Cross cutting theme - Deprivation Contents Part I: Deprivation in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Cross cutting theme - Deprivation Contents Part I: Deprivation in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Cross cutting theme - Deprivation Contents Part I: Deprivation in Hampshire Part II: Policy challenges in addressing deprivation at local level Part III: Case Studies Summary Part I: Deprivation in Hampshire The Indices of Deprivation &
Contents
Part I: Deprivation in Hampshire Part II: Policy challenges in addressing deprivation at local level Part III: Case Studies Summary
Part I: Deprivation in Hampshire
The Indices of Deprivation & the Index of Multiple Deprivation
Index of Multiple Deprivation
Older People 2 sub-domains (types)
Income Deprivation Employment Deprivation
Education & Skills Deprivation Health & Disability Deprivation
Crime Deprivation Barriers to Housing & Services Living Environment Deprivation Children Adults Young People Housing Services Indoors Outside 2 sub-domains each (types) 2 sub-domains (types)
22.5% 22.5% 13.5% 13.5% 9.3% 9.3% 9.3% A combined Index of 7 weighted domains (types of deprivation)
IMD Can be used for: Cannot be used for: ✓ Comparing small areas across England
X Quantifying how deprived a small area is
✓ Identifying the most deprived small areas
X Identifying deprived people
✓ Exploring types of deprivation
X Saying how affluent a place is
✓ Comparing larger areas e.g. local authorities
X Comparing with small areas in other UK
countries
✓Looking at changes in relative deprivation
X Measuring real change in deprivation over time
The Index of Multiple Deprivation and How it Can be Used
A Story of Urban Concentrations – Hidden Pockets
20% Most Deprived Areas 20% Least Deprived Areas Close proximity
Most & Least Deprived Places in Close Proximity 20% most deprived Places DCLG Index of Multiple Deprivation
41 28 18 8 1
Number of Area
1 1 1
Havant
Aldershot Andover
Portsmouth Southampton
Ventnor
Gosport
Blackfield Farnborough
1
Burlesdon
6
Newport Ryde
4 1 1 1
Shanklin Sandown
1
Netley View
IMD in Havant and Leigh Park Estate
Leigh Park Regeneration Fund Source: Havant Borough Council: Local Plan 2036
- Havant accounts 50%
- f all deprived places
in Hampshire*.
- Almost 1 in 4 of all
LSOAs in Havant fall within the bottom 20% in England.
- Leigh Park accounts
for two thirds of place deprivation in Havant and one third of place deprivation in Hampshire.
*Hampshire County Council Area
Different Deprivations ➔ Different Distributions ➔ Different Policy Challenges
13 41 28 27 3 2 11 30 25 26 6 5 22 28 16 26 4 4 24 50 44 58 23 27 7 51 26 20 4 3 72 39 26 7 9 9 13 26 18 81 32 27 64 87 15 21 4
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Isle of Wight Southampton Portsmouth South Hampshire Central Hampshire North Hampshire
Overall IMD Income (22.5%) Employment (22.5%) Education & Skills (13.5%) Health & Disability (13.5%) Crime (9.3%) Barriers to Housing & Services (9.3%) Living Environment (9.3%)
Number of Deprived Places The number of deprived places exhibiting that type of deprivation
Types of Deprivation where LAs Better Placed to Intervene
Income Deprivation Employment Deprivation Education & Skills Deprivation Barriers to Housing & Services
Legend
1 10% most deprived 2 11% to 20% 3 21% to 30% 4 31% to 40% 5 41% to 50% 6 51% to 60% 7 61% to 70% 8 71% to 80% 9 81% to 90% 10 91% to 100% Deciles (England Base)
Part II: Challenges of Tackling Deprivation at the Local Level
Policy Challenges
Often easier to Tackle Deprived Individuals over Place Deprivation Limited Access to National Databases, GDPR & Disclosure Deprivation Policies often directed by Central Government Constraints on Funding & Resources Getting engagement buy-in v stigmatising
V
Deprived Places & People: Where you Live Matters, as Well as Who you Are
Place A: Not Deprived Place B: Deprived
Churn (a policy challenge)
Person’s circumstances Improve, may relocate Replaced by ‘deprived’ Individual/family
Part III: Case Studies
Supporting Families
Two Phases (STEP 1 & II):
- STEP 1 2012 and
2014/15 targeted approx 600 per annum.
- STEP 2 to 2020
targeting over a 1,000 families in 2015/16 and 2016/17.
Skills & Employment Driven Case Studies
- Construction Skills Fund (CFS)
- Solent LEP – Centre of Excellence in Engineering & Manufacturing Advanced
Skills Training (CEMAST)
- Hampshire Careers Partnership and NCOP Funding
- ESF Solent Traineeship Engagement and Participation (STEP) Programme
- ESF Solent LEP & Enterprise M3 NEET Projects
- European Social Fund (ESF) Projects - skills support for the unemployed
- Economic Development
Sector specific
- Hampshire as a whole has low levels of deprivation, BUT has concentrated
pockets across the County, but focused in a few large neighbourhoods
- Deprivation based on the IMD is good at locating relative place deprivation, but
cannot identify deprived individuals – often hidden deprivation
- Although the IMD is about deprived places, most policies target individuals/families
- Hampshire County Council departments make a major contribution to easing
deprivation and preventing people from falling into deprivation through its skills & education programmes which increase employability and mobility.
- Economic development work with local businesses in creating employment
- pportunities that can be tapped into by all residents including those from deprived
areas.