # of Shovel Tests 1200 1040 1000 720 800 600 400 200 0 Then Now #of Shovel Tests

  11. The Results – Archaeological Resources Example: Upgrades to 20 Signal Locations Survey and Reporting Costs WITH MOU $42,000 WITHOUT MOU $72,000 $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 $70,000 $80,000 Without MOU With MOU Cost Savings: $30,000!

  12. Continuous Improvement The MOU significantly cuts down on project costs and delivers projects faster Potential Total Cost Savings for GDOT per Project: $252,500

  13. “Obligation to be Great” Office of Office of Traffic Environmental Operations Services

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend