CRYO Path Forward
April 6, 2020
Presented by: Gunther Haller Director, Advanced Instrumentation for Research Division Technology Innovation Directorate
CRYO Path Forward April 6, 2020 Presented by: Gunther Haller - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
CRYO Path Forward April 6, 2020 Presented by: Gunther Haller Director, Advanced Instrumentation for Research Division Technology Innovation Directorate Consortium agreed on a Downselect Process DUNE DocDB 6658 (12/17/2018) CRYOs role is
April 6, 2020
Presented by: Gunther Haller Director, Advanced Instrumentation for Research Division Technology Innovation Directorate
CRYO’s role is defined to be an “alternative” to baseline. NOT just a “risk mitigation”
symmetrically
the CERN Cold Box and in the LArIAT cryostat with a small liquid argon TPC.”
Full all-in-one system functionality demonstrated in DUNE v1 (very first prototype)
○ New cold test board correcting layout noise issues is currently being fabricated at PCB factory
First nEXO version 1 received from foundry in February 2020 (development and fabrication funded by nEXO)
nEXO V1 is suitable for system test at FNAL ICEBERG
2nd prototype optimized for DUNE (V2) is planned for system test on ProtoDUNE Cold Box (mainly cable driver and putting back DUNE amplifier, minor modification)
CRYO will be ready by the down-select date Feb 2021
3 ASIC type solution (amplifier, ADC, communication ASICs)
Cryo ASIC
much closer to having a complete system running on a board
DUNE Cryo ASIC path forward is simpler, shorter, cheaper, and lower risk (which will be retired with ICEBERG test)
○ All three system blocks already working together (in one ASIC) ○ Iteration of only one ASIC (DUNE V2), versus 3 different types
Considerations for future budget impact to DUNE project
Remaining cost for DUNE project will be lower for single ASIC solution
a 3-ASIC solution
schematics
○ Work in process
instrumentation
project management experience, BaBar Technical Coordinator, LZ, etc)
March 30
DUNE plans to support testing of nEXO version 1 which was just received (main items)
To complete the remaining work required for the down-selection:
tailored prototype in preparation for ProtoDUNE Cold Box test
ASIC
There is no justification to modify the Downselect process that was agreed to by all parties
down-select is small compared to the investment
DUNE, will meet requirements
project cost (only one type of ASIC to produce and test, board simpler, etc)
LBNF-DUNE detailee at DOE
contributed by SLAC
All concerns have been addressed and it is vital that the agreed down-select process be followed with both solutions on equal footing